The firefox that went right

Is this a good mobile browser?

Firefox is unbarebly slow on Android atm

>>62045604
Best android browser is Brave. Too bad the desktop version is such hot garbage.

too bad it will have no functional addons soon.

>>62045739
>too bad it will have no functional addons soon.

>>62045591
>went right
dropped harder than trump's approval ratings

How easy is it to switch to this from normal Firefox?

>>62045902
Install it. If you have incompatible addons you really need, use the Moon Tester Tool to forcibly install them. Worked on my machine.

File: peepee.png (116KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 1600x900px

>>62045591
Yep!

>>62045902
It was piss-easy for me but I'm just one person.

>>62045934
*pukes*

>>62045887
>Pale moon not better than firefox in security, less bullshit and memory friendly
only in your pathetic and leftist mind pale moon is not superior

>>62045934
>Futaba theme
other than that 10/10

>>62045999
Everything is more secure than autism browsers run by nobodies.

>>62046024
A (you) you desperately wanted, a (you) you desperately get.

>>62045591
>websites don't QA for pale moon
>unsupported and thus tons of bugs

It suffers from being an alternative for the big three

>>62046220
>modernererer web design bugs
>don't visit the site
nothing of value was lost

File: Screenshot_2017-08-23_17-24-04.png (214KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

214KB, 1366x768px

it just werks

>>62046220
Why would this matter? As long as their rendering engine supports the latest ES it doesn't matter.

Spotted the programming babby.

File: M.C.-Straver.png (35KB, 120x144px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 120x144px

Who's going to furfest 2017!?!?!
I get kind of sweaty after but we can take care of that. ;)

t. moonchild

>>62045604
Pale Moon for mobile has been suspended for some time due to lack of Android developers. Listen to >>62045614.

>>62046220
The problem is that they don't into standards in general, just hacking shit together until it works in babby browsers.

>>62045999
>security
>no tabs sandboxing
DROPPED

>>62046300
fappy tiem

>>62046359
Can someone explain this meme?
I don't get it...

>inb4 quick rundown bogs

File: brave-botnet.jpg (169KB, 926x773px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 926x773px

>>62045614
>>62046378

>>62046433
Why the fuck would you need browser level sandboxing when you have OS level sandboxing?

That's how I know you're a Wincuck

>>62046487
>justifying your insecurities with accusations

I use kernel 4.12 with arch, openrc and i3 scrub

>>62046469
Give me the source mozcuck

File: 2017-08-23-105244_1920x1080_scrot.png (185KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 1920x1080px

Just werks

>>62046517
It doesn't matter what you run, you brainlet cuck.

You didn't answer my question.

>>62046560
You stated that it was more secure than firefox.
I disproved you.
You attacked my OS in a last ditch effort.

File: brave-dev.jpg (22KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 300x300px

>>62046529
Go to their website.

>>62046615
>that nose
WTF EICH

>>62045591
>furrymoon
when will you redditors fuck off already

File: joke-glasses.png (99KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 480x480px

>>62046644

>>62046682
>asiatic with negroid nose
>dyed sjw hair
>oversized hipster glasses
>female "coder"
Sigh.

>>62046707
you forgot the nappy dreads

>>62045604
Pale Moon for desktop
Naked Browser for mobile

>>62046677
Which browser do you use, fellow redditor?

File: 1489851905322.png (199KB, 1800x1578px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 1800x1578px

>>62046677
(You)

>>62045591
Can anybody tell me what's technically wrong with Firefox?
>inb4 muh sjw
Not a technical issue.
>inb4 webextensions suck
They don't, your addon taste just sucks, Firefox is not supposed to be emacs.
>inb4 muh bloat
Nightly is twice as fast and light as the current stable version.

>>62046914
There's nothing wrong with Firefox. I just feel more special using Pale Moon.

>>62046914
>ask for opinions
>inb4 so much nobody can answer

I think what is wrong with Firefox is that it has a lot of truly incompetent developers. That's why I switched 3-4 years ago.

