http://www.pcgamer.com/intel-box-ar t-confirms-coffee-lake-c

>>62017579
Are those the boxes or just fanboy render? Because they look unappealing as fuck.

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-21 at 12.30.37-fullpage.png (228KB, 973x1246px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 973x1246px

heh there's a nag screen about adblockers how cute

>>62017592
https://www.intel.com/content/dam/products/hero/foreground/processor-box-8th-gen-core-i7-1x1.png

https://www.intel.com/content/dam/products/hero/foreground/processor-box-8th-gen-core-i5-1x1.png

>>62017701
Who the fuck designed these? Are they hiring teenagers to do their boxart now?

>>62017758
They are trying to appeal to linustechtips viewers

File: 1485127765992.jpg (81KB, 352x468px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 352x468px

>>62017579
>intel UHD graphics

File: Intel.jpg (1MB, 1845x1923px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1845x1923px

>>62017579
It's hilarious that so many retards thought that they'd just be dropping one of these into their Z270 (or even Z170) board.

File: 1489100922662.png (246KB, 882x758px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 882x758px

>>62017579
THIS CAN'T BE REAL

File: 1503314155502.jpg (14KB, 938x120px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 938x120px

AHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAHAH

I expected them to need a new socket. I have a choice between Intel and AMD. Everything will be decided by TDP

>>62018193
>retards unironically forgot desktop Broadwell
Eh, I guess goyim never learn.

>>62018236
You should be a 1600 or 1700 today then, because these things sure as fuck aren't coming in at under 65W. Even the current locked quad cores don't manage that.

>>62018236
1600 65w 6 core
1700 65w 8 core

Daily reminder not to buy zenver1 (but wait for zenver2), but buy used 2500k+P8P67 Deluxe instead.
And never ever to buy CPU with TIM'd heatspreader, unless you're willing to insert heatsink directly on the die.

File: 1411177440158.png (68KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 500x500px

>>62018236

Good, good boy
that's what I wanted to hear

No /g/entoomen with half a brain cell actually expected Coffee Lake to drop into Z270 did they? Even if it did, it wouldn't have been a big deal. Tick Tock may be officially dead, but we still only got one Tock on Z270, and I don't see that part of the pattern changing. If Coffelake was destined for Z270 it would have been another insignificant tick like Kabylake.

>>62018306
>did they?

like 70-80% did kek

whatever. i got a 6700k and its worth nothing now anyway. i wont be upgrading for years

>>62018300
yea I'm buying Intel to spite obnoxious amd shills

>>62018306
Skylake to Kaby Lake was barely anything. Like 5% in real world workloads. Only improvements came from higher clocks (and temps lol). And Z270 is so close to Z370 that it's like half a year inbetween.

>>62018335
Your parents aren't buying you a new laptop this year, little timmie.

>>62018322
Yes you will, because of 1) detoriating heat transfer from die to heatspreader and because of 2) rapid transistor decay post-32nm.

>>62018358
fuck you i wont do what you tell me

File: 1502192923956.png (350KB, 672x794px) Image search: [Google]

350KB, 672x794px

>>62018335

good, don't forget to DELID Brian

good job deleting my post AMD paid janny. really keeping it impartial you retard fuck.

>>62018337
Yup. Earned the name Babbylake for good reason. And aside from the availability of 6 core parts (allegedly) I doubt Coffelake will be any different even with the new chipset.
To be fair to Intel, having 6 cores on the mainstream alone will be a big deal. The only questions left for top end mainstream buyers..
200 dollars for 1600, or 300 for a 6 core coffelake with higher speed but higher heat and power draw? Or an R7 1700 instead with 2 more cores?

File: 1497987215125.png (509KB, 454x642px) Image search: [Google]

509KB, 454x642px

>>62017579
>intelfags think they can drop this into a z270
>Requires Intel 300 Series chipset-based motherboard
Do those shills think Intel will let them be shills without paying a tribute?

>>62018368
I TELL you to downgrade to Sandy Bridge at little cost and have CPU with only slightly worse single threaded performance, but with soldered heatspreader, and that will work for the next century.

