Orwell was right: Mozilla fans now want to censor articles that

>Virtually chrome and ff ate the only two browsers that exist.
>both are shit

File: cruss.jpg (32KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 480x480px

>>62163912
firecucks are gay lovers

if you are a :

Christian

/pol/

conservative

altright

pro freespeech

= abandon firefox

>>62163912
https://www.reddit.com/r/firefox/comments/6wxho5/firefox_webextensions_may_be_used_to_identify_you/dmbl2oc/

File: firefox-open-society-foundations-plant.png (448KB, 1566x804px) Image search: [Google]

448KB, 1566x804px

>>62163912
Oy Vey, delet this!

What do you guys use?

>bbbut it's for blocking nazis!!!!!
You faggots deserve it, enjoy your censored internet in the name of "tolerance", just like you enjoy your massive surveillance as a tool against "terrorism".

>>62163950
>>62163912
>browsing reddit
you know what to do

>>62164135
enjoy it cucker back on clearnet you and your pedos can have tor

https://dailystormer.al

File: DIcUiv4UMAAXiO7.jpg (109KB, 840x1199px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 840x1199px

>>62163994
we can still save firefox

I noticed since the update, when entering certain urls firefox just stops, and I have to press enter again for it go through. Is this one of their "soft" censorship mechanisms?

>>62164228
No it's probably just your ISP or DNS being shit

>>62163912
Kek, I thought Martin was a leftist cuck

>>62164186
Signed.

>>62164294
Dont think so, its never happened before. Doesnt happen on my phone either.

This is why free and open source is garbage.
The "People" are retarded. They don't know what they want nor what's good for them. When you give them control over everything, they WILL fuck it up.

>>62163912
why are lefties always screaming for oppressing different opinions?

>>62163941
Goddamnit, now I need to purge firefox and google this week, because I've been neglecting it. Fuuuucckkkk

Anyone tried IceCat?

>>62164105
vivaldi

>>62164431
>REEEEEEE chromium botnet clone owned by soros REEEEE!!!!

>>62164228
What certain urls?

>>62164526
Certain twitter users

Why not use Brace?

>>62164595

Brave*

>>62164595
fine on android, desktop version is lacking.

>>62163912
this is a normal evolution of open source software in general there is a reason as to why have compared both situations with the 5 steps of grief and loss
the time for linux is also coming a bit slower but the signs are there

ghacks author was very angry about the the australian theme. Ever since it was implemented he's been using a very hideous theme to show off new firefox features which occasionally confuses the users on his site and they complain about it.

>>62164595
I love it on android, but it's shit on windows.

>>62164595
I found basic ui operations like dragging bookmarks around are incredibly slow. Probably because it uses (((Electron)))

>>62164105
>Not getting all of your internet through Clover

Note: A private forum is not obligated to allow everything.

Free speech is perfectly intact. Everyone go home.

>>62164821

>it's okay when the company with the monopoly wont sell you the only water in town because it's not infringing your rights.

/r/firefox and firefox users general theme tune: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXQkXXBqj_U

>>62164877
A public utility like a water company cannot just deny you access to water without a reason. Those are strictly regulated by the government.

>>62163941
What if i'm pro government, pro free healthcare, pro gays but hate trannys and sandniggers?

>>62164627
Its fucking nothing! and nothing will happen, you all paranoid and full of conspiracy bullshit.
The difference with Linux and the rest of infected JSW holes is that Linux guys decided not to hire hipsters and so they evaded the bullet. Critical software requires more than just shitposting on twitter on how oppressive you feel.

>>62163912
The sad thing is the longest term developers for Firefox are the biggest Mozilla organization critics. He basically nailed why web extensions were not a valid replacement.
https://archive.is/486ZC

File: 1387065828509.gif (76KB, 482x412px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 482x412px

>>62163912
Why is the web so shit these days.
>firefox
>HURRDURR WE'S PROGRESSIVE NIGGERS ARE GOOD MKAY
>literally everything once good about firefox has been fucked over by incompetent devs

>chrome
>HURRDURR WE'S PROGRESSIVE AS FUCK WE ARE ALWAYS RIGHT
>literally big brother the browser

>everything else is a clone of either
>or completely insignificant
>or it's something stupid like OWWW THE EDGE or apple's fucked up babbybrowser

>>62165104
Savage.

>>62165054
Then you're just a good old fashioned communist, and not a nu-marxist.

>>62165104
>downthemall.net-domain expired yesterday
KEK

>>62165230
Well he was quite serious about his disdain for the Mozilla organization.

