So is this legit or just a meme?

It's not allowed on the google app store but you can manually install it, it's not that big a deal

>>62116737
Yes.

Whether it's retarded or not, it's a legitimate addon, and the only reason it's being blocked is because google and other big ad networks are understandably upset. The excuse of "malware" is repeated now and then, but that's completely unsubstantiated.

That being said it does load in ads so it may slow down page loads if you're on a shitty connection

Well, let's say there's a company you dislike and they sell products named A through Z. What would be more effective: not buying anything from them or buying all their products so they can't know which one you bought the most?

File: Capture.png (2MB, 1902x973px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1902x973px

here's MUH AD VAULT

Does this actually achieve anything?

>>62116737
Basically, it downloads ALL of the ads you come across and then hides them.
You don't actually know if the "automated clicking" is doing anything to fuck their data up, so don't bother.

>>62116801
Assuming all their products are free (as in, you don't pay anything at all to buy them) and they make all their money from analysing which one you bought the most, then the second strategy is obviously superior.

>>62116842
if a lot of people start using it, is going to fuck things harded, i hope the add bubble just burst already

File: boycott.png (7KB, 318x114px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 318x114px

>>62116842
Obviously it does

>>62116869
Isn't that like upvoting all posts on Reddit? It gives everyone +1 so in the end it has no effect.

>>62116842
looks like it does since everyone is getting real butthurt about it

>>62116926
If reddit's profits depended on datamining upvote patterns, then it would actually have an effect.

File: goolag.adsense.png (120KB, 819x490px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 819x490px

>"It's just a placebo /g/oy"

>>62116737
Oh wow, bring down ads so they're forced to change the way they get paid for websites. They'll just move to charging you to visit sites. I can't fucking wait until you have to subscribe to each website separately before accessing it!
Fuck off with your malware addon. It's malicious to the user and the future of internet. Nor will it achieve anything once they fight against it with more aggressive ads and DRM.

You will at best temporarily harm Google's revenue and this is only if you get millions of users on it. After a year or two they'll find a way around it which will be worse than ads.

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-27 at 2.00.27 PM.png (91KB, 427x393px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 427x393px

OP here, a bit of my concern is that its run by two members of the tribe

any reason to use adnauseum over ublock origin?

>>62117032
It's pretty fucking funny nigger

>>62117023
>They'll just move to charging you to visit sites
good, that way I will clearly be able to see which sites aren't worth my time or view so I can ignore them instantly

>>62117032
No. uBlock Origin uses less system resources and performs better, and also doesn't click on ads in background and connect to potentially malicious sites. Adnauseum is literal malware.

Are you being compensated for using it? If not, then it's a scam. Surely something this valuable would be providing us with compensation, if not, who is actually getting the money?

hmmmmmmmmm

ITT Neets who want to fight for freedom by destroying what makes the internet free

Enjoy paying money to view webpages, idiots

>>62117126
funny how the Internet worked in the past without ads

>>62117126
I don't mind ads.
I just don't want "tailored" and "customized" ads.

>>62117115
>who is getting the money
What money? What the fuck are you talking about? How is this "something this valuable"?

>>62117030 is a legitimate concern. You're not.

>>62116926
if one person +1s everything it does nothing. if everyone +1s everything then reddit stops working. the front page would contain the most recent posts since all posts would have the same score. quality would go down (is it even possible?) and people would leave the network.

File: 1503445209518.jpg (25KB, 600x451px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 600x451px

>>62117023
Some anons and their fucking defeatist attitude. If they evolve we evolve. Stagnant faggots like you are a cancer on society as a whole.
>things are bearable right now so leave it be
>trying to fix anything will just make them find out another way to fuck us
You are worse than a normie. At least they don't know any better. Get your shit together anon. No matter what we are all going to make it but we have to keep moving forward.

>>62117030
(((they))) aren't monolithic
there could be competitive reasons at play
pay close attention to their actions

How the fuck do I install any of this shit in Nightly? It's the only usable version of firefox for me, due to the latest performance updates

>>62117238
I dont get money for clicking ads as usual. The businesses who take out ads are getting faulty data and thus the purpose of their adspace purchase is defeated hence they request refunds from google who sold then the adspace. This isn't hard to understand.

>>62117238
>storm a factory producing something evil to stop the production of this something evil, tearing it down
>"You're ruining the evil-production industry! And you're using your own resources to accomplish it! Who gets the compensation?"

Um, nobody? In the example above the "compensation" would be the cessation of production of the evil stuff. In our case, the "compensation" is fucking up google.
Niether the manufacturers of the tools used to tear down the factory, nor the creators of this addon, need receive any compensation of their own either.

What am I missing?

>>62117030
nothing suspicious here goys

File: 1503817565902-bant.jpg (73KB, 632x634px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 632x634px

>>62116737
>not using Iridium

ITT Ungrateful NEETs who think they should get everything without giving anything in return.

You view ads to get content. It's an exchange. If websites can't serve ads then they will charge you to view the website and that's going to ruin the internet. Most people will pay for it too, just you jobless faggots will be left in the dust.

If you want shit you have to pay somehow. You don't pay anything by viewing ads but still create revenue for the website owners.

TL;DR Ads allow you NEETs to stay on the internet. Be fucking grateful.

PS: If you use AdNauseum you're a fucking cancer to society.

>>62117349
come and do something about it, redditman. Or are you just going to sit here and whine?

>>62117349
I pay for internet, $40/mo.
I'm not paying a penny more to be entertained while on said internet.
I also paid for my own computer and router and I decide what packets get to come through, and I don't want to see any ads on my machine in my hours of leisure when I'm already bombarded with this shit outdoors.

>>62117366
The only thing I can do is ask for you idiots to stop being idiots.

>>62117395
You're paying for a cable service from your ISP for $40/mo to be able to connect with other computers. Those other computers spend resources to serve you with content and you give nothing in return. This is being ungrateful.

>>62117455
I don't care, that's their problem.
Stop trying to defend the predatory practices of the advertising industry.

>>62117478
>I don't care, that's their problem.
Further proves my point that you're a selfish piece of shit.

