Google's forcing me to enrol to vote on gay marriage. This

>>62056742
What

>>62056742
Stop using google already.

>>62056742
Not forcing you to do anything, cunt.

>>62056742
enrol and vote no.

>Forcing you to enroll
Are you retarded OP?
You don't want to enroll to vote so I guess you are.

File: 1498266383906.jpg (321KB, 1212x2391px) Image search: [Google]

321KB, 1212x2391px

>>62056742
>2013+5
>still uses evil SJWOOGLE
wtf are you doing, shithead?!?!

File: 1494774011262.jpg (115KB, 669x755px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 669x755px

>>62056787
>Not forcing you to do anything, cunt.
kek'd. such a fucking retard.

File: 1440715419837.jpg (37KB, 300x263px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 300x263px

>>62056742
>forcing
There's a difference between forcing and encouraging. An ad doesn't force you to buy Pepsi and a rapist doesn't encourage you to take his dick in your ass. Learn the difference.

>>62056839
You don't have to use Google. You don't have to look at it and say, I'm obligated to support gay marriage now. They are a private business, they can support what causes they want.

>>62056742
I thought gay marriage was legal in every white country in the world except Ireland.

>>62056864
Google's a monopoly now. It's hard not to use them, idiot.
They're also extremely corrupt.
https://theintercept.com/2016/04/22/googles-remarkably-close-relationship-with-the-obama-white-house-in-two-charts/

start using startpage anon

>>62056884
>duckduckgo
>startpage
>bing
>yahoo
>hotbot

They're still not forcing you to do anything

>>62056839
The logo is already rainbow coloured wtf.

>>62056742
It's tell you to enroll to vote, not which way to vote. You could enroll and vote no. But that would be retarded because why would you vote against giving people equal rights?

File: 1473898937724.jpg (229KB, 1199x1795px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 1199x1795px

>>62056908
>The logo is already rainbow coloured wtf.
It's not faggoty enough, of course.

Google now makes ads with gays too! And check this shit out... two fags with two children. LMAO!

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/google-promotes-same-sex-marriage-gay-adoption-in-new-ad

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZNqSy-zFXo

Fuck SJWoogle!

>>62056931
Again, their business, they can support whatever the fuck they want.

File: 1492176533884.jpg (166KB, 1022x1166px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 1022x1166px

>>62056936
It's also my right to expose that degenerate company and to warn others not to support these bastards. it's also your right to be butthurt about it. kek. stay mad, degenerate.

Why shouldn't gays get married?

>>62056962
Marriage is between a man and a woman

I don't particularly care either way on the gay issue, but I think people should be able to marry who they want as long as both are adults and able to, and do, consent. Google, as pervasive as it is, pushing for it though seems a bit forced.

>>62056864
>They are a private business, they can support what causes they want.

I am not sure if those retards in this thread talking about "private company can do whatever they want" are trolling or just plain stupid.

Its result of being meme into believing that 100% capital market is a good thing.

Gov has tools to react in a such situation and they were doing it many times in the past (yes the us gov), just their tools are not update for 2017 and were used mostly to industries.

>us anti monopol laws (anittrus law)
>Monopoly - exist when a specific person or enterprise is the only supplier of particular commodity.

So now you fucking retard who are defending google, imagine that there was no anit monopoly act and gov would not react, today there would be one company that hold 95% of oil in usa, they could dumb ridiculous price because there would be 0 competition on the market, after the time they would grow so big they would be able to fund both parties in congress and be sure that they will have status quo.

Imagine similar situation in CPU market, intel is so rich now that they could buy whole amd and then set ridiculous price on cpu and stagnate any innovation or growth in cpu market for decades and with a such money they could stop any other company before they even have a chance to sell their product.

but thank to those laws its impossible, few years ago amd was in a such shit siutation that intel was helping them with own money to stay on the market because otherwise they would have monopoly act all over their aerohole and thanks to this law today amd is pushing new cpus and we have some price drop and cpu market is alive again.


How are those cases any different than google service? Because oil or cpu are "physical object" and google market is service?

No. there is not different, only outdated law that can not handle 2017 year.

Google is so big that they completely control search engine market and their os has over 90% of market share.

File: They+were+an+improvement+over+mgs1+coming+from+that+i+_2539955c4d722f40c0180b0c3291341e.jpg (38KB, 600x673px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 600x673px

>>62056811
>enrolling to vote for fag marriage make mE SMARRTT

>>62056966
According to (((middle eastern))) religions yes

>>62056966
Why the fuck would anyone care who gets married as long as they aren't kids and both are saying they want it? I'd rather see gays being able to marry than getting constant ads about supporting gays even when I have nothing to do with them. I don't even know any gays personally. Just get married and shut up about it already.

I'm glad google brought this to my attention, just voted no.

you're not forced to. you just won't have a say in anything. just vote yes and resume being a faggot.

