Whats the most aesthetic Linux distro?

>>62138691
distro=/=DE, retard

>>62138691
source mage

Read a book

>>62138691
distros aren't windows versions, you can make a distro (and by that i mean the desktop environment/window manager) look however you want it to look like

>>62138700
This. OP is a fucking retard.

>>62138691
You are retarded, you fucking retard.

Linux Mint is the only distro that looks good with default settings. Womanjaro's nigger loving color scheme is terrible, it's also a terrible distribution if you're too stupid to install Arch get on an Ubuntu and quit playing with bullshit distros

File: Screenshot_2017-08-29_01-09-44.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>62138691
any distro with a decent theme, icons and a background

>>62139150
>dark like my soul color scheme

File: 24iJzSF[1].png (51KB, 650x290px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 650x290px

>>62138700
Does your distro have this? Nah I don't think so...

>>62139165
it's good for the eyes anon

i don't wear glasses

>>62139197
What am I looking for??!?

>>62138691
ZorinOS

>>62139261
Probably the menu inside the app's titlebar showing how Unity is compact by default.

>>62139343
there is no point in having titlebar

ubuntu

CloverOS

File: kde-plasma-menu-button-.jpg (46KB, 655x332px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 655x332px

>>62139197
what now, cunt?

There's no difference between a distro and a DE since distros come with a DE

>>62139997
Glad you didn't waste a quad with your bullshit.
Kys.

>>62140019
>Kys
Reddit has arrived

>>62139997
how stupid can someone be?
what about flavours that don't come with DE? tech me pls

>>62139205
this

>>62138691
Give it back manjaro

>>62139150
Looks sexy as fuck. Can I make ubuntu look like this?

>>62140040
How do you know where it comes from? Are you a proud redditor yourself?
nonetheless thanks for the info, i'll stop using it.

>>62140097
yes you can

install xfce, install icons, themes, and get your wallpaper from wallhaven, don't forget about the plank and you're good to go

>>62138700
Not OP, but instead then, what's the most aesthetic DE?

>>62139997
jump off the building while you are still young. save yourself from suffering

>>62140136
arch

>>62140136
the one you like the most

>>62139979
How do I get that? My windows manager thing doesn't give me the option to put a file burger up there, just stuff like shade, minimize, close, etc.

>>62139197
That's the best feature of Unity, yet somehow hardly anyone knows about it. Fortunately Plasma has this too now.

>>62140203
>>>/g/sqt

>>62139711
It lets you access window functions and makes it easier to identify different windows by their title. Plus it just looks nice.

>>62140136
by default out of the box, it's kde hands down

>>62140232
because I don't know if it's firefox or terminal.
if you use mouse to close/min/max windows you should an hero rn

>>62139979
>>62140216
>Plasma has this too now
you wish. No support for qt programs outside of kde frameworks scope. Absolutely zero support for gtk(any version) programs, no support for firefox/chromium/atom/sublime text etc.
So, nah, your distro doesn't have it.

>>62140154
kek

File: Screenshot_20170828_200836.png (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

Bungie looks good. Especially w/ dynamic taskbar on.
I still prefer i3wm but Im no longer autistic enough to use it.

>>62138691
why is the clock font size locked so bigly in Plasma?

>>62140724
It seems to "jump" at certain points when you scale it. IIRC 24, 32 & 64px
If you make your taskbar under 32px its pretty normal.

>>62140667
>I still prefer i3wm but Im no longer autistic enough to use it
judging by this sentence, you are

>choosing a distro based on its default DE
kill you're shelves

Source Mage GNU/Linux

>>62139197
lovely mouse pointer.

>>62140216
this. its the only reason i am using Ubuntu. its so comfy and i get so much more vertical space. sadly, gnome is coming and this will be gone.

>>62140280
I feel like it's good design if a task can be performed with either keyboard or mouse, not just one of the two. Keyboard is usually faster, but sometimes I only have my hand on the mouse if I'm doing something like eating.

