>Gigi will be working to promote an open internet
lol, those fucking globalists always claim to do the opposite of what they actually plan to do. This cunt will censor anything that doesnt go with the Sorros agenda.
what fucking browser should I use now?
Not him, but pointing out a problem without giving a solution is pointless. So what's your solution? Chrome? Soros owns google stock. Chromium? Calls home to google, and Soros owns google stock. Brave? An absolute mess on the desktop at the moment.
So what's your solution? If you don't have one, then fuck off.
Oh? And what made you come to that conclusion? Even if they did, who is overwhelmingly responsible for chromium development? Google. Meaning you need to rely on Google's health in order for the browser to remain secure and functional.
So, once again, good thinking, retard.
the fucker funds different hate groups like antifa and black lives matter.
black lives matter are fucking racist, trying to stir up blacks against whites and forcing whites into the alt right camp.
all thx to our George
Oh now your "argument" has been reduced to ad hominem
Never seen this happening before
Then don't post in them, retard. Click the hide button. It's relevant discussion to /g/, if you like it or not. Or bump the thread so it has more visibility, that'll sure show everyone. Maybe they'll fuck back off to /pol/ if you fuck back off to /mlp/
Come on, now. "Tech illiterate," is a demonstrably accurate description of you, OP.
You, on the other hand, are name calling.
the point is to show firefox and mozilla that they cant do everything they want without consequences.
if you just swallow everything you get served, whats there to prevent them from raping you further?
its a matter of principle.
I'm sorry that you came to a tech board half-cocked, and thought you wouldn't be obliterated.
You give me a good option, and I'll listen. You offering half-assed solutions that ultimately change nothing, and calling me names when I tell you as much, isn't a good solution.
>Yes, except if they die, you don't have an open sourced browser with security support
there will be a fork, and the firefox devs (the ones that do actual work and are competent will have to go somewhere)
Also, they'll be more effective once they get rid of those SJW fucks that infiltrated mozilla.
>libcucks demanding to be spoonfed every bit of information with sheer arrogance
Every fucking time. Just do a sensible research on a few specific browsers of your choice and try to get as much information on who's behind them. Is that too much work for you?
You are presuming a conclusion that can not be demonstrated. In fact, if anything, it's the SJWs that survive, and the competent devs that find themselves without work a la Yahoo.
>Even if they did, who is overwhelmingly responsible for chromium development? Google. Meaning you need to rely on Google's health in order for the browser to remain secure and functional.
>not understanding that source code lives on with or without Google, the post.
>those SJW fucks that infiltrated mozilla
that problem starts at the top with their CEO.
No it doesn't. Hundreds of paid professional software engineers at Google work hard to fix bugs and security exploits, basement dweeling NEETs fork the security updates directly from Chromium channel and look for regressions.
Making a web browser is not a child's play. Otherwise Netrunner would be a thing now.
You're the one demanding to be spoonfed on solutions. I did my research and found out that George Soros has plants at Mozilla (something you're incapable of doing because it your lefty politics cloud your judgement) and am now using a browser that's my personal choice and has no Soros behind it. Do your own research, you lazy argumentative, verbose bitch.
>not understanding that Linux, a massively larger project, is maintained by volunteer work and Chromium could easily be maintained by the same community should Google abandon it.
Keep the keks coming, lefty.
Yes, Soros has plants at Mozilla. Which maintains the code for all the forks of FF.
Soros owns stock in Google. Which maintains the code for all forks of Chromium.
So what's your solution? What web browser do you have that is free, open source, and does not rely on Mozilla's or Google's maintenance of the code?
that dude is very handsome for his age
does this look like a fucking browser/tech website to you? If we actully stop support and donation to them, they might actually go back to developing free open source software.
those fucks even ditched Thundrbird lol.. but they do have time for useless sjw agendas
>does this look like a fucking browser/tech website to you? If we actully stop support and donation to them, they might actually go back to developing free open source software.
