Firefox will soon know every site you visit by default as &q

brave here I come.

>>62034174
t. Brave shill

But you forgot to mention they do the same thing.

>>62034152
Things are never as secure as claimed. People always make mistakes.

>>62034152
What are the alternatives ? Iridium?

>>62034152
This is disgusting

>>62034152
RAPPOR is secure, and in the e-mail shown, privately owned sites will remain private. This is why the fake data exists.

30,000 people visit site A
site A is then collected as valid data

10 people visit site B
site C is fake data, also visited by 10 people, but which is real? What about site E, X, N, K, L, Z? They could all be real too. The only way to determine if something is valid is by sheer numbers.

It's not perfect, but if other services could take this approach rather than just collecting everything they could get their hands on we could all benefit.

>>62034152
Vivaldi and Waterfox are better anyways.

>>62034152
>MUH BREITBART

If there hadn't so much brain drain happened at Mozilla, they would just offer their own DNS resolver.

>>62034152
Honestly i'm a bit worried about this too. No matter how trusted an entity is, there's info that should never get out of the computer even if it's supposedly anonymized. Even if we assume their intentions are 100% good and that it will be completely impossible to relate an individual with the collected info, still, there will be a lot of articles about how firefox "breach your privacy" and will be very hard to explain to most people why this is not true and even if you explain them it'll be impossible to negate that mozilla collects private info and that it's an opt-out. This could damage the brand a lot. honesly i don't think it worth to do this, i hope for them to not implement this.

>>62034152
They already do that with the suggested sites on new tab page