>>62117503
you're really not persuading anyone, keep getting upset as much as you like

>>62117517
Of course I'm not persuading (You). (You) have the intelligence quotient of a brick wall.

>>62117139
There were 10 times less users on it, and it also had ads. If you're talking about the very early days then there were 100 times less users and content/websites weren't so bloated and didn't consume as much space. You have shit web devs and software devs to blame for this, and people who push meme media resolutions (like 4K now). The ad companies have always existed and will always exist.

>>62117214
>things are bearable
You can always use uBlock Origin. No ads will be displayed to you and thus tracking you only wastes Google's resources for no results. With uMatrix you also get rid of tracking.

>>62117395
You pay that money to ISPs, not to website hosts nor website devs. I agree ISPs should be banned and are unnecessary, but only then should you pay for accessing websites. If you do this retardation now websites will be pay only AND you'll have to pay your ISP on top of that.

>>62117023
Fuck you and those who think like you

>>62117349

If ads weren't intrusive, page-load heavy or deceptive, I seriously would not block them. I whitelist that have ads that are not all those things I just listed. But 99% of them suck. So I block them, bitch.

>>62117611
No. Fuck (YOU) and those who think like you. You'll fuck up the free internet. I bet you're against net neutrality too.

>>62117629
the Internet is already lost, it's become a bloated abomination
hope it fucking dies

Seriously, what's wrong with ads?

Yes, data collection and tracking without the users consent is bad, and is alright to fight against. But what alternative is there to supporting websites other than seeing adds, paying subscriptions or donations? And we all know that the third option isn't viable.

>>62117349
Fuck you
The moment facebook and other normie sites ask for a monthly subscription of even as little as $1 they will die and the sooner that happens the better

>>62117649
Who cares about supporting websites?

>>62117649
>And we all know that the third option isn't viable.

It definitely is for websites with a dedicated user base. These also tend to be 'specialist' websites that have high quality content.

>>62117629
The (((free))) internet?
The internet that does its best to shove things down your throat you dont want based on data they collected about you?
Yeah then I guess you could say I want that

>>62116801
>>62116926
>customer wants to advertise his service, pays google
>thousands of fake clicks
>customer has to pay a shitload of cash but gets no new clients
>demands google to secure their platform
>refuses to give them shekels for fake clicks
>considers another, more profitable, way of advertising

>dev decides to add advertisements to his website as a way of getting shekels
>shitload of fake clicks
>google has to pay for them anyways
>eventually google bans his account for fraud, but they already lost lots of shekels and also a site for putting their ads

It works and they know it, otherwise Google wouldn't be so butthurt about it.

>>62116842
It gives money to advertisers even after their ads are blocked and it gives money to every webmaster who has a pay per click contract

That's all it achieves

>>62117808
>advertisers get money for clicks
Holy shit you're retarded.

Can you just not visit sites that practice this if you are only wanting to pay for your internet service and visit sites that only tout non-advertising?

I'm not against blocking ads and tracking but I don't see why we're complaining about using the services of sites that choose to use these tactics. Are you guys just trying to protect normies or something?

>>62116842

Can't target me for specific products if I click on every ad :')

>>62117700

IDK, people who don't want to see the Internet reduced to a bunch of subscription services?
> Follows a link sent by a friend: "We're sorry, our monthly subscription is 1.99$"
> Searches for how to fix a problem: "Get full access to all of our topics for 29.99$ a year!"

>>62117735

Yes, you're right about that. Tightly knit communities will always be here. But there's no way that people would donate to, for example, big e-mail services or video hosting sites.

A no-ads Internet would just be a bunch of niche communities living off of donations and big services which you "have" to pay for, unless you detach yourself from society.

>>62117553
Selfishness is good, now the people who make good things, they don't make their real money from ads, usually donations. And those worth it, well sure subscription. Besides ads don't work any more and will barely have any effect on sales anymore.

FYI from what I hear the best thing to do is set clicking to "sometimes." "Always" is suspicious and would be flagged as a bot or something.

>>62117937
The purpose is to hurt google otherwise we'd just not pull request ads in the first place with umatrix or similar.

>>62118188
What do you mean flagged? Is there a verifiable system in place to detect faulty ad clicks?

>>62117023
>You will at best temporarily harm Google's revenue
Yeah, you wish. The only people they are harming right now are adverisers (I'm one of them).

>>62116737
let's do this you glorious bastards
fuck google

>>62118082
>subscriptions for websites becoming a scourge in the future
This will never happen. If their service is not that impactful, I will not pay. If people are upset by a major service going ppv, then a free alternative will open itself up and create competition in the market. Economics 101 you stupid nigger.

>>62116737
It's pissing off Google.
I'd say it's working.

>>62118509
Ublock just blocks the ads.
Adnauseam actually cost Google money, also it has ublock built in

>>62117643
>>62117779
These. The internet doesn't have cancer It has become cancer itself

>>62116842
It's just short sighted childish bullshit.

>>62116842
Yes... Maybe

Its a fucking meme. Go ahead, prove me otherwise. I want a real proof this works, none of this "google banned it so we think it works" or "google said they deal with botnet clicks so we think it works".

Go ahead, change my mind.

File: google-frontrunners.jpg (571KB, 2896x2896px) Image search: [Google]

571KB, 2896x2896px

WHITE MALES BTFO
GOOGLE SUMMER OF CODE

"The Outreachy Summer 2017 program is wrapping up on 30 August with running a similar length to Google Summer of Code. The Outreachy May - August 2017 internship program offers stipends of $5500 USD and for this session was available to "(i) you are a resident or national of any country or region other than Crimea, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Syria, or Sudan and identify as a woman (cis or trans), trans man, or genderqueer person (including genderfluid or genderfree) or (ii) you are a resident or national of the United States of any gender who is Black/African American, Hispanic/Latin@, American Indian, Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander.""

>>62118318
They're working on one now if they didn't have one before.