Ok. Now offer a viable solution that doesn't rely on closed source software, and doesn't rely on chromium/mozilla code maintenance.
I don't think you know how Linux works. Linus doesn't write any code anymore. Most of the job is done by RedHat.
Yes, Linux is the biggest open collaborative in the world but most of the patches that come are just the companies trying to make their shit work with the kernel, these are not mainline patches. The mainline patches are strictly under the supervision of kernel devs (many of which work in RedHat, Debian and SUSE) and Linus himself.
Linux started out as a community based project but it's no longer the case.
Nope. And even if it did, it would still have been way bigger than Chromium, thus your premise about Chromium not being easily maintained by volunteer work is flawed.
bfy . tw/DeCk
>Ok. Now offer a viable solution that doesn't rely on closed source software, and doesn't rely on chromium/mozilla code maintenance.
market will come up with something, once they see that people would be willing to support an open source sjw free browser project
Do you know how many LoC chromium consists of? Do you think the 5 basement dwellers can even finish reading the chromium project source in a year?
Are you really all that much deluded?
Not to mention all that autistic non-standard clang extensions Google use
Hey, what if we combine the good things about Opera and Chromium and call it
wait for it
>Trying to get someone to stop relying on google
Great job, retard. Luckily, I use NoScript, so all I got was this. Fucking hypocrite.
a browser should be simple to code and use, chrome and furfox are overly bloated with stupid shit.
Unfortunately normies want bling so heavyweight and bloated crap will always be popular.
>I'm sure /g/ wizardz will know if it has anything suspicious
doubt it. there are probably 100s of thousands of lines of code you would have to go through lol
and the vulnerability in case of firefox is that they'll start censoring websites which dont support their agenda
I wouldnt be suprised to se:
"THIS WEBSITE CONTAINS HATESPEECH AND FAKE NEWS. CLICK CONTINUE TO PROCEED" in newver firefox versions
>That coming from someone without a 4chan pass is rich.
Really, now? Would it surprise you to know that I also use a VPN at the router level, and pay for both the VPN and the 4chan pass with bitcoin?
>How do you know and when will Chromium die?
when remains to be seen but it will be overtaken at some point.
remember too that chrome only exists because they forked webkit. google never really created a web browser from scratch
I'm not surprised however at you shilling Firefox when you're using it.
>dude third world inbred Somalis Muslims won't rape and behead me because I provide a needed service by making smart phone apps XD
Yet you responded to my post, asking how you knew what came next would be better, by showing that there is no guarantee that what comes next will be better, and may, in fact, be much worse.
shitposting will make real shitposters feel in good company. dont shitpost. rise above.
>Dude you don't understand we need to import more sub 60IQ Muslims into the west because they work the low skill low pay jobs. Yes I'm aware that 99% of them go to rich western European countries in order to leech off the welfare system and that these low skill jobs will soon be automated anyway. Me? no I'll be fine because the world will always need HTML coders.
I've never hid the fact that I used FF. You seem to think that this is a condemnation, despite the fact that this has nothing to do with hypocrites bitching about Soros using google scripts.
> the typewriter market.
I wonder what's the fucking difference here.
Posted from my Android with Chromium connected ty my Chromecast while checking my gmail while playing youtube in the background xd
It's either that or using google scripts. Also, I'm not the one arguing to ditch something. You're arguing to ditch FF because of Soros, even though google is partially owned by soros, and yet, here you stand, on this board, either paying for the site or using google scripts, making such an argument?
I'm not the hypocrite. That would be the people arguing that FF is bad because "muh Soros."
>Firefox in bed with the OSF
>OSF funds NGO's that engage in human trafficking across the Med as the webm shows
>Dude the niggers wont rape me because the world needs more instagram filters XD
What you posted has got nothing to do with the thread. AND no matter how much shitty /pol/ infographics you pull out of your ass it's not going to prove it.
