what did they mean by this ?

github hates the french

>>62028032
Do you have a modified user agent?

>using github
aaaahahahahahaha
you can't be serious

>>62028032
Old versions of Firefox may contain sexist, racist or otherwise offensive terms such as "master", "slave" or "bro" in its codebase, so it's important that we deprecate them as soon as possible.

>>62028048
What is the problem?

>>62028032
Old extensions allowed too much user freedom.
WebExtensions limit that (or rather, should I say, Firefox extensions 'enable nazis' and WebExtensions allows for a diverse and safe extensible web browser.

>>62028087
Firefox is the problem

>>62028108
My question was in reference to github

>>62028032
ITT We suggest anon a better browser

>>62028087
>hosting FOSS software on a proprietary platform

>>62028121
I still don't see the issue, and not all software hosted there is FOSS

>>62028129
that is hypocritical

>>62028140
How so? And even if it was, why should they care

>>62028032
I often get messages like that due to my user agent spoofing.

>>62028140
It is not, because the code that is running in your browser is free.

>>62028032
Do you have uMatrix or a modified UA?

What's the best place to host code?
I heard GitLab is FLOSS but removes antiSJW code.

>>62029668
Gitgud.io is a decent alternative. They won't remove anything unless it is actually illegal in their jurisdiction

WebM For Retards moved there after they got dumped by github for having an offensive word in their title

>>62030202
Like Github, closed source.

>>62029510
>code that is running in your browser is free
Except it isn't. Even GitLab doesn't bother to mark their js as libre software.

File: hosting your repositories.png (2MB, 862x2784px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 862x2784px

>>62029668