>>62046914
>he actually believes the high amount of security bugs and garbage that gets released on firefox stable is not an technical issue
I bet you never visited firefox bugzilla

>>62046971
I didn't ask for opinions, I asked for what is specifically wrong with the browser
>I think what is wrong with Firefox is that it has a lot of truly incompetent developers
Not a technical issue.
>>62046975
>minor bugs
Doesn't influence my browsing experience
>security bugs
[citation needed]

File: affluent_intellectual.jpg (280KB, 940x940px) Image search: [Google]

280KB, 940x940px

>>62047039
>incompetent developers who can't write code or understand technical issues
>not a technical issue

pic related is (You)

>>62047057
>he still can't name any technical issue with firefox

>>62046914
>Firefox is not supposed to be emacs.
It was, it's why I stayed with it. Losing this property is a problem with Firefox. Just because it's not a problem for you doesn't mean it's not a problem. A user in DMZ accessing corporate web resources will not care about code execution exploits in browser, but that doesn't mean they are not a problem.

>>62047039
>[citation needed]
t. 18 year old pajeet that never visited bugzilla

>>62047093
>not being able to tell the difference between minor bugs and security bugs
Again, if you actually saw it on their bugzilla then provide source.

>>62047093
I was looking at Bugzilla trying to find some bugs proving their absolute incompetence. Bugzilla is worse cancer than anything on 4chan.

>>62047105
This should have been fixed in beta
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1374047
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1371259

>>62047075
>It was, it's why I stayed with it
A browser is supposed to be used to browse html documents, firefox allows you to use addons to modify your http headers, how it connects to website, modifying the website content itself. For everything else you should use a different application.

>>62045591
It's a good browser. I use it a lot.
Media playback however isn't stellar.

>>62047130
Why am I getting access denied errors?

>>62047143
Just get the fuck out of here, you want affirmation not conversation.

File: 1497524612268.jpg (332KB, 736x738px) Image search: [Google]

332KB, 736x738px

>>62047191
Only elite hackers get access.

I thought we were done with the Pale Meme familia

>>62047203
That does sound like them. """"""Open Source""""" ftw.

File: 1424876697266.png (75KB, 198x198px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 198x198px

>>62047200
>being mad because the mozilla boogeymen are taking from you the ability to bloat your browser with shitty addons
You are as bad as the windows users installing useless bloatware and the wonder "why is muh pc so slowww :(".

>>62047242
>implying you know shit about me
go away summertard. it must be pathetic to have nothing in your life but trolling. consider an hero.

>>62047253
>y-you don't know sh-shit about me!!!
>proceeds to do the same thing he's criticizing
Do you shills even try anymore

>>62046460
Moonchild is one of the pale moon developers.
Anon just called him a furry, that's all.

>>62047273
>you are not an obvious shill
(You)

>>62047297
>no arguments
>totally not a shill

>>62047302
(You)

>>62046914
Honestly, this.

I tried to get on the /g/ bandwagon but Nightly is actually competitive.

>>62047307
If you don't want a conversation then why are you shitting up the thread? Are you looking for affirmation?

>>62046971
The performance begs to differ.
I suggest you try it before, you knock it.
It's only fair if it's been 3 years, after all.

I was skeptical about nightly too.

>>62047350
After encountering the cancer that Bugzilla is first-hand, I will never touch their shit again and actively cheer for their demise. I don't care if it gets me 100BTC, they are shit. I tried looking up the old bugs that finally forced me to move, but it seems they have been purged to cover their incompetence.

>>62047289
Gotcha.

File: 1443740110407.jpg (297KB, 1462x1462px) Image search: [Google]

297KB, 1462x1462px

>>62047372
So you literally don't want to use a browser just because you are too dumb to navigate their bugtracker?
>I tried looking up the old bugs that finally forced me to move, but it seems they have been purged to cover their incompetence
Maybe they fixed it you brainlet.

>>62045591
> The firefox that went proprietary
Fixed that for you.

>>62047372
>I tried looking up the old bugs that finally forced me to move, but it seems they have been purged
it's a good thing google and external archive sites back up all bug reports then so you can explicitly reference which bug reports have been purged rather than seeming like a paranoid shill

>>62047429
https://github.com/MoonchildProductions/Pale-Moon

>>62047429
DELETE THISSSS

>>62047429
no it didn't
only the branding has restrictions, basically the same as firefox itself
there's also an option during building to swap the branding for unrestricted branding if you need that

>>62047442
Agreed.
Show us this purgery!