Just in time for my new job. Upgrade from a Skylake i5 to a Coffee Lake i7. Seems like a good leap up.

>>62018621
i hope that 2% ipc incrase is worth rebuilding your system, anon

>>62018639
im just going to mine bitcoins anyway

>>62018639
Disregarding the addition of 2 cores and hyperthreading in that proposed upgrade. Are you pretending to be retarded?

>>62018666
if you care about those why not go for a cheaper processor that packs 2 cores and 4 threads more
coffe lake is literally skylakelakelake

>>62018639
>IPC increase
Apex kek, brother. If there's any performance increase, it's from MOAR COARS and MOAR CLOCKS. Intel is at an IPC dead end for the next 4 years.

>>62018621
>upgrade
heh

>>62018639
ipc? is apple making computers now?

>>62017955
It's even more hilarious when you realize that both cannon lake and ice lake will be on a new, different platform as well. Free 370 is literally only for one generation and it's dead before it even came out.

>>62018511
>300 for a 6 core coffelake
Not even the non-K will be that cheap. >>62000715

File: 1423262516561.jpg (18KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 600x600px

>>62018621
>He is going to pay for a new mobo and an AIO just for 2 additional cores with no ipc gain.

File: 1498480988469.png (673KB, 808x805px) Image search: [Google]

673KB, 808x805px

WHEN THE FUCK DO THEY RELEASE A GOOD CPU FOR ARMA 3?! AAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHH

>inb4 /g/ starts to impy they don't play games and >>>/v/

>>62018575
im already a year in so ill hold out. two more yesrs and maybe i can switch back to amd (lol)

>>62017579
intel might forget the whole tick-tock-model on their cpus every once in a while but they never forget it when it comes to sockets and chipsets

File: average ARMA 3 player.jpg (69KB, 277x344px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 277x344px

>>62018800
Just get a "muh clocks" i5 and shut up already.

>>62018903
or even an unlocked i3, if that game is literally all you want to do on the pc

>>62017758
>>62017701
Woah, wait what the fuck?
Didn't you guys see that like not even 2 hours ago it was the picture of the actual boxes, but now it's just a sticker?

>>62018193
lol you saved it for almost 3 months just to laugh at him at the right moment

File: Untitled.jpg (308KB, 1904x701px) Image search: [Google]

308KB, 1904x701px

>>62017758

File: 1498912784878.jpg (119KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 1000x1000px

>14nm+++++++

File: Kitty_Kat.png (294KB, 339x339px) Image search: [Google]

294KB, 339x339px

whats with the 80's style box art?

>>62019465
Someone needs to shoop keller's face onto this.

>>62017579
>>62019465
>red - danger
>green - toxic
>black - death

Well, at least they're warning customers ahead of time.

My desktop runs with an Ivy Bridge i5, 3570K.

It will probably keep going for years, but my graphics card could use an upgrade.
>XFX 9600GT "XT"
>680MHz, 512MB VRAM

Why do I even follow these "developments" in computers?

Seems a little disappointing, but i just delidded my 7700k and I'm running at 5ghz with 65c average at full load all cores. So I'm content for a few years till Intel straightens out and amd doesn't have a cpu the size of uranus.

File: AMD-EPYC-CPU-740x416.jpg (26KB, 740x416px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 740x416px

>>62019651
Don't hate on the BBC (big beautiful cores)

>>62018193
Based

>>62017592
Threadripper boxes looks unorthodox too. However doesn't mean it is a bad product.

Do not judge a cover by it's book.

>>62019612
my first card

>>62019925
unappealing != unorthodox

>>62019779
Who wanna bet those will work in TR4 sockets, with limited functionality? What will intel shills say when amd's hedt platform ends with 32 cores?

>>62018236
Wait till Intels T series releases. i7 at 35W.

>>62020147
At 2ghz, sure thing.

