WebExtensions / FF 57 / Nightly

Nice, another question, how is the Google Analytics going, can I block it?

>no rikaisama
That's already a turn off for me.

>>62063665
fpbp

>>62063665
Add

0.0.0.0    www.google-analytics.com

to hosts file

>>62063665
Yes.

>>62063684
or use about:config and umatrix for sites

>>62063703
>about:config
????

>umatrix
He was talking about the Google Analytics in about:addons which can't be blocked by uMatrix since WebExtensions don't have permission to interact with about: pages

>>62063632
why have a separate search bar ?

>>62063716
Can you show what you mean about the analytics in about:addons?

>>62063684
>mine already had it
wew
>sperg-outs btfo

>>62063684
BTFO

>>62063726
Why would you search shit in the url bar? What if you want to search using another search engine?

>>62063684
>it's ok if something is a botnet if you can block 1 server
LMAOOOOOOOOOOO
FIREKEKS LITERALLY CANT STOP MAKING UP SHIT EXCUSES

File: ff55.png (43KB, 1680x255px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 1680x255px

>>62063736
where were the last few days

>>62063774
also keywords

File: nightly-extension-alternatives.png (884KB, 2880x1800px) Image search: [Google]

884KB, 2880x1800px

Thanks who ever posted this last thread!
Very useful.

I've been enjoying Nightly.

>>62063736
Click Ctrl+Shift+E to open the Network Monitor and then go to about:addons and click "Get Add-ons"

>>62063785
>>62063748
>not having it in the first place

Question:
Is uMatrix still relevant?
Smart HTTPS or HTTPS Everywhere?
VimFX alternative?

File: google options.png (38KB, 776x248px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 776x248px

>>62063736
Mozilla uses google analytics on their website. Mozilla reached an agreement with google that prevents google from using that data for advertising.
As a consequence of that agreement every user of google analytics can now also do the same. There's an option in google's dashboard.

Those analytics happen to also affect the "Get Add-ons" page in Firefox. It's mentioned in the privacy policy on the bottom of that page.

>>62063632
damn constant shill threads: adding firefox to my op filters

>>62063785
>he relies on a webbrowser to act as a firewall for him
nigger cattle detected

CTR, Tab groups, Bamboo?
I'd say more, but I'm on my phone.

>>62063632
>So... all the most useful addons are already ported and webextension-ready.
Subjective.

>Why the fuck did you autistic knit-pickers jump ship before even giving it a chance?
Because Mozilla has become trash.

>Firefox (Nightly) is now faster and more secure than ever before.
OK m8

>The lack of obscure, shitty XUL add-ons shouldn't deter you from using FF57
There are glaring omissions, and that deters us.

>the best web browser of 2017
Delusional.

2/10 try harder shill

>>62063811
>pretending that 99% of them aren't negative
>you get offended by the 1% positive

Why waste time posting here?

We both know you aren't going to filter it because you hate firefox with a passion and will continue to make your anti firefox threads.

File: Clipboard01.png (197KB, 1920x1039px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 1920x1039px

>>62063787
>>62063797
>>62063809
Which one is the google analytics?

>>62063865
If you have do-not-track enabled then it doesn't affect you.

>>62063793
Decentraleyes will be ported to WebExtension and you can already get it now
https://github.com/Synzvato/decentraleyes/issues/173#issuecomment-322821857

WebExtension of HTTPS Everywhere will be made as well and you can already get it from here
https://www.eff.org/files/https-everywhere-test/index.html

Tampermonkey is proprietary binary blob botnet so I recommend Violentmonkey instead but I think if you really want Greasemonkey it'll be ported before November when 57 hits release channel
https://github.com/violentmonkey/violentmonkey

>>62063793
Thanks for this!
I just upgraded from 45 myself.

>>62063859
>nu-uh!
not an argument

>>62063875
Wow, so people are whining over literally nothing.

>>62063875
Instead you'll just be easier to track everywhere else since no one cares about DNT and so few people have it enabled doing so helps make your fingerprint more unique :^)

>>62063859
the only one here shilling is you

if you are a serious firefox user which i doubt you are then look here
>>62063793

the reality is you actually use chrome or something similar and were so triggered by a positive firefox thread that you had to post just how much you dislike it

if you didnt care you wouldnt be here but you are

>>62063889
literally an argument

>>62063838
>hosts file is a firewall
u w0t m8

>>62063632
>still no lastpass
>too lazy to switch to a password manager that isn't botnet

>>62063865
about:addons
get extensions
AFAIU

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-24 at 15.37.19.png (23KB, 416x194px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 416x194px

>>62063632
how did you make this border green?

>>62063875
Oh, thanks!
>>62063879
That's awesome!
I'm very greatful to hear that.
Thanks for the tips I'll be sure to implement them.

>>62063948
I find the level on enthusiasm in your post a bit concerning.

>>62063916
>the only one here shilling is you
That whole OP is bait.

>if you are a serious firefox user which i doubt you are then look here >>>62063793
Lesser substitutes.

>triggered
Where do you get that?

