How do I get into FOP (feeling oriented programming)?

>>62070307
>feeling oriented programming

What the fuck

>>62070307

#define true false
#define false (rand() % 0 == 0)

>>62070536
You meant to write

#define true false
#define false (rand() % 2 == 0)

There is a way to combat this (although you can never be sure)

#define sanity2 (true || true)
#define sanity4 (sanity2 || sanity2)
#define sanity8 (sanity4 || sanity4)
#define sanity16 (sanity8 || sanity8)
#define sanity sanity16

#define insanity2 (false && false)
#define insanity4 (insanity2 && insanity2)
#define insanity8 (insanity4 && insanity4)
#define insanity16 (insanity8 && insanity8)
#define insanity insanity16

>>62070307
Isn't the truth to use logic to create values?

When you are objective you should think about how the objective truth would apply to each persons point of view.

When you are frank and telling someone the truth you must use tact or else the truths you say become too painful and are lumped with the lies by those who hear it.

Justice is important but there is always a cause of why crime happened in the first place that must be understood. Being brutal to brutal people can cause more problems without discretion.

>>62072179
thanks for your insight

fag

>>62070307
Achieve CHIM

>>62072210
That hurt.

>>62070935
What the fuck is all this?

sanity 

will always be false,

 insanity

will still be random.
What are you trying to accomplish? If you just want a way to get back true and false you can just do

#define yes !true
#define no true

If you meant something else, then you really need to work on your communication

>>62072179
>Violence is okay but only when used by governments and criminals
Ok

>>62072391
Thats not what I said nigger

>>62070432
>What the fuck
came here to say this.

>>62072284
>What the fuck is all this? sanity will always be false,

insanity

will still be random.
Wrong retard. sanity will almost always be true while

insanity

will almost always be false.

Why?
Replace x'es down bellow with 0s or 1s randomly

sanity = x + x + x + x + x + x
insanity = x * x * x * x * x * x

You're pretty much guaranteed to get at least one 1 in sanity making (sanity > 0) or at least one 0 in insanity yielding zero (aka falsehood).
The likelihood of error is only 1 in 64.

>If you meant something else, then you really need to work on your communication
Nah, you should just work on your reading comprehension.

>>62070307
Vivec?

>>62072670
>be me
>have no reading comprehension
Sorry, my bad. I hadn't realised that true would be defined as

rand()%2 == 0

too.

Feeling oriented programming is when you're blind and you have to read code using braille.