Ad Vault Thread. >What is Ad Nasuesm Fork of uBlock with

File: adsense1.png (30KB, 827x296px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 827x296px

rip google adsense

File: 1483081206370.png (21KB, 736x113px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 736x113px

>>62135130
I ran icefrog's script over at >>62135270 overnight and here are my results

>>62135130
I appreciate what ou are doing but I feel like showing the whole advault to everyone would be a privacy risk

>>62135737
I mean, you could always blur or crop the image.

AdNasuesm is malware, and a placebo. Hide AdNasuesm threads, ignore AdNasuesm threads, do not reply to AdNasuesm threads. They are just Google shills.

Can I get adnauseaum on mobile?

>>62135130
i want /pol/fags to leave, no one is going to use your jew funded botnet plugin

File: 1471146539961.jpg (31KB, 601x508px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 601x508px

>>62137939
someones butthurt

>>62135130
for some reason my ad vault is empty? Can I block ads and click them at the same time?

>>62135130
The extension still works on Chrome. Only thing I've noticed is that it fails to click on Google ad services links.

>>62138087
Yes, check your settings. Blocking and clicking at the same time is the point of the extension.

>>62138087
Disable NoScript, Decentraleyes, and UBlock is you have them installed.

File: 8251487.jpg (33KB, 200x171px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 200x171px

>>62135284
dear god, whos gonna pay for this

File: 1404363412674.gif (1MB, 450x402px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 450x402px

>>62135130
>palememe furfag blocked it out
Please give me a better Firefox fork, I don't want to deal with this faggot's shit

File: 1502844648599.png (174KB, 1224x863px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 1224x863px

>>62138566

>>62138583
you can enable it on the config retard

>>62138566
Those are the estimated costs by AdNauseam which low-balls it. Icefrog's script, each click amounts to around $200 so the real amount is around half a million.

>>62138599
Thanks man, I truly am retarded

I have to ask, what is the point?

Okay, let's say enough people use this that ads become an unviable way to monetize a website, by themselves. All this means is that websites are going to look for other ways to extract money from you. Ads are easy to block, you never even see them if you have two brain cells to rub together. Normies who don't adblock pay for all my content. What they come up with instead could easily be much worse

The devil you know, yaknow?

>>62138615
No probs, we're here to help.

>>62138606
i was really surprised that even 1 click was worth a dollar. ads truly are a jewish scheme

File: 1479474632561.gif (348KB, 500x246px) Image search: [Google]

348KB, 500x246px

>>62138631
Stay salty, webdev. You can kiss your $300k easy-money salary good-bye.

File: 1477326007829.png (331KB, 975x1962px) Image search: [Google]

331KB, 975x1962px

>>62138649

File: Jewing_66e872_5416060.gif (378KB, 208x200px) Image search: [Google]

378KB, 208x200px

>>62138712

whats the intensity of the clicks that I should set it as so that google doesn't detect my IP as invalid traffic?

File: amandakleinman.jpg (530KB, 2048x2048px) Image search: [Google]

530KB, 2048x2048px

AdNanuesm is malwared, and & placebo. Hide AdNamuesm threads, ignore AdNaluesm threads, do not reply to AdNasuesm threads. They are just Google shills.

Sicut amet in caelum ut non-shitposting in caelum. Shilling enterprises is a non-for-jewing enterprise located in Tel Aviv.

Rotschild BLV, Tel Aviv - Isarel (IL)

>>62139900


dude read the fucking man ual on git hub.

BTW more than 10 request per minute should trigger the nazi-hating jew-loving rapefugee-supproting SEARCH ENGINE WE ALL LOVE

btw start the shit and lower the creep feature if the GOYGLE YOU LOVE got triggered but your shit searches.

AdNasuAdNasuesm is malware, and a placebo. Hide AdNasuesm threads, ignore AdNasuesm threadsAdNasuesm is malware, and a placebo. Hide AdNasuesm threads, ignore AdNasuesm threads, do not reply to AdNasuesm threads. They aAdNasuesm is malware, and a placebo. Hide AdNasuesm threads, ignore AdNasuesm threads, do not reply to AdNasuesm threads. They are just Google shills. threads. They are just Google shills.sm is malware, and a placebo. Hide AdNasuesm threads, ignore AdNasuesm threads, do not reply to AdNasuesm threads. They are just Google shills.

REALLY
E
A
L
L
Y

GOYM
O
Y
M

><YOUR ADS HERE>
>CONTACT: AVI2000_AT-WALLA_DOT-CO_DOT-IL

>>62135130
>What is Ad Nasuesm
It's a user installed clickfarm that benefits the devs by using your ip/bandwidth to automatically click ads for them. A literal botnet that only benefits Ad Nasuesm.

ad nasum just fullfills everyone's desire.

you get an advault of the jewish tiny images they gobble doen your browser PLUS an aleatoric sum that you're supposed to having avoided to LEND TO THE MONEYCHANGERS

THEY WERE THE ONES MUDDLING THE WATERS DURING THE BLACK PLAGUE

THEY WERE THE ONES WHO VOTED FOR KILLING CHRIST

THEY ARE REKNOWN FOR THEIR LONG HOOKED NOSES

...
.
.

>>62140171
>>62135130
>>What is Ad Nasuesm
>It's a user installed clickfarm
WHER ON EARTH ARE YOU SHILLING FROM
>that benefits the devs by using your ip/bandwidth to automatically click ads for them.
NO; THE REQUESTS ARE SIMPLE AJAX REQUESTS
>A literal botnet
SOURCE PLEASE
>that only benefits Ad Nasuesm.
AD NASUM, JEW

IT IS CALLED AD ANUS


Check the wiki before shilling

kikette

>>62140171
>>62139900
>>62138631
>>62138290
>>62138047
>>62137923
>>62135945
>>62135737

quality online

>>62140261
>ad nas shill in atack mode
>oh it just clicks ads for us, but it's okay goy your taking down goggle (hand rubbing intesifies)

>>62140261
>Check the wiki before shilling
Why I can see your hooknose from here jew.
>botnet through social hacking, hooknose devs make all the money from their adsense keywords

>>62140087
>>62140130
>>62140163
They're getting desperate.

>>62138631
>Nissenbaum argues that the project is not anti-advertising: “There’s an emerging movement in the online ad industry to use sites that don’t track you. We collaborated with our friends at the Electronic Frontier Foundation to make exceptions for ads on these sites. So in the rare event you see an ad while using AdNauseam, cherish it as it is probably being served by one of the good guys.”

By default it only fucks with advertisers who track users. The intent of the program is to force site owners to switch to advertisers who use no tracking, by making it unprofitable for web owners to run ads from companies that track. In the same vein it makes companies not advertise with advertisers because they don't want to pay for fake clicks, which hurts their bottom line and hopefully forces them to change their advertising model so they can actually not bleed money.