>if you didnt care you wouldnt be here but you are
I do care.

>>62063793
>>62063879
That's some useful information lads.
Much appreciated.

File: Clipboard01.png (12KB, 924x263px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 924x263px

>>62063875
I don't
This is me >>62063865

>>62063879
>>62063793
All these Chrome was getting to me, thanks anon for restoring my faith

>>62063962
Excuse me?
Not sure what you're implying.

I'm greatful to get a actual response with proper suggestions instead of the regular anti firefox rheteric that follows.

It's actully very refreshing when /g/ is being technical and useful.

>>62063942
you can customize how firefox looks through userchrome.css so that's probably how http://kb.mozillazine.org/index.php?title=UserChrome.css

>>62064016
Agreed.
Glad to see that /g/'s haste was unfounded, and was just bandwagoning while actual progress was being made.

>>62063793
Kill yourself nigger

>>62064038
dang i wasnt even aware thats pretty cool!
so its basically like about:config for the UI?

when did they add this?

>>62064064
It's been there since forever.

>>62064063
>angry chromecuk
yeah kill himself for being useful and not being a useless faggot like yourself who just trash talks in a browser thread

>>62064075
oh... well i guess i have some learning to do lol

>>62064077
Kill yourself SJW nigger

>>62063632
Only retards actually jumped ship. Most of those threads and anti FF spam is from chrome and that one firefox fork shills. Firefox only got better recently.

>>62063879
>>62063793
good to know guys

>>62064092
so hes a nigger and im a sjw?

what is your reasoning of that?
you are trash and you dont belong on /g/
>reeeee they use a browser i dont like reeeeeee

>>62064038
and how would I find the classes for tab bar??

>>62064127
when the fuck are thy going to integrate those tabs on the window's panel?

>>62064105
This.

It's amazing how ignorant their advocacy of chrome is while at the same time despising firefox and going out of their way to create negative threads.

>>62064138
Windows doesn't have this problem.

>>62064105
Chrome is more pro white than firefag is

File: James-Damore.jpg (78KB, 768x768px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 768x768px

>>62064164
>citation needed

>>62063632
Finally moved back to firefox, shit is really close be as fast as chromium 60.*

>>62064164
*cough*

http://www.dailywire.com/news/17400/google-hiring-less-white-men-progress-robert-kraychik

>>62064164
"Hiring fewer white men and pursuing more hires of blacks, Hispanics, and women is “[moving] in the right direction," according to Google’s “diversity” page profiling its hiring practices.

A declining share of white men composing its workforce is described as “progress:”"

File: gnomepixelsaver.png (28KB, 382x600px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 382x600px

>>62064138
never
this is how it should be
also what do you think is pic related
>protip, in gnome it does not make it "always on top"

File: google_diversity.jpg (15KB, 780x445px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 780x445px

>>62064164
#progress

>>62064228
>google is going down
sell GOOG

>>62064164
Both are top tier SJW. At least Firefox hires pink haired trannies that care somewhat about privacy.

>>62063863
I've been using firefox for more than 10 years; if they're not going to allow me complete access to the browsers internals unless I fork and maintain a previous version or patch the source, I'll have none of it. I'm using esr for now.

Web browsers have completely overstepped their scopes trying to become entire operating systems. Hell, I don't even want my browser to play videos. If someone gave me a swiss army knife and a steak knife to cut a steak, I'd pick the steak knife every time. I have a dedicated video player with my settings and keybinds that does a better job than any browser will ever do.

General web browsers need to die. If the desktop market itself doesn't die completely, desktop programs need to resurge as marketers see the real estate of the desktop for shortcuts and notifications as they do homescreens on mobiles. Also there's a lot more control and flexibility integrating into the OS rather than fitting the site into html with styles and scripts. I wrote a desktop program for 4chan for this reason, and it's completely replaced my browser experience. I'll continue others for my favorite sites.

File: google-frontrunners.jpg (571KB, 2896x2896px) Image search: [Google]

571KB, 2896x2896px

>>62064164
#browserboss
:^)

>>62064289
I don't understand where your misconception is?
They do allow you full access.

about:config

I want to ditch Chrome but need 4chan X! I wish it was available on FireFox.

>>62064320
2/10

>>62064320
Isn't there a script for tamper/voilent monkey?

>>62064320
violentmonkey

>>62064330
Ok

>>62064332
Not sure anon. Someone should really fucking port it, shit comes in handy.

>>62063632
I'll admit I was sceptical but it's substantially faster.

Glad I took the chance to investigate for myself instead of listening to the nay sayers.

>>62064361
>ip count didn't increase
I'm all for shilling Firefox but this is too much.

>>62064353
Thanks for the confirmation.

>>62064361
OP here. Please stop shilling in my thread pls

you faggots ruin everything

>>62064319
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1384515 for example

>>62064190
>>62064211
>>62064228
>>62064266
>>62064283
>>62064294
Fuck off cucks

>>62064404
>everyone who disagrees with me is a cuck

>>62064420
You're a cuck for defending SJWfox

>>62064404
What a pathetic fucking nigger
Fuck off and tell your boss at jewgle that the goyim know

>>62064319
>*Tries to change the default page for new tabs*

>>62064374
>>62064386
I wasn't shilling.
I posted this first because it was the first post I saw outside the thread.
>>62064332

Then I posted to the OP which was my original intention.

