Redpill me on net net neutrality. I know better than to trust

>>62153927

Just tech companies not wanting to pay for bandwidth and having 100% control of the internet.

These same tech companies have no problem censoring/blocking right wing websites yet they demand the ISP's not do the same thing as them.

ISPs will be legally obligated to not discriminate among any of their bandwidth.

Oh yay, another one of these threads.

(((hey))) just (((replying))) to your (((thread))) bro.

Holy shit that's fun.

>>62154119
>Just tech companies not wanting to pay for bandwidth and having 100% control of the internet.
Tech companies pay for their bandwidth connections.
ISP that sell access to their customers want to charge tech companies extra because the bandwidth the ISP sold to their customers was never something they intended to deliver.

It also means that all traffic is treated equally so you don't give priority in delivery to one type or source of traffic over another.
As all ISP use public lands for the right of way access to deliver the service the government has a valid claim to regulate them. The Title II regulation treats ISP like utilities forcing the ISPs to act in a service for hire manner. In that they sell access without discrimination.

ISP want to make the internet into cable packages so they can gain more income without providing any better service.