>>62165168
There is nothing wrong with using Blink or browsers that fully utilize the OS they're built on.
Once you get over this, it's much easier to find a browser you enjoy.

HELP! REDDIT IS TRAMPLING ON MY RIGHTS!

>>62165054
I like you

>>62165104
I get the vibe that this will send Mozilla to its death. And that's a shame, as I never felt Mozilla was evil (unlike Alphabet) - only that they were well-intentioned fools.

>all anyone has to do is fork an old version of Firefox
>nobody does

I like you, /g/. Sometimes it feels like you guys are the only people who actually care about privacy. But you're so useless when it comes to taking action

File: 1397248736824.gif (2MB, 282x257px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 282x257px

>>62165276
Fundamentally, no.
The concept is good.

It doesn't fucking help though that microshaft has a reputation for not giving a fuck and a half about web standards, or any standards for that matter. The same goes for apple as well, next to the fact that safari is a massive pile of shit.

>>62165343
Do you have any idea what a nightmare it would be to keep a FF fork up to date without accepting their code from November 2017 onward?

>>62165343
A web browser is not something you just fork for petty reasons like not liking the theme. Firefox is huge and the code can be very old and not well documented at times. It's difficult for anyone except Mozilla or an organization of Mozilla's size to use Firefox/Gecko for anything.

Personally I don't really mind the direction that Firefox is headed in.

>>62164338

Catholic Monarchy is the ultimate redpill.
Democracy is a mistake.

File: 1430237998670.jpg (63KB, 633x758px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 633x758px

What fucking browser should I use

>>62165054

> pro gays

kys

>>62165346
Except that reputation has changed. https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-edge/platform/status/

I still don't care much for it though, still lacking in ui polish at this stage. Brave is the same right now on desktops.

>>62163941
Already done, sir.

If you support firefox you support the leftist agenda.

>>62165343
what is palemoon?
unlike things like icecat, waterfox, and even seamonkey, palemoon is a complete fork, including gecko (forked off as goana)

>>62165704
Palememe is dead. They're blocking addons they don't like.

Orwell was right over and over and over again

how is it even possible to predict the future so accurately?

>>62165850
>They're blocking addons they don't like.
source?

>>62165864
he's a time traveller

>>62165430
>Not having a great marriage with a qt wife while banging some slim twinks on the side

What a fag

>>62165868
They are preventing certain malware addons from being installed by default. You can easily ``customize'' your browser experience and allow them.

>>62165917
that's not a source

>>62165420
What happens when you get a shitty Pope, then? Alternatively, what happens when the king wants a divorce?

>>62163912
It's a fucking cult
And yes, in case you were wondering, it's possible to shill for Firefox
https://www.reddit.com/r/Windows10/comments/6rp5ux/firefox_nightly_new_icon_is_so_pretty/
This thread is full of them
Notice how the thread is a combination of retarded Windows 10 users commenting on how "pretty" it looks and FF shills trying to convert them

>>62165917
>They are preventing certain malware addons from being installed by default.
and that's bad how?

>>62165204
what if you're pro free-market, just OK with gays so long as they keep their shit behind closed doors, barely tolerate trannies and think they should all either be euthanized or turned into sex androids, hope all religious sunni muslims get murdered, want all third world non-white immigration to completely stop, and think that while jewish intellect can be very useful, they should *all* be forced to live in a completely isolated israel so they can't fuck with anything? what then?

>>62163912
>a badly written extension can leak your information
WOW NOBODY WOULD'VE EVER THOUGHT THAT IS POSSIBLE

>>62165965
>tries to convince you that any add-on that doesn't fit Firefox's criteria is malware
it's one of their misleading tactics

File: Beady Eyed Anglo plotting at very hihg speeds.jpg (22KB, 490x313px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 490x313px

>>62165864
He's an (((Anglo))). His eyes are so beady they can pierce the space-time continuum and saw the future.

>>62163941
>if you are a :
>(((Christian)))
>(((/pol/)))
>(((altright)))

So Jew worshippers for brave and traditional White men for firefox?

>>62166049
That's not at all what the article is about. It is possible to enumerate what extensions you have installed, now matter how well they are written.

>>62166317
>If the WebExtension exposes content to sites because they have implementation flaws, sites may fingerprint users based on the unique ID that gets exposed in the process.

>>62165868
https://soylentnews.org/article.pl?sid=17/08/28/1128230

>>62165936
It is the source of contention. Did you have a more specific request?

>>62165864
Being a socialist allows you to view the world for what it is.

>>62166356
Implementation flaws are in the WebExtension system, not in extensions themselves.

>>62166428
The flaw is in the extension if you put the resource url on the page itself.