>>62057039
This, honestly. I have a few gay friends but honestly they don't bring it up half as much as the media does. Just let them marry so we can all get on with our lives

>>62056979
anti-monopoly act is the dumbest shit in the world. everything is basically a monopoly regardless. you just have TWO choices instead of one. there's rarely any competition.
let's take a look at how many choices we have in what would otherwise be monopolies
>walmart or target
>PS4 or XBox
>Demokkkrat or Republican
>SAT or ACT
>McDonalds or Murder King
>Chipotle or Taco Bell
>Intel or Ayymd
>Ayymd or Nvidia
>O'SeX or Wangblows
enjoy your "freedom to choose". and if you genuinely believe these companies are competing you have been so pummeled with propaganda that you are probably mentally damaged.
what a mistake

>>62056966
That's sort of an archaic understanding, like how marriage for awhile weren't interracial, and marriage between an adult and a minor was permissible. For better or worse these things change overtime.

>>62057039
>>62057095
children raised by gay parents will turn out mentally ill.

>>62057068
>vote yes
Fuck off fag

>>62057145
Just like ones raised by straight ones turn out totally fine?

>>62056948
why are you ashamed of loving cock

>>62057152
usually socially inept kids were raised by single parents actually.

File: 1496117855260.png (66KB, 695x500px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 695x500px

>>62056742
>Enrol

>>62057162
>ackshually

>>62057151
I'm telling OP to vote yes, I'm voting no when the time comes. Don't assume I'm voting yes just because I tell someone else to.
It's okay anon, I'm not enabling faggotry.

>>62056979
So what does that have to do with Google's right to put a small link about gay marriage on their page? Even if they are a monopoly they have that right

>>62057165
It's even worse when you factor in the government spending some $100mill

>>62057145
You better go watch some real porn instead of cartoon porn if you don't know how kids are made. Gays are just adopting the ones that are not doing very well anyway. It's still an improvement for the kids when they go from no parents to gay parents.

>>62056948
I don't see a problem with gays honestly. This board is full of assmad neckbeards who are so pathetic that not even men will date them.

>kek
>degenerate
>politics on a technology board
>>>/pol/

>trying to watch youtube on my phone
>every video is preceded by some unskippable ad for gay marriage
i really cant care less if these gaybos get married or not but i'm considering voting no just to spite them to be quite 2bqh

The neon god we've made.

>>62057233
Enjoy having your vote appear in public records and being fired from your job for being a racist nazi bigot.

File: 1503373187769.jpg (9KB, 225x224px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 225x224px

>>62056832
What the fuck is that creature?

>>62057275
>vote for us or else
lel

>>62057281
DON'T TALK ABOUT MY GF LIKE TAHT

>>62057183
its time to discuss at what point private company right to do whatever they want ends.

Its really dangerous, google is so big that they are able to influence view/trends on global scale, they can change search result or delete specific websites that they or they friend from politic find problematic.

If they hold 95% of smartphones market, they are monopolist, now its no longer only private company with their private service, they grow so big that at the same time they are private company their choice on what is good and what is allowed in their market has impact on global world scale.

Its a new problem that we had previously mostly in heavy industry.

I am aware that google service and their right to choose what is good and bad as private company is new.

but imagine that google is a newspaper, newspaper that has 95% of newspaper market and 5% are local newspapers with low range.

Now if a private newspaper company do they have right to write news that support their political friends and skip news that would show off in bad light their political friends?

If they are normal newspaper one in hundreds then yes, they have. but if somebody hold 95% of market, their can impact on whole society/global society.

its fucking dangerous.

>>62057231
>>>62056948
>I don't see a problem with gays honestly.
You must be dumb if you don't see a problem with fags

>marriage is a religious thing
>gays usually arent religious people
so why do they want to get married? whats the point?

>>62057162
My best friend is gay and he has two loving parents, one dad and one mom. So unless you have independent research backing up your claims, kindly stop lying
>>62057400
That's a lot of assuming.

>>62057376
That they have different preferences from everyone else? Is this what you're bugged about? You want everyone to be just like you? There are no problems with gays as a collective group, since every gay is different. And the fact that you're anti-gay unironically shows how underaged you are. Most everyone on 4chan used to be homophobic ironically. Once the 15 year olds showed up everything went down the shitter.

>>62056884
You ever hear that song by the Rolling Stones
You cant always get what you want?

>>62057546
>>>62057376 (You)
>That they have different preferences from everyone else?
It's a lot more than just different preferences
>There are no problems with gays as a collective group
LOL in what world do you live?
Fags are intrusive, it's their way or else and try to indoctrinate children. That's a big problem

>>62057372
Are you okay? The reddit spacing meme is real after all

>>62057662
Funnily enough, it's the militant straight allies that try to push it upon everyone. The gay people I know just want to be left to do their own things and not used as weapons in someone else's moral crusade.
>A lot more than just different preferences
Elaborate please

>>62057678
I am not only from reddit, but also from bombai.