>>62117649
I don't have a problem with ads in general.
You can put a logo on your packaging, you can put up a sign or a billboard to tell people about your products.
You can paint the side of a building or rent the space on parking lots.
But do you know what all these things have in common?
They are physical spaces, the resource is scarce so you need to pay in order to do it.

Websites and the trash they throw in your mailbox is forcing it on you.
If a website needs to payment to run, make it easy for people to donate or get sponsors.
A sponsor banner can be a static image, there is no need for tracking.
If you need something fancy, you can have a local banner for each area you have sponsors for. If you do that, you can limit how much tracking is necessary.
There is no need for personal tracking when it comes to advertisement.

I don't mind that stuff like the news is sponsored by the viewers, put a paywall on that shit if you need money. Or make it partially paid like some already do to attract more viewers.
But don't make sponsored content and pretend it is news, don't sell speech to politicians so they can control your narrative.
And if you cannot contain your personal opinion, make it clear what you personally think and what the facts are.
Paying subscriptions is a far better deal.
Then it becomes the customers who control the content, if you lie to them, they leave.
That way capitalism can work.

People who can't survive capitalism deserves to fail.

Do I need uBlock Origin if I have AdNauseum?

>>62117625
this

>>62118931
no

File: 1499728463501.png (57KB, 390x496px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 390x496px

>>62118931
No you don't need uBlock Origin, you should only use AdNauseum.

You may also need to disable other adblockers like Ghostery, NoScript, uMatrix, if you use those. Once you open up AdNaseum, you should see ads within them. Go on Google and search for "data server" and "factoring company" because those are currently the most expensive AdWords for Google.

>>62118082
How is that any different than when someone recommends the newest episode of a tv or netflix series?
You know how to get it and most people just have that netflix account, it is not that expensive.
When it comes to written news, you can still share a screenshot --fullpage if it is important (like what people on here usually do when they don't want to feed the trolls).

Stuff like stack overflow, 4chan, reddit, forums and wikipedia can survive without advertisements, those sites were not a problem in the first place, it costs a bit to run the site, but nobody has to live off it.

File: 1484547868257.png (331KB, 975x1962px) Image search: [Google]

331KB, 975x1962px

Most expensive AdWords (1/2)

File: 1501228872709.jpg (715KB, 800x3500px) Image search: [Google]

715KB, 800x3500px

>>62119005
Most expensive AdWords (2/2)

>>62118703
https://www.wsj.com/articles/google-issuing-refunds-to-advertisers-over-fake-traffic-plans-new-safeguard-1503675395

>Using Adnaseum instead of a great Adblocker

LEL

>Using Chrome at all

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

It seems to prove that adnauseam works, since they didn't block other adblocks.
Where are all the naysayers now?

Make sure to block "non-intrusive" ads and also block them.

>>62119128
And also click them I mean.

File: 1492309216926.png (349KB, 899x1284px) Image search: [Google]

349KB, 899x1284px

>>62119110
Stay mad salty webdevs!

Your $300k/year comfy living off of AdWords is about to come to a crushing end.

Would you still block ads and try to fuck advertising giants like this if they were unintrusive, not obnoxious, and not security risks?

you guys realize that things can be free because advertising pays for them? without ads you'd have to pay to use websites, 4chan isn't the exception

>>62118355
>The only people they are harming right now are adverisers (I'm one of them).
What is your scam? No legitimate business uses those ads.

>>62119078
>none of this "google banned it so we think it works" or "google said they deal with botnet clicks so we think it works".

Try again.

>>62117349
> ITT Ungrateful NEETs who think they should get everything without giving anything in return.

> You view ads to get content. It's an exchange. If websites can't serve ads then they will charge you to view the website and that's going to ruin the internet. Most people will pay for it too, just you jobless faggots will be left in the dust.

> If you want shit you have to pay somehow. You don't pay anything by viewing ads but still create revenue for the website owners.

> TL;DR Ads allow you NEETs to stay on the internet. Be fucking grateful.

> PS: If you use AdNauseum you're a fucking cancer to society.

What's wrong with paywalls?

>>62117349
Joke's on you I only need PTs and they don't serve ads.
I will learn to live without shitpostan (and some rich autist will make an even lighter 4chan clone and host it himself so he can be the admin and make funny bans anyway).

>>62118981
why is adnauseum any better than ublock origin

>>62118082
>But there's no way that people would donate to, for example, big e-mail services or video hosting sites.
Good, host your mail and torrent like a normal human bean.

>>62119199
Donations are the future.

>>62117349
my websides are free, I run them as a hobby
with 8 billion people there will always be places to visit

>>62119199
You realize that you can easily configure any adblocker, with the touch of just one button, to turn off so you can support your favorite websites.

It's probably time for you to fuck off back to Google, shill.

File: 1480905397734.jpg (125KB, 517x768px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 517x768px

>>62119298
Because it clicks on the ads and it costs the advertisers money, eventually it'll crash the ad market and companies like Google will go down as well because 98% of Google's $33billion revenue is from online ads.

People are very scared, Google has banned AdNauseum from its Chrome store for unspecified reasons. The developer of PaleMoon blacklisted the extension as well which is unprecedented. Also you'll see pockets of angry posters on /g/ and /tech/, this is because they're webdevs who make $300k/year for running some crummy website or mobile app that has adverts in them.

>>62119199
>He's poor
It's funny because I'm actually poor and I can still afford this.

>>62119174
You're an idiot right? Because I'm using ad blockers to make sure AdWords users don't get revenue.

Yeah. clearly you're a fucking idiot. Read posts before you reply you brain damaged imbecile.

JUST TESTED ADNAUSEUM AND IT DOESN'T BLOCK ADS. HECK IT DOESN'T EVEN WORK.

>>62119359
Simply depriving the whole market of revenue using blockers is a far better idea. Especially when you can popularize those blockers with normies by mentioning them on your social media shill accounts. No one wants to look at ads. No one wants to see them on YouTube.

Using AdNauseum to fight Google is fucking retarded. Eventually they're figure a way to fight it.

my only hope of killing this place

I've been noting certain posts in this thread and I've reported the relevant ones to Google and the FBI. You're all going to get charged with fraud and computer hacking

>>62117349
I was on the fence about adnauseum but your post convinced me to install it. Thanks.

