Why does linux not have any good image viewers? Pic related.

>>62221690
i have not had any problems with mirage

File: Screenshot from 2017-09-02 15-07-13.png (847KB, 1680x1023px) Image search: [Google]

847KB, 1680x1023px

install pix

>>62221690
I use MComix (just drag and drop the folder into it).

It's actually for viewing comics but it's a far better image viewer than most out there.

geeqie

Nomacs

>>62221690
literally don't see any issues with shotwell

>>62221690
It's called feh.

>liking this ugly orange cunt

viewnior

File: m.png (324KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

324KB, 1366x768px

anything that lets you disable useless toolbars is fine.

>>62221690
i use viewnior to open shit from the file browser and gthumb when i have to manage the pics

>>62221690
Feh is amazing you knuckle-dragging winbabby.

mpv.

>>62223546
i use it only as wallpaper manager

>>62221690
>thinly-veiled recommendation thread
Fuck off with this shit, if you want image viewers, just fucking ask.

>>62223574
How?

Viewnior

>>62221690
What is an "image viewer"? You don't have a printer?

Sxiv and ahoviewer

>>62225670
viewnior is good. Does gifs too.

nomacs is god tier viewer and browser you winblows pleb

https://nomacs.org

>>62222142
She is not wearing a bra.

>>62225501
What do you mean?

>>62222142
pix vs gthumb?

Viewnior

>>62221690
Nomacs? That's what I'd use on windows, and it's available on Linux too.
Although the image viewer which comes with KDE is fine imho.

>>62222332
overrated

>>62221690
it actually does have the only good image viewer that is not bloated and isn't an ugly piece of shit, it's called gthumb and windows doesn't have it

XNViewMP

File: 4007031.png (157KB, 459x424px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 459x424px

>90% of the image viewers don't even support gif
>none support webm
>feh is overrated garbage
>all other viewers are bundled-in bloatware

File: Screenshot_2017-09-03_16-49-33.png (629KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

629KB, 1920x1080px

>>62221690
not sure what you mean by that

why are android image viewers the only ones competent enough to show gif and webm?

>>62232189
>>62232345
Gwenview

>>62232189
>>62232345
Literally all of them support gifs, or are you talking about windows?
Webms and videos are even shown in the default KDE image viewer if I remember correctly.

>>62221690
Linux has a fucking problem with thumbnails in general.

>>62221690
>not using a formally verified porn viewer
https://github.com/MichaelBurge/pornview

>>62233160
windows and linux. i dont use a DE on linux so that explains why ive never heard of desktop webm support

uhh gwenview is excellent
at least if you are willing to pull down 90% of the KDE dependencies

>>62236096
gwenview has the best resize tool.
Overall it is decent, but it is the only tool I have found that makes better than anything else.

>>62234703
not using a DE means you don't know what software is available on linux?

>>62223450
gthumb is the way to go
my only question is, why can't the competitors into decent image viewers

>>62232189
why would a image viewer support videos or other non image files? some do and i hate that.

>>62227948
that is rather common these days