OP is just baiting but politics don't belong on a fucking search engine page. Imagine seeing "Please vote for Trump!" on under your DuckDuckGo search bar. Although something like Net Neutrality I can understand because it has to do with the internet and technology which is something websites are actually involved in.

>>62057708
Get
Out

>>62056888
This

>>62057721
Basically this

>>62056742
What's so bad about that? You should vote on it if you are for it or against it.

>>62057662
It's you who's indoctrinating. One of the first steps of indoctrinating people is telling them how bad a collective group of people are. Also, the way you go out of your way to make gays seem like the worlds greatest problem screams closet homo.

>>62057478
>That's a lot of assuming
no it isnt

>>62056884
it horrifies me that the part of google's corruption that you focus on is their support of gay marriage (i.e. a completely inconsequential meme-issue which corporations absolutely LOVE because it gets people all worked up and distracts them from reality)

>>62057722
Why?

>>62057745
>Roaches are a problem
>now I am a closet roach lover

>>62057754
Well looking up marriage in history shows a great majority of the reasons people get married for are not, in fact, religious ones. So that already shows you know little about marriage beyond whatever moral system you believe in

>>62057773
Not the place for you, return to Facebook

>>62057231
clearly a brainwashed moron right there.

>>62057794
marriage itself is a religous ceremony dickhead, they dont hire a priest just as a joke

>>62057800
I do not use fb, not many friends with access to pc

>>62057708
A pajeet from reddit? It's like every meme comes true at once

>>62057839
>what are celebrants
you know nothing about marriage, anon. Let me ask you this: why do people get married? Not gays, I mean straight people? Why do ones who do not believe in a religion get married? Read a history on it and you'll see marriage happens for many more reasons that religion

>>62057848
It's a shame to live in Africa I guess

>>62057873
We were kings while your people were sticking stick in shit and laughting in ass cold areas

>>62057891
And now you're not kings and instead sticking sticks in shit and dying from STDs.

>>62057131
but isn't inside trading illegal or someshit ?

>>62057131
troll or dumb

>>62056742
Its illegal to do that? i mean they got a fine from EU, why they still do that?

>>62057721
OBVIOUSLY OP is baiting.
>Aha! Now I'll make people hate /pol/ even more with my tricky tricks!

Regardless, """non-partisan""" organisations keep coming up to try and encourage people to vote yes on this issue. Recently got an email from university telling us about registering to vote for this with a preamble about how important it is to let people love... then some links to support services for homos

File: 1503358519488.png (880KB, 1409x4383px) Image search: [Google]

880KB, 1409x4383px

Pic related is what happens when you leftist bully scientist who dare to say that some gender disorders may be mental problems and that gender is not social construct

>>62057998
he should have been treated for his mental illness and he'd be better off today. no wonder 43% of these freaks commits suicide. that guy probably killed himself already.

>>62057998
What does that have to do with being gay though? Heck, what does being gay have to do with technology?

>He doesn't like gay people

>>62056742
Switch to Ecosia or Searx for search.

File: 1503524226117-b.jpg (100KB, 981x785px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 981x785px

>>62056907
>Google is just a search engine

>>62056742
>TIL Australians spell enroll as "enrol"

>>62057865
To have children, or power in the case of aristocracy, which needed children anyway to pass down their kingdoms. Marriage for love alone is a relatively modern thing based on romanticist drivel.
Gays cant have children, and we dont have aristocracy, so no marriage for Adam and Steve.

>>62058496
But neither of those are religious reasons. What about couples that get married but don't have kids for either not wanting them or can't have them? Should they be banned from getting married too? By your logic they should because they won't produce offspring

File: Kent.Hovind-YouTube-800x430.png (307KB, 800x430px) Image search: [Google]

307KB, 800x430px

>>62056908
>Why would you vote against equal right
Oppresive Cis-gendered white males don't deserve a vote. As giving them a word or vote is seen as a micro-aggression towards the oppressed minorities.

>>62056776
I'm just constantly surprised that on a supposed technology board, people do use it.

>>62058527
I didnt say they were, I just listed several non-religious reasons as to why marriage is supported by the government. Right now the government has ditched this understanding of marriage, so there is no reason for it to be backed by the government (because it doesnt get anything out of it), under this understanding, a ceremony for friendship with added benefits has as much legitimacy as this marriage.

> Should they be banned from getting married too?
No, because marriage laws work on principle, and sterility is accidental to a heterosexual couple, while it is essential to the homosexual couple. To say we should ban them would be akin to getting rid of the age of majority because of the responsible 16/17 year old or the irresponsible 19 year old, it is virtually impossible to apply and goes against the essence of law, which works in principle.