TL;DR it will make advertising unprofitable for advertising firms that track users to the point they either adapt and learn to respect privacy, or go bankrupt.

File: george-soros.jpg (64KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 600x400px

>all of these google employees

>"Google lobbyists planted john oliver for net neutrality"
>"Google Tries to Stop Ads From Appearing Next to Hate Speech"
>"Google's Chrome browser to block some ads starting next year"
>"George Soros Buys Google, Liberty Global, Sells Citigroup"
>"George Soros Buys Google and Comverse Tech"
>"George Soros Acquires Stakes In Alphabet, Netflix As Both Corps"

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-tn-google-chrome-ad-block-20170602-story.html

https://medium.com/@JackPosobiec/george-soros-and-google-lobbyists-planted-john-oliver-net-neutrality-campaign-c8d6668db12e

https://www.forbes.com/forbes/welcome/?toURL=https://www.forbes.com/sites/gurufocus/2012/02/16/george-soros-buys-google-and-comverse-tech/&refURL=https://www.google.com/search?q=google+soros&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&referrer=https://www.google.com/search?q=google+soros&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

https://www.redstate.com/setonmotley/2017/04/26/george-soros-google-champion-government-control-internet/

http://www.educationviews.org/soros-google-funding-net-neutrality-groups-control-internet-censor/

http://www.nasdaq.com/article/george-soros-buys-google-liberty-global-sells-citigroup-aig-ge-apple-cm246602

https://disobedientmedia.com/2017/02/george-soros-buys-stake-in-netflix-google/

https://www.forbes.com/forbes/welcome/?toURL=https://www.forbes.com/sites/gurufocus/2012/02/16/george-soros-buys-google-and-comverse-tech/&refURL=https://www.google.com/search?q=soros+buys+google&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&referrer=https://www.google.com/search?q=soros+buys+google&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

>>62140087
>>62140130
>>62140163
>REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

atleast get paid for shilling, fuck...

why doesn't adnauseam detect 4chan ads?

Google only has 57k employees. Only a small fraction of them work with advertising, tracking, etc. Would it be possible to dox and harass them? It would create a chilling effect and slow down their work. Hypothetical question of course

>>62137900
damage control muh?

>>62143485
You are a pathetic human being if you are interested in doing that.

>>62143480
It's whitelisted in exchange for a reduced price for viral ad campaigning

>>62143504
>I'm not out of my element
>>>/v/

>>62135130
Why wouldn't this destroy people wanting to make a little money from having ads on their website to keep the content free(not behind a paywall)?

It looks like this would be a little dip to google but a massive crash to content producers, is it not?

>>62143485
Getting definite proof of the rumored google blacklist would be better. It would cause a massive amount of internal strife.

>>62135130

Ad Nauseum is notorious malware, a virus invented by 4chan cyber hackers

File: Capture.png (130KB, 509x433px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 509x433px

nice (((devs)))

anyways have fun aiding them in their extortion scheme

>>62143567
Then they stop using google ads and start using a privacy-respecting alternative. Ad incomes are very small anyway.
>>62143574
But how would you do that? Creating a climate of """harassment""" would be very easy.

>>62143508
kek

File: Clipboard01.jpg (239KB, 999x880px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 999x880px

installed it yesterday

File: 1499961633766.jpg (126KB, 808x820px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 808x820px

THIS IS ILLEGAL, STOP IT RIGHT NOW

>>62135130
Since adwords is an auction will the market not adjust itself to this, bringing the exact same profit to google and advertisers??

>>62144967
price of keywords will go down, just like google's revenue

>>62144990
>price of keywords will go down
Yes, but quantity of hits will go up.

>>62145007
except companie dont want to pay for fake clicks, thats why google had to refund some money, thats why people stop byuing keywords and thats why price of them will go down, where do you see profit in this?

jewwwwwwwwwsssssssss

Kek the amount of butthurt from these bloggers itt is hilarious

After reading some people say about how AdNauseam is actually making money from this by clicking their own ads I've started to doubt AdNauseam.

First, it was just one person on /g/ that mentioned AdNauseam last week. Not one mention in any other thread. Suddenly today everyone is shilling AdNauseam.

We've been baited by the Pale Moon cuckery, I'm not falling for another one ever again.

>>62135284
Wait
The Icefrog who made DotA?

>>62145015
You have 10 clicks worth 200$, now you have 1000 clicks worth 2$.
If you had 20.000 clicks worth 3$ each, adding a couple of thousand wouldn't make much difference.

File: 48557902834.jpg (38KB, 470x293px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 470x293px

>>62145082
well said my friend, we cant allow these dirty bastards get money for this, but im ok with google making billions

>>62145106
I'm using Android and also uses almost every single Google's services except their ad network and analytics since I don't run a big website or anything.

However, I am curious about that "privacy respecting" ad network that the other anon here mentioned. What if one day I run a successful blog? Perhaps that will be the day I uninstall every single ad blockers I have on my computers.

>>62145121
find a real job, no one cares about feelings put your blog

>>62145104
this wont fly because advertiser gere would have to pay for all 20000 clicks, eeven if its only $1 that still too much for shit keyword, no one is gonna pay google for this

>>62145132
I do and I'm making about 1.8k per year. Seems pretty decent.

>>62145174
then you dont need ads

>>62145082
where do you even see their ads? surely not on google

>>62135130
so basically, take time an effort to hurt a business with little to no real profit for myself? I'll pass.

y'all just petty fucks.

>>62145174
$1800 a year? that's poverty unless you're living in your moms basement, and even then....

>>62135170
what is this a chart of and why is it relevant

>>62135130
You apple fanboys have really become quite pathetic.

This is silly. It will hurt Google but it will also hurt smaller sites with no other monetization options. Let the normies subsidize your web experience, just use ublock. This just fucks with people for no benefit to you at all

>>62145828
no google shouldn't have messed with us
now we fuck them back

>>62145082
>First, it was just one person on /g/ that mentioned AdNauseam last week.
it was mentioned months ago, and it was garbage so everyone stopped using it
the only reason it's discussed now is the all the board refugees that won't stay on their side of the quarantine line

I am not installing your skid DDoS addon.
Anyone that does doesn't belong on /g/

File: 1466774149846.gif (2MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 640x360px

>>62145828
>mfw enabled clicking on non tracking ads
i hope your site dies

>>62145970
buck to reddit

>>62145970
Stay mad. Your site is dead

Reminds me of when people were installing LOIC like 10 years ago.
Going to skip this one too.
>inb4 moralfag

File: Google Script5.jpg (158KB, 744x501px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 744x501px

>>62138087
Just a couple notes of interest. From the testing of codefag's original GooGun script, we found that the cooldown/sleep needed to be about 10 seconds to reliably avoid captcha for almost everyone. Some were fine with 3-5 seconds. I don't think we ever tried 1 second.