>>62064449
Says the cuck defending a browser made now for niggers

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-24 at 16.18.44.png (77KB, 774x476px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 774x476px

>>62064038
ok, so I found out the class and can change some settings... now how the fuck to get rid of that blue line?

>>62064453
werks for me

>>62064440
youre a cuck for pretending theres any alternatives

>inb4 use chrome

>>62063632
Bamboo has not been ported m8

>>62064467
I'm not the one who's using (((Chrome))) faggot cuck

>>62064499
Whitout using some addon for it?

>>62064467
too bad googles chrome is the niggers browser now
look here
>>62064228
#progress
u mad white boy?

File: 1491686604281.png (4KB, 183x275px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 183x275px

>>62064486
Explain to a brainlet how you even found what CSS to modify

>Chrome is now shilled by a 15 y/o /pol/ crossboarder
Sad day for G**gle

File: 1503549316088.jpg (118KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 960x960px

>>62064465
I forgive you, anon. I'm glad you're enjoying this piece of software.

May the klossy gods bless your soul with good fortune and protect you from the evil botnet.

>>62064486
not him but what happens when you reduce the margins pixel amount?

>>62064533
Aren't you the one who opens 5 Chrome shilling thrads a day?

>>62064547
What game is that on the screen? It looks familiar.

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-24 at 16.25.23.png (41KB, 966x416px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 966x416px

>>62064549
yeah, thats how I did it in the end, since I cant find the element id/class which renders the border

>>62064533
>implying that google and youtube werent the biggest anti trump platforms in 2016

opinions discarded

>>62064063
>>62064092
>>62064164
>>62064404
>>62064467
>>62064533
>>>/global/rules/6
>>>/trash/pol/

How do you get unlock, or adblock working in Nightly?
It says it's not compatible

File: kode.with.klossy_.png (877KB, 1192x1129px) Image search: [Google]

877KB, 1192x1129px

>>62064547
Thanks, mate.

Klossy is a babe but she can't rice for shit.

>>62064611
Not OP, but ubo works in firefox fine. However I have been using AdBlocker ultimate with no complaints

>>62064611
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ublock-origin/versions/1.13.9rc5

>>62064541
you create it in /Users/xxxx/Library/Application Support/Firefox/Profiles/xxxxxxx.default/chrome/userChrome.css (OS X)

contents:

@namespace url(http://www.mozilla.org/keymaster/gatekeeper/there.is.only.xul);

 tab[selected="true"] {
   /* color: green !important;
   text-shadow: none !important;
   background-color: red !important; */
   /* padding-top: 10px !important;
   margin-top: -10px !important; */
   /* border-top: 4px solid orange !important; */
 }
 /* tab[selected="true"]::before{display: none !important}
 tab[selected="true"]::after{display: none !important} */

 
 tab {
   margin-top: -2px !important;
   padding-bottom: -2px !important;
 }

>>62064573
Hm.
well sorry i couldnt help more.
ill be looking more into it this week when i have time since i wasnt even aware about the css function to be honest

File: 1489581805965.png (16KB, 1366x97px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 1366x97px

Fix the titlebar for Gnome
Or show me addons to fix it

>>62064652
>>62064248

>using firefox in 2017
ew

>>62064652
Remove window decorations because they are completely useless

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-24 at 16.34.12.png (34KB, 422x268px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 422x268px

>>62064634
its good enough though, I didnt want to change the color anyways, I wnated to hide the border...

now I need to remove this wasted space next to traffic lights (pic related)

>>62064599
I'm not sure how he expects to win us over with this profanity and baseless character assasination.

Talk about technical details and you might get some attention but just shouting at people till they do what you want isn't very mature.

To the anon who is responsible don't bother replying because I won't be responding.

>>62064652
I think the titlebar is strictly controlled by the WM in GTK/gnome so there's nothing Mozilla can actually do about that. It was made that way deliberately by the gnome devs.

>>62064652
i3 does not have this problem

>>62064571
Bro...
That's Sonic!

>>62064627
Those are old version

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-24 at 16.37.36.png (104KB, 1060x530px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 1060x530px

>>62064668
>I need to remove this wasted space next to traffic lights (pic related)
actually figured that out too.. now it looks somewhat decent

>>62064631
Interesting.

>>62064707
>Released August 21, 2017
hmm...

File: 1486142606061.png (250KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

250KB, 1920x1080px

>>62064652

>>62064662
>>62064685
Chromium, Opera, Vivaldi and even Brave don't have this problem though.
When will firecucks even catchup? Also there is an extension called Htltle which used to fix it but it isn't supported anymore. Even full themes like Arc and FXChrome themes fixed it but those themes aren't supported anymore. I hope they will find a way somehow.
>>62064660
>>62064689
ya nah
Believe me or not this is the only reason I'm using Chromium right now. Fix it and I'll use sjwcucks again.

