[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Looks like /g/ is exposed as sexist and misogynist yet again

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 112
Thread images: 22

File: Screenshot_2017-09-01_21-10-18.png (536KB, 1322x956px) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot_2017-09-01_21-10-18.png
536KB, 1322x956px
Looks like /g/ is exposed as sexist and misogynist yet again

https://archive.is/h40es
>>
>>62208089
brb chopping my penis off
>>
>>62208089
>implyinggg

we've been saying this for years now
>>
>>62208148
This. Crossdressing makes you a much better programmer.
>>
What sort of sampling and sample size are we talking about here?
>>
>>62208089
Study count accepted commits, women just send documentation corrections even political correct count.
>>
>>62208089
> what is peer review
> a group of students
A get the feeling that this wasn't a well designed "study".
>>
>>62208172
>>62208148
i'll make you both expert programmers.
>>
This shit again.

If you read the paper they state that they had to guess the gender of the account owner. They literally say in that paper that accounts with anime girls as their avatar were classified as female owned accounts.
>>
>>62208278
Wow. I thought it was bad, but that's really bad.
>>
File: 1473290026114.png (234KB, 914x654px) Image search: [Google]
1473290026114.png
234KB, 914x654px
>>62208278
So this means that animeposters are the best coders.
>>
>>62208314
That was always obvious though
>>
>Women considered better coders
>coders
I was done reading at that point.
>>
>>62208278
How do they not know anime gril avi = male?
>>
File: 121.jpg (51KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]
121.jpg
51KB, 480x480px
>>62208148
i can safely agree with this
>>
>>62208089
(((researchers)))
>>
>>62208278
Also to make matters worse, their sample size for men to women was something like 100:1, you can't make any reasonable assumptions about female programmers even if those anime avatar guys were actual women.
>>
>>62208089
Looks like this is another blatant /pol/ bait that /g/ will bite without question once again
>>
>>62208278
Why are weebs such good programmers?
>>
Can I get a thorough explanation on why Intel and adds are different? Or if I'm Trynna have a good music player while animating and something that can game and run a music player, what should I go for.

As a matter of fact, #2 I'm Trynna get into animating. Should I get a sketch pad in order to implement my world's easier? Animation via cartoons.

#3 Also music production is important so apart from a controller pad, what should I look for?
>>
>>62208278
Did did they just assume one's gender in 2017!
>>
>>62208148
>>62208172
>>62208227
wearing panties != a better programmer
>>
>>62208431
>>62209382
>>
File: 1484919817827.jpg (139KB, 782x366px) Image search: [Google]
1484919817827.jpg
139KB, 782x366px
>>62209382
then explain why /g/ is FILLED with gaybois
>>
>>62208089
>When a group of computer science students decided to study the way that gender bias plays out
>they discovered that their own bias was confirmed by that study
Shocking.
>>
>>62208089
fake news
>>
>>62208089
Maybe because any "programmer" who considers it important and relevant that we know their gender is also a fucking retard cumdumpster?
>>
>>62208089
Why are some programmers so mean to women? Is it a Silicon Valley thing? Everyone is really nice (not in a beta orbiter way either) to the female developers here in Seattle.
>>
>>62208807
They claim it's 11.2:100 not 1:100
>>
>>62208691
Haha long goy
>>
>>62208278
>They literally say in that paper that accounts with anime girls
I cannot find this, maybe I am looking at the wrong paper?
>>
>>62208089
This research uses anime profile pictures to show that the submitter was a woman.
>>
>>62208089
Why didn't they do the same thing for the male programmers?
(((Gender))) is a Marxist political buzzword, It is obvious that nobody takes "pull request, btw I am a woman" seriously.
Github (which was their sauce for these findings) have a ton of (look I am a woman, every site is a social media page) type people which will pollutes the site.
Not accepting a pull request is not sexist.
There can be so many factors to why that happens
>>
>>62209103
What language is this?
>>
>>62210704
Think about it, idiot. How are they finding the gender of people who hide their genders?
They're making assumptions based on the user's profiles. Read the research- they use anime profile pictures as one means of identifying their gender. IE; anime girl profile pic = female.
>>
>>62210731
I still don't know where to find the ever updating definition of gender.
>>
File: lls its joke4534.png (445KB, 484x613px) Image search: [Google]
lls its joke4534.png
445KB, 484x613px
>>62210731
Just more proof that anime posters are more intelligent that anime haters.
>>
>>62209006
It's the autism that makes them good.
>>
File: 1503785426343.png (256KB, 627x715px) Image search: [Google]
1503785426343.png
256KB, 627x715px
>In 2013, GitHub installed a rug in its headquarters that read, “United Meritocracy of GitHub.” The rug was removed in 2014 after criticism from feminist commentators that, although meritocracy is a virtue that it is hard to disagree with in principle, it doesn’t do much for diversity in the workplace

for those who dont want to google
>Meritocracy (noun)
>government or the holding of power by people selected on the basis of their ability.
>a ruling or influential class of educated or skilled people.

