So my 250GB SSD isn't enough and so I'm going big.

4 tb

>>62065522
At those sizes, I'd go with the Pro since it has higher write endurance than EVO. It's also marginally faster, but it's the endurance that matters.

>>62065689
But doesn't higher capacity also mean higher endurance as well?

>>62065705
Yes. No. Sorta ?
A 4TB EVO is going to have two times the endurance of a 2TB EVO since it has twice as much NAND, but it would still take the same amount of full drive overwrites to wear it down.

I guess it depends on what you plan to be doing with it, though. Will you use it as an archive type drive that just stores a lot of data never to be deleted or changed ? If so why aren't you getting an HDD ?
Or are you going to use all that space actively to write a lot of big shit to it very often ?

>>62065779
To store all games, os, applications, and have my mining done on it

>>62065833

you would drop $1,500 on a 54 tb ssd?.

>>62065910

*4 tb

>>62065922
well the 4tb evo is £1000 and 2tb pro is £799

>>62065955

Amazon says it's $1,600. You sure you can get it for that price?. money.https://www.amazon.com/Samsung-2-5-Inch-Internal-MZ-75E4T0B-AM/dp/B01G844OOO

>>62065975
yeah, I'm in the UK, also the 4TB evo has 4MB cache as well over the 2TB Pro
4TB EVO:
12000-20000TB writes
2TB Pro:
16000-20000TB Writes

>>62066000

I would suggest you don't waste your money on a SSD that big.

SSD's are worth it for their speed not their size. With that money you can get a LOT more storage on HDDS.

>>62066029
More NAND = faster speeds

Sure you could buy a lot of SATA SSDs/HDDs but then it wouldn't be nearly as fast. A 1TB nVME Pro is probably best for his situation.

>4tb SSD for gaymes
the ABSOLUTE STATE OF /g/

>>62066790
Well Final Fantasy XV is gonna be something crazy like 150GB andnew COD is 80 or so.

>>62066790
Not OP but I fell for that same trap too. 250GB is not enough.