Thread replies: 11
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
Anonymous
Adnauseam acting weird 2017-08-23 02:23:17 Post No. 62049108
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Adnauseam acting weird 2017-08-23 02:23:17 Post No. 62049108
[Report] Image search: [Google]
>go to Huffington Post article to test Adnauseam
>0 ads blocked
>no ads on site
>go to same site in Firefox with uBlock Origin
>66 ads blocked
How is this program supposed to work? That's probably like $100 in clicks on a single page I could have done.
Here's the site I tested it on: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/baby-named-eclipse-after-solar-eclipse_us_599bdbf1e4b0771ecb06c8a9
>>
>>62049108
What is the point of adnauseam? Ublock works fine.
>>
>>62049293
It clicks all the ads it blocks, reducing confidence in advertising companies to drive users to sites. It's the same as Ublock Origin (it's a fork), it's exactly the same effectiveness and speed.
>>
>>62049337
So it loads everything and gives the ad network detailed information about what sites you visit?.
>>
>>62049391
yeah, it's fucking retarded. i don't know why anyone would willingly install this shit
>>
>>62049391
>>62049428
If ad companies liked it, then why did google ban it?
It's clearly more disruptive than uBlock.
>>
>>62049450
and yet it loads ads, posing a clear security risk and reduced privacy.
>>
Adnauseam is for /pol/ level retards that can't think for themselves. In a few months they'll be getting prepaid "acceptable ads" and their browsing history sold.
>>
>>62049472
>>62050589
That would make sense... except for Google banning it from their store.
>>
>>62050612
Its a fucking autoclicker you retard of course they will ban it.
>>/pol/
>>
>>62050657
They don't ban imagus, which "auto clicks" too
Thread posts: 11
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1