>9.2% improvement in 4.5 years
Why was this allowed?
>pissmark
>processors became soldered on
I'm much more flustered by that than some minor performance improvement. It's not as if you need that for a laptop anyway. Fixing stuff you own yourself however is very much a necessity.
>>62135746
that's ivy bridge retard
>sandy bridge
>iX-3XXX
????
>>62135868
>>62135853
Doesn't matter, Ivy is just a dieshrink of Sandy
There's some 2-3% IPC difference between them
Lack of competition
Literally no reason to do any R&D when your main competitor was so far behind
Ryzen has given them a sharp kick up the rear. Suddenly Intel will figure out how to eke out performance gains of more than 0.3% each generation
>>62135746
http://www.anandtech.com/show/9483/intel-skylake-review-6700k-6600k-ddr4-ddr3-ipc-6th-generation/9
Skylake over Sandy Bridge did bring significant uplift, its just not shown in the /v/ tier bench you've chosen to focus on. The issue is that between Haswell, Broadwell, and Skylake the uplift is minimal with each iteration.
>>62136141
It isn't lack of competition. Intel has genuinely been putting all into X86 development that they can muster. The simple fact is that diminishing returns is a reality.
>>62135746
It's funny because half of that improvement is just the extra 200MHz clockspeed
>>62136216
>The simple fact is that diminishing returns is a reality.
Yeah no shit it is when you play it safe and don't develop a new architecture.