this rug was deemed "problematic" thanks to olympic level mental gymnastics by feminists

a fucking rug

im more pissed at THIS than the article desu
>>
>>62208691
Your deprived loving big black cocks and faggots society has nothing to do with the superior Jews. The Orthodox Jews don't accept faggotry.
>>
>>62211399
Protip: The jews is /pol/-talk for "the patriarchy." It's the same bullshit just peddled to 16 year old virgin white boys instead of fat 16 year old white bitches. Identity politics is dumb.
>>
>>62211347
The more money you have the more attention form feminists faggotists bigblackcockists you attract.
>>
>Ubuntu
>MacOs
Throw these normies in the trash
>>
>>62208089
>the guardian
sage
>>
>>62208089
What is wrong with sexism/misogyny?

According to
>>62208278
I get that bullying the mentally ill in the industry might have negative effects on code quality, but that was already obvious.
>>
Women are such better coders, that software quality altogether in the whole field saw a drap in the past few years parallel to the inclusion of feminist startups;
while no relevant software used by people was made by any woman.
>>
>>62208089
>women are better coders if they hide their gender
Then how do you know!
>>
>>62211347
>although meritocracy is a virtue that it is hard to disagree with in principle, it doesn’t do much for diversity in the workplace
Brb, buying an oven mitt.
>>
File: 1345391972019.jpg (118KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
1345391972019.jpg
118KB, 1280x720px
>In 2013, GitHub installed a rug in its headquarters that read, “United Meritocracy of GitHub.” The rug was removed in 2014 after criticism from feminist commentators that, although meritocracy is a virtue that it is hard to disagree with in principle, it doesn’t do much for diversity in the workplace. CEO Chris Wanstrath tweeting, “We thought ‘meritocracy’ was a neat way to think of open source but now we see the problems with it. Words matter. We’re getting a new rug.”

Meritocracy is a phenomena of seeking a collective of intelligent, and nothing but intelligent people.
Diversity in the aspect of meritocracy means that they need as many stupid people as intelligent because stupid people can have a lucky mental break once in 50 years, and the stupid people are of course supposed to be feminists seeking employment with sub-par CV-s filled with bullshit.
Meaning GitHub is a business seeking profit by employing stupid people, which of course will always lead to losses rather than profit as Mozilla portrays.
>>
File: fig-5-full.png (149KB, 3128x3037px) Image search: [Google]
fig-5-full.png
149KB, 3128x3037px
Full paper is here:
https://peerj.com/articles/cs-111/

>>62208278
>>62208278
>>62208314
>>62208431
>>62208807
>>62210607
>>62210731

Wrong.

Obvious gender: They automatically evaluated user/display names with regard to male/female, and only used the results with highest confidence. They also had a 3 person panel of 1 American (man), 1 Chinese (man), and 1 Indian (woman) origin, evaluating the profile pictures.

"True" gender: They linked the email addresses to Google+ accounts (you can search by email), and you have to state your gender (male/female/other) for Google+ accounts.

>We considered a GitHub profile as gender neutral if all of the following conditions were met:
>an identicon (rather than a profile image) was used,
>the gender inference tool output a ‘unknown’ for the user’s login name and display name, and
>none of the panelists indicated that they could identify the user’s gender.

This seems to be sound.

>>62208204
>Out of 4,037,953 GitHub user profiles with email addresses, we were able to identify 1,426,127 (35.3%) of them as men or women through their public Google+ profiles.

>User not on Google+: 325,100
>Acceptance rate: 71.5%

>User identifies as ‘Male’ on Google+: 312,909
>Acceptance rate: 74.2%

>User identifies as ‘Female’ on Google+: 21,510
>Acceptance rate: 79.9%

>>62208207
Wrong, it even holds for C and C++: See picture.

This study is sound. /g/ eternally BTFO'd again!

