https://www.gigabyte.com/Graphics-C ard/GV-N1030SL-2GL Will

>>62044075
it will run 2000-2007 games just fine

what's that, like $70? I'm sure you can find a used good one like a 750Ti for that kind of money and run 2000-2014 games the way you want it.

>>62044075
The entire card is a fucking heatsink lmao
>Will this run 2000-2014 games in medium settings?
>2000-2014
Thats a very broad timespan
it should run most games fine on medium, around 2014 games you will probably run into some issues

>>62044075
It's not comfortably safe. You're on the margin if we compare the 660M i had in my g75v. (clearly gpu bottlenecked).
Since it's clear you want a passively cooled card I'm not sure there's many better options. Maybe if you find a cheap active cooling card and buy a https://www.amazon.com/ARCTIC-Accelero-S3-Graphics-Compatible/dp/B00RVAEI1E
You could get something comfortable.

Since you mention the range there I say you're ok with the card you suggest. It's notably stronger than my card and I'm quite OK with it still for most games. Not every game is playable though. Back in 2014 it would be.
So go for it. It's a very high price/performance ratio judging from www.videocardbenchmark.net

Just remember that you likely shouldn't just use passive cooling. Use one very silent case fan to get some air moving. If you're not constrained on principle.

>>62044075
just buy a used 1050ti for 100$ you faggot

>>62044075
That card's cute.
CUTE!

>>62044406
>buying used technology

I'm not a cuck

>>62044428
The GT 1030 is the most cuckiest gpu ever fag. Nvidia didn't even compare these to actual gpus when releasing it

>>62044428
>cuck

ebin choice of words

>>62044418
what did he mean by this

File: P_setting_000_1_90_end_500.png.jpg (37KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 500x500px

I have this one, but I don't game. Costed a $100 bucks, the 1050 was $150 and the 1080 $750.

>>62044075
https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814125919&ignorebbr=1&nm_mc=KNC-GoogleAdwords-PC&cm_mmc=KNC-GoogleAdwords-PC-_-pla-_-Video+Card+-+Nvidia-_-N82E16814125919&gclid=EAIaIQobChMI7bKMs9ns1QIVXLbACh33JwhbEAYYASABEgJ8cPD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds
buy this one retard.

literally just use the onboard graphics at that point

>>62044075

No.

Get a GTX 1050 or RX460

If you can afford it go up a step to the 470 if you're not cucked by miners, 1060 if you are.

>get a job at mcdonalds for 3 days then quit
>now you can afford a GTX 1060

Rx 550 is a better choice at the price of the gt1030
1030 performs about as well as a 750, not a 750ti, so don't expect much, but it should handle most stuff on medium settings fine, depends on the processor as well

>>62045979
>implying they'll give you full 8 hour days
>implying those 3 days wouldn't be complete garbage
>implying taxes and shit wouldn't fuck you over
T. Burger king employee
I cannot fucking wait to quit this job

>>62046009
unless youre a minor mcds is very likely to give you full hours because of high turnover rates
they always need goys to make them money

you can buy a brand new 1050 for like $110

File: card.jpg (24KB, 362x237px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 362x237px

>>62044131

>The entire card is a fucking heatsink lmao

problem?

File: image.jpg (56KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 600x450px

>>62046200
>>62044131
Herr ya go guys just 4 U
Now the beautiful pcb isn't covered up by that big ole stupid sink

File: Sapphire_201328163627.png.jpg (62KB, 800x621px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 800x621px

>>62046200
it's like you're not even trying

File: 193a.jpg (158KB, 600x475px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 600x475px

>>62046200
>>62046259
or how about this passively cooled 680?

>>62046259
Is a card "silent" if it visually screams at you

Just get a 750ti, it'll do what you want and you can get passively cooled versions.

File: 1452185656817.jpg (36KB, 506x556px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 506x556px

>>62044486
That card is so CUTE.

>>62046360
Computer
Used
To
Entertain

>i5 8600k will beat i7 7700k

Is there any truth behind this rumor? if so, I just got jewtel'd

File: file.png (355KB, 618x620px) Image search: [Google]

355KB, 618x620px

>>62046200
>>62044131
>>62044075

Why would you want to run that many games anyway? I usually run 1, maybe 2 at most.

>>62044075
anon the absolute low you should aim is 560 or 1050 anything below that is just ....

>>62046642
Seeing as how hyperthreading is a bit of a meme I can see this end up being true, yeah.

>>62044075
That's a nice card.
I wish it was amd. It'll go great on Ryzen builds for non gaming purposes.

>>62044541
If you don't game, that's a decent purchase.

What's the most powerful GPU with passive cooler and VGA output? The Palit 750ti has only DVI-I, and all the reductions that I've tried fuck up my resolution list whenever I try one of those passive adapters.