Any news on tabgroups support?

>>62064668
thats understandable
if you find that general location name i could probably help

>>62064722
>Chromium, Opera, Vivaldi and even Brave don't have this problem though.
Those are all based on Chromium and Chromium uses its own widgets for everything. It's also why it looks almost exactly the same on every OS.

>>62064652
go into customize and hide the title bar

>>62064747
Then Firefox should start doing the same. It's now a full on Chromium clone anyway. :^)

>>62064661
>2017
>posting obvious bait in a thread specific topic
go back to using chrome and leave us in peace

>>62064712
not him but thanks for this!

>>62064765
After 57 I think they should have somewhat more freedom to mess with the interface code so they might be able to do stuff like that then. We'll see I guess.

>>62064353
How?

>>62064722
just disable the titlebar
its a built in option now

>>62064741
they should just allow you to use the web inspector on UI elements.. how else can you find out the structure of the UI?

I dont know how those poeple who create userstyles do it.

>>62064839
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/violentmonkey/

>>62064862
>they should just allow you to use the web inspector on UI elements
Open chrome://browser/content/browser.xul

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Tech/XUL/Tutorial/The_Chrome_URL

>>62064857
You can you disable the titlebar on *nix? I thought the titlebars were still handled by the WM/widget toolkit in firefox on *nix.

>>62064857
ya, how?
>>62064832
hope so

>>62064542
4chan is /pol/, cuck

>>62064862
maybe they would be open to that suggestion.

this guy found a solution to your problem btw
>>62064712
its the left margin

File: 1480722765569.jpg (109KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 900x900px

>>62064911

>>62064896
>chrome://browser/content/browser.xul
jesus fuck bro, thx..

but now I'll fucking waste hours of time customising the browser lol.

>>62064919
nvm ignore i didnt notice it was you and i wasnt paying attention clearly lol

>>62064921
>>>/reddit/
>>>/leftypol/
>>>/tumblr/
>>>/cuckshed/

>>62064919
this dude provided an answer already >>62064896
you open that location and inspect it inside the browser.

>its the left margin
yeah, its the huge margin next to the traffic lights.

>>62064945
>TRIGGERED

>>62064897
i have it disabled right now and im using arch with openbox

>>62064911
>>62064945
>>>/pol/
Fuck off back to your containment board

>>62064933
>wasting hours ricing
This.
Pandoras box has been opened.

>>62064969
>>>/reddit/
Fuck off back to your containment website

>>62064780
>leave us in peace
Not when you guys are enabling violent nazis.

>>62063632
How do I know this is not just chromium where it download Google shit after install?

>>62064969
Why do liberals hate their race so much?

>>62065003
Why are cuckservatives are so fucking dumb?

>>62063632
Can't wait of FF57 hitting the Arch repo

>>62065019
for*

>>62064902
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/customize-firefox-controls-buttons-and-toolbars

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-24 at 17.00.19.png (111KB, 2332x410px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 2332x410px

>>62064989
Actually I'm finished...

just gonna use the shipped dark theme but with transparency (I dont know why the put pure black in first place)

I guess I'm gonna use that shitty browser now, since it looks that good

>>62064722
>ya nah
he literary showed you how to fix it

>>62063793
>using tree tabs
>now you have 2 different style tabs
For what purposes?

>>62064999
Please try to make yourself look literate when you come to /g/.

File: 1393796383102.jpg (12KB, 203x200px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 203x200px

>>62064911
Oh you mean the board for basic faggots whose political opinions don't extend anywhere further than "I hate le SJWs xdddd"

>>62065065
Triggered reddit cuckold, lmao

>>62065083
Why is /pol/ so passionate about being cucked?

>>62065035
Post userchrome.css

>>62065019
here ya go
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/firefox-nightly/

>>62065095
Because the left wants niggers and beaners and sandniggers to invade their country and rape their women

>>62065027
that's doesn't work.
>>62065040
k

>>62065083
Alright, calm down.

Why must you guys always devolve into fighting?
Just take a step back and breath.

>>62065113
>their country
Are you sure about that? If you are American, chances are you are originally not immigrants

>>62065035
Can't argue with that.

>>62064866
Yes, but how do I set up the 4chan X.

>>62065145
>not immigrants
I mant immigrants.*

>>62065113
Not sure what that has to do with technology.

>>62064911
>>62064945
>>62064993
>>62065003
>>62065083
>>62065113
>>62065145
stop shitting up the thread with politics you spastic fucks

>>62065154
https://www.google.com/search?q=4chan+x+script&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

>>62065179
This.
It's already bad enough we have to constantly combat /v/ botnet apologists and proprietary advocates.