Take your fake news to infowars
Mentally block out Soros posters anon. They are basically like the Koch brother posters that just live on conspiracy theories. The only thing Soros is guilty of is being a wealthy man that donates to political causes he agrees with. Much like anyone else with billions with no possible way to spend it all would do.
You sidetracked the argument with "reee hypocrisy" and have been called out on your own.
Aside from Youtube and other google products, Captcha doesn't want to censor the internet like Mozilla under Soros does.
>Captcha doesn't want to censor the internet like Mozilla under Soros does.
It literally helps Google with thier AI, which can be used (probably in use by now) to block hate speech
>drawing attention to what causes he donates to and disagreeing with them is makes someone a conspiracy theorist
>mfw when someone uses a bigoted Nazi browser
>It's ok when I do it for reasons.
Whatever, anon. I'm not using google scripts, you are. So keep going on about muh Soros while you keep using products he partially owns.
Regardless of all this, there has yet to be a reasonable argument made about what should be used instead of FF.
This comment isn't tech related please go back to making your shitty addons.
>dude fuck white people lmao
>dude save me white people lmao
>dude Africa stronk but we still can't master farming so I guess there's another famine now lmao
oh yeah we are getting them all ported.
How are your brave addons coming along, anon?
>not paying attention to what soros posters really talk about
>pretending it's just about the organizations he donates to
>pretending there isn't a bunch of anti-jew haters that think he is going to bring in white genocide
>Closed source browser that uses chromium code
>B-b-but it'll p-p-probably be revived as open source!
You know, I actually used to be a /pol/ poster before Trump made the board unable to talk about anything else. The arguments in this thread wouldn't have withstood scrutiny 2 years ago on /pol/. Trump really ruined the board.
Muh migrant rape fantasies, ruined. Who will I spread my asshole for now.
>he thinks niggers aren't obsessed with chink cartoons
>Muh migrant rape fantasies
Is that a thing. I happen to be of jewish decent. I believe I am illegal in America.
The good news is /our president/ is still in charge :^)
Did you read my post? It's Opera 12.x you goddamn retard. It uses its own rendering engine called Presto. There's nothing Google in it, it's from before Opera we know today transitioned to Blink/V8.
And yea, the code is publicly available now.
Keep spreading all you want, cuck
This isn't the wall we voted for
>it's a firecucks get triggered that their shitty browser just got a little shittier episode
Why don't you about:config a better browser for yourselves, faggots.
>Just use a closed souce, proprietary chat service to learn about who maintains the code.
How do I make Firefox not run like complete bloated shit?
>The top 10 companies, which employ kernel developers to contribute to the Linux kernel, make up nearly 57 percent of the total changes to the kernel. The category “none,” which represents volunteer developers who aren’t paid by any company, fell to the No. 3 spot this year from No. 1 in the last report issued in 2015. And Renesas moved up in the rankings from No. 13, replacing Texas Instruments at No. 10. A large portion of development continues to be developers of unknown corporate affiliation, who typically contribute 10 or fewer changes.
Please stop posting
>talking shit about discord when 4chan has obfuscated code that generates code that's non-accessible.
Sad state of affairs when your initial postulation has been reduced to this kind of faggotry. The absolute state of Firecucks.
Your post doesn't disprove that Linux is maintained by volunteer work. It only add ups that it's also maintained by companies that employ kernel developers, but volunteer work is still present.
Even if you're a 4chan pass holder, you're still contributing to the site that endorses the same Google scripts and ad campaigns, regardless of you blocking them or not. Why torture yourself? Just kys.
The fuck are you talking about? The point I was making was that people can draw their own lines wherever the fuck they want. The fact that you are pushing for people to drop firefox for some horse shit opera browser that you shilled, yet are completely unwilling to answer even the most basic stupid fucking questions, like who maintains the code, instead referring people to a closed source, proprietary chat client, is horse shit.
I mean, seriously, do you people even have the goal of getting people to switch, or just come off as if your shit don't stink, despite the fact that you are just as much of a hypocrite?
