>This is what /g/ actually believes

>>62146168
>those things are wrong
this is what pajeet, posting for 10 rupees per thread created actually believe.

>>62146168
>forget about drivers
because there aren't any
>do something for the environment
what?
>no back doors
kek

I like how it doesn't say that linux is stable, just implies that windows is unstable

>Forget about drivers.
That can't be true, right /g/?

>Linux
>Forget about drivers
lol I get it, it's because linux has no drivers

None of these advantages listed there are due to the Linux kernel.
It's GNU/Linux.

>>62146168
Which one is wrong or misleading?

>>62146296
>no drivers
Yes, in Lunix, the devices communicate with the OS via telepathy and choosing all those drivers before compiling my Gentoo kernel were all placebo. Fucking neck yourself, 7/10 bait, made me reply.

>>62146296
>>62146318
>>62146310
Linux kernel has more drivers and hardware compatibility than Windows and definitely helluvalot more drivers than macOS, what the fuck are you talking about?

>ndiswrapper

No complaints otherwise

>>62146345
you forgot the botnet

>>62146168
>forget about drivers
So you're saying that you don't have to perform some kind of exorcism to get your wireless drivers to work with older broadcom cards? Yeah right

Is Linux actually usable for a primary daily driver yet though?
Everybody, even on /g/ still say Linux is good for work if you're a programmer and nothing more. I'm not a programmer. What use is Linux for me?

Linux is useless unless your work requires it

>>62146168
THANK YOU, BASED LINUX