Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
Anonymous
Coffee lake general - speed edition 2017-08-29 11:40:32 Post No. 62155839
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Coffee lake general - speed edition 2017-08-29 11:40:32 Post No. 62155839
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: Intel-Coffee-Lake-Core-i7-8700K.png (91KB, 550x550px) Image search:
[Google]
91KB, 550x550px
In this thread we share news and info waiting for coffee lake launch
Confirmed specs
8700k 3.7 - 4.7 GHz
Ring bus
Probably will require new board
News
New benchmark puts 8700k ahead off ryzen 8 core parts
Single core performance already on par with 7700k or better
http://wccftech.com/intel-core-i7-8700k-cpu-benchmarks-leak-faster-than-8-core-ryzen/
ame was seen in Fritz Chess benchmark, the Core i7-8700K had the best multi-threading score while the Core i7-8700K and Core i7-7700K were close to one another in single threaded tests. Moving to Cinebench R15, the Core i7-8700K with it’s 6 cores was 10 points lower than the 8 core Ryzen 7 1700 in multi-threaded test but was way faster in the single-threaded test. In the older Cinebench R11.5 benchmark, the Core i7-8700K was faster than AMD’s 8 core chip in both single and multi-threading tests
>
>>
File: Intel-Core-i7-8700K_Benchmarks.jpg (92KB, 690x306px) Image search:
[Google]
92KB, 690x306px
>>62155839
>So the benchmarks compare the Intel Core i7-8700K to the Intel Core i7-7700K, Intel Core i7-7800X and the AMD Ryzen 7 1700 CPU. All CPUs were clocked at their stock frequencies and the results in the benchmarks are very interesting. In wPrime, the Intel Core i7-8700K managed to beat every CPU in single thread and even multi-thread performance
So only Intel own 8+ CPUs can manage to beat Intel on miltithread. Consider this CPU overclocked, it's getting better than hedt
Also last but not least:
Intel is releasing ultra low voltages CPUs with 4 cores at 15w
>>
>>62155839
>New benchmark puts 8700k ahead off ryzen 8 core parts
in what? housefires
>Single core performance already on par with 7700k or better
beyond wishful thinking, its lower
>>
>>62155870
well duh they already have 7w dual cores that run at 1.3ghz bclk and turbo to 3.6ghz. 15w isn't a surprise
>>
File: 1503450239097m.jpg (102KB, 895x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
102KB, 895x1024px
>>62155997
At stock faggot. Stay mad amdrones.
It's not really hard to find Intel would top ryzen on miltithread, with a miserable IPC increase it was already well ahead amd. With more cores it's flying.
Amd still is the poor man option. When Intel 6 cores arrive, and rivalling prices with 1700, amd is dead again on consumer market
>But muh muh 7nm
It's all vaporware now and I really doubt and will pull this shit b4 2019
>>
>>62155839
Better question, buy a 7th gen or wait for the 8th gen.
>>
>>62155839
>8700k 3.7 - 4.7 GHz
None of this is confirmed.
>wccftech
>chinese rumor mill
Shilltel proclaiming victory before the fucking thing is even out yet, just like Frylake-X.
>>62156473
>amdrones
Endlessly masturbating to rumors presented as fact by WCCFturd makes you a shill, fucknugget.
>>
>>62156833
Boy, sure would be nice to get some official information on these new CPUs
>August 21st presentation is a cringefest, also lol more Kaby Lake Refreshes for laptops
Welp.
Thread posts: 8
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3