Also, despite our early testing, where we decided that Incognito/Private browsing worked best (thus the message that pops up on the jsfiddle page), it seems to not actually work in Incognito for many/most, anymore. It also specifically says in the AdNauseum FAQ that it does not detect or click ads in Incognito/Private browsing.

How do I install this shit on FF Nightly 57?

Advertising will die soon anyway, companies are realizing it's not profitable to pay for clickfarms in Ukraine to view your ads. Some companies have even stopped advertising altogether, they didn't notice any difference in sales.

>>62138583
set your

extensions.blocklist.level

to level 3 in about:config

>>62138599
> "your browser, your way"
> you can't install an addon because the developer doesn't like it
> he thinks it's okay

>>62145828
> complains it'll hurt website owners
> still pirates all their media even independent works

/g In a nutshell

>>62143485
Are you out of your mind

>Install this addon goyim, make sure you disable private browsing mode so the CIA and other websites can scan your browsing history

File: Clipboard01.jpg (140KB, 1013x640px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 1013x640px

feels good

>>62135130
Go post this in >>> /pol/ where it belongs along with all the shill threads
>>62143498
>Clicking ads is good
>Ignore that they may inject maleware.
>Ignore that it is a dumb clicker from the 90's

>>62150150
>t. Google

>>62143447
Except it relies at advertisers following the do not track rule.

>>62150219
>Telling you to shill to pol not here
>Did not tell you to stop
>Get called Google


This is why 4chan hate /pol/ you make us look like retards.

>>62150241
>complains about fake ad clicks
>expects not to get called out

>>62150241
you dont need to defend google or 4chan, just hide and go to your prefered threads

>>62150257
>Reee get out my thread I don't want people against my meme cause.

>>62150150
Is Google no longer a technology company?
Are they no longer hurting people's internet privacy?
How is that /pol/ related exactly? Honestly, if these threads are on /pol/, mods should probably move any thread of this nature to /g/

>>62150522
This a thread created by pol for pol.

This add-on was not a daily shill till pol got it. Before it was discussed and dropped as irrelevant. It is only pol shilling this shit

>>62145104
Why would you as an advertiser want to pay for fake clicks? What is the benefit you derive from this?

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-29 at 14.50.22.png (121KB, 1269x909px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 1269x909px

How long does it take to start giving me statistics.

Running https://jsfiddle.net/icefrogcode/kqdx7cyb/1/ on an empty profile (Private mode) but vault is empty

>>62152519
private doesnt work

DOWN WITH THE MALWARE

#ISTANDWITHPALEMOON
#MOONCHILDWASRIGHT
SPREAD IT ON TWITTER AND REDDIT FAGGOTS

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-29 at 15.29.34.png (407KB, 1279x890px) Image search: [Google]

407KB, 1279x890px

>>62152582
>private doesn't work
Much better now, still the script shouldn't suggest you running on private mode.

Man all these people saying adnauseum is the jew. Alright fine.

Python selenium used for automated testing can be used to automate this too. We can just make our own code. I've already made my own, leveraging codefag's query list.

>>62150641
Do you have stocks in Google or something? I don't see what issue you take with this.

>>62145771
who is this poster and why is he such a retard

File: Clipboard01.jpg (26KB, 843x100px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 843x100px

running it whole fucking day :DDD

My only problem with this is adnauseam clicks ads on sites you visit that means you are hurting google (very good) but also sites you care about instead of ones you hate.

>>62154487
necessary sacrifice

>>62154487
With stuff like PP, crytocurrency, flatrr, patreon, kickstarter, opengogo, etc, there's a viable business model to ditch ad revenue while increasing the quality of the content.

Ad nauseam makes people so mad I love it

Ad nauseam keeps on displaying "0 ads" and nothing on vault on firefox, what did i do wrong?

>>62154916
Check you're not running on private mode
Check you confing doesn't block any type of ads, just click them

File: 2017-08-29-234035_1920x1080_scrot.png (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

>>62154940
Nice, working now. Just had to make firefox to default settings.

>>62154676
but not really though, through ads you can consume online products for 'free' (what you pay is time and information)

>inb4 "hurt poorfag durr"
most of us were poor at some point, if not you're pretty much admitting to being raised with a silver spoon in you face (respect -10000). in my own experience, if it wasn't for pirated software, I wouldn't have a decent job and I wouldn't have had the opportunities I have now.

If you can't think of a real replacement, then there's no point complaining.

Will this conflict with Either ABP or Privacy Badger?

I installed it and it keeps saying "failed failed failed" for all of them, what do?

Any list of cancerous sites to inflict ad clicking on?

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-29 at 17.57.42.png (7KB, 225x75px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 225x75px

>>62155164
It takes literal 1M (a million) views a month to generate 3k USD (a month).
http://www.minterest.com/how-much-traffic-do-you-need-to-make-money/

I don't think many people can pull this this off unless they're really big (say CNN, Gawker, WSJ) or famous (PewDiePie or any other YT celeb), I don't think you're likely to pull it.
On the other hand, patronage doesn't require you for everyone to give you money, but those who do, don't give you pennies, they give an good amount of money.

I really hope this works, has a huge impact, and that tons of sites that rely on ad revenue shut down.

I want to see how eager /po- i mean /g/ is to actually pay for internet content.

>>62155305
see >>62154676 and >>62155302

>/g/ in 2017 is gloating about clicking on ads

>>62155342
1. This doesn't counter anything I said. I said I want to see how eager people are to pay for content, not what methods of payment exist.

2. "while increasing the quality of the content" - show me where this is true. Which alternative site listed has better "content" compared to the google run norm.

>>62155305
i want this too, let them all die

>>62155378
there will be no pay per content, they will just die

>>62154676
Except, they're now forced to lock content behind the paywall otherwise they don't really have an incentive to donate.
>>62154811
I guess you love being a feminist too with that logic.

>>62155378
HHave you ever been to a shitty clickbait video/article/etc and said "wow, I should give money to these people"?

>>62155446
An overwhelming majority of those clickb8 platforms that continue existing past 6 months are privately funded. It literally doesn't matter if ads die to them. Their social influence means much more to the investors.

>>62155422
Wrong.
If people like it enough they will donate.
In act, I listen to a guy who releases his show for free but gets paid on patreon.
The incentive is to get more content.

>>62155446
No. Have you ever seen people laugh at the idea that web content should be paid for? Yes, which is why you may want some kind of alternative system to offer rather than pretend everyone is going to patreon every currently free site/service they use.

>>62155465
*fact

>>62155422
>I can read for free every webcomic I want for free or donating. My call
>Can't read WSJ without paying
OK buddy.

>>62155465
And how long do you expect people are just supposed to pump out quality content before the patreon $ rolls in?
The incentive to get more content doesn't work if everyone is already getting it for free.

>>62155483
What?

>>62155492
How long do you expect people to pump out quality (youtube) content before the ad revenue starts coming in?

Come on, anon. People do whatever they do on the side until people notice them and they get gud.