>>62140136
Cinnamon, objectively

>>62140136
Not the guy replying to OP, but what's the most aesthetic WM?

>>62138691
none because they practically all can be customized to look the same

>>62139205
this. why the fuck are unity/gnome devs so fucking incompetent they cant even copy a good looking ui?

>>62140667
>applets

i dont like that word.

ruins the vibes

everyone knows tiny apples are shit

>>62138691
Out of the box aesthetic? I'll go with Elementary.

File: 2017-08-29-113535_1920x1080_scrot.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

Anything with XFCE will do

> two clocks
Fight me

>>62138700
Why did this thread go on after this comment. >>62138691
Research your shit op.

File: 1503234464437.jpg (20KB, 379x364px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 379x364px

>>62140154

>>62139150
what's nqq ?

wow i though desktop threads died out years ago.

unhappy to see that their shit screenshots are still being passed off as "aesthetic" on /g/.

File: Screenshot_2017-08-29_11-19-07.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>62145181 is right, anything XFCE does the trick

>>62141646
dwm

>>6213869 elementary os i'd say

>>62139197
>try to install global menu extension for GNOME
>frequent issues due to its rather experimental, far more hassle than its worth

feel like pure shit just want unity back x

>>62140349
>you wish. No support for qt programs outside of kde frameworks scope. Absolutely zero support for gtk(any version) programs, no support for firefox/chromium/atom/sublime text etc.
You are screaming at the wrong wall retard. The toolkit is responsible for exporting menus, not the DE or distribution or anything else. Qt5 and chrome/chromium are the ONLY toolkits that actually supports it. gtk and everything else that uses their own shit has no support because they love sucking redhat cock. Ubuntu is heavily patching sources of that shit to support this but that in turn leads to outdated packages and instability and all other sorts of non portable fuckery.

>>62145535
I'm going MATE once 18.04 hits, they have quite a few unity-like new features. You should check it out

>>62139069
Mint-X looks like shit. Mint-Y is preinstalled and looks good though.

>>62138691
unironically Solus

>>62139979
wtf is that menu, unity handles it better
this isnt a fucking smartphone

>>62138700
nobody said that idiot, obviously looking at distros bundled with DE's out of the box you autist

>>62138691
you probably meant DE. My favs are WMaker, Openbox, Xfce. But if aesthetic you meant the 80s-ish then WMaker and its NextOS looks is a sure winner here.

>>62139056
>repeating yourself
Why?

>>62144791
gimme a dotfiles

File: cde.png (34KB, 1013x765px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 1013x765px

There is only one correct answer

>>62138691
Anything I rice.

File: unity-desktop-environment-on-ubuntu-14.04.png (269KB, 650x488px) Image search: [Google]

269KB, 650x488px

>>62144284
Unity is basically a rip off of the MacOS interface, what with the left side window buttons and menu bar, oh but the dock is on the side oOoOoooo so its totally different and not a rip off guys. But even then they make it ugly, can't you give me some semi transparent window elements, bros at ubuntu?

>>62151142
does that work on 64bit systems yet?

>>62139150
cinnamon is better tho

>>62151142
what is this?

File: newelementarydesktop.png (1MB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1366x768px

>>62138691
elementary OS

File: 2017-07-29-173606_1920x1080_scrot.png (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

debian has the colest logo

>>62144791
Ugly but better than all the other ones in this thread. Stop using a raster font, you edgelord.

>>62153796
I want to put this on my laptop but fucking linux kernel seems to have problems with a certain series of Intel processors, so every single distro i've tried just freezes randomly on it

>>62138691
definitely not anything that uses kde

>>62153107
it wasn't their fault that apple had been the only developer to know that all of the important clickable controls should be close to eachother, for example on the left side of the screen.

>>62153329
No.

>>62153796
I'll never understand why people would want a second dock panel at the bottom of the screen instead of just having one panel to save space.