Thoughts on the new firefox screenshot utility?
>>62216973
Normally I'd be mad at Mozilla including yet more useless junk while ripping out useful things. But a built-in screenshot tool will frustrate websites that try to stop people from saving images, and I hate those people a lot more than I hate Mozilla.
>>62217012
Having a window-sized snap of the entire screen is not the same thing as downloading an image
Firefox has had a screenshot utility for years.
>>62217153
but this is slightly easier to use
Seems better than any of the addons.
>>62217088
socrates over here
Can't take screenshots of the whole page, it's dicks.
>>62217335
shift+f2 and type screenshot --fullpage
>>62217452
I know, but I'm talking about the button.
For that matter, I could press F11 and right click a div and screenshot.
>>62217502
Doesn't capture the whole page if it's long though.
>>62217502
virgin detected
>>62217530
No, I mean, if the button doesn't provide the functionalities of both the command line screenshot and htlm inspection (I meant F12) screenshot, it provides no functionality at all, since going into HTML inspection is the same number of clicks as the button.
>what is snipping tool
>what is printscreen
>what is alt printscreen
dweebs kys
More shit. Check out your "system addons"# rm /usr/lib/firefox/browser/features/*
user_pref("extensions.systemAddon.update.url", "");
>>62217576
How do I use this to screenshot a single node?