>>62155492
There's also kickstarter and opengogo.
also

>>62155530
>People do whatever they do on the side until people notice them and they get gud.
True dat. That's basically the indie game scene. With both examples, the shit no one cares about and the ones that break through.

>>62155561
>That's basically the indie game scene.
Interesting you utilize an example which is rife with shovelware and all it takes to 'make it' is getting a bunch of youtube celebs to play your game.
I thought you guys said quality would improve?

>>62155530
What incentive is there to donate when they are already getting the content free?

>>62155618
Akin to saying that just because you're posting you're improving the quality of 4chins.
Just because there's a lot of shovelware doesn't mean there's not good content being generated, found and supported. If the content is good, people will support it. Just look at the amount of artist working with patreon.

>inb4 it's all porn and furshit
That's what people want to support. If you don't like it, don't support it.

>>62155422
Does me being a feminist make you mad?

>>62155618
>What incentive is there to donate when they are already getting the content free?
If they actually care about or even like the content they are receiving, they will donate.
Even now with all of the ad revenue youtubers get, they still get donations. Why are they getting donations, anon? It's obviously some mistake.

And this guy I mentioned, he quit his job to produce content full time. That's what the people wanted. I don't see any problem with releasing content for free and taking donations.

Ok, let's say this campaign against advertisers is successful and they pull most of their ads.
They switch to another model besides pay per click. People (amazon, for example) already do refferal type ads where they only get money when the clicker purchases something.
ez pz
It's not the end of the world, anon.

>>62155271
pls respon

File: 1503352625080.png (25KB, 136x102px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 136x102px

>hurting the only company that has non malicious ads
>Completely ignoring all the ad companies who spread malware

>>62150150
>may inject malware
t. Pajeet

File: 1498684656448.png (607KB, 1431x804px) Image search: [Google]

607KB, 1431x804px

Long time user reporting in

>>62155271
>>62155763
I don't know about ABP (which you should uninstall because it's shit, ublock is better) but it shouldn't clash with PB.
Although you might not get all the ads you can potentially get while using PB, since it'll will fully block ads/tracking domains.

>>62147947
but you can, you're just too dumb to know how

Reminder that the ONLY way to correctly do this is setting up a GNU/Linux virtual machine with adnauseam installed in Opera and taking advantage of it's free VPN.

File: 08c.jpg (48KB, 600x547px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 600x547px

>>62155923
>GNU/Linux virtual machine with adnauseam installed in Opera and taking advantage of it's free VPN.
Thanks, I was starting to get captchas over here

>>62135130
We always joke about every piece of software being a botnet, this is a literal botnet.

Somebody decided they wanted to fuck with Google, we're the fools using our computing power to assist it.
We aren't the main characters in this story. Whatever political meaning they assign to it, the person or group that claims to be the creator,(s) have control over what our intent is perceived as too.

This is against the terms of use of Google, under the cfaa use of this software is considered a felony. Have fun.


The ad portrait is fun though, I'll concede that

>>62155923

You mean GNU+Linux right?

>Implying opera doesn't log your IP

>We always joke about every piece of software being a botnet, this is a literal botnet.
true, but we join this botnet by choice
>Somebody decided they wanted to fuck with Google, we're the fools using our computing power to assist it.
by choice
> We aren't the main characters in this story. Whatever political meaning they assign to it, the person or group that claims to be the creator,(s) have control over what our intent is perceived as too.
by choice
>This is against the terms of use of Google, under the cfaa use of this software is considered a felony.
Good luck with that.
>Have fun.
I am

>The ad portrait is fun though, I'll concede that
:)

>>62135130
Where is the Ad Nauseum button in palememe? I'm not seeing one after installing.

>>62156013
>palememe
I see why you're having problems

>>62155802
QT as @#$&

>>62155995
>both google and opera gets spammed with foggy trash data

eyy two birds with one stone

>>62156011
Third line

>By choice


gg comrade

>>62156025
I changed the about:config setting already.
I don't want to use Firefox or Chrome, and that doesn't leave much that can run this extension.

File: file.png (4MB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1600x1200px

>>62135284
what if I set all my computers to do this

>>62156036

>implying Google doesn't see the opera VPN cross referencing with their little problem

>implying opera can't do the equivalent of F3 to search for data that looks the same

>implying Opera doesn't give Google what they have because they don't want legal pressure

I need to stop now, this is all semantics, I'm only making myself look retarded

>>62135130

You'll all regret this when ads get 10x more insidious as a response.

>>62156110
If you actually had that setup you should ask /biz/ to tell you what to do with it

>>62156163
if he has that setup he already knows that to do with it without asking biz

File: adnauseum.png (2MB, 2560x1267px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2560x1267px

Bow down idiots and faggots

It is telling me I should deactivate uBlock because it is interfiring. May I do it?

>>62158738
yes you may

>>62158822
Thank you, anon.

I will be testing it in youtube or some webs tonight. uBlock blocked >2k ads while listening only to music so lets see tomorrow.

>>62158861
godspeed friend

>>62135130
I'm trying to runIcefrogs script but no tab is being opened, what am I doing wrong?
https://jsfiddle.net/icefrogcode/kqdx7cyb/1/

>>62135130
how to add icefrogs script to Ad Nasuesm???

>>62150150
>Ignore that they may inject maleware.
From the FAQ:

>Does AdNauseam's clicking put me at risk for malicious Ads or ransomware?

>Absolutely not. AdNauseam simulates clicks on Ads by issuing an AJAX request to the adserver in a background process. This request is made without opening any additional windows or pages on your computer. The text-only request is safely discarded by AdNauseam before it has a chance to execute in the browser (no DOM is constructed and no code is ever allowed to run). Further, all cookies from AdNauseam's visits are automatically blocked before they reach the browser's local storage.

>>Ignore that it is a dumb clicker from the 90's
Stay mad Jewgle. The same way Jewgle tried to destroy regular straight people, we will destroy Google.

if those ads have malware wouldnt you get malware too?

why do (((they))) keep shilling this?

I've been seeing a lot of anti Ad Nauseum shilling lately. People saying it's immoral... as if anyone on 4chan gives a shit about morality. People saying it's malware... with no proof other than a couple of browser developers calling it malware because they don't like what it explicitly advertises that it does. I mean... perhaps the only legitimate argument I could see made against it is that it makes some pages a little less responsive if they normally have a crapload of ads, but I'm pretty sure you could fix that with a config, and otherwise, it's not significant enough to make me want to uninstall.

>>62159194
if you dont get that message to open in private mode then your javascript is fucked

>>62160019
google doesnt have any malware in their ads, its safe to destroy them

File: 1476917054766.png (197KB, 608x541px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 608x541px

>>62135170
hahahaha

>>62137900
explain how it doesn't fuck google right in the ass then

shit they had to pay back a bunch of advertisers this past month

in three months nobody will buy any ads any more

google is finished unless they can sell those glasses and cuckmobiles at a profit you faggot

Which is the better script, icefrog or codefag? The only difference right now seems to be keyword lists, but if I distribute one link over social media is there a risk it will be the one that stops getting updated?