>>62166383
F

>>62166443
The site probes for an extension by forming a URL by itself, without any assistance from extension developer.

>>62164821
>it's ok everyone go back home, corporations are allowed to form monopolies/cartels and then censor you
>it's only censorship when the government does it!
>whats antitrust???

>>62166454
>form a url to a randomly generated uuid
How many stars do you think would stay alive in this universe by the time you found one?

>>62166399
That's why the economic model horribly failed 24 times and people still want to implement it in the current year, just like people literally think fascism will work any time in the future

>>62163912
stay on fucking reddit if you care so much what the fuck they are doing over there

>>62166489
Timing side-channel attack.
https://www.ghacks.net/2017/08/29/browsers-leak-installed-extensions-to-sites/

hey, /g/uys! is iridium placebo botnet or a decent fork of chrome?

>>62166492
Why do americans keep conflating socialism and communism?

>>62165917
>malware
You spelt legitimate add on wrong manchild

>>62166519
That only works if the ids are not randomly generated, which they are now. You need to know the id in advance to be able to check for it.
Did you even read the link you posted?

So let me get this straight
>Google Chrome = Jew botnet
>Mozilla Firefox = leftist shills
>Microsoft IE = Microshaft botnet

What browser is actually safe and respects my rights? Fucking Opera? Chromium? Some Firefox fork?

Is Tor the only legitimately safe option now or has that been compromised too?

>>62166543
Because all these nations were expressively socialist. like the USSR, Venezuela, Eastern Europe and Pre-Deng China. Even Lenin said that socialism's end goal is communism, so I'm not wrong in calling these nations socialist instead of communist.

>>62166581
Tor Browser and Brave.

>>62166593
>Brave
AHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAAHHAHAHA
You don't like ads? HERE, HAVE SOME OF OUR OWN

>>62163941
I'm a centrist lol

>>62166581
Tor has been compromised for years. They've recently become leftist shills as well, did you miss the memo? /g/ was full of threads about that.
Your best bet is a Firefox fork, Seamonkey looks good, no idea whether botnet or shills though.

>>62166600
Except that doesn't happen. It blocks ads. Try it sometime retard.

>>62164105
Safari 90% of the time, Chrome on whatever Safari doesn't handle

>>62166592
So these nations were using socialism to maliciously get to communism, and yet socialism is to blame?

>>62166592

I'm no defender of socialism, but you can still have socialism without going communist.

Both the UK and France are socialist countries that have world standing financial industries.

>>62165864
Because Orwell is a bimaru

>>62166730
No we are not.
Stop lying faggot.

>>62166730
fuck off commie

>>62166685
Yes

>>62163941
>if you are a :

>Christian
no
>/pol/
no
>conservative
no
>altright
no
>pro freespeech
yes

>>62166730
The UK and France are your typical neoliberal/neoconservative democracy in the West. They're hardly socialist.

>>62163941
kys religiousfag cancer

>>62166764

Fuck off.

I cannot believe that someone would argue that either of those countries are not socialist. It is almost impossible to fire people in France because of the fucking unions and the UK has the most comprehensive welfare system in the world.

>>62166798
>democracy is incompatible with socialism
Murrican education everyone.

>>62166764
EU is fully socialist, stop pretending. Socialism isn't even bad. It's much better than corporatism.

>>62163912
Orwell is a pajeet. Look it up nigger.

>>62166798

No. Just no.

File: 1503650409222.jpg (433KB, 1230x1573px) Image search: [Google]

433KB, 1230x1573px

>>62163912
THE GOYIM KNOW! SHUT IT DOWN!

>>62166592
>Because all these nations were expressively socialist
>Venezuela
venezuela is also completely in favour of private enterprise outside of whatever the government has their mitts on, they're only tangentially socialist because they make shit communists
>Even Lenin said that
lenin also advocated for state capitalism and one man management which arguably are the driving forces behind the corruption in communist hellholes, I don't know why anyone listens to him anymore

>>62166730
>Both the UK and France are socialist countries
don't bother arguing with these people anon, uk/europe was never socialist because 'muh private enterprise' and if they do concede it was socialist during those times then it was during the uk being the sick dog of europe era ergo neoliberalism and thatcher are their lord and saviour, that said, I wouldn't call uk socialist today and can't say for france

>>62163912
>never talk about Pale Moon's flaws
all i've read on /g/ for the past 3 days is shit about how much the furfag loves censoring everyone's favorite ad extension... so yeah, no.

>>62166873
Except they're capitalistic as well. The only socialist democratic states in the world are in the Nordic regions and most of them are getting fucked over by the massive waves of limitless low-skill immigration and their tendency to go on welfare and state housing.

