Firecucks will defend this

File: George-Soros-Firefox-Fake-news.png (563KB, 800x1143px) Image search: [Google]

563KB, 800x1143px

>>62161564

>>62161564
is that a man or a woman?

File: firefox-open-society-foundations-partnership.png (187KB, 730x775px) Image search: [Google]

187KB, 730x775px

>>62161580

File: b74.png (204KB, 600x528px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 600x528px

>>62161583
Let's just call it a happy merchant.

File: 1504018332499.jpg (91KB, 660x708px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 660x708px

>>62161583

highlighted text and red arrows? that's all that i needed to see

File: 1502925295723.gif (1MB, 245x280px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 245x280px

>>62161564
how does it feel now mozilla cucks.

What am I supposed to be defending, exactly

>>62161564
>Gigi will be working to promote an open internet

lol, those fucking globalists always claim to do the opposite of what they actually plan to do. This cunt will censor anything that doesnt go with the Sorros agenda.

what fucking browser should I use now?

>>62161564
>>62161580
>>62161590
This /pol/ autism is true cancer, literally 25 threads made each day and it's getting boring
Fuck off, OP

I don't get this political shit
what does this have to do with technology
fuck off

>>62161725
Now that you can't scream (((FAKE NEWS))) anymore, you tell these threads to go away. Facts are a hard to swallow pill for liberals.

>>62161752
It has everything to do with technology, mongoloid. If you have a problem with that, take it up with the likes of Soros who use tech is their own political vehicle.

>>62161756
Not him, but pointing out a problem without giving a solution is pointless. So what's your solution? Chrome? Soros owns google stock. Chromium? Calls home to google, and Soros owns google stock. Brave? An absolute mess on the desktop at the moment.

So what's your solution? If you don't have one, then fuck off.

>>62161752
Stop trying to limit discussions about what you think is related to tech.

>>62161813
>So what's your solution?
>Iridium
>Waterfox
>Opera
>Palemoon

Why do you hate George Soros so much? Because he is rich? Stop the wealth shaming.

>>62161564
Dude I left them when they fired their CEO because muh traditional family wrong gay good..

Now I am on Brave and Opera( yeah I know I sell myself to Chinese :( )

>>62161824
>Iridium
Don't trust chromium.
>Waterfox
Relies on FF's work to remain secure.
>Opera
Closed source
>Palememe
Same issue as Waterfox.

Good thinking, retard.

>>62161828
>Why do you hate George Soros so much?
because of his divide and conquer strategies and his effort to censor people

he wansts to fucking turn us into North Korea.

>>62161845
>>Iridium
>Don't trust chromium.
well, I believe the Iridium devs did enough to get rid of chrome telemetry and homecalling

>>62161824
>Chrome fork
>Firefox fork
>"alternative to chrome and firefox"
Your brain in /pol/

>>62161853
Hyperbole.

>>62161873
Still using gay shit derivative....

>>62161869
>I believe
Oh? And what made you come to that conclusion? Even if they did, who is overwhelmingly responsible for chromium development? Google. Meaning you need to rely on Google's health in order for the browser to remain secure and functional.

So, once again, good thinking, retard.

>>62161878
>Hyperbole.
the fucker funds different hate groups like antifa and black lives matter.

black lives matter are fucking racist, trying to stir up blacks against whites and forcing whites into the alt right camp.

all thx to our George

>>62161891
>rely on Google's health
Nigger what the fuck are you talking about? You some kind of schizophrenic? Google will be around long after you're dead. Worry about your own health.

>>62161891
Owned that autist desu

hurr durr dont use firefox
use firefox forks instead, they are different somehow

neo-/g/

>>62161910
Not neo-/g/. Tech illiterate /pol/ tards who think they know shit about shit.

>>62161910
/pol/ is a cancer, really

>>62161919
>>62161921
>>62161904
t. transgender antifa faggots

>>62161564
Do me a favor, OP. Screencap your desktop. I want to see what OS you're using.

File: 1500148675467.png (44KB, 706x674px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 706x674px

>>62161929
Oh now your "argument" has been reduced to ad hominem

Never seen this happening before

>>62161725
Then don't post in them, retard. Click the hide button. It's relevant discussion to /g/, if you like it or not. Or bump the thread so it has more visibility, that'll sure show everyone. Maybe they'll fuck back off to /pol/ if you fuck back off to /mlp/

>>62161904
>YAS SLAY QUEEN!

File: argument pyramid.png (74KB, 707x530px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 707x530px

>>62161929
Come on, now. "Tech illiterate," is a demonstrably accurate description of you, OP.

You, on the other hand, are name calling.