If it pisses obnoxious faggots like you off, I'll install it on all my corporate workstations (2k machines)

>>62116867
Probably not but will end up downloading some malware bullshit.
Not to mention is not legal to actively try to make a company lose profit like this. I don't know what the term is in English but google lucrum cessans. It's a matter of time til they sue the creator or some random user to scare the shit out of everyone.

>>62118642
/thread

>>62119461
Then continue developing it on the dark web.

>>62119401
>Simply depriving the whole market of revenue using blockers is a far better idea.
Betting all your money on a single horse is retarded.
Some websites block content if you do not disable your adblock. And no, normies don't circumvent that.
Regardless of what you do, they'll always find a way to buttfuck you.
>>62119446
Are you *literally shaking*?

File: 1483931789423.jpg (69KB, 504x630px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 504x630px

>>62119367
You wouldn't be this angry for using an Adblocker. Nice try Googler.

>>62119401
Google won't figure out a way to fight it. If you've ever taken a machine learning course dealing with bad data, you have to apply filtering so you'll end up resulting in some false positives. Either way, Google will be affected and they have been already.

Again, stay salty webdevs.

>>62116737
So what's this thing? I'm reading it's built on top of origin, which is good in my book.
Google hates it, which is good.
Should I get it?

File: 1472795671060.png (14KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 1024x768px

>>62119540
Yes, and make sure it works. You should be able to see the ads it clicked.

>>62119502
>Google won't figure out a way to fight it.
Yep. You're an imbecile.

>>62119490
>Betting all your money on a single horse is retarded.
No. Your plan is retarded. Ad Blockers are simple, easy to use, and easy to promote among the general populace. There is literally no downside.

File: 1484840482367.png (318KB, 466x518px) Image search: [Google]

318KB, 466x518px

>>62119387
You need to disable all the other adblockers, NoScript, etc.

>>62119567
Did that. That's why I have ads now. Because AdNauseum doesn't work.

File: 1485277302266.jpg (166KB, 2000x1500px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 2000x1500px

>>62119446

>>6211956
>disable adblockers, noscript, etc
Spotted the Google shill.

File: 1482047193522.jpg (320KB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]

320KB, 2048x1365px

>>62116737
>Trying to cause Google temporary upset
Yes it's working.

>Trying to send a political statement against a company who's practices are blatant racist against whites, conervatives and meritocrats.

Maybe. They'll solve their way around it and the community will solve their away around that and.... It's like how they don't want us to download youtube vids locally. We find a way, they fix it, we find another way, they fix that.

It's an arms race, and it's hard to tell where it's headed. There are many factors.

>>62119582
These idiots are just trying to trick you into using something that makes you view ads, providing revenue for Google.

File: 1498616509220.jpg (41KB, 651x280px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 651x280px

>>62119582
You need to tell it to hide ads, go to settings and make sure you have the toggles set correctly.

>>62118082
Good, now only small websites/community hosted locally will survive. How the fuck is that a bad thing?

>>62119614
I do. Try again.

Does it simply not work on Firefox?

File: kelp.png (139KB, 479x352px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 479x352px

>>62116737
>freegan autists get a great free browser
>they get mad when the corporation protects their asset by removing freeware that would interfere with the company making money considering they gave the browser to you for free
>autists get upset
there really is a reason /biz/ makes fun of you /g/ooks

File: 1487489941658.jpg (46KB, 665x367px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 665x367px

>>62119611
hi webdev, kiss your $300/yr ad salary goodbye.

File: 1467831515805.jpg (6KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 300x300px

>>62119561
Except the one I explicitly mentioned here
>>62119490
>Some websites block content if you do not disable your adblock.
Here, I even quoted it for you.

>installing a single addon is hard
Dude what

I don't care if you use uBlock, AdNauseum or whatever. As long as you're using one of them you're fine by me. But don't go dismissing other's ideas without giving it some serious thought.

>>62119486
To use it on the clear net?

Sadly doesn't work for me on 04.08 nightly.
I mean it blocks adds but claims it made no clicks.

>>62119643
Yes, retard. You can develop software on the deep web and use it on the clearnet. Or in this case, the browser.

Fucking retards I swear...

>>62119641
But that's exactly what I want you imbecile. Please KYS for the betterment of humanity.

File: 1486738830636.png (825KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

825KB, 700x700px

>>62119626
Hmm, I personally don't use Firefox. I got it to work on Vivaldi, Opera, and Chrome...

Anyways, I use a separate browser or profile for general news and web browsing purposes so that's where the ad clicking takes place. The browser empties everything when I exit the session.

>>62119582
It works in an autistic way. Cant wait to see the creators in jail for this shitty addon. Just use unlock origin.

>>62119005
>>62119027
Are you telling me they pay $50 for a single click?

yeah, you know what
ublock origin works perfectly, I don't think I need this at all
also the thread looks like it's filled with kids

>>62117030
If I learned something from history it's that the only thing jews love more than jewing goyim is jewing jews.

>>62119666
Waste of trips. The devs names are out in the public out there, the users can be easily tracked and sued too. Really not that hard to understand what I said.

>>62116737
Adblockers are a meme in general. Just don't patronize sites that have shitty ads.

>>62119705
Fuck off Google shill. Tell us how they're a "meme" you fucking retard.

Why do I want to sit through shitty ads on YouTube? Go ahead. Give us one legitimate reason you dumb cunt.

>>62119702
Doesn't mean it can't be developed anonymously in the deep web. And no, you can't go after users.

File: 1474575811412.jpg (89KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 640x640px

>>62119686
Yes, I interviewed for Google once and they asked me a question similar to the following:

Q. How much would you charge for an ad for a blender?

I failed the question, but the interviewer was nice enough to reason with me and tell me you'd charge the ad a little lower than the price of a blender, so let's say $20. Now let's the say the item is a car, or a "data store," or malpractice lawyer. The ad clicks can easily go into the $$$, especially for first-page impressions.

inb4 butthurt he didnt get the offer

Would be nice if it actually worked lol

>>62117808
It also messes up their statistics. If a lot of people would start using this then they would have no way knowing of who is actually interested and how effective their ads are.

