THANK YOU BASED MOZILLA

File: 08f000b8.png (897KB, 1060x1080px) Image search: [Google]

897KB, 1060x1080px

>>62056285
nice

57 IS HERE
PANIC!

>>62056285
That logo looks so fucking good
I welcome back the return of gradients

>>62056310
About:config
Legacy.extensions.enabled:1

I just switched back to Nightly after using Chromium for Windows for about a year. Kicking myself for not ditching Chromium earlier

>>62056285
thats one sexy logo.

>>62056285
> based
> sjw
pick one

looks like the mozilla devs have been given a day off to shitpost on 4chan.

>>62056285
B A S E D

>>62056402
since they're actively stripping XUL as we speak, legacy extensions will end up gradually failing in weird ways

>>62056285
Comfy logo

What are the advantages to using this anyway?

>>62058961
The logo.

>>62059188
it looks gay

>>62058961
Eventually they might be able to declutter the code and add all the brand spanking new features they want like sandboxing etc.

Though it's a heavy price to pay, and it's gotten to the point where I only use firefox out of lack of a better alternative. I no longer 'like' firefox. I just hate it least

>>62056310
yes my addons died
>>62056350
i did that, it allows SOME addons to be installed
but not others, do you know any other methods that might allow installing old addons?

>>62059612

sandboxing is already enabled in Nightly

>>62059612
>I just hate it least
i unfortunately am going to have to agree with this

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-24 at 11.05.56.png (46KB, 690x346px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 690x346px

>>62056285
yeah, they are very based... want me to "pay for google adds"

>>62061524
>Doesn't block ads through hosts which is superior and just works with all browsers

TOP KEK

>>62060861
>do you know any other methods that might allow installing old addons?
Switch to Waterfox.

>>62061563
>>Doesn't block ads through hosts which is superior and just works with all browsers
yeah, that would be convenient, specially if you'd like to turn it off for some sites which you'd like to support

>>62061524
uBlock Origin doesn't have this problem

>>62056402
Chromium happens to run much more smoothly on my toaster than Firefox. Is nightly somehow faster than Chromium? What makes it superior?

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-24 at 11.20.32.png (32KB, 664x246px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 664x246px

>>62061615
fuck you liar

>>62061596
go back to red dit faggot
>>62061563
>doesn't block ads through DNS so he won't have to fuck with hosts

>>62061628
>go back to red dit faggot
ok, I'm red.dit, you're retard.. big deal

File: uBlock.png (26KB, 1288x280px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 1288x280px

>>62061624
learn to install it

>>62061656
I know you are reddit.
KYS

>>62061660
>learn to install it
learn to suck my dick... fuck you and your stupid browser

>>62061666
ahahahaha u told hem bro XD

>>62056402
TNX anon

i moved to esr. nightly is unusable without addons, and a lot of the API still isn't ready.

I'm making or using desktop programs for my favorite sites anyway. Browsers are just for backup.

File: Screenshot from 2017-08-24 12-31-55.png (14KB, 576x256px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 576x256px

>>62061524
retard

>>62061721
>needs to edit about:config
>needs to download extension from github

yeah, I dont give a fuck about SJW infested George Sorros supported communist browser, that I'm going through all those problems..

I shouldnt have installed this commie piece of shit in first place.

>>62061743
are you retarded? this is a webextension from addons.mozilla.org
Do you know how to use computer?

>>62061743
See >>62061755

>>62061743
This is the state of /g/

>>62059612
>I just hate it least
Yeah, that's it.

Just use Chrome.

>>62061841
*Iridium

why the fuck would you willingly share your browsing with google?

>>62061624
I swear we get this post every hour. are there really that many retards here or is it just one guy trolling?

>>62062010

If you can't tell the difference, either you're a fucking idiot or you're trolling to bump your own thread.

Personally I think it's the former myself but then again this is 4chan so it's probably some of both.