>>62161939
Thinking of it versus actually doing it

>>62161891
the point is to show firefox and mozilla that they cant do everything they want without consequences.

if you just swallow everything you get served, whats there to prevent them from raping you further?

its a matter of principle.

>>62161951
Yes, except if they die, you don't have an open sourced browser with security support. I mean, it's not like I pay to use FF, is it?

>>62161939
>>62161946
sorry, I didnt read /g/'s CoC faggots.. I'm very sorry for making fun of your mating habbits and gender identification

>>62161964
>I didnt read /g/'s CoC faggots..
let me help
>>>/global/rules/

>>62161896
>says the guy with no proof

#stopthewealthshaming

Mozilla is our enemy

>>62161910
>use firefox forks instead, they are different somehow
mozilla and all it's various forms of cancer like palememe should die.

>>62161964
https://www.4chan.org/rules#g

>>62161964
I'm sorry that you came to a tech board half-cocked, and thought you wouldn't be obliterated.

You give me a good option, and I'll listen. You offering half-assed solutions that ultimately change nothing, and calling me names when I tell you as much, isn't a good solution.

>>62161959
>Yes, except if they die, you don't have an open sourced browser with security support
there will be a fork, and the firefox devs (the ones that do actual work and are competent will have to go somewhere)

Also, they'll be more effective once they get rid of those SJW fucks that infiltrated mozilla.

>>62161813
>>62161845
>>62161891
>libcucks demanding to be spoonfed every bit of information with sheer arrogance

Every fucking time. Just do a sensible research on a few specific browsers of your choice and try to get as much information on who's behind them. Is that too much work for you?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_web_browsers

>>62161845
Then what do you use.......

>>62161976
What are you supposed to use, as an uncucked anglo saxon that takes 5 red pill in the ass everyday?

>>62161984
You are presuming a conclusion that can not be demonstrated. In fact, if anything, it's the SJWs that survive, and the competent devs that find themselves without work a la Yahoo.

>>62161986
It's not too much work for me. Critical thinking about the source of these web browsers is apparently too much work for you, though.

>>62161891
>Even if they did, who is overwhelmingly responsible for chromium development? Google. Meaning you need to rely on Google's health in order for the browser to remain secure and functional.

>not understanding that source code lives on with or without Google, the post.

>>62161992
>it's the SJWs that survive,
because they get funded by Soros and the likes to promot social division and censoring, under the disguies of openess and equality.

>>62161998
And who will maintain/update the code when Google falls?

>>62162001
Great, so you cede the point.

File: 4380174338_d7c552d3af_z.jpg (125KB, 415x500px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 415x500px

>>62161984
>those SJW fucks that infiltrated mozilla
that problem starts at the top with their CEO.

>>62161998
No it doesn't. Hundreds of paid professional software engineers at Google work hard to fix bugs and security exploits, basement dweeling NEETs fork the security updates directly from Chromium channel and look for regressions.

Making a web browser is not a child's play. Otherwise Netrunner would be a thing now.

>>62161997
You're the one demanding to be spoonfed on solutions. I did my research and found out that George Soros has plants at Mozilla (something you're incapable of doing because it your lefty politics cloud your judgement) and am now using a browser that's my personal choice and has no Soros behind it. Do your own research, you lazy argumentative, verbose bitch.

>>62161992
4chan has archives for a reason...

>>62162028
>not understanding that Linux, a massively larger project, is maintained by volunteer work and Chromium could easily be maintained by the same community should Google abandon it.

Keep the keks coming, lefty.

>>62162030
Yes, Soros has plants at Mozilla. Which maintains the code for all the forks of FF.

Soros owns stock in Google. Which maintains the code for all forks of Chromium.

So what's your solution? What web browser do you have that is free, open source, and does not rely on Mozilla's or Google's maintenance of the code?

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-30 at 10.28.04.png (1MB, 1279x943px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1279x943px

>>62162016
that dude is very handsome for his age

>>62162014
does this look like a fucking browser/tech website to you? If we actully stop support and donation to them, they might actually go back to developing free open source software.

those fucks even ditched Thundrbird lol.. but they do have time for useless sjw agendas

>>62162055
Linux stopped being a volunteer work 17 years ago.

>>62161583
Was wondering the same thing

>>62162062
>does this look like a fucking browser/tech website to you? If we actully stop support and donation to them, they might actually go back to developing free open source software.

Ok. Now offer a viable solution that doesn't rely on closed source software, and doesn't rely on chromium/mozilla code maintenance.

>>62162028
>Making a web browser is not a child's play
depends how complex you make it, I have made my own simple browser and it works pretty damn good.