File: where is windows 9.jpg (97KB, 482x424px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 482x424px

>>62119698
Some people are getting really anal about this for some reason.
I bet there are shills from both sides.

>>62116737
Meh.
https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?t=16504

File: memed on.png (228KB, 300x420px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 300x420px

OTHER PEOPLE:
>Whine whine whine
>How dare you make a decision about what you see on the internet
>THIS IS FRAUD
>We at manchild productions *autistic screeching*

ADNAUSEAM USERS:
>Deal with it

Other people's butthurt is my main reason for using Adnauseam, and no amount of whining will make me stop.

>>62119793
Ad blockers are much more effective. At best, Adnauseum is nothing but a mild nuisance.

>>62119780
Yeah, it's weird how many ppl are shilling against AdNauseum, one guy even got so buttmad he claimed to report us to the FBI. Wtf.

>>62119812
AdNauseum is much more effective. At best, Ad blockers is nothing but a mild nuisance.

File: Screenshot 2017-08-27 at 4.48.05 PM.png (721KB, 1919x1115px) Image search: [Google]

721KB, 1919x1115px

Hey how come ad nauseam misses a bunch of ads that ublock origin catches fine?

>>62116737
if you're talking about adnauseam, it's a complete meme. It takes all the benefits of an ad blocker and throws them away by loading the ads, and clicking on all of them for you, just so you can stick it to internet advertisers that have the gall to essentially pay for all the free shit you want to watch. I'f you don't like ads, block them, don't try to fuck up ads for literally everyone, or else we'll all have to actually pay for this shit.

>>62119847
because it's garbage, don't be memed into using it.

>>62119847
That's what I was saying. I've visited several sites now and the number on the icon says zero.

It simply doesn't work.

File: 1485021405686.jpg (26KB, 357x400px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 357x400px

>>62119831
>ppl
>Wtf
What did you mean by this?

File: JC Researching.png (87KB, 455x451px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 455x451px

>it will download malware
supposedly it doesn't actually load anything it clicks on
see here: https://github.com/dhowe/AdNauseam/wiki/FAQ#how-does-adnauseam-click-ads

>>62116891
if a lot of people use it, those people will get blocked from all ad-based content providers for breaking the shit out of the EULA in an actually illegal and fraudulent way.

>>62119904
>actually reading the code
Bad goy, it's a malware.

>>62117349
Brave Payments are the solution to this

>>62119847
I noticed a few ads don't get blocked, but it blocks the majority of them on mainstream websites. Not sure why your AdNauseum doesn't show any ads.

>>62117214
Fix what ?
What's the reason for this other than to annoy google?

>>62119726
Use ublock, I never get ads anywhere.

>>62119843
Ad blockers completely deny revenue. That's why you're an idiot. Adnauseum will be eliminated by Google.

Shit, you're such an imbecile you can't even come up with your own argument.

>>62117349
>You view ads to get content
and? my mind is programmed to delete that shit in a matter of picoseconds. ads in 2017 are aids.

>>62119266
it fucking restricts content and information flow you fucking idiot.

The goal is to make more content and information free and accessible, by removig paywalls to things like academic journals and scientific publications so people can be more informed, not walling off all content so only the fucking ones with the most money can access it.

>>62116842
Nah it's just pol being retards as usual.
It's like an ad blocker for retards.

>>62119359
they banned it from their online store because it breaks the terms of service by actually committing fraud, something no other ad-blocker does.

File: 1480581462830.jpg (23KB, 646x720px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 646x720px

>>62119991
>Ad blockers completely deny revenue. That's why you're an idiot. Adnauseum will be eliminated by Google.
And AdNauseum actually hits them where it hurts. How exactly would Google "eliminate" AdNauseum, you think they're going to zap it from my computer HDD?

Stay mad salty webdev, your $300/yr adword revenue is coming to an end. Or maybe you work for a shady company that relies on AdWord.

File: 1473175533704.png (46KB, 819x490px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 819x490px

>>62116737
ADNAUSEAM KILLS GOOGLE DEAD!

>>62116962
Ah so it's just pol stupidity.

>>62119634
The /g/ooks didn't get mad at ad revenue, some of us just blocked ads. We got mad that they bacame so blatantly political against free speech. So some of us hit (((them))) with some malware.

Fact: If Google was completely politically neutral, and hired solely based on merit, this never ever would have happened.

File: 1474356500356.jpg (197KB, 633x758px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 633x758px

>>62120016
It's not fraud, they even explain it on AdNauseum how it's not fraud. Google gave some lame excuse to ban the plugin. Stay ignorant and salty my friend.

>>62119847
please file a bug here: https://github.com/dhowe/AdNauseam/issues

>>62117032
Not unless you're a pol monkey.

>muh adnauseam going to gibme dem viruses senpai
If you read the github FAQ, you would know that it BLOCKS (not hides) ads from malicious domains.

Additionally, even if it wasn't blocked, it uses AJAX to request the data, and it never gets processed by the browser after being clicked. The request is sent -- the response is never processed.

>>62117563
> 100 times less users

More like 100 thousand times less users.

File: 1492165340276.jpg (34KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 480x480px

>>62120051
I never go on cancerous /pol/, I'm a /g/entoo and I support this plugin.

>>62119699
>If I learned something from history it's that the only thing jews love more than jewing goyim is jewing jews.
This.

>>62116842
If every person that currently uses ad-block switches to it, on-line advertising as we know it is basically over. I'll let you decide if that's a good or bad thing.

It only works if the majority of internet users activate it
Also I have shitty bandwidth so I am not using it

>>62119847
update your lists.
also, add lists specific to your country/language/geolocation:

https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Filter-lists-from-around-the-web

Using adnauseum right now, why can I still see ads by google on search results?

Why nobody thought of this before?
Why isn't there a virus that spreads and just give fake clicks to ads?

>>62120161
Can confirm.

>>62119621
Shit content.