>>62166903
Not an argument

>>62164595

If you want to use a browser for the sole purpose of watching ads that makes Brendan Eich richer, then first castrate yourself so that you don't carry your shitty genes onwards.

>>62165054
>pro free healthcare
>free healthcare
>free

>>62166933
>venezuela is also completely in favour of private enterprise outside of whatever the government has their mitts on
I guess that's why they kicked all private enterprise out of their country and nationalized all the oil extracting reserves used by said companies.

File: a prank, bro.png (149KB, 373x323px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 373x323px

>>62163912
>antabaka

Asukafags are freedom hating nazi numales. What else is new?

Just look at what happened to moot.

I fucking hate 2017, why is everyone such a fucking cuck they need to ruin every fucking decent thing. You cant even find a fucking internet browser anymore that isnt trying to constantly jew you

Fuck this shit

>>62165168
mozilla is a study in what NOT to do at this point. they had more market share than chrome and a giant headstart. there's no reason they should've completely lost all their users other than bullshit like this.

>>62163941
this

>>62163912
>using irefox in 2017
If you cared about security or privacy you would use a proper browser without js support.

>>62166990
This

>>62166986
the important private industries like oil were kicked out and taken under control of the state, like I said, and plenty of other industries had some appropriation of private companies, however under chavez the private sector did grow faster than the public sector and it was only a few years ago that traditionally anti-socialist outlets, like fox news, were claiming that venezuela can't be socialist because private industry is flourishing, it's only under maduro with saudis fucking the oil price up that the conversation has shifted back towards 'well of course they're socialist/communist, they've ruined the country!'

and don't get me wrong, both of those presidents were corrupt as shit and have likely caused huge lasting damage to the country

>>62167339
>it's only under maduro with saudis fucking the oil price up that the conversation has shifted back towards 'well of course they're socialist/communist, they've ruined the country!'
No it's because the Venezuelans wasted money that could have been invested into their main economic export and its extraction on some useful but a lot of useless social programs. Had Venezuela actually saved that money when the US discovered massive oil deposits all over the fucking place and started extracting and exporting them (which actually fucked OPEC prices back in 2011-2012), Venezuela would be a little worse off than Russia and Saudi Arabia, who are in a recession but are better off for the sheer fact that they actually moved into banking over the past few years. However, they didn't and their country is literally imploding because they tried to distribute the wealth instead of actually making a sane investment.

>>62166903
Yes they are, retard. Thanks to idiots like Friedman, Reagan, Tatcher etc this shit spread fucking eveywhere in Europe. Italy for example had a """""""""social democratic"""""""" party for the past 4 years but if you look at the policies you will see that it's just the neoliberal party.

Where are all the usual open source firecucks telling us it's are prerogative to accept the policing of language and opinions on the web?

>>62164186
Go ahead, sign it, just like I did. It makes no difference. Firefox is now run exclusively by SJWs and they adore free money, ESPECIALLY if it comes from Soros, as they share a similar agenda. They already took the funding, they will not give it back, and even if all the signing worked, Soros would still find a way to fund FireFox, and Firefox would take it, but just be more secretive this time.

Be Brave.

File: o-SYRIAN-REFUGEES-570.jpg (65KB, 570x406px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 570x406px

>>62166955
>Except they're capitalistic as well.
socialism and capitalism aren't mutually exclusive
>The only socialist democratic states in the world are in the Nordic regions
which are also heavily capitalistic and definitely globalist(with the exception of norway/iceland somewhat) and wouldn't fall under the socialist label for the same reasons uk and france wouldn't either
>and most of them are getting fucked over by the massive waves of limitless low-skill immigration and their tendency to go on welfare and state housing.
wow it's almost as if actual socialists are pro immigration control for this exact reason and that the shift to neoliberalism is only going to put immense strain on the public services in the nordic countries and sweden in particular

speaking of sweden, they received a shit ton of refugee requests and subsequently accepted a shit ton of refugees despite being a relatively tiny country of almost 9m, it's no surprise that it's gone to shit there

>>62167612
>socialism and capitalism aren't mutually exclusive
American education i guess. Yes, they are mutually exclusive. One is the abolition of private property and the socialization of the means of production, the other is about the private ownership of the means of production. They are fucking opposites. You can have a mixed economy but that's not socialism.

>wow it's almost as if actual socialists are pro immigration control for this exact reason and that the shift to neoliberalism is only going to put immense strain on the public services in the nordic countries and sweden in particular

You're right about this though. Socialists aren't necessarily ok with open borders.