>>62160019
>not running on a strange platform with your browser running in qemu on another strange architecture when you're doing your naughties
casual

>>62154060
thank you for explaining that chart

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-30 at 1.09.22 AM.png (3MB, 2540x1228px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2540x1228px

>>62159736
>google for "google executives"
>it shows pic

>>62135130
Isn't this fraud though. False clicks is a felony. It's a crime in the same tier as murder. I don't think this is a good idea.

>>62155305
>>62155469
>implying there were no websites before ads from google existed
you probably don't even remember when sites had no ads at all and it was the same time when hosting was WAY more expensive

File: google-full.jpg (669KB, 1800x1800px) Image search: [Google]

669KB, 1800x1800px

>>62161889
no it's not fraud, you're in no prior legal agreement with google when some other person pays them for your fake clicks

this is a great idea and the fact that internet nannies like you are in here concern shilling and literally wetting yourselves proves that this is great

>>62138631
We've always wanted an honest paywall dipshit.

>>62138583
just use seamonkey

>>62161911
Are you feeling sleepy, anon? I feel sleepy.
Lets go to bed and sleep.

>>62143485
i bet their entire college site history and all their papers are online

>>62145828
Google decided to become the Internet Police with their anti-conservative botnet AI censorship program.

They need to be put to pasture, Myspace and Friendster and Jeeves style.

>>62162010
i looked at the emails and it's literally nothing

File: 1502692044446.jpg (525KB, 2000x1641px) Image search: [Google]

525KB, 2000x1641px

this will only get better, people were able to piss off google without public knowledge about this addon, but now that public see this shit works it will only get more downloads

my cpm went to 0.42€ from ~1€ :V

>>62162310
isnt that good? you pay less for keywords now :^)

>>62140171
>using your ip/bandwidth to automatically click ads for them.
Who even cares about this? It's insignificant to you but extremely irritating to goolag.

>>62162138
>wrinkly face
How old is she?

>>62162310
o nvm i just got half of my website flagged for porn

>>62143574
>rumored google blacklist
wut dis

Can AdNauseam be used in conjunction with uBO, Privacy Badger, Https Everywhere, and Decentraleyes? Those are my main add-ons...

>>62162433
adnauseam is ublock, just replace it. if the rest dont block ads then they are ok, but something like noscript is a no

Reminder that if you don't want to be blacklisted from clicking ads, do the following:

>ADNAUSEAM SETTINGS: Change the clickrate to only sometimes click the ads
>JSFIDDLE SCRIPT: Change await Sleep (10000) to await sleep (60000 + (Math.random() * 60000));

If you click on +50% of the ads every 10 seconds, you will be blacklisted within a short timeframe.

>>62135130
i'd like to use this, but only if they keep it up-to-date with new changes from ublock origin. do they? or is it just a fork of some old version?

File: 1426382939682.jpg (42KB, 500x437px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 500x437px

Anti-AdNauseam shilling simultaneously started appearing on 4/g/, 4/pol, 8/pol/, 8/tech/, and 8/leftypol/.

Google is out in full force trying to make people stop.

/pol/ and /g/ goes as well as shit and strawberry pie.
Cant we just get rid of /pol/ already?

>>62162739
ublock in itself doesnt update much, its all about filter lists and both use the same lists

>>62145828
All adverts on the web need to die, I actually do want people to go back to hosting content because they want to, not because they want to be paid or compensated for their "service". There was a time when this was not only the norm but also expensive, it's much much cheaper today and if you go the distributed route (Freenet, IPFS, et al.) it only costs as much as your internet bill that you pay for anyway and some low powered mips or arm server.

If some people would chose to not spend the couple of cents extra a month on their electric bill then I can live with not seeing their content over them getting a few cents of profit from hosting their content with ads.

I use the Ublock extension for Firefox, and have used it for over a year with no problems. Now today it is not working, it is in my extenions when I go there but it does not show up on the main browser page. I tried a fresh reinstall and it is still the same, anyone else getting this?

File: Slowpoke.png (13KB, 312x295px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 312x295px

uBlock Origins has stopped working on Firefox, did I miss something?

>>62162414
they have been keeping a list of naughty people

>>62162803
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/commits/master
plenty of commits at least every couple of days.
so the question remains, does ad nauseam merge in those changes?

>>62162846
Then leave.

>>62162753
Take your retardation back to /pol/.

>>62162931
Instead of wasting everyone's time, how about you express your opinion using words.

>>62162911
its open source, if you could find github for ublock i think you are smart enough to find github for adnauseam and check it yourself

>>62162950
This site uses ads. Please leave for your avowed preferred "self-hosted" content.

>>62162964
Before I write a response I need to know, Is English your first language?

>>62162960
yeah but i'm not gonna check every single commit

>>62162989
I said leave.

>>62162993
i think top 10 would be enough

>>62162994
I will not, now answer the question if you want to be taken seriously.

>>62163005
So you're both a liar and too stupid to know you're one. Good combination. How long have you been working on it?

>>62162939
hello google

>>62162994
You are the lone voice, so you get to leave, you retarded sperg.

>>62163032
This site uses ads. If you prefer the type of internet that doesn't use them, why are you here? Host your own web page and sit and stare at it.

>>62163013
I don't know what you're implying where you're inferring it from. Since you won't answer me I'll assume the answer is "no" and give you my patience.

In English, "want" is an expression of desire, it's not indicative of the current state of things. I have no idea what you thought I meant or why you think I have to leave this site just because it's not the desired thing. You'll have to either explain yourself and what you think I meant so that I can help you get on the same page or shut up because you obviously have no idea what you're talking about but continue to misrepresent me through your own misconception. Stop that and answer seriously instead of like a child, otherwise nobody is going to listen to anything you say, let alone orders.

>>62163041
>false dichotomy
top lel

>>62163046
The hypocrisy shows you're too dumb to know your preference.
>"I want to go back to when we didn't have cars!"
>owns a car
If you didn't want a car you wouldn't own one. Owning one shows your true preference.

Here you are on an ad-supported site instead of all the millions of hobbyist ones. Shows you prefer what ads can buy.

>>62163041
This is a crusade against Google. Delegitimizing Google as an online advertisement company will hardly kill online advertisement.

How can you be so fucking dense?

>>62163076
>adds are like cars
World ain't black and white like dat

>>62163077
So it targets only gopgle ads?
I didn't know that

>>62163094
That's the entire point, yes. Hence all the scripts which automatically searches high-value keywords on Google.

>>62163041
> If you prefer the type of internet that doesn't use them, why are you here?
I stand firm in my assumption that you don't understand English, but it's possible that you are insane. Think of "prefer" as "my preference", not "the only choice".