>>62062082
I was able to tell the difference like 5 years ago but then tens of thousands of underage 9faggers came here to stay and I haven't been able to tell since then

>release logo
>community hates it
>go on spite-trip making the shittiest possible logos they could think of
>revert to previous hated logo
>much better
>wow

>>62062350
>community hates it
At least it looks like a firefox logo and not just a blank sphere.
It looks great too.

>>62059612
>I no longer 'like' firefox. I just hate it least
This.
I want a light browser with XUL extensions support.
Literally just a core featureless browser that uses firefox "legacy" extensions to expand

>>62062350
>community hates it
fuck you, gradients are my fetish

>activate webrender
>40% CPU use on average 30% GPU use
>out of memory with 16Gb
Jeez, nightly seems promising.

>>62062350
>community hates it
[citation needed]

>>62063133
webrender isn't anywhere near ready. what do you expect?

File: OpzJg_vZZKUyrSjpoLQ9coLWRqHuUpdkMns4BGVqmxc.png (123KB, 384x384px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 384x384px

>>62056350
It sure does

>>62056350
>the only thing they got right was the logo
Is Nightly /our browser/?

Nightly is very responsive on mobile too!

Very happy with the transition.

>>62056521
>muh sjw
>pretending theres any other option that is competitive whilst being foss

nice job using jewish tactics of presenting a problem without a solution

>>62061660
Hey, um...
Delete this, please?
Thanks sweetie.

Reminder that until Firefox has been independently audited it is a botnet and the fact you blindly trust it because it's open source makes you a terminal brainlet. Even worse if you use precompiled binaries.

File: teutonik.christian.jpg (34KB, 376x500px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 376x500px

>>62061666
tfw I witnessed satan getting wrecked

>>62063476
reminder that all the alternatives cant be audited because they are proprietary

please provide citations of your accusations anon otherwise fuck off because you are just a insecure faggot who is scared of firefox progressing

>inb4 im not
why post in this thread then?

>>62061616
Nightly isn't faster than Chromium, that's just a meme. Benchmarks put it at around 60%.

>>62061743
>soros
nice fake news
>sjw
are you triggered?
>>>/pol/

if you respond with bait please list your alternative browser that you use without these issues anon :^)

>>62063498
>firefox is the only FLOSS browser
t. brainlet

>>62061755
REEEE
FUCK OFF
I HATE YOU OKAY?

>>62062010
its the same faggot who always makes these anti firefox threads

hes a chrome advocate too who always false flags issues with firefox until people call him out

>>62062350
It actually got a lot of praise from the community.

Even all of those anti logo threads weeks back the majority of it was praise with 2 people who hated it just because.

Lots of people like the synth/vaporwave aesthetics.

>>62063498
Open source software needs to be audited to verify its' security otherwise it's no better than proprietary software. Noone knows what's in there. And if you use precompiled binaries then you're just a moron, binaries aren't free software and they could be literally anything.

>>62063530
>reading comprehension
i said competitive

palememe and waterfox dont have the performance or security

>>62063610
no you didn't, that word doesn't appear in your post once

>>62063598
so what browser do you suggest wise one?

oh thats right you only want to sow seeds of dissent without a solution

kindly fuck off

>>62063618
Why did you ignore this post but choose to reply to the other?
>>62063447

The point still stands.
Nothing is as capable that is still foss.

>>62056285
Updating from 55 now.
I was able to import my profile from v41 seamlessly.

>>62063373
I wasn't even aware that Nightly worked on the phone too.

Thanks for the info!

Question: does this mean plugins need to be approved by Mozilla now? If so would they deny anything thats not sjw friendly like the (((coincidence detector)))?

when's the stable version supposed to come out? I tried nightly and I like it, but it's too early to use it regularly

File: mozilla-amo.png (49KB, 674x444px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 674x444px

>>62063734
In order to be put on the AMO site they'd always need to be approved by Mozilla. There is no change to that.
But you are allowed to install extensions they rejected for whatever reason from 3rd party sites.

>>62063843
>this ugly text rendering
I think you need to go see a eye doctor, anon.

>>62063746
november

>>62063874
looks perfectly fine on my screen apart from a very slight red fringing

>>62062390
Pale moon?