Wait, the real question is why more than 50% of these users even have a Google+ account...
>>
>the guardian
unlike the virgins at /g/ i actually care about equality, but please tell me you don't actually believe the crap they write
>>
File: 1456117797614.png (35KB, 358x304px) Image search: [Google]
1456117797614.png
35KB, 358x304px
>>62213376
>The real conclusion is that having a Google+ account makes you a better coder.
>>
>accepted PR == code quality
What a retarded metric
>>
File: fool.png (370KB, 1196x952px) Image search: [Google]
fool.png
370KB, 1196x952px
>>62213416
>>62213430
>>62213444
fool
>>
>>62208089
male wannabe programmers are shit coders
female wannabe programmers don't code at all
only the pretty good female programmers code
>>
>>62213472
Whelp, at least I care about proper orthography and referencing, enough to correct myself. Still too early in the morning though... :3
>>
>>62208278
well this got /thread'ed quite early
sorry girls
>>
>>62213557
Except that it isn't true. They got the gender by linking the email address of the commit to their Google+ account.
>>
>>62213542
not him but I really liked your post
have a wonderful day anon
>>
>'github approved code'
Why would I give a fuck what they think? They're just holding onto my shit for me until someone gets pissed i don't have a code of conduct or forks to remove all references to slave.
>>
>>62208172
I can't wait till this meme dies.
>>
>>62214798
Die now then.
>>
>>62213376
First and most important: Correlation does not imply causality. Some other factor might be causing good female programmers not to disclose their gender.

Second: Number of accepted commits is a really shitty metric. The study might as well be measuring the difference in size between male and female commits. I wonder if the result holds if they had used total LOC changed.
>>
>>62208089
when i play online games i use female names for the givs, who the hell being a female would hide their sex? it makes them actual to men and you lose the access to the female privilege, this article makes no sense
>>
>>62210731

wouldn't that mean that animeposters are dumb? since the assumption here is that (showing yourself as women) == (using anime girls as profile pic)
>>
File: 1497980115368.gif (2MB, 540x540px) Image search: [Google]
1497980115368.gif
2MB, 540x540px
>>62208278
would a avatar of ferris make me considered a qt girl or a girl (male)?
>>
>>62215085
>Second: Number of accepted commits is a really shitty metric. The study might as well be measuring the difference in size between male and female commits. I wonder if the result holds if they had used total LOC changed.

They did:

>Women - Median: 29 lines added, 5 lines removed, 2 files changed, 1 commit
>Women - Mean: 1,591 lines added, 597 lines removed, 29.2 files changed, 5.2 commits

>Men - Median: 20 lines added, 4 lines removed, 2 files changed, 1 commit
>Men - Mean: 1,003 lines added, 431 lines removed, 2 files changed, 4.8 commits

Again, women have more commits and significantly larger commits.
>>
>>62208431
I LOVE ASTOLFO
>>
File: 1502570985001.png (199KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]
1502570985001.png
199KB, 1024x768px
>>62216378
By the way this goes directly against the statistic regarding the productivity of Google employees on Github
>>
>>62213592
When I make Google account, I always choose female as my gender because why not?
>>
>>62216378
Does this include faggot manager types that don't actually commit anything?
>>
>>62208089
Wow omg, I should have checked my privilege?
>>
It's incredible that every site that the majority of the users are rightists are considered to be nazi.
>>
>>62208089
Who the fuck is going to believe that women are better at programming than men?
>>
File: f33Tjk1.gif (1MB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]
f33Tjk1.gif
1MB, 480x270px
>>62208089
>women considered better coders
>but only if they hide their gender
You don't notice how this is obviously talking about women(male)?
/g/ has been saying this for years
>>
>>62213376
>even holds for C and C++
c and c++ were created by a man :^)
>>
>>62215085
>/pol/ cuck cites articles about the blacks being violent
>"dude you can't argue with the facts"
>/pol/ cuck comes across paper that debunks something he believes strongly about
>"dude correlation does not imply causation!"
kek
>>
>>62217176
I don't even get near /pol/, but if an article says blacks are more likely to commit violent crimes, it means just that. Not that they are more likely to be violent BECAUSE they are black.

