Is Vim good for working with Common Lisp? I hate Emacs.

>>62031233
Sure. While you lose the advantages of using Emacs to write Common Lisp code, there's no real harm in using it.

>>62031233
Well you should write java instead (obviously)

>>62031693
Hell no, I'm working on a Lisp project at the moment.

>>62031752
Better port it to java then (obviously)

>>62031233
Emacs has nice completion for lisp languages.
You can also nicely integrate a repl in Emacs.
And there are nice keybindings to quickly evaluate single s expressions / a block of code / the entire buffer.
But you can work with vim as well.
Vim probably has nice completion too. I expect one of the plugins will work well.
Vim is not made to integrate other software in it, so you'll probably just use a second terminal for a repl.
And you'll probably just switch to the repl if you want to eval a piece of code too.

So you'll lose the nicely integrated workflow of Emacs, but if that's not a problem to you, then you can use Vim.

OP you can do slimv but it will fuck up your vim so that it can only open .lisp files.
You'll have to install nvim.