>>62161681
Brave or Opera

>>62161583
If it's a liberal and you can't tell that it's a man or woman, then just assume it's the same sex as you and disregard them.

>>62162082
>Brave
Chromium based, relies on Google
>Opera
Closed source.

File: received_1971138833156451.jpg (123KB, 888x765px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 888x765px

So what's a good browser

>>62162055
I don't think you know how Linux works. Linus doesn't write any code anymore. Most of the job is done by RedHat.

Yes, Linux is the biggest open collaborative in the world but most of the patches that come are just the companies trying to make their shit work with the kernel, these are not mainline patches. The mainline patches are strictly under the supervision of kernel devs (many of which work in RedHat, Debian and SUSE) and Linus himself.

Linux started out as a community based project but it's no longer the case.

>>62162081
I should've been more verbose.
Making a browser to compete with Chrome/Firefox is not a child's play

>>62162091
Opera is literally Chrome re-skin now

>>62161564
wtf /pol/, you really opened my eyes!
Guess I will switch to a botnet browser or some placebo shit made by furries.

>>62162065
Nope. And even if it did, it would still have been way bigger than Chromium, thus your premise about Chromium not being easily maintained by volunteer work is flawed.

>>62162056
bfy . tw/DeCk

>>62162082
opera is chromium based too

Fun fact: Soros is such a fucking animal even Benjamin Netanjahu spoke out against him recently, calling him the enemy of Israel.

>>62162080
>Ok. Now offer a viable solution that doesn't rely on closed source software, and doesn't rely on chromium/mozilla code maintenance.

market will come up with something, once they see that people would be willing to support an open source sjw free browser project

>>62162096
That doesn't mean that Chromium's source code couldn't be picked up by another corp e.g Redhat should Google decide to abandon it.

>>62162110
Do you know how many LoC chromium consists of? Do you think the 5 basement dwellers can even finish reading the chromium project source in a year?

Are you really all that much deluded?

Not to mention all that autistic non-standard clang extensions Google use

File: pepe_peepee.png (64KB, 395x578px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 395x578px

Hey, what if we combine the good things about Opera and Chromium and call it

wait for it


Opium

>>62162125
Protip:
If the original devs don't come to the fork, it will wither away

File: neat.png (48KB, 1364x681px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 1364x681px

>>62162110
>Trying to get someone to stop relying on google
>Uses lmgtfy
Great job, retard. Luckily, I use NoScript, so all I got was this. Fucking hypocrite.

>>62161681
I mean, isn't firefox open source? I'm sure /g/ wizardz will know if it has anything suspicious

>>62162140
He's probably even posting with google captchas

>>62162101
a browser should be simple to code and use, chrome and furfox are overly bloated with stupid shit.

Unfortunately normies want bling so heavyweight and bloated crap will always be popular.

>>62162137
So what? something better will come along.

>>62162130
/g/ can't even fork systemd, Chromium is EONS ahead of their league

>>62162153
Sounds about right. Gotta love how tech illiterates think they know anything. They take a grain of knowledge and act like an expert.

>>62161756
which facts are you referring to?

>>62162130
If Chromium dies, something better will come along. Move on.

>>62162156
Your juvenile stupidity frustrates me

>>62162181
And how do you know that what is offered will be better?

>>62162151
>I'm sure /g/ wizardz will know if it has anything suspicious
doubt it. there are probably 100s of thousands of lines of code you would have to go through lol

and the vulnerability in case of firefox is that they'll start censoring websites which dont support their agenda

I wouldnt be suprised to se:

"THIS WEBSITE CONTAINS HATESPEECH AND FAKE NEWS. CLICK CONTINUE TO PROCEED" in newver firefox versions

>>62162115
this seems like a plus to me, anon

>>62162181
Yea, you are forgetting the capitalist part of every company. Companies like monopoly and absolute power. Once they attain it it is bound to become evil

>>62162182
i always rustle snowflakes feelings

>>62162197
Are you using FF? If so, I want you to open up a new tab, click on the address bar, and type in about:config .

You're welcome.

>>62162197
>"THIS WEBSITE CONTAINS HATESPEECH AND FAKE NEWS.
That's desirable.
I have disabled 4chan, br***rt, infowars, CNN access in my business network

>>62162140
>>62162153
>>62162177
>REEEE Google captchas

That coming from someone without a 4chan pass is rich.

>>62162211
u must be da trolle master of 20I7

File: 1473841355224.png (84KB, 1888x540px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 1888x540px

>>62162221

about:preferences#security
>block dangerous content
?

>>62162189
netscape > ie6 > firefox > chrome > "something else"

always...

>>62162189
How do you know and when will Chromium die? See how stupid that sounds?

