Can you tech fags do something about google/youtube? Develop

>>62188020
>google
alternatives exist, duckduckgo etc bing's not bad, image/video search is much better than google's

>youtube
Never ever. It's too expensive. The only reason why youtube still exists is that google owns it and they have a shitton of money to burn. Actually making money on video hosting the way youtube does it is impossible.

File: youtube-alternatives-v1.3.png (711KB, 1600x3759px) Image search: [Google]

711KB, 1600x3759px

Okay faggot.

We have been using superior autistic scraper tools to watch YouTube videos (ppffft, not that any of it is as good as my chinese cartoons).

Too difficult? There's a really Easy(TM) site called Hooktube.com that just works. You don't give Google views, ad revenue, or information about yourself.

Some faggots think that Bitchute, which uses Webtorrent/WebRTC to establish peer to peer connections is a superior decentralized service. While that might be true, WebRTC is not free of security risks. Always make sure you mask your IP in someway (VPN) just like you would do with any bittorrent tool (becuase you're a responsible person right?)

There are are other competitors to YouTube but they all want that advertising money which means when nazi chads post their videos they'll probably get taken down or the website gets shoah'd.

Just pick your poison and consider P2P.

>>62188065
> Bing, he says
> It's not bad he says

Do you realize you owns Bing?

>>62188020
I'll start working on it as soon as you idiots go back to your containment board. >>>/pol/

>>62188065
>Never ever. It's too expensive.
making a rule that uploads have to meet a minimum quality level and not be stupid shit like "watch me eat noodles" or "I ALMOST GOT RAPED TODAY ON THE TRAIN [NO CLICKBAIT]" would probably reduce the scale and thus costs by 95%

>>62188210
bitch ute seems alright

There may be technically superior alternatives to YouTube already, but they just don't have the resources to scale it anywhere close to the scale of YouTube - it's not a profitable business model and you need millions of dollars a year to burn on it.

Google has alternatives, but there's no such thing as a non-botnet search engine as they all require you send your search query to them along with any other information your browser gives up, at which point you're just taking their word for it that they aren't using it for any data mining/selling reasons.