is the dark web worth shit if you're not a pedophile?

File: 1503143876156.png (88KB, 911x718px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 911x718px

only if you are not a racist

>>62112238

get drugs on, yeah

>using the term darkweb unironically

>>62112238
No. Our ISP puts you on a higher priority in watchlist if you use Tor too much.

>>62112344
you -> vpn tunnel to some vps provider geographically near you -> tor

>>62112365
VPN users and high amounts of data being sent to a single IP are marked too.

>>62112395
"it's for work" tho

>>62112395
Everyone gets marked!

>>62112261
(You)

>>62112409
2TB of "work" per month.

>>62112453
conference calls muhdood

Is the clearnet worth shit if you're not a pedophile?
Why don't you try and find out?

Is there something like github on darknet? So I could feel like 1337 haxor commiting my 'hello, world' on darkweb

>>62112547
http://git.psi.i2p/
http://git.psii2pdloxelodts.onion/

>>62112238
There are lots of libraries and knowledge bases.

>>62112453
Yeah. So what? I'm on every watchlist ever anyway.

>>62112567
thanks

>>62112332
shadow web?

>>62112332
hide and seek web?

>>62112261
what, that should not be able to work

>>62112238
Yes
t. Drug dealer pedophile

>>62112261
>what is open source

>>62112238
This is like asking if its worth being into trucks if you're not a terrorist.

>>62112332
The Mariana Trench web?

>>62112772
Because the image is fake. It was instantly dismissed in reality.

It really worries me how quick people are to believe something just from an unsourced screencap

>>62114041
It wasn't fake. It's a real image.
Just that the 'issue' was immediately shot down.

>>62112238
You need it if you need to do something that should not be tracked, which means most valid uses are against some big authority that can inspect your packets.
So, well leaking things from horrible regimes, denouncing corruption on your company, buying dragon dildos..

>>62112344
Having worked for the largest ISP on the planet I promise you we don't give a shit, can't be bothered, and honestly couldn't even keep up without a government agent telling us we have to.

>>62114094
Thank you for repeating what I just said?

>>62112395
>shadowsocks
>innocent youtube vk game torrent traffic in the background
Try me.

How do you guys feel about I2P, Freenet, ZeroNet, etc. in comparison to Tor?

>>62112332
you're mom's ass web?

>>62112238
I've wanted to checkout tor but never bothered with it because of the same concern as OP.
>>62114142
I'm sure there's sites that are only accessible through tor. Since most normalfags are clearnet only, I was hoping to find sites like the internet of old, well, without the flashing/rotating gifs and blaring midis. Web2.0 was a mistake.

>>62114859
Also, is it any different to host a small website on tor? I'm sure one doesn't buy domains or pay a host like usual hosting, right?
Sorry for the obviously dumb questions but I've never really looked into as I'm sure just googling these questions will land you a higher rank on a watchlist.

>>62114954
rtfm kiddo
their wiki answers all your questions

>>62115011
fair enough
thanks

big thankies from mcspankies

but how else do I sell weed without having to get to know druggies?

>>62112261
>he doesn't know they closed that issue and told the guy to fuck off

>>62114743
ZeroNet has zero anonymity. Last time I used it it was trivial for a user to basically track another user's activity across the network.

Freenet and i2p are good. i2p supports torrents and has a built in torrent client. I think people used to the "typical" modern internet would find i2p easier to use. Freenet is basically designed to be a decentralized datastore. This means that anything uploaded to the Freenet network is distributed to other peers and accessible even if the original uploader goes offline. Files are pruned from the network based on "popularity". Less frequently downloaded files are pruned sooner. Additional functionality has been built on top of this decentralized datastore.

You could argue about the security of any of them until the end of time, but Tor, i2p and Freenet all suffer from the same fatal flaw: If an attacker owns a significant portion of the network he can deanonymize users.

>>62114743
I2p is java so quality will vary

>>62112238
Yes, they tolerate way less shitposting on most forums over there.

>>62112238
No.

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-27 at 14.52.44.png (197KB, 1556x908px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 1556x908px

>>62112261
Nice FUD faggot.

>>62112238
jimmy was in the wrong here

>>62112344
>already on a watchlist
>tor actually helps me by encrypting my traffic

Well then I don't give a shit

>tfw use windows anyway so using tor is redundant when gchq can literally log into my machine any time it's connected to the interwebs

At least this makes the fuckers work for it, and if a tool ever comes out which can detect past intrusions then I'll sue the government

File: 1477991301966.gif (28KB, 500x415px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 500x415px

>>62114418
>(((You)))

Your shekels are waiting in your offshore account

>>62119012
Based Jews!