Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: 85fcb2cb-21bb-4e68-ab6f-dc0a495941ae-thumbnail.png (4KB, 110x30px) Image search:
[Google]
4KB, 110x30px
I thought Chrome/Chromium was good, until I saw this.
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=379532
> "Search Google for this image" menu is missing if Google is not default search engine
> WONTFIX
The fact that Chromium developers client-side-disable a feature based on a client-side setting, which totally could be subverted through having a headache of some changing of Chromium sources, makes me reevaluate them as unethical, unscrupulous.
>>
Bump. What are your thoughts? Would it be adequate to expect something like this?
>>
>>62215403
Well it's Google what do you expect, blowjobs? Go fork it or go home
>>
>>62214955
>Chromium
This is a firefox board
>>
>>62214955
I would assume an extension of sorts exist for this purpose.
>>
>>62214955
>>62215403
Uh, duh? It's "google service exclusive" or some shit.
It's the correct behaviour (since you've changed your default search engine) until they make it send an image to whatever "search by image" service you've set as default.
Yandex could raise it's screams again because "opression!" or some shit since they offer search by image.
Bing doesn't. Duckduckgo doesn't.
Until then you can use Image Search Options extension, for example.
>>
>disable google as search engine
>WAHH, WHY DOESN'T IT LET ME SEARCH ON GOOGLE?!!
Are you retarded?
>>
>changes search provider from Google to something else
>complains there isn't still some Google searching
>links a bug report from 2014
I WANT POOJEETS TO LEAVE BECAUSE THEY CAN'T INTO LOGIC, OP INCLUDED
Thread posts: 8
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1