>>62064121
kill yourself CIA nigger

>>62065106
use the dark theme and put this in

/*
Install:
- Save to "(Firefox profile directory)/chrome/userChrome.css"

*/

@namespace url(http://www.mozilla.org/keymaster/gatekeeper/there.is.only.xul);
/********* chrome://browser/content/browser.xul */

#TabsToolbar {
   /* background: transparent !important; */
   -moz-appearance: -moz-mac-vibrancy-dark !important;
   padding-left: 4px !important;
   /* margin-left: 10px !important; */
    /* background-size: 0px !important; */
    /* background-color: transparent !important; */
}


#TabsToolbar:not(:-moz-lwtheme)::after {
   opacity: 0 !important;
 }
 
 tab[selected="true"] {
   /* color: green !important;
   text-shadow: none !important;
   background-color: red !important; */
   /* padding-top: 10px !important;
   margin-top: -10px !important; */
   /* border-top: 4px solid orange !important; */
 }


 
 tab {
   margin-top: -2px !important;
   padding-bottom: -2px !important;
 }

File: 1479248750322.png (106KB, 480x529px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 480x529px

>>62065154
You installed violentmonkey, yes? Click on this:
https://www.4chan-x.net/builds/4chan-X.user.js

>>62065244
This isn't the TempleOS thread, friend.

>>62064722
>Even full themes like Arc
no it didn't and what you whine about is called fullscreen which works excellent in gnome

>>62065249
Thanks.

>>62065249
thx for the tut anon your setup looks pretty slick

someone needs to start a github repo for css presets

>>62065280
it did you nigger

>>62063632
Well the addon I like can't be ported to webextensions. (Tiling tabs) It was a GREAT addon, so I'm a little bummed about it. I'll probably leave it behind but it is still an addon I'll miss since I don't use a tiling WM

>>62065194
>>62065271
Thank you.

>>62064541
open
chrome://browser/content/browser.xul
and use the element inspector

>>62065420
no it does not i was just using it before it became ""legacy""

>>62065613
but it does. Install gnome on your distro, install ff 55, see those ugly titlebars, install arc theme, it will look just like on windows or osx. May be you need htitle also. But it used to work perfectly for me before 57.

Is there a Stylish replacement?

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-24 at 10.48.02 PM.png (9KB, 237x68px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 237x68px

Now how do I move the refresh button to inside the browse bar?

>>62065637
why i never noticed this with 54? was using arc for gtk too

>>62065648
idk what the fuck you are talking about
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/arc-theme/versions/

anyway
how do I turn off Window decoration for firecucks in gnome?

File: 1476651223567.png (306KB, 593x540px) Image search: [Google]

306KB, 593x540px

>>62065684
>gnome

>>62065662
here ya go bud

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/styl-us/

>>62063632
>all the most useful addons

who gives a fuck about Selenium anyway, right

>>62065610
cool thnx!

>>62063895
No, this was changed after people complained. It was completely ignoring DNT before.

Also, Mozilla's choice of analytics provider was questionable at best. They could easily deploy a self-hosted instance of Piwik and not give Google user data.

They argued that they wouldn't choose an "inferior" analytics provider just because its FLOSS. IMO the irony was rich here, as people precisely use Firefox because of principles (floss, privacy-minded, etc.) despite it being slower than the botnet.

>>62065684
i was talkin bout the legacy thing which misled me into thinking is already didn't work, still never noticed the "feature" you talk about AND if it did make it "look just like on windows or osx" then why are you asking for help in the first place?

anyway you were already told more than once
F U L LSCREEN
U
L
L

>>62063793
Download star as a DTA replacement, my sides.

File: 1491390385351.png (141KB, 1680x1050px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 1680x1050px

>>62065610
>chrome://browser/content/browser.xul
thank you kind shitposter

>>62065684
not sure about gnome but for most WMs you just left click the top left title bar and click undecorate

>>62063879
Shame that Violentmonkey, Tampermonkey and even the ported Greasemonkey will have more limitations that the legacy greasemonkey.

>>62065773
pretty sure that was a bug outside of stable

>>62065786
No sane person uses a "download manager" in 2017. Most people just used it to mass download a bunch of links or images from a single page.

>>62065804
What are some major limitations they will have? All I know so far is userscripts no longer can add items to the context menu

>>62065837
Oh, so the problem is not losing features the problem is the user that wants to use them?

>>62065804
4chan x works and that's all I need from it.
Not sure what limitations you are speaking of but maybe its for the better if scripts don't have 100% access to everything for security reasons.

>>62065864
When has this "I need a babysitter" ideology took over the use of common sense?

Is this our future?

>>62065854
Yes, the retarded user that wants to turn a web browser into a download manager is the problem.

>>62065900
disable your router firewall now or else you are a fucking cuck

also enable all scripts by default you hand holding faggot

>>62065900
What limitations have you reached though?
I don't understand what ability you lost?

>>62065927
>>62065932
oh god that smell, it seems it's time to change your diapers.

No uMatrix still?

>>62065900
Most of the addons that can't make it into webextensions are trash anyways, it's not like firefox will have no addons from now on, just the most usefull and relevant addons. Your argument doesn't apply.