>>62020233
Nice FUD. But really Skylake went 2.9GHz unto 3.8GHz

https://ark.intel.com/products/97122/Intel-Core-i7-7700T-Processor-8M-Cache-up-to-3_80-GHz

>>62020272
Not on 35wt, dumbass.

>Requires Intel(tm) 300 series chipset-based motherboard.
...

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

WHEN WILL THE GOYM LEARN?

>>62020355
*sighs* yes at 35W TDP.

At 2.0GHz it is 25W TDP.

File: 8Rch6JF.png (55KB, 1509x905px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 1509x905px

>>62020272

File: 1501547198033359.png (6KB, 350x314px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 350x314px

support israel stupid goyim

>>62017579
Why do companies literally ruin their boxes with memes like "vr ready" and "for a great vr experience"
Shit get plastered on mother boards, when was the last time a motherboard was the limiting factor in something?
cpus, a cpu is hardly the bottleneck. I can run vr perfectly fine inside of a windows virtual machine, emulating a copule cores, but only using 1 single thread on my cpu.
Each emulated core takes time away from the real single thread that the entire vm is limited too.

The ONLY thing that should ever advertise "vr ready" is _maybe_ graphics cards.


also fuck them, amd 5 lyfe nao

>>62020532
Were you around during Y2K? You'd see a "Y2K compatible" sticker slapped on everything, from software to modems, even if there was no actual possible issue with that product and the Y2K problem.

File: 1502459682012.jpg (79KB, 812x621px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 812x621px

>>62017824
They prefer amd

>>62020557
That would piss me off too.
I was young at the time but I remember seeing "I survived y2k" shit everywhere.

Back then they didnt really fearmonger kids like they do now

>be me, upgrade from Q6600 to skylake
>see this shit

Well at least when I get a new motherboard it'll have RGB headers so I can sync it all up

If it's going to eventually be the chipset for 10nm and so on I don't really see the problem, if not thats super gay, but you're an idiot for ever buying a brand new CPU anyways regardless of AMD or Intel

File: 1503223217737.jpg (101KB, 750x937px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 750x937px

Daily reminder that these threads are the /g/ equivalent of audiophiles.

pic unrelated

>>62020814
>3DPD
>>>/out/

>>62018193
i aspire to be this petty

>>62018800
you got it all wrong m8
arma is the one who needs to optimize
>only uses 5 of my 8 cores and of those cores it only uses a average of 15-18% of my cpu
but meh gets average of 35-50 fps in koth

>>62018473
>good job deleting my post AMD paid janny.
Interesting, so it happens to other anons too. Do you get weird 30sec bans also?

>>62020996
It's so optimized that a pentium, and an i3 can run it.

>>62018800
Why play arma when ashes of the singularity, and doom exist?

>>62019126
I saved that image yesterday though.

>>62021069
arma is horridly optimized

>>62021415
You mean 'The latest update to Operation Flashpoint has poor optimization'?

>>62017579
Year of the socket

>>62018337
Haswell wasn't a single gen socket too? I don't remember but ivy bridge used the same as haswell?

>>62021415
Runs ok on intel.

As someone who's motherboard socket is completely irrelevant and needs an upgrade, why would this /v/irgin buy a Ryzen mobo if intel makes a Ryzen 1600 equivalent with IPC that isn't stuck at Haswell tier?

>>62017592
Lets be honest the boxes are probably the most appealing part of them

File: 1411502080621.jpg (72KB, 359x391px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 359x391px

>Post YFW i5 2500k overclocked is still strong

>>62022652
But anon, you need to play in ULTRA on 4K! You need all the lens flares!

>>62022652
this. mfw I have no face

>>62018738
Oh wow. So it's basically an entry level X#99 6 core but with poorer memory and PCI-E offering but with an IGPU (whoop-dee-doo). Can't really see the sense in that.

File: orgasm1.png (141KB, 289x297px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 289x297px

>>62022652
>mfw

>>62024980
It doesn't have the mesh and cache changes Skylake-X does.

>>62022455
because you'll not need to buy another motherboard if you want to replace your cpu for a new one until DDR5 arrives