Are you afraid to tell me where you're from? I'm from Philadelphia, a city on the Eastern coast of the US, I am a native English speaker. I am not going to judge you based on where you are from or your native tongue, I simply wish to know so that we can possibly communicate more easily.

>>62163076
We're not talking about cars anbd that's not analogus to my argument at all, it's either an intentional misconstruction or an accidental misunderstanding, either way it's not fair to assert my argument, I am telling you that's not the case and you refuse to give me the befit of the doubt, I can't take you seriously this way.

Analogies are inherently bad to begin with, what you're doing makes me think you're doing this on purpose to construct a strawman and further drive away from the actual point that was made.

What's worse is you're wrong too, 4chan has ads but it is not ad supported, it never has been, moot was very open about the fact that the site never made profit from ads, when they switched to passes they finally were breaking even, it's unfair to say that 4chan was not 1) paid for by the owner and 2) ad supported, especially today when passes are what make the money, not the adverts.

>>62163041
I have a 4chan pass.

>>62163090
Ads support the infrastructure you enjoy. You think a hobbyist is going to host exabytes of storage like Youtube? You think anyone is going to be able to afford to crawl the net and serve up billions of pages a day for a search engine? It doesn't take much popularity for server costs to skyrocket into the tens of thousands a month, so what you're saying is that anything that people actually like must die due to the lack of support.
Ads work because they scale. The more traffic, the higher the costs, but the more ads pay.

>>62163122
Your actions show your true preference, moron. You are on an ad-supported site over hobbyist ones, therefore you prefer what ad support can serve you.

>>62163142
>You think a hobbyist is going to host exabytes of storage like Youtube?
YouTube has to fucking die so the world can go back to sharing that stuff P2P over BitTorrent or maybe something made specifically for the purpose.

File: centralized-decentralized-distributed.jpg (38KB, 600x380px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 600x380px

>>62163142
>You think a hobbyist is going to host exabytes of storage like Youtube?
Are you seriously so retarded that you don't know what a distributed system is?

>>62163163
Are you seriously so retarded that you don't know that nobody seeds?

>>62135130
Your IP gets blacklisted if you click on ads too fast. So what if you modify the script to blacklist an IP as fast as possible? You then bundle it into an APK and run it on phones. Set it up to toggle airplane mode automatically, then you could get your entire mobile ISP blacklisted from google. That would cost them a lot, since phone users are usually their best ad clickers.

>>62163142
I stand firm in my assumption that you don't actually care about this issue and would rather argue about wild tangents instead, none of what you said has anything to do with my original statement, you've supplanted the argument for something you made up. You'd rather see me waste my time reiterating my stance just so you may ignore it and waste time. Fine by me, I will continue to clarify since it keeps the thread bumped.

>>62163160
>You are on an ad-supported site
Objectively incorrect, it has never been true in the entirety of the site.

>>62163142
>You think a hobbyist is going to host exabytes of storage like Youtube?
BitTorrent has thousands of times more content measured in gigabytes.
>You think anyone is going to be able to afford to crawl the net and serve up billions of pages a day for a search engine?
Yes.
>It doesn't take much popularity for server costs to skyrocket into the tens of thousands a month
Only with poor optimization.

>>62163178
Not an argument, hasty generalization with no basis or evidence. This is on par with saying that nobody hosts a website, what an ass.

>>62163188
4chan doesn't pull a profit off its ads. That doesn't mean it isn't ad supported, moron. There are ads here.

>>62162939
even /leftypol/ is in on this

you pissed off the wrong internet

>>62163041
so does google own 4chan or what?

File: 0b4.jpg (35KB, 453x576px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 453x576px

>>62163123
why didnt you post with it?

>>62163210
And they are shilling AdNauseam to all the normie libshits on social media.

This is gonna get good.

>>62163142
>You think a hobbyist is going to host exabytes of storage like Youtube?
All they need to do is use bitchute or zeronet, exabytes of storage aren't needed

>>62163142
>You think a hobbyist is going to host exabytes of storage like Youtube?
Literally Perfect Dark, e2k, bittorrent, freenet, etc.

> You think anyone is going to be able to afford to crawl the net and serve up billions of pages a day for a search engine?
Literally YaCy

Bonus:
>You think anyone is going to contribute their time and effort to generate and revise content
Any wiki ever, newgrounds.com, any link aggregate site like hn, reddit, etc.

> It doesn't take much popularity for server costs to skyrocket into the tens of thousands a month
lol where is this even coming from

>people actually like must die due to the lack of support.
>ads are the only form of support

>The more traffic, the higher the costs
this is only true for centralized

>>62163182
holy shit brb

>>62163227
campaign only started a few weeks back and they're already giving back money

this is fucking hilarious, i've hated google for a long time

>>62163195
>BitTorrent has thousands of times more content measured in gigabytes
No it doesn't. Youtube probably has more hours in cat videos than Hollywood has put out in the last 20 years. Youtube gets five hours of video every second. Torrent sites aren't that active.

File: 1479407394587.jpg (114KB, 745x745px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 745x745px

>>62163239
Their next quarterly earnings report will likely take a small dive as an effect of this.

It's the quarterly earnings report after that, that we will see the true effect this has had.

And if this had a noticable effect, the Google stock is going to drop, costing them billions.

>>62163203
If the ads don't make money, they don't "support" the site, the whole thing hinges on what pays the bills and it's pass sales not adverts. Regardless this isn't important at all to the point I made, whether the site is ad supported or not doesn't mean anything, if it's ad supported I'd rather it not be, simple as that. This is what "preference" is. Let's use a terrible analogy like one of the previous posts; if I prefer chocolate ice cream but you catch me eating vanilla ice cream, that doesn't invalidate my preference or make me a hypocrite.

>>62163292
>support isn't support if I don't want to admit it
Funny.

>if it's ad supported I'd rather it not be,
Why don't you just wish for a stable of supercars while you're at it?

>>62163313
Support isn't support if it's failing to support. Half of a beam is not support. You're welcome to disagree with my opinion on the matter but do not misrepresent my argument, I have been nothing but patient with you and you've been nothing but ignorant. This only make me more spiteful and more willing to spread these methods that will hopefully lead to what I want and you don't, I'm sure others feel the same way. Remember this if you truly care about what you say, you have the opportunity to sway me and the public with reasonable discourse but you chose to repeatedly attempt subversion, unsuccessfully.

Do you care or are you just wasting time? Tell me honestly.

>Why don't you just wish for a stable of supercars while you're at it?
Who says I don't, what harm is there in wishing for a better situation? Wouldn't it be nicer in a world without ads, wouldn't it be nicer with a stable full of cars? I legitimately don't know what your problem is here, that you wish to police thoughts now, it's ridiculous either way.

