>Elon Musk leads 116 experts calling for outright ban of

File: scared.png (757KB, 706x608px) Image search: [Google]

757KB, 706x608px

Doesn't matter, USA will use it anyway for 2 things war and propaganda. All papers and laws in the world won't change it.

>>62012324
He's a businessman, not a political activist.
He does it for publicity because his companies' share value is tied directly to his public image

>>62012622
He doesn't need to talk about it for his business, he's been personally obsessed with the topic for years.

>>62012324
NO

NO

Fucking faggot.

Humans needs to die.

>>62012622
even if you are a business man it doesn't need your motivation from everything stems form business

>>62012324
>ban military robots
>let humans kill themselves instead of having hunk of metal shooting a hunk of metal
Wow gee based muskrat

File: 1496543128188.jpg (538KB, 3119x1754px) Image search: [Google]

538KB, 3119x1754px

>>62012324

We do that after third great machine war in year 2132

>>62012324
Why is Musk turning into such a fucking scare mongering luddite holy shit.

its all fun and games until we end up inventing a robot powered by biomass and give it a gun

>>62012324
I don't like both him but this is certainly good.
Too bad it won't change shit.

>>62014814
Both him and his company*

Maybe it's better for humanity as a whole if there's less of us around to squander this planets finite resources.

>>62013224
>t. Pajeet (which isn't a human)

>>62014738
>crosswbow gets sentient, murders knights and pope
Guys don't strawman the topic into absurdity, rogue AI has very little to do with weapons

>>62013335
>>let humans kill themselves
Humans have morals and ethics built in (as long as they're white)

File: Jimbo.png (176KB, 500x659px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 500x659px

>>62012324
>mfw skynet will became a thing in your lifetime

Well there should be somekind of rules for them.
Like if country A has army of size 100k and country B has army of size 500k it's not fair.
So country A should be allowed to use some robots so they could get close the 500k man soldiers.

>>62012324
>be CEO and owner of world's frontrunner in AI research
>want to ban AI research for other companies

Jewish tactics.

>>62016322
Also defenders should have fixed number of robots that's added to everything else as defenders bonus. The count should be tied to size of area the country is defending.

>>62016236
>>>/pol/

>>62012324
If we don't use it the Chinese and russians will.

>>62016373
Just like nuklear weapons, oh wait US is the only country that has used them...

>>62016388
Used them in war, yes.

Used them in general, no.

>>62016322
>rules of any kind for conflict
Nice joke m8.
You think terrorists or rogue states would be content building just a few of them to have a fair fight?

>>62012324
We're always going to have one country thats not going to sign the treaty that gets to do it unless the treaty says anyone who declares warn on a non signer gets the support of other signers in the invasion.

But we can just remote pilot the robot from inside a nearby tank or whatever. What they really need to ban is attempts to build machines equal to or smarter than people and have that enforced by special forces whose whole purpose is to destroy said machines.

>America bans warbots
>China doesn't

Oh yeah, these fucks totally have our best interests in mind.

tfw google and apple AI becomes sentient and they already have AI vehicles

tfw all software is proprietary and streamed via the botnet cloud and not locally booted

tfw its all locked down hardware with no ports and all wireless I/O with smooth edges

tfw there will be a elite group of cyberpunks who have a boxy outdated hacked together toaster oven with weapons running GNU/Linux t-100 Penguinator edition.

Tfw hes slower than apples i-liquidmetal bot but he can be upgraded and repaired with anything

we must hold out brothers

>>62016538
>chinas bots fall apart physically / fail from bad programmers or turn on their masters

>all the best haxxers are white or slav burgers/scandi/euro/russo

>>62016514
And you think it's a good idea to gain the enmity of machines smarter than humans you fucking retard?
Step 1 to human extinction, thanks brainlets.

>>62016322
>war
>fair
thats not how it works

>>62016388
Wrong.

Also this isn't about use, it is about banning the development and producting of them. And look how well that worked with NK.

>>62012324
What an idiot.