>>62065954
>I ran out of arguments

>>62065959
>Most of the addons that can't make it into webextensions are trash
Not necessarily trash but definitely something that probably shouldn't even be a browser addon in the first place.
For example this https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/sqlite-manager/

File: 1423266928484.gif (2MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 640x360px

I thought asking here would be better.
After opening certain sites that contain videos firefox CPU usage reaches 100% and remains even after closing the tab, and I need to restart firefox.

I thought it was of because partial blocking of JS but it remained even after allowing all scripts.
Any idea what would be causing it or how to stop it?

>>62065989
What certain sites?
Flash or HTML5?

>CPU
Do you have hardware accel on?
Your GPU should be the one that's active not CPU rendering.

>>62065989
Use uMatrix, disable media on the website and view the video with mpv + youtube-dl.

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-24 at 11.15.53 PM.png (22KB, 537x54px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 537x54px

>>62065249
This looks perfect, except when the text is all over the tabs.

>>62063911
New European Union regulations will require webpages to stop tracking users if they have Do Not Track enabled.
>DNT makes you easier to identify
So do your fonts, disabling WebRC, the battery API, JavaScript, referrer, User Agent, etc. There is literally no way to stop tracking unless you're using Tor and never logging in to a website that tracks.

>>62065983
That's basically a separate application. The only thing it has in common with firefox is that it reuses the browser window but it basically replaces everything contained inside the window.

>>62065989
If you can reliably reproduce it on a new profile you should file a bug.

>So... all the most useful addons are already ported and webextension-ready.
Except for tree style tabs, which will never be ported, and is the only reasonable way to manage large numbers of tabs.

>>62066010
>What certain sites?
Online streaming services.
>Flash or HTML5?
While I do have flash installed, I've set it to ask before using it, so I believe it would be HTML5, though the video stream is in mp4 format.
>hardware accel on
It's set for "use when available"
I'm using a think pad T420 with iGPU.
>>62066012
I'm using NoScript, I need to enable some of the scripts to get the video link, then open it with Open with mpv add on.

Maybe opening large video file is causing it?

>>62066081
>which will never be ported
Which already has a working alternative albeit still without the ability to hide native tabs.
Dumb tripfag.

>>62066040
>new profile
It reproduced with new profile, however only when using pinned tabs.
And opening in different window of firefox doesn't seem to make a difference.
I thought different window meant different process.

>>62065989
>I thought it was of because partial blocking of JS
nope. js is one of the things which can make the cpu go through the roof, forbidding js only makes loading pages faster and cpu much less used, and some sites unusable

>>62066027
What's the difference between the built in Do Not Track and Privacy Badger?

File: vargstop.png (112KB, 208x206px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 208x206px

>>62066081
stop using lots of tabs

>>62066119
A script running into an endless loop because another script was blocked doesn't sound unreasonable.

>>62066118
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi

File: amphibian2.png (7KB, 420x420px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 420x420px

>>62066081
>OP literally has a Tree Style Tab like extension installed and open in plain sight

>>62066027
fonts can be hidden but then i suppose you would be an easily identifiable because you dont show font
>same for the rest
only canvas fingerprinting is untouchable

>>62066103

If it provides worth functionality, why the hell should I use it rather than use tree style tabs on Waterfox, which also doesn't spy on you?

>>62063665
Stop blocking my analytics you asshole.

>>62064652
pixel saver

File: big eats.jpg (62KB, 437x437px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 437x437px

So will Firefox 57 just ship with square tabs so I don't have to deal with these fuckin awful looking australis tabs?

>>62066156
>moving the goalposts
The issue in question is actively being discussed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1332447
Dumb tripfag.

>>62066140
my idea while writing that was forbidding all scripts or js == nope

>>62066156
Why do you need tree style tabs in the first place? What kind of a nigger are you? Tab hoarding is a mental illness.

File: 1487275506897.png (3KB, 373x22px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 373x22px

>>62066163
partially works but look at the window control buttons lol

>>62066140
>enter_bug
I don't even know, why it happens.
It could be my fault completely, since I use old hardware.

>>62066162
stop analysing my asshole asshole

>>62066144
It doesn't also remove the tab toolbar at the top.

>>62066209
If someone from Mozilla can reproduce it then they'll figure it out.
You don't need to know why it happens, just how to make it happen.

>>62066207
thats why i told you fullscreen and in gnome windows is still normal and allows other windows over it

>>62066232
>>62066178

>>62065846
Can't use external editor, which is a major flaw because every internal editor sucks ass.

>>62066207
yes that's very annoying, but pixels saved>buttons aesthetic

>>62066120
When you enable Do Not Track, your browser tells websites "guys, please don't track this user, mmkay?" Whether or not websites respect it is a different thing. Some websites will stop tracking altogether, others will stop third party tracking, others will diminish the amount of cookies they save in your browser, others will ignore it or track you even more by using the DNT flag. (I once saw a website that didn't even let you access if had it enabled, but they ended up removing that.)
DNT is not enforced and every website does whatever it wants with that flag. However, the EU will force them, starting next year, to abide by it next year.
Privacy Badger scans the scripts that load whenever you visit a website. If it "thinks" there is a script following you between websites, it will block it. Privacy Badger stops tracking by not allowing tracking JS to run at all.