File: airtop.jpg (363KB, 6000x4000px) Image search: [Google]

363KB, 6000x4000px

>>62047696

there is this anon... its a one box solution that passively cools a xeon and a GTX 950 no fans

im in love.. it would of been my next purchase but it does not do nvme.... yet

Why the fuck you need passive ones? Any card nowadays can stop fans when idle.

>>62044541
That card looks like it's ready to run someone over.

It should work fine, but I would honestly buy a 1050 instead. Its wayyy better without costing alot more

>>62046383
> abbreviating "to"
neck ur self senpai

>tfw the gtx 1030 beats my laptops shitty gtx 960m

Oh man did i fuck up when i bought the computer 1 and a half year before pascal came out

>>62048768
You're always going to be cucked by technology.

As soon as you purchase something, even if it's brand new, give it a few months (or sometimes even days) and there's something better.

>>62048950
Yes but this time we have desktop gpus in laptops without any bottlenecks versus literal smalle improvements for every M release

>>62048756
>senpai
Fuck off pedo

>>62044075
Even the gtx 750ti is better than that shit. gt 1030 is unexpectedly total trash.

>>62048768
Mobile GPUs used to be fucking cancer.
That the desktop and mobile versions didn't match in performance is such a huge scam.
And then comes all the thermal throttling because manufactures jew out on the heatsink sizes. (Even on higher end models.)

>>62044075
It's worse than a 750 ti. Only good for silent media centre builds.

>>62046267
This isn't even my final form.

i considered one for my threadripper build but ultimately went for a single 1060. nearly went for a 1050ti even. 1030 just isnt strong enough

>>62044075
It runs Shadow of Mordor 1080p medium
It runs observer maxed out
Source: mine

I do not understand why people spend money in bottom end shit cards...

I upgraded to dual nVidia 680 for $120, and I can run all my games at ultra settings 60fps without major drops.

If I want a next upgrade, I'll look into 980ti when they drop to around $100 each on the used market.

>>62044075
No, that shit is built for shitty e-sports "games"

>hurr durr people buying this are stupid
Some people have space constraints, and this card is the only cheap one slot low profile and short card
And when i say one slot i mean true one slot, because some take more than on inside
The value is massive if you take that into account
It is pretty evident, specwise that the 1050 is better value, but it does not fit in some setups

>>62049467
Pretty sure the fan version is just as small. Either way, where you going to space?

>>62049525
I am talking about the whole 1030 series
I bought the asus one, because the heatsink is not that humongous

File: 41512345123452345.png (900KB, 956x710px) Image search: [Google]

900KB, 956x710px

>>62044075
I was using a 650 recently (680 died after 5 years) and they're about the same in power. You can make lots of shit work with abhorrent settings and resolutions but it really wasn't a good experience at all, made me appreciate my old 680 even more.

Anyway, the bare minimum should be a 1050ti (Again about the same power as my old 680) as you can still play most shit on decent settings and resolutions. If you have a tiny bit more money to spend and live in europe, I can recommend going for a ~200€ GTX 970 and OC'ing the shit out of it. Best bang for buck card right now duo to all the inflation.

>>62044075
>>>/v/

yes.
sage because wrong board

>>62050360
counter-age

>>62044428
Yet you can't even afford a mid range card. Underage faggot fuck off.

>>62044127
heh, 750 ti here are still sold for like 90-100€

>>62044428
>nvidiot
>not a cuck

3/10 bait made me reply

>>62048756
>not abbreviating "to"
You nu-generation fuckwit

>>62049467
The 1030 in OP pic is neither half-height nor single-slot

>>62049618
If you're thinking of a 1050ti just get yourself a 470 or something
1050 is a good price/performance but 1050ti is way too close in price and power to not be getting a 470

2014 games will run just fine on APUs

>>62047696
>VGA output in 2017
what is wrong with you

>>62044428
yo are a cuck for not buying used

RX550 is a better choice, but still rather shit
Or pick up a used card, or save up for GTX1050/RX560

>>62044075
>Will this run 2000-2014
2000-2010, sure.
1030 won't, just like the GT710, GT610, GT510 run the Steam Big Picture mode at 60fps, the plain UI only.
That's how shit it is.

It's good for displaying data only.

>>62051738
It is single slot and low profile, but you have to take care of the heatsink size inside
1050s are mandatory 2 slot unless you mod the second slot output

>>62053264
My ass

>>62046259
That's not really 'passive' though, it's a server/workstation card and will require at least 150cfm of laminar airflow through it.

>>62044131
Considering the fact that its completely passive? Not terrible, really.