>>62120168
>Why isn't there a virus that spreads and just give fake clicks to ads?
You mean like a botnet, repeatedly spamming requests?
Now that would be very effective desu.

>>62116842
Too early to tell. Also OP is manufactured dissent.

>>62120168
That's a good idea. Let's make it.

>>62120216
>>62120233
It would completely kill ads
It would only use a tiny bit of bandwidth so people wouldn't even give a fuck

Google has a very sophisticated system that filters out junk clicks. Why is this even a topic? Are you dumb enough to believe they haven't already reverse engineered Adnauseum to see how it works so they can combat it?

>>62120168
>Why nobody thought of this before?

People weren't pissed off enough. The more intrusive and annoying the ads get the more pissed off people get and pissed off people tend to get creative. At first we countered ad bullshit with simple pop-up blockers, then, as ads got more insane, ad-block was created, since then things got even worse, so here we are.

((adnauseam)))
just use ublock

>>62120253
If everyone uses it then they can't filter it out

>>62119847
By default, ads that abide by the "DO NOT TRACK" order are not blocked.
You can change that setting tho.

>>62120253
>reverse engineered open source

you must be intelligent!

>>62120253
>Google has a very sophisticated system that filters out junk clicks.
If you've ever taken a machine learning class, you'd know if you have to filter out negatives, you'd also inevitably filter out false positives as well, hence reducing revenue.

Also Google has had to refund some of the money back to its advertisers because of fake traffic clicks.

is there a script which surfes automatic? or for example lets me define words that will be searched? I would feed it with the most expensive ad words and let it loop

>>62120284
Are you saying they haven't researched a way to combat this? Idiot.

File: 1461548635922.png (274KB, 640x401px) Image search: [Google]

274KB, 640x401px

>>62120233
I do hope someone makes it though.
I want to see them crash and burn.

>>62120323
You don't need to reverse-engineer something that is open source

>>62120271
And if everyone uses ad blockers they'll get no revenue at all. Your idea is crap. Normie Joe isn't going to use Adnauseum, but he can be convinced to use an easy to use adblocker.

>>62120317
Yes, this has been discussed, some of us are working on our own versions

>>62120340
random noise is better than silence

>>62120335
You didn't answer the question idiot.

>>62120340
Except for the few instances they're forced to disable adblock.

>>62120001
what the hell does this have to do with pol? why do i always see posts like this

>>62120361
Because there is no point in answering that question

>>62120323
they surely look into this but what I am saying is that you are a freakin moron because you said they'll reverse engineer open source, faggot

>>62120357
No revenue is better than fake ad clicks.

Isn't this fraud?

>>62120317
>>62120347
>is there a script which surfes automatic?
http://makeinternetnoise.com/index.html

File: 1475702224021.jpg (55KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 640x480px

I've fallen for too many /g/ memes and I have learned my lesson now.

No thanks, I'm sticking to ublock.

File: 1479457274170.jpg (33KB, 582x600px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 582x600px

>>62120323
I think I've figured out these Google-shills, they're tech-illiterate, very emotional, even threatened to "report us to the FBI and NSA."

Probably they're college kids obsessed with Google and see them as their dream job and don't want us to rain on their parade. Starting to make sense.

>>62120377
Because you don't like the answer.

Because it negates the purpose of this entire bullshit topic.

>>62120378
Doesn't matter what I said faggot. The truth is they'll easily figure out a way to deal with this, especially because it's open source.

Now you see why you're stupid.

>>62120381
Why can't I click ads for fun?

>>62120381
No it's not fraud, the AdNauseum folks explained on their website how it's not fraud.

>>62120399
>Use something that gives false clicks to ads, which Google easily filters out.

>Use something that denies them revenue completely.

Spotted the Google shill.

>>62120347
>>62120384

hopefully you will release it

thanks for the link

>>62120432
>which Google easily filters out
Source?
Thought so.

File: 1479714553110.jpg (358KB, 2000x1087px) Image search: [Google]

358KB, 2000x1087px

>>62120432
>still doesn't understand what we're doing here
>mfw

Stop shilling for Google, you shill. Your reverse psychology is such fail.

>>62120381
You're fraud.

>>62120462
>Source?
Common sense.
>>62120469
>Please give google your ad money! It's their biggest source of revenue!
Spotted the google shill.

>>62120405
>Doesn't matter what I said *repeating now cursewords like a kid

of course it matters, that was my whole point!

I pointed out that you must be very intelligent; now you admit that you meant something totally different-> thats what freakin stupid people like you do! just stfu and learn to accept that you f'd it up and now try to change the subject

you are a living example of a stupid moron you human garbage

>>62118054
Sure they can. Because you load the ads they know which websites you visit and can build a profile from that.

They need to release a web-ext version

>>62120506
You're clearly an angry little idiot because the entire purpose of your bullshit thread has been negated.

You want people to waste their time doing something that truly won't hurt Google at all. The easier and most simple solution is to just use an ad blocker to deny them revenue.

That's why you're such a low functioning autistic retard. You can't even grasp the basic truth. It triggers your autism when people clearly point out that you're an idiot and you're entire idea is bullshit.

File: 1490362761048.gif (631KB, 153x200px) Image search: [Google]

631KB, 153x200px

>>62120498
Sorry, you're the Google shill wanting to work for the company. Too bad you'll never work for them because you're too much of an idiot to figure this out.

>>62120317
>>62120347
http://jsfiddle.net/codefag/3t9r045q/
For specifically targeting google adsense.

>>62120462
>Source?
Filtering random machines would be harder, but normal users usually leave their Google accounts logged in. And obviously Google has access to their own fucking cookies, so they can identify you easily.
>random users sent 1 million ad clicks today
>"Seems legit" - t. Google
It's not going to work THAT easily. They'll tweak their code.
>he thinks he's anonymous on 4chan while posting from his regular browser
kek

A botnet would probably be harder to filter though.

>>62120540
>Please give Google your ad clicks! They need the monies!!
Sure thing Google shill.