>>62216378
And this anon got it. The study really seems sound.
>>
>>62213376
HAHAHA just fucking delete /g/ already
>>
>>62217103
why were they so mean to him(e)
>>
>>62216378
median and mean aren't the same thing, fucking idiot.
>>
>>62211414
This is very much true. Every time I hear feminist talk about the patriarchy it feels like listening to neo-nazis talk about Jews.
>>
>>62217103
>women(male)
*trans woman
>>
>>62217273
Because they are girls(female), women are cruel, anon.
>>
>>62216312
a qt girl (male)
>>
>>62216378
So this show that woman who hides their gender are better than womeb who display it
>>
>>62217324
*Mentally ill
>>
>>62217246
>if an article says blacks are more likely to commit violent crimes, it means just that.
>but if an article says women write higher-quality code than men, it means that we should refuse to believe it
you act like men are somehow better at copy-pasting code from stackoverflow
>>
>>62213376
>men are the best at .txt files
Women BTFO'd once again
>>
File: 1499538931116.jpg (231KB, 1153x1536px) Image search: [Google]
1499538931116.jpg
231KB, 1153x1536px
>>62213376
>more than 50% having Google+ account
As if they couldn't make it more obvious it's fake
>>
>>62208207
This.
>>
>>62213376
>This seems to be sound.
their way of determining gender is garbage.
>>
>>62208089
at least there is a thinkpad in the picture
>>
>>62208278
>>62208807
>>62210583
>>62210607
>>62210731
Holy shit they are right.

It says right here:

>In an informal inspection into profile images, we found examples of non-photographic images that conveyed gender cues, so we did not attempt to distinguish between photographic and non-photographic images when classifying profiles as gendered.

>so we did not [...] distinguish between photographic and non-photographic images

They did in fact count accounts with anime girls in the profile picture as female.

Case closed.
>>
>>62219331
>The study states that they had to guess the gender of the person based on their avatar
>This means that people with avatars of anime girls are considered women
At least a black person is definitely a goddamn black person. Are you gonna tell me it's just people disguised as black people?
>>
You do not have the right to express hate speech.

If you consider your self a male nationalist, you literally do not have the right to speak. Ever.

Just shut your mouth or we will shut it for you.
>>
>>62222764
>This means that people with avatars of anime girls are considered women
where does it say that? Why would they assume women are the weebs? Anime avatar is a pretty good indicator of the poster being a male, especially if it's an anime girl
>>
>>62220001
google makes you an account when you make a gmail. I had a google+ account I did not know about until people started adding me
>>
>>62209006
they're NEETs
as in they have a ton of free time
>>
>>62222783
Hate speech is free speech.

Shut your sjw typing fingers and go back you leftist.
>>
File: great-study-10-out-of-10-ign.png (282KB, 1308x936px) Image search: [Google]
great-study-10-out-of-10-ign.png
282KB, 1308x936px
>>62222846
>where does it say that?

How about right here
>>
>>62223010
>>62222783
why do polfags do this?
>one makes a retarded post
>another one retardedly responds seriously

what's the point
>>62223047
is a non-photographic image of a flower counted as a girl or a boy
what gender cue is that

makes you wonder how good the gender inference tool was
>>
>>62223047
where does it say "we considered those who had pictures of anime girls as their avatar to be women"??'

Furthermore, if your avatar is a picture of an anime girl, I doubt the code you are contributing is of high-quality
>>
>>62223092
>Furthermore, if your avatar is a picture of an anime girl, I doubt the code you are contributing is of high-quality
i would agree with that especially now, since anime is normiecore

who knows
maybe they ought to study that
>>
>>62208089
>Not peer reviewed
>Don't understand what GitHub does
>Or how it works
>Old article
This is a troll thread.
Ignore it.
>>
File: 1492747775677.jpg (127KB, 579x519px) Image search: [Google]
1492747775677.jpg
127KB, 579x519px
>>62222783
>male nationalist
>>
File: mysticial.png (120KB, 1019x416px) Image search: [Google]
mysticial.png
120KB, 1019x416px
This is clearly a girl.

t. the authors
>>
>>62223169
you guys spend so much time "pretending" to be faggots and dressing up as girls wearing thigh high socks, then you start crying like bitches because people might mistake you for a woman

you autistic faggots never cease to amaze me
>>
>>62223196
wew lad
>>
>>62223196
This fucking guy just nuked half of /g/
>>
File: 1377431365001.jpg (4KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]
1377431365001.jpg
4KB, 200x200px
>>62223196
Well shit
>>
File: 1472828716357.jpg (22KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]
1472828716357.jpg
22KB, 320x320px
Who give's a shit this is just a thinly veiled /pol/ thread anyways. Mods end this shitter.
Thread posts: 112
Thread images: 22


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.