Vega 64 Cucks BTFO https://www.kitguru.net/components/ grap

File: 1325553347550.jpg (87KB, 500x274px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 500x274px

>>62182846

Bruh it's reaffirming the the 54 is better in everyway. 1070 cost with 1080ti performance

File: 1329843496350.jpg (92KB, 776x602px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 776x602px

>>62182979
>1080ti performance

File: image.jpg (255KB, 1280x1440px) Image search: [Google]

255KB, 1280x1440px

>>62184830
He's right though, in games without AA or CMAA the 56 almost matches the 1080ti.

Ever wondered why the 1080ti, 1080, and 1070 are getting massive price cuts? That's why.

>>62184830
Maybe in two month?
Whenever next major Crimson update.

>>62184860
>Ever wondered why the 1080ti, 1080, and 1070 are getting massive price cuts? That's why.

They're not, you and your shill benchmark can fuck off.

What the fuck AMD was doing with 64?

File: Ifhewashonest.jpg (133KB, 960x462px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 960x462px

>>62185910
JUSTifying Rajas job.

>>62188091
is t rel?

File: download (1).jpg (12KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 225x225px

>>62182821
Moron. This just proves that Vega is front end bottlenecked like crazy at the moment since the 8 extra CUs in 64 are delivering 0% more performance right now.

I wonder what is going to happen when primitive shaders get implements and Vega's geometry performance increases by ~100-400%?

>>62188587
I can't wait for that. It will be hilarious.

File: 1cAuk8s.png (35KB, 600x513px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 600x513px

>>62188609
Yeah, it's going to be real interesting to see what happens when Vega is better at tessellation than Pascal and you don't get results like this anymore in tessellation heavy workloads.

>>62182821
But Vega 64 was already BTFO on launch, just slightly OC'ing and undervolting Vega 56 gets you to 64 level

>>62188494
No

>>62182821
>flashing a BIOS with higher clocks and power limits improves performance

Really blew my mind.

>>62188587
Just wait™

How long should I wait this time?

File: 1347348143949.png (181KB, 475x556px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 475x556px

>>62182821

So save money and get the same performance, fucking hell AMD is allover the fucking place

>>62185910

It is fully enabled silicon which can easily more energy efficient then 56 if you undervolt it and downclock it a bit.

64 is also faster at general compute and professional stuff too.