>>62163279
they are panicking and already sent shills all over the place

i suspect it's having a bigger effect than even we expect, especially because people are using those high dollar search term scripts

>>62163292
>pays the bills
there are no real bills these days, hosting is dirt cheap

also this will drive people to host on decentralized platforms like zeronet

>>62163374
you btfo'd that alphabet nigger all the way back to mountain view

>>62163374
How is monetary income failing to support something that takes monetary income to support? Support doesn't mean sole support. That's why the word "sole" is in there you freaking idiot.

>what harm is there in wishing for a better situation?
You're wishing for things that cost money to be free and basing your plan on this occurring. You might want to rethink the viability of that.
"Wouldn't it be better if supercars were free? Let's get rid of car dealers because I'm sure if we do that we'll end up with free supercars!"

>>62163250
There are 100m torrents. Say average torrent is 700mb (10 latest on torrentproject) = 70 pb
YouTube has 1bil videos. Average is apparently under 70mb, so they have less. Also bandwidth is the expensive part, not the storage. Bandwidth is free since it used unused residential capacity

I support Google.

>>62163402
The other anon is implying it costs some exorbitant amount, I agree with you and hope for a distributed future like it should have been originally in the past.

>>62163413
wew
I'm just a turbo autist that really cares about being genuine and I feel like adverts are the main detractor of it. Would we even have clickbait garbage if people couldn't profit from it? Would people lie as much? Would we have all these supposed shills and additionally the shill allegations if not for this garbage? I want it all gone, I want to go back to how it was, it was less quantity but more quality. The only difference was the technology.

>>62163430
>How is monetary income failing to support something that takes monetary income to support?
I don't think I can make it any simpler than I already said, if it doesn't support it then it's not supporting it. Adverts do not keep 4chan up, previously it was moot that kept 4chan up then it was passes. If you want me to be pedantic
>bear all or part of the weight of; hold up.
"the dome was supported by a hundred white columns"
Of the "or" I take the former, you're welcome to disagree with my opinion on that but it's not the argument at hand, with me asserting that as the definition and making that clear, you have to address it on those terms, by that sense adverts do not support this site, passes do, adverts have always been and continue to be the lowest contributors, the bottom of the list, especially when under 50% is not anything of practical value. To put this into perspective 4chan would actually shut down if passes were not a thing because ads cannot support the site alone, and this is the crux of my point. With that in mind 4chan is not "ad supported", I'll give you "ad assisted" and then immediately tell you what I just said again, that it's marginal and will not sustain the load on its own, e.g. they are not critical in a practical sense.

>>62162787
>he doesn't know about C=

/leftypol/ here - before we start churning out propaganda for various normies can we get a jsfiddle adapted for wider use, specifically with a larger word list and more broadly whatever else you can think of to make it harder to detect by google. Also preferably under a release name that won't make the outstanding minds of social media flip out, unlike "codefag".
Would do it myself but I'm a poorfag so don't have the required seven proxies and my field is design, so it's more effort for me to only potentially fuck it up.

>>62163647
>/leftypol/ here
>my field is design
most jej

File: 04f803adf2060c8722ef245a8772051a4324f5cad98fe8cd89377364fef7f963.png (12KB, 246x200px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 246x200px

>>62163660
Kek, walked into that one. In this case it's the only skill I have that's of use.

>>62150150
It registers a click, it doesn't actually open that shit.

Expanding on my earlier idea: google blacklists IPs doing too many searches. It's more powerful if phone normies can't even use google services, it will cause a lot of disruption.

What did he mean by this?
https://warosu.org/g/thread/S45739448

>>62163702
>used XHR
Can't it trivially be detected?

>>62164157
On my Firefox, XHR always adds an X-Requested-With: "XMLHttpRequest" HTTP header. I don't know if they are disabling that in the extension.

>>62135170
Y axis?

>>62164224
Shekels

>>62164227
How many though

>>62135130

Make a safari version!

>>62145771
Google market share

>>62164244
Rough estimate here. AdNauseam threads have reached post limit on 4/g/, 4/pol/, 8/pol/, 8/tech/ and 8/leftypol/ for about 3 weeks. Several threads per day.

Let's be very conservative and assume that only 1000 people currently use AdNauseam + script.

>500 of them are using it wrong and are blacklisted
>The 500 people using it right can easily click 1000 ads per day on average using the script
>Conservative estimate of $15 per click
>500,000 clicks per day at $15 per click
>$7.5 million per day

I assume there's a fuckton more than 1000 currently using AdNauseam though. So Google better come up with a response soon.

File: 55630.png (95KB, 645x773px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 645x773px

few edits incoming

>>62135284>>62145102
fucking icefrog should be nerfing terrorblade and is instead doing this shit

>>62138290
>disable all the things you use for privacy
you are not doing a very good job at convincing me this isn't botnet

>>62140087
>AdNanuesm is malwared, and & placebo
proofs?

File: 93875908165363.png (87KB, 452x676px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 452x676px

>>62164308
fixed

>>62164282
Ye, but I still want to know the scale of the posted graph or at least it's source.

>>62164282
>$15 per click
what the fuck

File: 1484083593318.jpg (28KB, 250x188px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 250x188px

>>62164335
in reality its much more because scripts use top 2k keywords that are $100 and higher

>>62164360
Who the fuck pays $100 per single click?

I want to install this, but I'm wondering: does it eat up computer resources?

File: 1503773129955.jpg (89KB, 491x491px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 491x491px

>>62164374
>>62164374
big companies, judging by keywords, its mostly lawyers

>>62164335
The codefag script searches the top 2000 keywords. They are extremely competitive (health insurance, corporate lawyers, rehab, plastic surgeons, etc, etc).

Prices fluctate since there are auctions, but many of these companies will easily pay Google upwards of $100 per click or more. Because it's extremely competitive, and because one customer will make sure their profit is in the thousands of dollars.

Simple calculation that businesses use:
>Pay $100 per ad-click
>Expected profit-margin per client is $2000
>On average, 25% of the ones who click ads end up being clients
>$400 is spent on advertisement to bring in that one client
>$1600 profit

>>62164392
>>62164405
That's amazing.

>>62135130
> trying to defeat ads by playing multidimensional checkers with advertisers

no, just fucking block.most foolproof way of telling advertisers to fuck off for good

>>62164625
blocking ads does nothing, our way destroys advertisers and in the end also google

>>62164648
> he thinks the end goal is to destroy advertisers totally

content creators need a source of revenue and we want to keep enjoying their services, ads are the tax stupid people pay to keep the internet alive while the rest of us use adblock and enjoy the best of both worlds. there's enough boomers and staceys to click on dumb shit for all of us

>>62164282
>Conservative estimate
>extreme orders of magnitude off
i cant tell if retard or fetching for (you)s. so here, have a (you)

>>62138583
about:config -> extensions.blocklist.level to 3
or you can disable blocklists completely by setting extensions.blocklist.enabled to false. The second one worked for me.