Also >>>/pol/

>>62058635
But why the extra definition? Just call it marriage and be done with it. Clearly you'll never experience marriage regardless, and since you're not gay them getting married has 0 impact on your life.
Marriage can be just for love, and if the definition has changed in the past as new reasons came up to get married, it can change in the current day to be about wanting to be with one person. While I think you have good arguments for your stance on the issue, I fail to see why it can't be expanded (barring the inability to make kids) to allow gay people to marry.
>/pol/
I don't even know their stance on this topic, with how often they get brought up supporting both sides of so many things

File: William-Adolphe_Bouguereau_(1825-1905)_-_Sewing_(1898).jpg (632KB, 1391x2291px) Image search: [Google]

632KB, 1391x2291px

>>62056908
1. If there are two people and neither of them can get married to the same sex - that is equal rights
2. I want the right to express my sexuality openly and marry who I want but society despises me for it while praising faggots. Fuck them.

/pol/ get out

>>62057998
high change that he killed himself after that

It's just reminding you to do your duty as a citizen and vote, it's not telling you to vote for any option in particular.

>>62058692
>I fail to see why it can't be expanded (barring the inability to make kids) to allow gay people to marry.
For the same reason you cant square the circle, it is a self-evident truth. When one grasps the essence of marriage one understands why it has to be procreative in principle, which is why any state that denies it is has no basis on fact, and this will show up in further legislation, something that has already proved itself right in recent times (most people confuse the rational argument that since there isnt anything procreative about marriage in principle, and we can adjust the definition of marriage however we please to include anything, then there isnt anything wrong in principle with including incest, polygamy, zoophiles, waifufags, etc. with some kind of slippery slope argument. I mean, if reciprocal love is a sufficient condition for marriage, then how can you in principle deny marrying the Smith twins? Or if we have already lowered the bar on marriage, what disallows us to lower it again).
>and since you're not gay them getting married has 0 impact on your life.
I disagree, we are social animals, and any change that happens in our society will inevitably affect everyone in it in one way or another. The case of Kim Davis or the Christian bakers is proof of this.

And I said >>>/pol/ because this line of thought doesnt belong on a technology forum, but on >>>/pol/. And I rather keep it like that than follow with this discussion (And also, because I need to get things done).

>>62058832
not your safe space faggot

Why should gay marriage be legal, but not incest marriage? If theyre consenting adults how can you say ones ok and not the other? Is incest the new gay? In 50 years are we about to be having this debate about incest? Im pro gay marriage by the way, people should be able to do whatver the fuck they want as long as all parties consent. But why do people currently have such bigoted views against incest? Literally every argument about incest you can use for gays, but everyones pro gay but would never admit being pro incest. Double standards faggotry

>>62058892
Adoption and surrogates are a thing couples that can't have kids can do. Good luck getting your things done, anon.

>>62056742
Yandex

File: 1485794893570.jpg (102KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 640x640px

>>62058941
Have you ever considered that people don't actually think for themselves and people with "intelligent and open-minded" views are just following whatever is trendy or told to them?

Pedophilic attraction in men is literally more common than homosexual attraction in men.

>>62058941
I have nothing against it honestly. It's not my thing but as long as everyone involved is a consenting adult, who cares?
>>62059030
Source on that claim?

>>62056880
that's beautiful

>>62056863
+1000 - grammar and punctuation
+ 5 - SJW bashing
+ 1 - good point

>>62057376
Well, they do give you lung cancer.

>>62057400
Lots of Civil matters are in function of marriage.
The sane solution would be abolish the marriage and reform these civil matters, but meh.

>>62056884
Seriously. I read that article. Are you joking? There are so many things wrong with that article to use it to support your argument.

File: 1444148207450.jpg (585KB, 2074x3061px) Image search: [Google]

585KB, 2074x3061px

>>62056742

They are gently reminding to make sure your address is current ... which i just updated cause i moved a few months ago

its great because now i can vote against this leftest cultural marxism and hopefully send these snowflakes a real clear message with my fellow based aus bros

>>62056832
>SJWOOGLE
You try too hard, man.

>>62056742
>!

>>62057039
Once they get marriage youll start hearing about some other poor minority needing a few extra rights. Activists only care about pushing their ideology. It never ends.

Switch to yandex already.

>so weak-willed that a sentence underneath the search bar asking him to vote and the colors of a logo threatens him

>>62057131
Literally none of these are monopolies

>>62059505
>?

>>62057546
>There are no problems with gays as a collective group, since every gay is different.

It's not enough that they're tolerated. They want to force their views on everyone and every culture. They would go out of their way to get your attention.

The only right they need is the right to get medical assistance and cure themselves.

>>62060334
>>

>>62056742
Just vote against it.

>>62056742
I opened this thread and now it's forcing me to respond. I should have opened another.