I installed it on my Macbook a few days ago and I don't know why but, the overall feel I got was not smooth at all. Firefox chocked a lot while scrolling and dragging the window, plus it froze when displaying certain sites like YouTube.
Try reading the post I responded to again
>not understanding that Linux, a massively larger project, is maintained by volunteer work and Chromium could easily be maintained by the same community should Google abandon it.
If you think a single person can maintain Chromium or the Linux kernel then more power to you
It was also posted here on 4chan and its source is partically closed, yet you're not complaining about that. You're just being argumentative for the sake of being argumentative and I have no desire to convert anyone, especially someone like you. Opera is a 12.x is a sensible alternative to Google and Mozilla's offerings, but naturally you will shit on it like the good Firefox shill you are. I started this thread to debunk the notion that /g/ "debunked" Soros' involvement with Mozilla. You are simply assuming and projecting a lot of things that were not in the OP to divert attention from the fact that Mozilla wants to censor the web.
>I started this thread to debunk the notion that /g/ "debunked" Soros' involvement with Mozilla.
Ok. Good. Consider it debunked. Never mind that the OP image has been posted on /g/ before. Never mind the fact that you included no sources. Never mind the fact that you're a god damned retard that had nothing but an image in the OP, leaving people to interpret it however they wanted.
It's debunked. Great. Guess we can end this thread, and never, ever start a thread like it again.
Thank god for you, OP. Truly, you are a gift to this world.
Yes, it's been posted before, for the first time, by me.
>pls spoon feed me the sources, I can't do my own research, reason why I'm still a Firecuck!
You know, for someone who is supposedly from /pol/, you sure are shit at debating. The burden of proof is on the claimant.
I need them. Until it starts getting these kinds of extensions, its not ready for me.
You claimed the image in the OP isn't proof because you're unable to research the content in it on your own. You were presented enough proof, you just want to make it seem like you're winning a strawman argument.
Decentraleyes will be ready next update. NoScript will be ready by 57. Ublock origin already has an extension ready to go in open beta (just gotta go to the dev channel to get it). That leaves Flash Control (there are other extensions that do the same thing), Random Agent Spoofer (there are other extensions that do the same thing), and DNSSEC/TLSA Validator, which I haven't bothered researching, but is available for other platforms, so will most likely be updated.
i think he meant to say based on, or rather a fork of. the issue with that ia only security really since oversights will carry through. brave should implement the web browser standard so that ff and chrome extensions work on it
>You can't disable Webgl in chromium browsers.
Slimjet doesn't work on a test.
As for that add-on:
>How to fix the WebRTC Leak in Google Chrome?
>There is no known working solution, only a plugin that is easily circumvented. Please use Firefox instead.
I'm willing to admit I made a false claim when you are willing to prove it false. Consider me unconvinced.
A shame, because I thought for a second that chromium based browsers might have become a valid option.
>All this shit
>Still no actual evidence
This seems to be a common theme regarding people who have debated me in this thread. I mean, the site you listed the very app that has a workaround.
Use what you want. I remain unconvinced.
Consider this my last response until you meet the standard that I said was needed in order to end my skepticism. At this point, I'm just going to repeat myself, and you're just going to repeat yourself with articles that go to chrome extensions.
What I'm asking for is not unreasonable. If you're unwilling to meet it, fine, but continuing this conversation is pointless.
>until you meet the standard that I said was needed
Also false: https://zenguard.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/201259661-How-can-I-protect-myself-from-IP-leaks-caused-by-Flash-or-WebRTC-
>Dude asks for a Webm.
>5 replies with links to an extension, none of which refute the assertions made in privacytools.io
You took longer to pull this shit than to make a webm, and never rose above "contradiction" in the argument pyramid.
What the hell happened to /pol/? They went from great debaters to this? No wonder public opinion on Trump is so abysmal. How the mighty have fallen....