>>62164669
This has been gone over multiple times, read the thread and contribute something new or fuck off back to the "thinkarium" or whatever you faggots at google call the room with the drawing board nowadays.

>/pol/ and /leftypol/ are agreeing on something for once
Holy fuck this is getting serious, I need to install this extension pronto. Would setting it to always click be a bad idea?

>>62164699
> if you don't want to install the addon i'm shilling for you must work for google

you are choosing to play game with google instead of just opting out. they are a huge corporation as long as you play on their terms they will find a way to unfuck shit up for them

>>62164724
Hey look it's one of the things that's already been gone over. Now scroll up back to the top of the page and read the thread.

>>62164303
If you weren't tech illiterate, you'd understand why it isn't. Hell, you can monitor the extension yourself.

File: file.png (35KB, 1780x111px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 1780x111px

RIP jewgle

/g/uys can someone tell me how do I open this "ad vault" thingy where it shows how much financial damage I have caused and how many ads blocked and shit? I can't seem to find it, maybe I'm retarded.

>>62164693
Do you think there are less than 1000 people using AdNauseam?

Do you think $15 per click is too much?

Elaborate.

>>62164827
> $15 per click
top fucking kek, it's a few cents at most

>>62164783
F

>>62164907
>Knows nothing about AdWords

Go check out what rehabs, plastic surgeons and corporate lawyers pay per click.

Google's annual advertisement revenue of ~$71 billion doesn't come from cents per click.

>>62164976
This

>>62164783
F

>>62164286
> nerfing terrorblade D:

>>62164907
Lie

>>62164286
Why nerf?

>>62162727
>>JSFIDDLE SCRIPT: Change await Sleep (10000) to await sleep (60000 + (Math.random() * 60000));
The codefag script is at (10000), but the icefrog one is just (60000) rather than (60000 + (Math.random() * 60000)); - is that okay?

>>62165128
The absolute best is to make it random, in order to bypass any Google clickfraud detection.

you guys realize this will only strengthen the google ai botnet? ill give it a week or two and then jokes over.

>>62165135
I'm cobbling a build together for the normies but I'm not really into coding. Wouldn't leaving it at math.random potentially put a far too large number in there?

>>62164976
>everyone running adwords campaigns is a surgeon
>all surgeons run campaigns on google adwords
>every keyword on adwords is worth $15 and more
kys and be done with it, youll be doing a favor for mankind

Would it work if I have a hosts file or firewall

File: Clipboard01.jpg (24KB, 940x104px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 940x104px

>>62164783
you are like a small kid

>>62165190
>Everyone are using auto-search scripts containing top 2000 and 20,000 keywords
>top 20,000 keywords with an average click-cost of $97

Look it up. God damn, you're either borderline retarded or work for Google. Whichever it is, neck yourself.

>>62164907
oh wow it's only half a million I love google now

>>62165174
no, Math.random() return value between 0 and 1, if you have no idea whats going on then dont fuck with it

>>62165174
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Math/random
From 0 to 1, so you multiply it. For 10 to 60 seconds (see examples):

Math.random() * 50000 + 10000;

>>62165242
>everyone who uses adwords uses the top keywords when running their adwords campaign
>thus all fake clicks and impressions cost millions
you really want to be dead, just do it already! end your suffering and shame!

File: you being retarded on purpose.jpg (46KB, 667x556px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 667x556px

>>62165310

>>62165270
>>62165294
Fair enough, I just asked for a version with the adjustment and a different keyword list three hours ago and was going to take initiative and do it myself before I have to go, otherwise what I was going to do won't get done until Friday.
See >>62163647

File: 1380141541644.gif (2MB, 320x180px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 320x180px

>>62165310

File: image.png (124KB, 521x471px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 521x471px

>>62165324

>>62164282
>>Conservative estimate of $15 per click

>>62156110
is this a cluster of single-board computers? which model?

File: Capture.jpg (23KB, 1329x77px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 1329x77px

>>62165443
ARE YOU HARD OF THINKING?

>>62165488
you are a stupid child, have you ever even used adwords? jesus christ you fucking kids have no humility at all

keep your ego in check dumbfuck, get a clue

>>62165356
I can't find any keyword list.
Could anyone write a script that gets you blacklisted from as many google APIs as possible? Using curl/wget (preferably wget) and shell scripting (preferably sh)

settings put global airplane_mode_on 1 am broadcast -a android.intent.action.AIRPLANE_MODE --ez state true
...
settings put global airplane_mode_on 0 am broadcast -a android.intent.action.AIRPLANE_MODE --ez state false

Is there an easy way to paste into android terminal?

>>62165488
Don't bother. They're either pretending or they actually are retarded. Either way, not worth responding to.

>>62156110
Limitation is on IPs, not computers.

>>62165520
Someone over on leftypol from 4/pol/ gave me this as a list
https://gist.githubusercontent.com/anonymous/65a93872b6f905b36e5c3eeed18ffcb0/raw/20a55190d908fa00655a10b5598c821504d49122/Top20kCPC

>>62165310
This is what fear looks like.

>>62165517
From Googles own released numbers:

Keyword Average CPC
Business Services $58.64
Bail Bonds $58.48
Casino $55.48
Lawyer $54.86
Asset Management $49.86
Insurance $48.41
Cash Services & Payday Loans $48.18
Cleanup & Restoration Services $47.61
Degree $47.36
Medical Coding Services $46.84
Rehab $46.14
Psychic $43.78
Timeshare $42.13
HVAC $41.24
Business Software $41.12
Medical Needs $40.73
Loans $40.69
Plumber $39.19
Termites $38.88
Pest Control $38.84
Mortgages $36.76
Online Gambling $32.84
Banking $31.43
Hair Transplant $31.37

Notice the word average. CPC means cost per click.

I refuse to believe anyone is as dumb as you're pretending to be.

>>62165583
do you sincerely believe that they are paying these prices for your 16-year-old NEET clicks? just fuck off
you are hopelessly stupid and a massive cunt to boot
probably literally, like IRL, a fat little cunt
or one of those skeletal ones
either way kill yourself kiddo
:^)))

>>62165621
even if they paid far less, its still taking a chunk out of their profit

File: INTERNET IS A FUCK.png (41KB, 415x543px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 415x543px

>>62164693
>>62164907
>>62165190
>>62165443
>>62165517
>>62165621
Silicon Valley aren't sending their best, folks.

File: 78c9258d02db3f6738a8531396320da2d259c25ca17f6298dfcc9c7086a0e334.png (25KB, 286x400px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 286x400px

>>62165659
The google shills arent providing proof that the clicks arent worth that much

File: 1492813856477.gif (3MB, 348x384px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 348x384px

>>62165659
>tfw google thinks all they need to disrupt us are a couple of poos on H1B1 visas with a combined IQ of 75

shame on them

File: craft.png (36KB, 644x513px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 644x513px

>>62165697
uwu