>Inb4 I can't

File: grinch.jpg (5KB, 250x187px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 250x187px

>>62047442
Witnessed.

>>62047442
Took me awhile because I don't memorize these numbers like an autist.

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=812695

File: 1443872121580.jpg (23KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 480x360px

>>62047589
>windows

>>62047589
>RESOLVED FIXED in Firefox 31
What a surprise, windows users are retards.

>>62047626
How would that have helped me in the year+ it took them to fix it? Moonchild fixed the issue right away and that is the only reason I didn't switch to Chrome (which also had no issues). But by all means, go on being a sad shitposter.

>>62045902
I made the switch last night and it wasnt that hard
took a little more effort to make the browser look the way I wanted it to, but it was worth it.

Absolutely. Best browser out currently

>>62047626
Whelp that didn't go the way he thought it would.

LOL

>all of these gay furries

>>62047725
>current year
>making an issue of people's sexuality

>>>/pol/

>>62045614
>>62045604
Since this thread has devolved into shit, what's the best android browser that supports extensions (mostly for addblocker, really)

>>62047738
I don't go on /pol/ but if you support gay furries or are a gay furry, you need to get the fuck off my board right now. Your kind is not welcome here.

>>62047671
>is a windows user
>would have no issues if he wouldn't use a pozzed os
>was considering switching to chrome instead
>"thankfully moonfurfag fixed the rendering on my shit os!"
Hey if palememe does works well on your nsa/windows then stay there, you did the right choice. Firefox should be only for linux users so that the firefox devs don't have to waste their time on patching retarded issues.

>>62047748
regular firefox supports ublock, shame it doesn't support umatrix or noscript

>>62047766
>he's still mad because he got btfo

>>62047769
I guess I'll stick with it then, thanks anon.

>>62047738
I hope you don't have any pets.

>>62047748
Mobile Nightly can use desktop webextensions (even some google extensions) and also has sync support.

I host a offline sync server on my lan to simplify.

>>62047757
>pozzed os
The only pozzed software was Firefux. If moonfurfag could figure it out but not mozilla's best and brightest then what does that say about mozilla? Absolutely shit-tier devs, who like you want to masturbate over an OS than get shit done.
>was considering switching to chrome
I was in college and using my computer for real work, which involves Windows and proprietary software in the real world. But keep larping kid.

>>62047786
I also don't have any pants, anon. Hug me :-*

>>62047806
They did fix it though.
That was also then and this is now.

Where even stable firefox has sandboxing and multi processes.

Palemoon is looking very dated in comparison.

What happens when Nightly hits stable and its even more of difference?

>>62047750
>my board
show proof of ownership

>>62047848
But what good is it if you have no faith in the community?

>>62047757
>Firefox should be only for linux users
It will be soon with their paltry market share. I'm all for them self-containing.

>>62047885
I have way more faith than a furry dev who can't even incorporate modern features.

Look what the community did in 4 months.

You clearly haven't tried 55-57

>>62047784
some browsers have their own adblock with filters you can't edit (tuga and brave) but you should be paring them with your own using adaway anyway. their pro is they don't eat battery as much, but that's about it.

>>62047908
>can't even incorporate modern features.
In the works.

>You clearly haven't tried 55-57
Do I need to go there again?

>>62047448
It's source code. Binaries are proprietary.
>>62047443
No, it's not. Firefox uses open-source MPL 2.0 license for this, but Pale Moon could done the same, but furfag choose to use it's own proprietary license without any reason.