>>62120532
what is wrong with you? what makes you think I started this thread? ah I see because you think Anonymous is a username.... oh my gosh, you are a brainwashed idiot of it's own kind...rofl

>>62120498
>Common sense.
So not a source then, shill.
Simply say "I do not know"
Or "I think, but have no proof, that..."

Or shut the fuck up faggot.

>>62117349
Fuck you, if people want to post their content they should pay, not me.

>>62120579
Yaaaaaaaaawwwwwwnnnnn

We can only combat a botnet with another botnet
Let's do it /g/entoo

File: 1476165880225.jpg (102KB, 676x720px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 676x720px

>>62120560
Just amazing the amount of stupidity in these Google shills. Gotta think long-term man!

>>62120608
>Give us those clicks! We need to pay our employees at Google!
No.

File: 1496816738705.jpg (126KB, 379x568px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 379x568px

>>62120607
Yeah, I'm done arguing with these college kids who want to get into Google, shilling for Google. Let's /g/et to work.

File: 1501587866142.png (1MB, 1600x863px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1600x863px

>>62120545
Thanks, running this. Can we make a /g/eneral thread out of this where we share code on automating this stuff?

File: 1461264949661.png (356KB, 629x643px) Image search: [Google]

356KB, 629x643px

>>62120579
>rofl
>ellipses
He's doing it again.

Don't be a fucking pussy and go all out like >>62120607 said. Google will just use their analytics cookies to filter obvious malicious traffic anyway.

>DON'T USE IT, YOU'LL HURT REVENUE :(( muh free internet
>DON'T EVEN BOTHER, THEY EASILY FILTER IT OUT
>YOU'RE GIVING THEM FREE MONTEY!!
Well, which is it?
If it isn't going to do anything, why do you care? lmao
Also, there is an option to click ads randomly, not 100% of the time.

Fuck all of you moralfags. I want to watch it all burn.

File: NZKZFZoPFldLOSnK0cNNfHLscRMkJIk5-YcslBfj13w.png (126KB, 680x476px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 680x476px

you know it works since google bans it from chrome just like they do youtube downloaders.

everyone should be using ad nauseum. it sends fake requests to the ads, it doesnt actually "click" on them from your computer so youre safe from any possible issue with clicking and performance, also it has built in ad blocking using ublock origin

INSTALL NOW

File: marco.jpg (113KB, 960x1280px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 960x1280px

>>62120681
>Google will just use their analytics cookies to filter obvious malicious traffic anyway.
k den

I'd use it if it actually worked.

>>62117023
OY VEY DONT GO CAUSING TROUBLE FOR GOOGLE, GOY

>>62120714
If Google weren't this intrusive, this wouldn't be happening. As it turns out, they know more shit about you than your own mother.
What makes you think they can't filter you? Have you at least logged out of all your Google accounts in all devices sharing the same IP?

Also please write like a normal human being. It makes your shilling stand out.

>>62120762
>I'd use it if it actually worked.
It does work. What's the issue?

>>62120836
It doesn't actually block or click any ads. Seems like a big deal to me.

>>62120862

I had the same problem; I removed ublock and then installed the extension provided from their website

>>62120277
I changed that setting and the ads on drudge report still are not blocked but they are blocked by the official ublock origin.

>>62120712
It doesn't work for me. I mean the ublock part blocks ads, but the extension is only able to click ads on google.com from what I've tested (and I use DDG so it would never be able to do anything).
Dunno, maybe it works better on Chrome or stable FF, I'm on Nightly.

>>62120862
Disable any other adblock and restart the browser.

They have some troubleshooting too.

>>62120959
That's the first thing that I did.

File: 1502505037369.png (277KB, 469x452px) Image search: [Google]

277KB, 469x452px

>>62117629
>free internet

It's not gonna save the world, but it might save the internet.
Keep doing it, you're doing god's work.

>>62116842
It fucks with all ads equally so Google won't be losing any marked share.
They'll also probably notice an IP adres clicking almost all ads.

File: 1485380794611.gif (2MB, 350x251px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 350x251px

>>62120984
Personally, I installed another browser and use that for general web browsing purposes. I also have it clear everything upon browser exit or have it remember nothing.

Also, AdNauseum does not work in private mode, even if you enable it for private mode.

>>62121093
>It fucks with all ads equally
False, it does not fuck with ads respecting the "DO NOT TRACK" order.

So it fucks with google and any company tracking you, thus treading on your privacy.

File: 1478779983227.jpg (65KB, 800x537px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 800x537px

>>62121093
>They'll also probably notice an IP adres clicking almost all ads.
I have a dynamic IP address, once I trash this IP, I can manually change my IP to another one.

There's another guy creating a script to autoclick ads on his raspberry pi's and will place them in public WiFi hotspots and have it rip 24/7.

Also some of us are talking about doing this on Amazon EC2 free-tier and other cloud providers, forcing Google to blacklist entire IP ranges.

Also I have VPNs and proxies which I have the scripts from to click Google's ads.

File: e9701.jpg (15KB, 254x257px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 254x257px

>>62119791
>those comments

>>62121117
Doesn't appear to work in normal mode either.

>>62116737
>So is this legit or just a meme?
Just a dumb meme.

>>62121167
>Doesn't appear to work in normal mode either.
Works on my computer (TM)

>>62121152
You can disable that. Argument invalid.

>>62121171
No it's legit.

>>62121171
>Just a dumb meme.
t. Google

>>62121187
>You can disable that.
Well, sure, if you want to fuck with everything and if YOU WANT the extension to be basically useless, you can.

But if you leave it by default, it actually works and encourage companies to not track.
It's good.

File: a7b.png (295KB, 986x1356px) Image search: [Google]

295KB, 986x1356px

>>62121160
>>those comments
Damn man, people are salty.
Also, Palemoon is now dead in my book.

Brave is pretty nice.

>>62121152
How does it know the ads respect "do not track"?

>>62116737
Its just a meme

The only reason you see it pushed is because of the /pol/tards infesting /g/ who are butthurt because Google is rightfully cracking down on racist hate speech so they spread memes like adnaseum or the lie that Chrome is a botnet

>>62121291
Hell if I know. Maybe what's written in the cookie? There's more detailed stuff on the website of Ad Nauseam.

