>>62237413
no but it just werks™ so it's probably the best
The intimacy of Gentoo appeals to me in a comfy way.
>>62237426
What's the comfiest one then?
>>62237445
Xubuntu if you're willing to rice
>>62237413
Isn't it worse security-wise than Windows?
>>62237563
>these are the kind of people who post on /g/
>>62237592
care to explain you meme arrow fuck?
Debian Stable or old stable are much more comfortable.
>>62237445
ZorinOS Lite
>>62237710
not him, but:
>linux
>less secure than windows
I think it's pretty self-evident and doesn't warrant an explanation.
LMDE is comfier
>>62237413
fucking /g/ is ruined, none of the faggots that posted on this thread pointed out that this shit distro has stupid mantainers that exposed their community for a massive hack and private data leak fucking new faggs have to leave or lurck more before posting
>>62237985
sounds like Mint touched your no-no zone there bud.
>>62237413
It's shit. Peppermint is better in every way
>>62237985
what part of "it just werks" do you not understand?
>>62237413
I hope you like outdated packages
>>62238337
And hacked isos
If you're on a laptop and you don't have xubuntu, you're wasting your time.
Also, linux mint? Seriously?
their install image repos have been compromised TWICE
>>62237445
manjaro gnome
>>62238557
You misspelled Arch
>>62238574
kinda. its just the short term for noob-install-arch
>>62238557
moreover, they have their own repos, which are kinda tested for stability reasons. however, since aur exists you can practically do anything with this machines without spending endless hours on installing arch.
you dont even need to use the console, because of pacmak, a gui installer for pacman.
>>62238524
ubuntu? one single bar for everything lololol...
Ubuntu and Mint are the easiest to set up proprietary graphic drivers. If you don't need that or can do manually, Antergos also competes. Personally don't see why Mint, their software isn't that good (update center, software center, Cinnamon) except when compared to Canonical crap, it's based on stable Ubuntu so packages total old.
>>62238557
this
>>62237763
I think he's remembering when the Mint servers were compromised a few years back and mistaking it for in-distro security issues
>>62237413
Unless you really need that up-to-date software, Debian is a much better choice.
>>62238858
the Mint software center and graphical update manager are basically the best in the linux world, i wouldn't call them shit
>>62241660
debian is not the "better choice", Mint will work on your laptop 100 percent right now. you can install it on McDonald's wifi. Debian does not support proprietary wifi drivers and graphics cards without jumping through hoops. Mint is soooo much better for 99 percent of users
>>62238524
>laptop
>xubuntu
It's fantastic for laptops, assuming you don't need palm detection, fully functional suspend, or decent battery life. Other than that, it's great for laptops.
>>62238557
I love installs that require hours of post-install work to actually provide a functional desktop. Fantastic user experience. Top notch.
>>62242286
>jumping through hoops
> dpkg -i
>>62237445
Ubuntu minimal or mate
>>62238557
hecc no
>>62237445
debian minimal
>>62237413
kde5 is better than cinnamon imo
>>62237413
No, this is
>>62243364
>Ubuntu MATE
no search, Cinnamon is just like MATE but with a good menu. also, LInux Mint MATE is way better than Ubuntu MATE
>>62243709
Nice comfy kevinnet.
>>62243835
I was with you until you mentioned mint.
>>62243709
Solus is maximum comfy.