>apple sells a usb drive compatible with their USB C only

$80 for a $40 flash drive

i work at office depot, those exact drives in a different color are like $35 right now

what the ACTUAL fuck Apple

>>62232310
>>62232358
>how to fleece a sheep

>>62232310
*dongles sold separately

It's weird/cool how $80 for 64GB of flash storage is now considered obscenely expensive

File: 1486940539641.jpg (127KB, 508x339px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 508x339px

>>62235350
It's weird/cool how iToddlers defending paying $80 for 64GB of flash storage when you can get 256GB for cheaper from the same manufacturer.

>>62235520
>It's weird/cool how iToddlers defending paying $80 for 64GB
the anon you are quoting didn't defend the price dumbfuck

>>62235350
>>62235583
>t. iToddler

>>62235520
How can someone be this illiterate?

>>62235602
I use use Linux (inb4 GNU-males interject). only Winbabies cry about apple products

>>62235520
iTODDLERS BTFO

>>62235630
>i use use
Being this assblasted.

File: usb-c-drive.png (215KB, 777x549px) Image search: [Google]

215KB, 777x549px

>>62232310
they didn't even have the balls to make it like this

>>62235699
kek

>>62232310
>$80 for a 64GB thumb drive
It's 2010 again.

>>62232310
>charges $80 for a 64GB USB
wew

It's premium quality.
Something broke penguins can't afford. ;)
>"b-b-but muh sandisk"
What about "muh security"?
Apple approved.

Silly, silly /g/.

>>62237640
>t. mactoddler

File: Screenshot_20170904-070109.png (437KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

437KB, 1440x2560px

Those reviews

Either SanDisk or Apple have hired shills. Rifk

>>62237640
Lowiqb8

File: 1483614973703.jpg (1MB, 1280x1024px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x1024px

>>62232310
those are a much better quality than regular drives, it really is worth the price

>>62237640
>Sandisk
>premium quality
elle emme aye ouing hard in here, familia

>>62237685
>Big Little Guy
for you

>tfw when enjoying my 128GB Samsung USB3 memory stick that cost me $45

File: 1504219132855.jpg (134KB, 600x799px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 600x799px

>>62232310
>doesn't even have covers for either end

>>62235602
>>62235520
I remember being young trying to fit in yelling whatever to sound cool

>>62235602
>0 reading comprehension

File: elegant.jpg (33KB, 598x672px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 598x672px

>>62232310
>elegant

>>62243895
Wtf, looks like a midget on lsd

>>62235350
Because it is
64GB here is like 20 euros