File: really.png (140KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 1366x768px

>>62162221
>That coming from someone without a 4chan pass is rich.
Really, now? Would it surprise you to know that I also use a VPN at the router level, and pay for both the VPN and the 4chan pass with bitcoin?

>>62162234
>netscape > ie6
kek

>>62162234
Let's just follow this logic. IE6 was in no way better than Netscape, and Chrome is in no way better than Firefox.

So, by your own (retarded) example, you prove yourself wrong.

Google will never die, they control everything (EVERYTHING)

>>62162200
Well you're probably 14.

>>62162235
>How do you know and when will Chromium die?
when remains to be seen but it will be overtaken at some point.

remember too that chrome only exists because they forked webkit. google never really created a web browser from scratch

File: 1504012097231.png (282KB, 1511x618px) Image search: [Google]

282KB, 1511x618px

>>62162241

I'm not surprised however at you shilling Firefox when you're using it.

File: NGO-Trafficking.webm (3MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1280x720px

>dude third world inbred Somalis Muslims won't rape and behead me because I provide a needed service by making smart phone apps XD

>>62162299
What does that have to do with not using google scripts? Could it be that you're trying to move goalposts?

>>62162259
damn you got me

>>62162299
Rephrase

>>62162305
Wrong tab
>>>/pol/
Stay there

>>62162252
Did i say it was better, no. but thats how it happened. if you are old enough you would remember that.

>>62162306
No, just exposing your shilling.

>>62162335
Yet you responded to my post, asking how you knew what came next would be better, by showing that there is no guarantee that what comes next will be better, and may, in fact, be much worse.

>>62162254
>Google will never die, they control everything (EVERYTHING)
IBM will never die, they control the typewriter market.

>>62161583
worse. a jew.

File: 684384536843568438564.jpg (93KB, 800x733px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 800x733px

shitposting will make real shitposters feel in good company. dont shitpost. rise above.

File: MSF-Cultural-Enrichment.png (345KB, 639x658px) Image search: [Google]

345KB, 639x658px

>>62162326
>Dude you don't understand we need to import more sub 60IQ Muslims into the west because they work the low skill low pay jobs. Yes I'm aware that 99% of them go to rich western European countries in order to leech off the welfare system and that these low skill jobs will soon be automated anyway. Me? no I'll be fine because the world will always need HTML coders.

>>62162344
I've never hid the fact that I used FF. You seem to think that this is a condemnation, despite the fact that this has nothing to do with hypocrites bitching about Soros using google scripts.

>>62162353
>everything (EVERYTHING)
vs
> the typewriter market.
I wonder what's the fucking difference here.

Posted from my Android with Chromium connected ty my Chromecast while checking my gmail while playing youtube in the background xd

>>62162348
it could be worse, it could be no different or it could be better.

it's called fate.

>>62162378
I'll take the evil I know, thanks.

>>62162363
Why are you posting on a forum that endorses Google scripts then? Yea, you're a hypocrite.

>Soros is bad meme
fuck of /pol/, he's the greatest living man

>>62162381
I block them. Meanwhile, people condemning me use "Let me google that for you."

>>62162305
If this has been going on have there been any photographs of niggers disembarking from these ships in Sicily? Legit curious.

>>62162371
fact: google doesn't control everything.
fact: ibm back in its day was the equivalent to google/microsoft combined.

>>62162115
Israel isn't exactly a liberal country... What's your point???

>>62162388
>lmgtfy
>what is irony.

You blocking them doesn't change the fact that you pay 4chan to have Google scripts and ad campaigns on their boards.

>>62162389
Here's an example >>62162361
And here's the result of it https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=df0_1503584095

>>62162400
Yes but the time has changed, don't kid yourself anon. Google is more powerful than America itself.

>>62162407
I don't know. Israel is full of fags and degenerates, but on the other hand they're proudly nationalistic, and hate arabs.

>>62162418
I know they are dangerous but they are also potentially very weak and vunerable too.

>>62162415
It's either that or using google scripts. Also, I'm not the one arguing to ditch something. You're arguing to ditch FF because of Soros, even though google is partially owned by soros, and yet, here you stand, on this board, either paying for the site or using google scripts, making such an argument?

I'm not the hypocrite. That would be the people arguing that FF is bad because "muh Soros."

>>62162398
>Firefox in bed with the OSF
>OSF funds NGO's that engage in human trafficking across the Med as the webm shows
>Dude the niggers wont rape me because the world needs more instagram filters XD

>>62162440
Hmm dude woah. Where did you get that news from? Is it /pol/?

