>tfw fell for the 16GB ram meme I realised that I need to

>>62211469
Link me to everything ahh

File: 1480218830572.png (190KB, 2270x334px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 2270x334px

>the legend

Noone needs more than 256PB of RAM.

File: 24.png (1KB, 96x37px) Image search: [Google]

1KB, 96x37px

>>62211445
16 gigs? meh

Why would anyone get upset if they have overkill RAM? It's not like it's ruining everything. It should be something that relaxes you, knowing there's one less thing to have to worry about.

File: hackerman.jpg (48KB, 700x522px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 700x522px

4Gb faggot reporting in for duty.
AMA

>>62211777
I remember years ago when I first got into computers having too much ram was actually bad is this not true anymore?

File: System.png (184KB, 1631x931px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 1631x931px

>>62211445
>>62211686
ramlets..

File: chrome.png (185KB, 798x1834px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 798x1834px

I had to add another 16 because I like having a billion tabs.

>>62212041
why 7 bro

>mfw been stuck on 16gb since 2013 because of stupid prices
>new 2017 ryzen build also limited by stupid prices and anything over 16gb is slow as fuck mhz

File: ram.png (33KB, 1007x634px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 1007x634px

>>62211686
>>62212041

File: spec.png (3KB, 234x68px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 234x68px

>>62213181
I am sure my RAM is not running at 66MHz...

File: IMG_2013.png (909KB, 640x1136px) Image search: [Google]

909KB, 640x1136px

>upgraded to 16 DDR3
>every new processor needs DDR4
>everything gets more expensive
Help

File: wut.png (72KB, 331x290px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 331x290px

>>62213291
but is it EDO...?

File: Untitled.png (34KB, 647x409px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 647x409px

8GB of DDR2 1066 5-5-5-15 master race reporting in. Got enough horse power in this baby to last me until 2024 EZ.