>>62047848
>sandboxing
i just use firejail for that
>multi processes
is that really a big deal? palemoon runs fine with lots of tabs open as it is, and uses less resources since it's one process

>>62047924
Multi-process is a meme for brainlets

>>62047922
>It's source code. Binaries are proprietary.
how is that different to say, RHEL?
just get the sources, that's what i do

>>62047922
>Binaries are proprietary.
Citation needed
The only thing they don't have open source is the logo and the .exe windows release
Don't lie faggot

File: 1495684694088.jpg (40KB, 562x437px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 562x437px

>>62047775
>btfo for refusing to feed the troll

>>62047936
None, but it's enterprise, and another is furfag custom build.
> just get the sources, that's what i do
Can't be bothered.
>>62047967
> redistribution of the Pale Moon binaries (executable form) is limited by certain conditions under a proprietary license by Moonchild Productions
https://www.palemoon.org/redist.shtml
Don't use proprietary software, faggot,

File: 1492999820757.jpg (188KB, 496x700px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 496x700px

>>62045591
>Sorosfox

>>62048248
Literally not

>>62045591
My only problems with Pale Moon is that it seems to have the same garbage issues that old Firefox had with terrible smooth scrolling and bad hardware acceleration. It's always very slow scrolling through threads on 4chan.

>>62048248
>spreading fake news

>>62047935
t. brainlet

>>62047924
What's stopping you from using Nightly + firefjail combo?

Security is best in layers.
What happens when your firejail gets a vulnerability?
Better to be safer than sorry.

>>62046914
In their attempts to become Chrome they're inching closer and closer to the botnet.
https://github.com/mozilla/addons-frontend/issues/2785
It's going to get worse.

>>62048537
no harm in that, but i don't want to use nightly for other reasons as well

>>62045591
That's not icecat

>>62048223
wtf..
I wasn't aware of that clause...

>base software off existing software
>relicense to prevent others from doing the same

>firefox
>bad
nice meme

File: 1497330885253.png (142KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 400x400px

>>62048548
and it starts again

>>62048548
While it's still not a botnet i am ok with it.

>>62048548
Nice bait.
about:config
disable telemetry

>>62048591
0.01 cents has been deposited into your account.

>>62048621
0.01 cents has been deposited into your Pale Moon account.

>>62048621
The link says just enable "Do Not Track" to disable it

another option suggested is to block the GA via DNS

>>62048591
the responses suggest that disabling telemetry does not affect this

>>62048621
0.01 cents has been deposited into your furrymoon account.

>>62046707
She also worked on Let's encrypt and is actually a respected figure in the infosec community.
Feel free to shit all over Karlie Kloss but leave people who actually finished MIT out of this.

File: 1503251260505s.jpg (3KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 250x250px

>>62045591
So I finally decided to switch from chrome (botnetified edition) to pale moon. First thing I notice, can't fucking open original images in discord anymore, and about 2x slower than chrome.

Why can't opensource devs into design?

REEEEEE

>>62048659
enable do not track does

>>62048700
Yes you can, you dumb fucking sack of worthless shit.
>using discord
get the fuck out back to your shithole, redditor.

>>62048680
doesn't change the fact that she's a SJW hipster without a sense of identity.

>dreads, dyes, glasses

File: 1503096915401.jpg (118KB, 614x768px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 614x768px

>>62048256
>>62048591

>>62045591
Looks like a great buttplug for furfags and windowsfags.

>>62048700
Just use Nightly.
Way quicker and more secure.
It has support for some Chrome extenstions too.

>>62048736
>Implying you wouldn't hit that
you underestimate palemoon user base anon

File: 1500974575053.gif (120KB, 600x487px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 600x487px

>>62047068
>>62047143
>>62047242
>>62047273
>>62047302
>>62047337
>>62047398
>>62047442
>>62047456
>>62047482
>>62047608
>>62047626
>>62047757
>>62047775

>>62048740
tfw the memes are true...

https://www.google.com/search?q=palemoon+furry&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

>>62046487
>>62046560
> X is not a replacement for Y
> Why the fuck would you need X if you have Y?

?????

>>62048765
>bumping a dead thread for bait replies
someones triggered
>>>/v/

>>62048790
>why would I need a secure browser if my OS is secure

:^)

>>62045591
Why isn't there an official Debian package for this?

>>62051109
ANSWER ME

>>62051109
Because nobody serious is going to waste their time for a gay furry placebo meme browser.

But if you want a better answer: moonchild the furfag has made a license that forbids other binary distributions than his.
So much for a free browser :^)

>>62051109
Because it's proprietary.

>>62045934
OS Anon?