>>62162440
What you posted has got nothing to do with the thread. AND no matter how much shitty /pol/ infographics you pull out of your ass it's not going to prove it.
Take your fake news to infowars

>>62162448
Stay on topic and post more blacked stuff faggot.
Also >>> r/pegging

>>62162448
Mentally block out Soros posters anon. They are basically like the Koch brother posters that just live on conspiracy theories. The only thing Soros is guilty of is being a wealthy man that donates to political causes he agrees with. Much like anyone else with billions with no possible way to spend it all would do.

File: 1495512544177.jpg (269KB, 1231x930px) Image search: [Google]

269KB, 1231x930px

>>62162398
>>62162421

>>62162439
You sidetracked the argument with "reee hypocrisy" and have been called out on your own.

Aside from Youtube and other google products, Captcha doesn't want to censor the internet like Mozilla under Soros does.

>>62162455
It has everything to do with the thread now go back to your safespace your firefox nigger.

>>62162462
>Captcha doesn't want to censor the internet like Mozilla under Soros does.
It literally helps Google with thier AI, which can be used (probably in use by now) to block hate speech

File: 1468476305916.png (6KB, 356x480px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 356x480px

>>62162458
>drawing attention to what causes he donates to and disagreeing with them is makes someone a conspiracy theorist

>>62162467
>n-no it is relevant because I say so
FUCK OFF TO YOUR CONTAINMENT BOARD WEAK KUCK LMAO >>>/pol/

>>62162472
>probably

Not an argument when you pull that out of your ass.

File: uu20ltpc8ijy.jpg (172KB, 1026x767px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 1026x767px

>mfw when someone uses a bigoted Nazi browser

>>62162467
>dude these niggers are taking our job and women
http://xxgasm.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/small_penis_-1816.jpg

>>62162462
>It's ok when I do it for reasons.
Whatever, anon. I'm not using google scripts, you are. So keep going on about muh Soros while you keep using products he partially owns.

Regardless of all this, there has yet to be a reasonable argument made about what should be used instead of FF.

File: ctr.jpg (140KB, 741x838px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 741x838px

>>62162487
This comment isn't tech related please go back to making your shitty addons.

File: WE.jpg (713KB, 3124x1068px) Image search: [Google]

713KB, 3124x1068px

>>62162498
>dude fuck white people lmao
>dude save me white people lmao
>dude Africa stronk but we still can't master farming so I guess there's another famine now lmao

File: 1496167588192.png (85KB, 291x344px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 291x344px

>>62162510
>Addons
oh yeah we are getting them all ported.
How are your brave addons coming along, anon?

>>62162502
>what should be used instead of FF.


I use Opera 12.x with Presto. The source code was leaked recently and the project will be revived as open source.

>>62162518
>dude read my autistic screenshot college lmao
>dude literally proves why I am still a virgin lmao

>>62162518
Are you feeling insecure?

>>62162305
It takes one /pol/ cross boarders to ruin a thread

>>62162477
>not paying attention to what soros posters really talk about
>pretending it's just about the organizations he donates to
>pretending there isn't a bunch of anti-jew haters that think he is going to bring in white genocide

>>62162549
We eat white pussies lmao. Stick to your anime girls rofl

>>62162527
>Closed source browser that uses chromium code
Jesus Christ.

>B-b-but it'll p-p-probably be revived as open source!
Neck yourself.

You know, I actually used to be a /pol/ poster before Trump made the board unable to talk about anything else. The arguments in this thread wouldn't have withstood scrutiny 2 years ago on /pol/. Trump really ruined the board.

File: 1485062665444.png (24KB, 764x706px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 764x706px

>>62162550
Muh migrant rape fantasies, ruined. Who will I spread my asshole for now.

File: Nig.jpg (12KB, 250x217px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 250x217px

>>62162560
>he thinks niggers aren't obsessed with chink cartoons

>>62162458
spot the lefty

File: 1491862531006.jpg (219KB, 1242x1171px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 1242x1171px

>>62162563
>Muh migrant rape fantasies
Is that a thing. I happen to be of jewish decent. I believe I am illegal in America.
The good news is /our president/ is still in charge :^)

>>62162561
Did you read my post? It's Opera 12.x you goddamn retard. It uses its own rendering engine called Presto. There's nothing Google in it, it's from before Opera we know today transitioned to Blink/V8.

And yea, the code is publicly available now.

>>62162552
No one has mentioned that in this thread stop false flagging >>>/pol/

>>62162573
Nah it's mostly chinks and whites. The weakest race.

>>62162581
Not him, but who is maintaining the code?