>>62121294
If it was just a meme, most browsers wouldn't go out of their way to ban them, like Palemoon did, alienating his userbase.

>>62121294
>Google is rightfully cracking down on racist hate speech

"First they came for XXX, and I didn't say anything because I wasn't XXX...

>>62121353
its a meme

The Jews who are running adnaseum are getting all the Money from the fake clicks, so are the companies

>>62121377
>The Jews who are running adnaseum are getting all the Money from the fake clicks
Source?
That's what I thought.

>>62121377
I'm going to need you to explain to me how blocking ads and spoofing clicks earns adnauseum money

>>62120367
>if I don't like it it's /pol/ fault

File: 1491150450780.png (1MB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 640x640px

NEW THREAD

>>62121416
>>62121416
>>62121416

MIGRATE

>>62121416
>>62121416
>>62121416

how much extra bandwidth do i need for tIs bullshit?

my internet sucks ballz

>>62117126
I already pay my ISP, fuck off jew, your website your responsibility to pay to host it

>>62121452
I'd recommend you just keep uBlock Origin and such on your regular browser. Just run the script we have over at the Google general thread during the night while you sleep on a different profile or another browser.

>>62121409
They want to devalue ads in order to massively purchase ad space and spread whatever shitware/malware they want. Similar to how discord exploded in popularity.

File: 1492714264974.jpg (88KB, 669x696px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 669x696px

>>62119791
>>62119791
>It doesn't take a large percentage of visitors with AdNauseum to raise a flag in their algorithms, especially considering most people visiting websites with ads don't click on them religiously.
Oh boy, this can be weaponized.

>>62120016
>clicking ads is fraud
?

File: Screenshot_20170827_154050.png (472KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

472KB, 1920x1080px

>>62116737
There's a better solution, pic related.
Ignore the temp, this is running on a VM so I'm not sure where it's getting the temp from as the host machine is at 40C right now.

>>62118718
your picture has a white (fe)male in it.

File: 1457198824643.jpg (221KB, 1312x738px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 1312x738px

>>62121156
>>62121156
>There's another guy creating a script to autoclick ads on his raspberry pi's and will place them in public WiFi hotspots and have it rip 24/7
>This is the beginning of the passive, ongoing dystopian cyberpunk warfare against the globalist machine

Get ready to say "Back in my day, Google was just a web crawler, we only needed seven proxies. And gas was three dollars!"

>>62121560
I don't think you understand how basic supply and demand works...

>>62116842
It prevents google from building a profile on you. The idea behind it is you can't be specifically profiled if you click on every single ad, it's supposed to render their data useless.

That's the idea any way.

>>62118642
I don't understand how it's childish, that's a pretty retarded thing to say. Are you a retarded adult? It must be tough being that weird ass adult that hangs out with teenagers.

File: 1498894146678.png (871KB, 1468x1080px) Image search: [Google]

871KB, 1468x1080px

>all this assblasting over "muh ads" and "muh ad freedom"
Top jej. I installed this thing a few days ago. Good uBlock Origin fork in my opinion.

Glad to be part of the people who will force ads out of the online world. Not only am I blocking the content, I'm getting advertising account flagged for adbotting. Fucking kek.

Make better content and I'll pay for it. Fuck advertisers and fuck advertising companies. I hope I got 4chan's account suspended too.

so, this thing LOADS ads, CLICKS on them and then HIDES them?

why the FUCK would anyone install this garbage, loading ads is the same as loading malware in many cases and you still get tracked.

why not just use an adbloxk though?

>>62122158
>>62122209
lol

File: hostsman.png (35KB, 349x369px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 349x369px

>not blocking ad providers in your hosts file

>>62119199
There are only 2 websites I need, so not my problem

>>62122209
There are several antimalware filters

>>62122381
those filters can't magically predict what url the malware is going to use next. as long as shit is being loaded you are at risk of being infected and tracked and pages load slower, too. this is the most retarded addon i've ever heard of

>>62122404
So suddenly, everyone who uses ublock is in danger even tho noone has complained?

>>62117104
it just sends a post request without reading the response data.

>>62122463
yes, which is why you use umatrix to block scripts. how stupid are you?

>>62122480
I am neither stupid nor in danger of malware. I run zero security software and no updates. System handles exactly the same to the megabyte of RAM as a fresh install

>>62122502
>i'm completely fucking retarded
wtf happened to this board

My website uses affiliate ads.

Could you please install an addon that buys stuff from websites you visit? Thanks in advance.

>>62122514
You fell for the "security" meme like a littoe kid.

>>62117023
You're soon going to be doing that anyway because you voted for Trump.

File: 1468629836897.jpg (16KB, 654x640px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 654x640px

>>62122502
>no updates or security software

>"I leave my front door open but I haven't been robbed yet!"

I know you're probably baiting anon but I had to respond anyway

>>62122569
*unlocked while at home

>>62122569
If he's not on Windows there is no issue with doing that. Especially on stable software intended for servers like Debian derivatives.

>>62116790
>That being said it does load in ads so it may slow down page loads if you're on a shitty connection
Only compared to raw uBlock Origin of course. It's still faster than no adblock.

>>62119923
So just like them unsuccessfully trying to block out adblockers in general, right now?

>>62122632
Security through obscurity is a risky venture anon.

>>62122650
It's even faster than adblock or adblock plus.

>>62122755
It's not security through obscurity, it's not being stupid. On GNU/Linux you're in charge of everything so if you get a virus it's usually on you. On Windows, it's usually because a stupid amount of things need administrative privileges which you don't learn are dangerous as fuck by using Windows.

File: nna9zbo6zp.gif (1000KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

1000KB, 500x281px

>>62122502
>"System handles exactly the same to.."
>It's a computer
>It "handles"

I just want the old Internet back, plain html with hyperlinks,images and some videos. No java at all, no popups no ads. Please make it so.
New small websites will flourish,they'll get linked toghether,they'll form 'rings' again. Google being just an efficient search engine , like in the early 2000