Why would you use a shit """"browser""""

>>62078497
What """browser""" is not full of security holes? Are you literally fucking retarded?

>>62078890
firefox doesnt even compete in pwn2own any more because it's too shit

>>62078497
Firejail, and agent spoofer, and NoScript severely limits the amount of damage that anything on the web can do to my system. DNSSEC/TLSA Validator and HTTPS Everywhere limit the damage I can do to myself online.

While Chrome can do almost all of these things, they can not do NoScript. Therefore, I would argue that FF is more secure.

>>62079001
>, they can not do NoScript
umatrix

>>62078497
And what the fucks it got to do you with what I use? do you hae some kind of mental problem?

File: 1500923444460.jpg (203KB, 708x847px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 708x847px

>>62079001
>firejail

>>62079125
Neat. I prefer NoScript.

Of course, I was just going by add-ons. I forgot about WebGL, which I don't think any other browser has a workaround for, whereas on FF and its derivatives, you can just disable it.

>>62078917
How does that refute my point?

>>62078497
"Botnet" is a privacy concern, not a security one. By default Firefox is the most privacy friendly mainstream browser. Furthermore you can harden Firefox both on the privacy and on the security front with extensions and config settings. Sandboxed tabs should also improve things on the security front when they come on FF 57.

>>62079001
>agent spoofer
Literally does nothing

>>62080170
Are you fucking autistic or just pretending to be?

>>62082306
firefox was at pwn2own this year. all the browsers at pwn2own get routinely owned, and mozilla patched the hole in less than 24 hours. firefox will be less vulnerable in the future as more of the codebase is hardened with rust which eliminates a whole class of attack vectors.

>>62078497
>security holes
citation needed
>botnet
citation needed

Same /pol/tard that's been shilling against firefox the past month

>inb4 install chrome

>>62079170
I prefer hand crank starting my car too.

>>62082551
>implying /pol/ would shill for chomeshit

File: dudewhat.jpg (103KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 480x480px

>>62082306
>Someone asks a question relating to the discussion
>Respond by calling them autistic
You lost this one by resorting to the old ad hominem logical fallacy. Take this L and go home

>>62078497
Nobody uses it. It's just shills paid by Soros.

>>62078497
chrome is for valley girls and transsexuals

>>62081163
Why do people still use agent spoofers? Are there any evidences to support their claims that it makes their browser safer?

>>62084944
It doesn't make the browser safer. It just fucks up Mozilla's and Linux' marketshare since people tell ads and trackers they're on windows/chrome. So it's generally a retarded thing to do and absolutely pointless.

>>62079001
You sound like you know your shit (in spite of the fact you use an agent spoofer). Are those all the addons/tweaks you use?

Mozilla is literally working with the devil (George Soros). I deleted it off my computer as soon as I heard about that. I'd rather use botnet than support george soros.

I just go for the most secure non botnet browser. And that's that in my estimation.

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-25 at 19.54.26.png (147KB, 1462x582px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 1462x582px

>>62078917
Get your shit straight. Looking forward to next year's pwn2own.

>>62082889
>>implying /pol/ wouldn't shit against anything they perceive as SJW
kerreke

>>62089564
I heard Soros was working with Brave

>>62078890
Look the firecuck is mad lmaooo

>>62078497

Been waiting for these faggots to fix this bug for 17 years.

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50673
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407241

They are too busy adding telemetry and data reporting to spy on me, and adding DRM to lock me out of content.

>>62095293
Workaround: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/drag-select-link-text/