>>62162579
Is that picture implying he's a Jew puppet or something? Give me your name and address so I can report you to the ADL and stop derailing the thread or go back to >>>/pol

File: 1503319113155.jpg (219KB, 1172x1182px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 1172x1182px

>>62162563
Keep spreading all you want, cuck

>>62162576
Right winger. Nice try tho. Does it ruin your worldview my mine doesn't shatter from one little man that is left wing donating to political organizations?

>>62162595
https://bitbucket.org/prestocore-fan/presto/

File: 1496663429621.jpg (16KB, 311x326px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 311x326px

>>62162597
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vfbqp14hhU0

>>62162603
Ok. So who is maintaining the code?

File: sheeeeit.jpg (17KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 640x480px

>>62162586
Niggers love anime.

>>62162606
Based trump.

>>62162606
>>>/pol/ antisemitic filth

File: 1477240774853.jpg (42KB, 640x403px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 640x403px

>>62162606
THANK YOU BASED TRUMP

>>62162092
Nothing. Everything is either Chromium/Firefox based (instant botnet), Edge/IE (shit and Microsoft Botnet) or too old and obsolete.

File: 1479926094515.png (113KB, 411x600px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 411x600px

>>62162623
NOOOOO
This isn't the wall we voted for

>>62161946
Stop, this is just cringy

>>62162614
You're helpless, anon. You can't even comprehend the difference between Opera 12.x and Opera Blink/V8, let alone read a repo.

File: 1485974621592.png (478KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

478KB, 600x600px

>it's a firecucks get triggered that their shitty browser just got a little shittier episode
Why don't you about:config a better browser for yourselves, faggots.

>>62162636
>Cringy

>>62161946
>Not posting the "smug anime face.jpeg" one

>>62162638
Again, not who you were responding to initially. Who maintains the code? Should be easy to answer.

>>62162654
I will not entertain your samefagging. At this point you're jut trying to save face after being BTFO.

>>62162675
Are you saying you don't know who maintains the code for the browser that you are using?

>>62162677
On the contrary, just exposing your inability to read yet again. Keep it coming disingenuous Firefox shill.

>>62162595
>>62162614
>>62162654
>>62162677

Just hit their discord to find out, holy fuck give it a rest you absolute retard.

>>62162718
>using discord
Nope.

File: 1379521718083.jpg (66KB, 500x383px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 500x383px

>>62162718
>Just use a closed souce, proprietary chat service to learn about who maintains the code.

Hilarious.

File: 1502781728818.gif (4MB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 480x270px

How do I make Firefox not run like complete bloated shit?

>>62161564
>no url
>no archive link
>only edited images

Shilling at its finest

>>62162055
>The top 10 companies, which employ kernel developers to contribute to the Linux kernel, make up nearly 57 percent of the total changes to the kernel. The category “none,” which represents volunteer developers who aren’t paid by any company, fell to the No. 3 spot this year from No. 1 in the last report issued in 2015. And Renesas moved up in the rankings from No. 13, replacing Texas Instruments at No. 10. A large portion of development continues to be developers of unknown corporate affiliation, who typically contribute 10 or fewer changes.
Please stop posting

>>62162062
Does google.com look like a browser/tech website to you?

>>62162757
Might I suggest the stupid questions general?

>>62162062
This does:
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/

>>62162728
>>62162748
>talking shit about discord when 4chan has obfuscated code that generates code that's non-accessible.

Sad state of affairs when your initial postulation has been reduced to this kind of faggotry. The absolute state of Firecucks.

>>62162757
Downgrade to maybe the last version that supported Windows 2000.

>>62162772
Your post doesn't disprove that Linux is maintained by volunteer work. It only add ups that it's also maintained by companies that employ kernel developers, but volunteer work is still present.

>>62162850
adds up*

>>62162826
Good point. By that logic, we should all be using chrome since 4chan has google scripts anyways, right?

Fuck off.

>>62162757
Consider upgrading from your Core 2 Duo CPU and dial up internet

>>62162873
Even if you're a 4chan pass holder, you're still contributing to the site that endorses the same Google scripts and ad campaigns, regardless of you blocking them or not. Why torture yourself? Just kys.

>>62162800
>>62162830
>>62162886
Thanks for the help moz://a shills.

>>62161583
Yes

>>62162850
So if there's only a single volunteer contributing then you can claim that Linux is "maintained by volunteers"? Solid logic, champ

>>62162897
What do you want us to tell you? Firefox runs just fine as long as you use a computer made in this decade, should Mozilla be responsible for paying you to buy a new PC?

>>62162905
Yes, because it's true.

1 volunteer = volunteer work
0 volunteers = no volunteer work

Cmon anon, you can't be this dumb, and I believe you're not. You're just being disingenuous.