>>62044075
I dont have the time to test that many games for you, and the range is oddly specific considering the total number desired

>>62053278
You have one, yes?

>>62046270
this is why you buy a windowless case. close it up, never see it again until cleaning.

>>62053331
I play tomb raider 2013 in 1080p ultra
And arkham knight works decently well too

>>62053407
At how many frames per minute?

>>62053264
i have played for 2 years using a 630, and i recently updated to a 1030
this guy is talking from his ass, or is running 3 antivirus at the same time
I use Steam Big Picture since 2012 without any issues

>>62053433
tomb raider runs at 60fps
arkham knight about 40, so i play in 720p
another good example is SFIV: it averages 120fps at 1080p. it basically maxes the game
it is not anything amazing, but for 70$, and using no fan at all, i find it a really good deal

>>62053503
I'm sure you have played minesweeper and 'Call of Atlantis' for two years.

>>62053554
Feel free to prove it any time.
Shadowplay is right there.

File: 1474400885809.gif (338KB, 538x572px) Image search: [Google]

338KB, 538x572px

>being That Guy™ that asks about video games
>and does not buy mid market hardware
Full retard.

>>62051790
My CRT does up to 1024x768 at 180Hz, 0 percievable flickering and any resolution is native, perfect for emulation and playing Quake.

>>62049618
My friend bought a 1050ti for his build, I have a 960. Who's is better?

>>62051755
RX 470 is massively overpriced right now. Can't find a single car under 300.

>>62047696
Nothing new has VGA.
AMD stopped at GCN1.0 (Hawaii and Bonaire were both no VGA)
nVidia stopped around fermi/kepler.

>>62053686
>any resolution is native
Ah I see new-CRT-fags are finally popping out of the wordwork to express their half-educated opinions.

CRTs do have a "native" resolution - the aperture grill is specifically designed for the monitor's specced standard rez, and only exact multiples (or divisions) fit that aperture perfectly.

>>62053560
>>62053575
Sure
I don't have anything else to do than shill a videocard here, or brag about my library of games
I play everything and my wallet is happy about it
cheers

>>62044075
It is a rebranded 750ti

>>62054066
No it's not. 1030 have 384 CUDA cores. 750ti have 640 CUDA cores.

>>62048610
GPU of peace

>>62053883
The difference between between perfect alignment and the worst possible outcome is practically non-visible to the naked eye on anything smaller than 22", no need to boast on anonymous internet forums about your knowledge of the unimportant.

>>62053554
I bet my Iris 550 could mop the floor with you.

File: 1499138378913.jpg (24KB, 515x361px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 515x361px

>tfw any new part will be an upgrade but all the affordable midrange cards are stupid expensive due to miners, I can't afford a 1080, and if I get a 1050ti it'll just be a slight upgrade.
Do I just do it and buy a used 580 off ebay for around $350 (if I'm lucky)?

>>62054304
Wait, dipshit

In this case waiting IS the appropriate, non cuck action to take

>>62054304
Used cards are fine.

>>62054304
$350? wut? is that aud or cad or something? an r9 290x on ebay will cost you about $250 usd at most

>>62054091
>>62054293
outstanding 3fps difference
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94ErjYk8G1w

I am wondering if anyone here really has tested this card at all

>>62054293
>>62054091
>>62053560
>>62053575

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hn3e6b0mwQ

>>62044075
it can play new games but at low settings and only got somewhere around 30 fps

>>62055328
damn, the card is beefier then I thought it would be.

Def a contender for a SFF HTPC/Couch gaming computer(think duck game, tower fall, castle crashers, etc).

>>62044428
Nigga, you can even afford a low end graphics card new. Now stop being a faggot and take advantage of the used market.

>>62055328
The cheapest 560 is only 20 bucks more and we're looking at probably double the performance. Really under 100 bucks you're better of just getting a used card like a R9 280/285/380 or 770/960, which will shit all over both of these cards combined.

>>62044131
do you not want a graphics card to have a huge heat sink on it?

>>62047696
When I bought a GTX 750 ti to it came with a dvi to vga adapter. Tried it out and it works fine.

File: ASUS-GeForce-GT-1030-2GB-GDDR5_1-840x840.jpg (47KB, 840x840px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 840x840px

>>62055583
I understand your point, but this card is designed towards HTPC, tiny boxes, etc
the form factor of this is clearly part of the price

pic related, the ASUS one

File: kfa2-geforce-gtx-1070-katana-fast-single-slot-hw4all.com-01.jpg (15KB, 640x426px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 640x426px

my next build will feature one of this bad bois

>>62044075
FFS, get a RX560 instead.

>>62055884
Linus sub detected

>>62046073
Part time at mc dicks. A whole month (23 hr/week) got me just about a 1080ti. P gud