File: 1500722199970s.jpg (2KB, 125x123px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 125x123px

>>62066156
stop hoarding tabs

>>62066238
>allows other windows over it
it doesn't. It says on top unless I un-fullscreen it. then we are back to square one.

>>62063632
That cookie deleter is redundant since you're using umatrix.

>>62066274
>the EU will force them
is that for servers located in the eu or for businesses with seats in the eu or how does it work?
what about jewtube for example? they in murricistan

>>62066144

Tree Tabs are in addition to, not replacing the regular tabs. Tree-style tabs replaces the original tab bar, giving me more vertical space.

>>62066178

Multitasking. And who the hell are you to tell me how to use my browser? Haven't you ever heard that the customer is always right?

>>62066285
you're saying when you make ff fs with that button in the hamburger button ff does not allow other windows over it? i was just using gnome 24 until a few days ago and this caught my attention that it was allowed (fs windows acted as normal window), i mostly used super/activities to switch windows

File: Screenshot at 2017-08-24 10-33-50.png (154KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 1366x768px

Decided to poke my nose into nightly to check it out. Since my PC isn't from the 90s (just an x220) don't notice anything faster.

First complaint though, although otherwise Photon looks okay. Since arc theme is dead, I can't make it one uniform light color though, which kinda bugs me

File: Screenshot at 2017-08-24 10-42-08.png (110KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 1366x768px

>>62066373
Oh screenshot didn't screenshot the bit I was referring to. Oops

>>62066337
You're retarded, the tab hiding functionality will be most likely implemented in Stable.

>>62066313
>>62066274
The website most likely will get a work around for that like enforcing the users (and you can't get rid of the button unless you block it with ublock or click "accept") to let them to track them even if they use DNT just like "accept cookies" now.

>>62066337
You can multitask pretty well with the current tab layout you drooling retard unless you are fucked in the head and use more than 10 tabs. In that case you should jump off a bridge you nigger.

>>62066337
What the fuck are you on about?
The exact thing you asked for has an active bug open for it.

First you come in here saying that tree tabs will never be ported, then you get btfo'd and now you are acting like a retard.

>>62066371
>you're saying when you make ff fs with that button in the hamburger button ff does not allow other windows over it?
Yes, that is exactly what I mean. Which distro were you using? What are you using now? I can't even hover to the top right to go to overview when I am on fullscreen.

>>62063632
>Tampermonkey
I'm sure there are some userscripts that doesn't run with it.
Also no DownThemAll

>>62066499
You know there are a shitload of other download managers, right?

>>62066438
arch, used gnome wayland so that's my only reference (dont know gnome on xorg)
now i3 tabbed because couldnt settle for the wasted ram

>I can't even hover to the top right to go to overview when I am on fullscreen.
yes that is correct but you can press super

>>62066520
None comes close as DTA.
It even shows links to the actual obfuscated media.

>>62066539
I see.

Well, thanks for trying to help. I really appreciate it.
Right now I think I will stick with Chromium and wait for them to fix it, although I highly doubt it. Or someone to come up with some kind of solution. Else I'll probably stick with chromium forever. Good riddance.

What does minimize memeory usage do?
Is it safe to use it frequently?

Are there any WebExt versions of addons like imagus (shows full image on hover)?

>>62066432

If you have less than 20 tabs open, you probably don't do much real work.

>>62066437

The exact thing I asked for doesn't have an API available as part of webextensions, and is the reason why tree style tabs has not been ported. The developer had been asking for it for quite a while, and Mozilla decided it wasn't worth their time.

>>62066666

>>62066689
If you have more than 10 tabs open you probably don't even know what you're doing you impulsive hoarder.

>>62066689
got over 100 open right now senpai

>>62066732
t. brainlet

>>62066689
>ozilla decided it wasn't worth their time
Source?

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1332447
>A vertical tab solution is on the WebExtension list of add-ons we'd like to have support for

>>62063632
Ignorant question, very much liked Nightly but for a while I could not use uBlock Origin so I uninstalled. Is that fixed now? In your screenshot it seems to be.

>>62066768
Get the webextension from github or scroll down to "development channel" on amo and install it from there.

File: 1503118201208.png (1MB, 1280x1527px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x1527px

So in nightly what's the deal with the titlebar? When fullscreen, it seems to hide itself. Which is a cool deal. But no window controls, and furthermore, when you resize it, brings the titlebar back which is AIDS imo, and not going to fly since the tile tabs adodn is dead

Welp. Developer of tree style tabs started to port to web extensions 3 days ago. Something changed.

https://github.com/piroor/treestyletab/issues/1317#issuecomment-324099531

>>62063774
Use a different keyword for the different search engine? It's not rocket science.

>>62063632
>Why the fuck did you autistic knit-pickers jump ship before even giving it a chance?
Because I dropped Firefox when they forced a ui update that looked ugly, broke some add-ons and added nothing positive to the browser.

