lets just fucking stop with this overpriced AMD shit

jewser benchmark creative benching protocols

>>62037280
isn't threadripper an alternative for xeon, not i7?

>>62037280
Weak b8, fag

>>62037280
>userbenchmark
>single core and quad core tests
>>>/trash/

File: doitfgt.jpg (85KB, 835x703px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 835x703px

>>62037280
>it's another "let's pretend cuckerbenchmarks effective speed isn't retarded bullshit based entirely on single/quadcore performance" thread

>>62037353

LMAO at this fucking goalpost moving

literally no business would purchase ryzen with known bugs and errors to trust their revenue with

>>62037428
>7 posts 6 IPs
OP samefagging his own shitty bait thread. Sad!

>>62037353

Ryzen3 : Core i3
Ryzen5 : Core i5
Ryzen7 : Core i7
Threadripper : Core i9
Epyc : Xeon

Epyc is the alternative to Xeon. Threadripper is for the HEDT crowd. Intel used to market CPUs in this market as Haswell-E, Broadwell-E, and Skylake-X. Now they're just rolling them all under the i9 brand.

HEDT crowd is not for gaymen.

>>62037428
http://phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Ryzen-Segv-Response

File: 1503407131269.png (571KB, 1920x1023px) Image search: [Google]

571KB, 1920x1023px

>>62037280
Oh he mad alright

>>62037280
Isn't x299 already obsolete?

>>62037280
>Not taking into account that the Intel processor needs a $500 mobo

>>62037465
got to play wow, while recording wow, while rendering wow, all at the same time, and still have half a cpu left over