>>62167457
>However, they didn't and their country is literally imploding because they tried to distribute the wealth instead of actually making a sane investment.
sorry if I wasn't being clear but I'd say we're in agreement, their economy is/was entirely based on oil for the most part and all it took was the saudis tanking the price of oil to put the country in disarray because of the sheer mismanagement and corruption of that industry

to be fair though it is basically only norway that managed their oil wealth correctly and planned for the future, even rich first world countries like canada are mismanaging their oil reserves but at least they're not corrupt nor have their entire economy based on it

>>62167733
>American education i guess.
wasn't the one to make that quip earlier in the thread nor was I the one you were replying to in >>62166955 - I just wanted to interject, but I'm a brit not an american

>Yes, they are mutually exclusive.
but they aren't, you even alluded to this at the end of your point,
>You can have a mixed economy but that's not socialism.
if we were to go by strict textbook definitions then we wouldn't be in a capitalist society either as 'pure' capitalism has never existed outside maybe iceland or ireland, at which point trying to discuss this will get us nowhere as we can't use the shared relatable terms we know, as a note though anarchocapitalists have a term for the current form of capitalism we're under - crony capitalism

I wouldn't go as far as to say england was a socialist country in the 70s as >>62166730 claimed, and it would certainly be wrong to say it was strictly socialist, but we definitely had some extremely socialist leanings and even today you'll hear people calling things like the nhs socialised healthcare despite private healthcare (and insurance) being extremely prevalent - if it's not socialist then we have to find some other far less common and less useful terms to describe what the average person would call socialism or at the very least social policies, but if you want to discount it as not being socialist because it's not textbook socialism I won't really argue further but I do take issue with you calling the nordic countries socialist democrats when they're by no means more socialist than the uk is/was

File: haveto.jpg (466KB, 1057x792px) Image search: [Google]

466KB, 1057x792px

using reddit.

>>62163941
Christianity isn't right-wing enough.

>>62163941
Good that I am none of those things accept pro free speech. Although I use a different definition of free speech than you probably do.

>>62165168
Everything is shit at this point. Everywhere you look is decadence, stupidity, and degeneracy.

We're reaching the peak of things that have their roots centuries back, but really picked up in the 1920's. Formalized crowd psychology, induced tribalism, and divide and conquer are the oldest ways of controlling the overall motion of a population. Most people are so brainwashed and delusional you can tell who created their opinions within a few sentences. People's belief systems, value systems, and ultimate actions are completely disjointed. Because they don't actually understand the world and are useful idiots for various parties.

It's mostly by design. All of my daily frustration and misery has been created, by design.

>>62168617
>none of those things accept pro free speech
>accept free speech
>accept
>muh hate speech isn't free speech
Why are commies always brainlets?

>>62165346
Chrome is shitting on standards a lot more nowadays.

Yeah, they are the first to adopt some new standard, but then they leave it unchanged / unfixed when the W3C finally makes it a real standard.

Both Microsoft and Mozilla had to add support for -webkit- prefixed css. It's worse than IE6 now.

>>62164105
Waterfox. All the greatness of Cuckfox without the bullshit plus added features. Dev is chill too and keeping legacy support past v57

>>62165168
Switch to Netrunner

>>62166600
>he doesn't know how to scroll through the settings

>>62169309
Not to mention the fact that a lot of good standup comedy wouldn't exist under that kind of mentality. Wasn't there a comedian in Canada that got fined $15K for calling a heckler a "dyke?"

Why does waterfox use 2x more memory than firefox? Firefox will very briefly allocate roughly the same amount of memory, maybe for some sort of cache management horseshit shortly after launch, but deallocates it shortly afterwards. Waterfox does not.

Haven't done extensive performance testing yet. It's mostly feelings based.

>>62170512
Also, intermittent cpu usage spikes. Using Windows 64bit.

Why is everything and everywhere trash.

>>62165054
Then you're just a retard

>>62164105
Icecat

File: waterfox.png (115KB, 1107x715px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 1107x715px

>>62170620
Doesn't scale well either.

Disappointing. I'm going to fork firefox myself. Lot of old ideas, I'd like to figure if they'd actually pan out.

Brandon "Fag wedding? I'd rather fag beheading" Eich. Brandon "Waste a kike" Eich founded Mozilla, got run out of town for bashing fags. After training with Ben Garrison deep in Montana militia camps he's back to gas the advertising game to death with concentrated Zyklon BAT and the Brave browser ecosystem.

Women and women (male) should be banned from tech.

>>62170759
>winlogon and crss with no owner
You need to nuke your hard drive right now..

>>62164186
oh classic, get in here now!

>>62164186
link so I can sign