>>62066955
untick auto hide

>fullscreen
>resize

>>62066955
What does her pussy look like?

>>62067128
i don't follow. I'm not saying I want the titlebar, I'm just saying that it would be nice for them to implement the controls in the same way Chrome does, or on the Windows version. Since hide caption titlebar plus is going to be kill, I'll just have to do everything with macros. It doesn't bother me or anything, but afaik I have to hide the titlebar from my WIM now

>>62066969
>tripfag is retarded
Nothing changed.

>>62067199

Well whatever API he was bitching Mozilla wouldn't add for him is no longer a problem.

>>62067175
>When fullscreen, it seems to hide itself.
you can right click around the tabs to make it not hide

What's a good cookie editor?

>>62067217
But I want it hidden. (Although right clicking the tab area doesn't give me an autohide option)

I might have to switch from MATE's default WM since it doesn't seem to support undecorating specific applications.

>>62067255
F12, Storage tab.

>>62065249
>>62065035
How does one use the "Dark"- theme?

>>62067259
Also note i just realized that this was my WM set up to do this. Guess I have to replace it for sure. Bummer

>>62067263
Oh. I'm an idiot, thanks.

Wtf? Opening a private window resets my theme from Dark to the theme by default.

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-24 at 20.03.29.png (133KB, 1020x1058px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 1020x1058px

>>62067316
>customize

also, here's the new style where you can modify the line or hide it.. the selector is "tab .line"

/*
Install:
- Save to "(Firefox profile directory)/chrome/userChrome.css"

*/

@namespace url(http://www.mozilla.org/keymaster/gatekeeper/there.is.only.xul);
/********* chrome://browser/content/browser.xul */

#TabsToolbar {
   /* background: transparent !important; */
   -moz-appearance: -moz-mac-vibrancy-dark !important;
   padding-left: 2px !important;
   /* margin-left: 10px !important; */
    /* background-size: 0px !important; */
    /* background-color: transparent !important; */
}


#TabsToolbar:not(:-moz-lwtheme)::after {
   opacity: 0 !important;
 }
 
 tab[selected="true"] {
   /* color: green !important;
   text-shadow: none !important;
   background-color: red !important; */
   /* padding-top: 10px !important;
   margin-top: -10px !important; */
   /* border-top: 4px solid orange !important; */
 }


 
 tab {
   /* margin-top: -2px !important; */
   /* padding-bottom: -2px !important; */
 }

tab .tab-content{
   background: transparent !important;
}

tab .tab-line{
   height: 1px !important;
   opacity: .5 !important;
   display: none !important;
}

>>62063632
NoScript and uMatrix?
uBlock and Privacy Badger?

Why the redundancy?

>>62067736
Werks in my machine™

>>62063632
DownThemAll?

nothing comes close to the power, flexibility and convenience of DTA integration, not to mention its extremely practical and sensible UI function and design decisions.

I'm holding my breath, here, I need DTA, it's my daily driver.

>>62068049
What OS are you using?

"Do not track" was a fucking mistake.

It's like walking around with a paper bag over your head: they can't see your face, but you stick out like a sore thumb

And it's just as retarded.

>>62068119
Mac OS.

>>62063632
>Local CDN
For what purpose?

>>62063774
![search engine] [search term]

WAOW

>>62068242
Me too, I don't know what's going on then

Based 312c

>>62066337

#TabsToolbar {
  display: none;
}

dumb tripperson

Anyone uses lastpass here?
It doesn't work in ff57 it seems.

>>62068350
You can try toggling extensions.legacy.enabled
It might completely break at any time though.

>>62068372
I already tried it and it really doesn't work.

>>62063632
1 I fucking hate sjws, lbgts and feminists so basically I hate everyone at mozilla
2 Firefox is slow and bloated as hell now, it stopped being good at version 30
3 I hate how Firefox became part of Google's botnet
4 There are better alternatives now like Palemoon
5 I hate anything Mozilla related because of sjws and their stupid decisions
6 I hate Firefox because its botnet, you can't go to a blank page without it connecting to several Mozilla servers and Google servers too
7 I fucking hate how it looks now
8 I don't want to install beta crapware on my pc

>>62068709
>Palemoon
why?

>>62068709
>i hate anything related with mozilla
then why the fuck are you here?

>>62068350
Either don't use nightly or wait webext to go live and LP to push a WE version.

>>62063942
pretty sure that's the container addon. can make something like a profile, and change the color of each container and the border of a tab becomes that color.

>>62068709
>muh internet politics at #1
>minimum 2 meaningless meme words per sentence
I give this post the /pol/ seal of quality

Is the webext version of ublock ready yet? I had to move back to Firefox Beta because it wasn't yet

>>62069505
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/releases/download/1.13.10/uBlock0.webext.xpi

>>62069505
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ublock-origin/versions/beta

>>62069528
Do you get automatic updates if you install it from github?

>>62069528
>>62069543
Thanks. You guys saved me some googling

>>62069543
>Do you get automatic updates if you install it from github?
yes

>>62069269
>meme words