>>62162889
The fuck are you talking about? The point I was making was that people can draw their own lines wherever the fuck they want. The fact that you are pushing for people to drop firefox for some horse shit opera browser that you shilled, yet are completely unwilling to answer even the most basic stupid fucking questions, like who maintains the code, instead referring people to a closed source, proprietary chat client, is horse shit.

I mean, seriously, do you people even have the goal of getting people to switch, or just come off as if your shit don't stink, despite the fact that you are just as much of a hypocrite?

>>62162916
I installed it on my Macbook a few days ago and I don't know why but, the overall feel I got was not smooth at all. Firefox chocked a lot while scrolling and dragging the window, plus it froze when displaying certain sites like YouTube.

>>62162923
Try reading the post I responded to again

>not understanding that Linux, a massively larger project, is maintained by volunteer work and Chromium could easily be maintained by the same community should Google abandon it.

If you think a single person can maintain Chromium or the Linux kernel then more power to you

>>62162970
I actually used to have interesting conversations with /pol/. They didn't used to be so fucking tech illiterate. They also didn't used to act like Tumblr's polar opposite.

>>62162932
It was also posted here on 4chan and its source is partically closed, yet you're not complaining about that. You're just being argumentative for the sake of being argumentative and I have no desire to convert anyone, especially someone like you. Opera is a 12.x is a sensible alternative to Google and Mozilla's offerings, but naturally you will shit on it like the good Firefox shill you are. I started this thread to debunk the notion that /g/ "debunked" Soros' involvement with Mozilla. You are simply assuming and projecting a lot of things that were not in the OP to divert attention from the fact that Mozilla wants to censor the web.

>>62162970
We know there isn't only one volunteer maintaining the Linux kernel, don;t be sill. My post was only in response to your ignorant diatribe.

>>62163025
>I started this thread to debunk the notion that /g/ "debunked" Soros' involvement with Mozilla.

Ok. Good. Consider it debunked. Never mind that the OP image has been posted on /g/ before. Never mind the fact that you included no sources. Never mind the fact that you're a god damned retard that had nothing but an image in the OP, leaving people to interpret it however they wanted.

It's debunked. Great. Guess we can end this thread, and never, ever start a thread like it again.

Thank god for you, OP. Truly, you are a gift to this world.

>>62162091
it doesnt rely on Google. if chromium stopped development brave wouldn't become abandoneware

>>62163083
Not him. That's a fair point. Another fair point is that Brave isn't ready for prime time on the desktop. The extensions are limited and shit.

Brave you firecucks

Yes I'm coming from /pol/

>>62163103
Let me know when Brave can selectively allow scripts, and uses ublock origin as the ad blocker. Then it might be acceptable. Still won't be ideal, though.

>>62163074
Yes, it's been posted before, for the first time, by me.

>pls spoon feed me the sources, I can't do my own research, reason why I'm still a Firecuck!

https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2017/06/08/increasing-momentum-around-tech-policy/

http://archive.is/E80jL


https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/press-releases/five-major-foundations-announce-groundbreaking-plans-develop-public-interest

http://archive.is/5lyp0


https://wiki.mozilla.org/Main_Page/Proposals_for_WMM#Donor_Organization:_Open_Society_Institute_MENA_Grant

>>62163101
Seriously who uses extension, I can understand how it matters for those that need them but 90% do the need them

>>62163115
CEO got fired because he is pro traditional family.. thought police 101

Seriously just go finish it install windows 10 while you at it

>>62162916
>should Mozilla be responsible for paying you to buy a new PC?
why not, mozzy gets most of it's money by holding the begging bowl out.

File: extensions.png (172KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 1366x768px

>>62163115
You know, for someone who is supposedly from /pol/, you sure are shit at debating. The burden of proof is on the claimant.

>>62163116
I need them. Until it starts getting these kinds of extensions, its not ready for me.

>>62163136
>CEO got fired because he is pro traditional family.. thought police 101

That's when I dropped Firecuck.

>>62163145
>The burden of proof is on the claimant.

Also on the negative claimant.

>>62163173
I never claimed shit. I was skeptical. Big difference.

>>62163185
You claimed the image in the OP isn't proof because you're unable to research the content in it on your own. You were presented enough proof, you just want to make it seem like you're winning a strawman argument.

>>62163225
No, I claimed that you made a statement without citations. Which you did.

Seriously, as a former /pol/ poster to whatever you are, learn to debate.

>>62161590
Sources (links) were also posted here. Carry on with your strawman.

