Why are Snaps and Flatpacks still not bankrupt and finished when Appimage exists?
I mean, with this motherfucker you even can run applications on a live system.
Is there a downside to this format?
>>62216085
>Is there a downside to this format?
It is designed to run on systems with a "normal" desktop metapackage installed. "No need to install anything, just download it and run" is a lie, it HAS external dependencies. If you use a minimal or source based system you will run into missing libraries. Problems will rise if you cannot install the missing deps for one reason or another (no rights to install, live system does not support installing software etc).
>>62216085
Because they are different. Appimage is much like portable apps while snaps/flatpaks are sandboxed
>it took linux 2 decades to copy apples executable format
lol
>>62216360
That's no exe format, dumb mactoddler. And the ELF has been available for Linux since kernel 2.xx
Go back to your containment itoddler toy thread
>>62216474
.app you idiot