Thread replies: 7
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
File: Intel 8700K.png (23KB, 762x330px) Image search:
[Google]
23KB, 762x330px
>New Coffee Lake 6 core i7-8700K
>same single threaded performance as 7700K
>only slightly better multithreaded over Ryzen 1600X 6 core
T O P K E K
So this is Intel's answer to Ryzen? I expected much better from a company worth $170 billion.
>>
File: intel_j.png (148KB, 763x930px) Image search:
[Google]
148KB, 763x930px
Who would have expected any better?
>>
>>62109456
CPUZ is a meaningless benchmark desu.
>>
>>62109456
>Intel has better IPC
Intel fanboys shouted
>4.3Ghz bearly can keep up with 4Ghz
>>
>>62109618
They even "fixed" it because Ryzen was performing "too well". It's not biased to amd in any way.
So it's much better than most benchmarks posted.
>>
File: IMG_5430.jpg (50KB, 639x640px) Image search:
[Google]
50KB, 639x640px
>50% more threads
>40% more multithreaded performance
>>
>>62110063
Intel admitted a long time ago there would be IPC regressions to get higher throughput. If the chips are nuclear hot (unlikely but possible) then Intel truly will have done what AMD couldn't - make bulldozer V2.
Thread posts: 7
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3