>>62163145
Fair

>>62163145
>Until Braves starts getting these kinds of extensions
>most of the extensions picture by this anon are Legacy and cannot be used with Firefox

top kek

>>62163298
Decentraleyes will be ready next update. NoScript will be ready by 57. Ublock origin already has an extension ready to go in open beta (just gotta go to the dev channel to get it). That leaves Flash Control (there are other extensions that do the same thing), Random Agent Spoofer (there are other extensions that do the same thing), and DNSSEC/TLSA Validator, which I haven't bothered researching, but is available for other platforms, so will most likely be updated.

>>62163320
That literally could happen to Brave in the same time frame. In fact, you can right now install existing Chrome(ium) extensions in it.

>>62163354
You can't disable Webgl in chromium browsers. Also, just because it "could," doesn't mean "will."

>>62163101
i think he meant to say based on, or rather a fork of. the issue with that ia only security really since oversights will carry through. brave should implement the web browser standard so that ff and chrome extensions work on it

>>62163368
>You can't disable Webgl in chromium browsers.

False:
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/disable-webgl/nlapleiepodflfbclacdhmbldadobpah?hl=en-US

http://techdows.com/2011/05/how-to-disable-webgl-in-chrome.html

http://www.linuxlinx.com/2016/08/how-to-enable-webgl-for-google-chrome.html

>>62163368

And the rest of your post is esoteric bullshit because "can."

>>62163399
Mistyped. Meant WebRTC. I apologize.

>>62163414
I'll take a "will" over a "can."

>>62163418
>Meant WebRTC

Also false:

http://www.slimjet.com/en/how-to-disable-webrtc-in-chrome.php

https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/webrtc-leak-prevent/eiadekoaikejlgdbkbdfeijglgfdalml?hl=en

>>62163456
Slimjet doesn't work on a test.
As for that add-on:
https://www.privacytools.io/
>How to fix the WebRTC Leak in Google Chrome?

>There is no known working solution, only a plugin that is easily circumvented. Please use Firefox instead.

>>62161564
So all browsers are cucked.
When /g/ is planning to finish the ntr browser of theirs?

>>62163471
The extension works and that isn't the only extension for Chrome to control WebRTC. Still false.

>>62163500
Feel free to take the test on privacytools.io to prove my point, then. Please, make it a webm, so that we know it isn't edited.

>>62163509
No, I will not. Enough proof has been already posted and there's nothing you can post to disprove it.

>>62163525
Ok. Then consider me unconvinced.

>>62163530
That's your problem. You made the false claims and got BTFO. What else are you expecting? Get fucked pedantic dipshit.

>>62163555
I'm willing to admit I made a false claim when you are willing to prove it false. Consider me unconvinced.

A shame, because I thought for a second that chromium based browsers might have become a valid option.

>>62163573

No one is selling you a product for you to consider it a valid option. Your claims are still false. https://nordvpn.com/blog/important-notice-browser-security-hole-detected/

>>62163594
>All this shit
>Still no actual evidence
This seems to be a common theme regarding people who have debated me in this thread. I mean, the site you listed the very app that has a workaround.

Use what you want. I remain unconvinced.

>>62163643
False: https://www.purevpn.com/blog/disable-webrtc-in-chrome-and-firefox/

>>62163656
Keep posting links that go to a google extension. See if it convinces me.

I told you what it would take to convince me. Until then, I remain skeptical of your claims.

>>62163683
False: https://www.ovpn.com/en/blog/webrtc-might-expose-your-ip-address-despite-vpn/

>>62163694
Consider this my last response until you meet the standard that I said was needed in order to end my skepticism. At this point, I'm just going to repeat myself, and you're just going to repeat yourself with articles that go to chrome extensions.

What I'm asking for is not unreasonable. If you're unwilling to meet it, fine, but continuing this conversation is pointless.

>>62163717
Still false: http://best10vpn.com/webrtc-vpn-bug-fix/

>>62163717
>until you meet the standard that I said was needed

Request denied.

Also false: https://zenguard.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/201259661-How-can-I-protect-myself-from-IP-leaks-caused-by-Flash-or-WebRTC-

File: 1504093967389.png (30KB, 955x511px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 955x511px

Firecucks in a nutshell.

>>62163912

>>62164009
true

>>62163509
>Dude asks for a Webm.
>>62163594
>>62163656
>>62163694
>>62163726
>>62163749
>5 replies with links to an extension, none of which refute the assertions made in privacytools.io

You took longer to pull this shit than to make a webm, and never rose above "contradiction" in the argument pyramid.

What the hell happened to /pol/? They went from great debaters to this? No wonder public opinion on Trump is so abysmal. How the mighty have fallen....

>>62162016
mental illness: the hair

>>62165043
>proved wrong time & time again
>samefags "Dude asks for a Webm."
>still bitching about his meaningless request being denied

Literally (You). Stay mad Firefuck.