Why does Tucows have a problem with registering domains for sites with "hateful opinions" which is legal in the US but does not have a problem registering the domains of sites whose organizations actively promote and advocate for men having sex with young boys aka pedophila and pederasty which is not legal in the US?
Any other examples of tech companies having hypocritical stances as soon as you do any digging into their customer base?
Nambla isn't destabilizing your hellhole country at the moment.
>>61990757
It's not hypocrisy if they like pedos and dislike racism. I assume this describes most of the left.
>acting surprised that liberals turn a blind eye to pedos
>>61990785
>pedos
>not ruining a country
yeah ok
>>61990785
Neither is the so calles alt-right.
The Antifa does. The alt-righters would be peaceful if they would be let alone.
Baboons like BLM have raided and looted whole neighbourhoods in the past, Antifa too (see germany, G20 - catastrophic, war-like).
And nambla is pedo-stuff. Should be on the darknet if ever.
>>61990821
>And nambla is pedo-stuff. Should be on the darknet if ever.
Why does the US government allow these sites to remain on the clearnet? NAMBLA members would probably be on an FBI watchlist, so why are they allowed to have a site easily visible to minors?
>>61990788
This. It should be well known by now that if you're a liberal you're a pedophile at a minimum. They've been trying to normalize it for years
>>61990757
They are right though. Racism is about spreading hate, pedophilia is about spreading love.
>>61990757
While hypocritical, it's not so much about the actual ideology of the company, as much as bashing neo-nazis (and alt-right by association) is the current popular thing to do.
Most people can barely articulate an understanding of the situation beyond "muh nazis" and "white supremacy", and eat it up whenever they see something about a company speaking against neo-nazis.
>>61990845
Probably ties to the Clinton Foundation for fresh children supply.
Have to get the child-sacrifices from somewhere.
>>61990902
>Racism is about spreading hate, pedophilia is about spreading love.
lol ok pedo
Children can't fall in love, and have no idea what they are doing with a man. The man is typically using them for sex.
>>61990929
>implying women have never molested or raped children
Feminazi logic
>>61990946
The conversation was about men, but yes, women do it too. They usually insert objects into children since they don't have a penis.
>feminazi
what a strange conclusion to draw from my post
>>61990785
>pedos
>not destabilizing entire generations of children
anyone who agrees with tucows is a soft pedo at the very least
>>61990757
because one opinion has lots of media coverage, while the other does not
>>61991001
>media coverage
who controls the media?
>>61990787
>>61990788
>>61990859
SJWs are against paedophilia and anime (because as they claim anime promotes paedophilia).
>>61990811
They just look at pictures on their PCs, how are they ruining any country?
>>61990821
>The Antifa does
How so? They just have a different political ideology.
>And nambla is pedo-stuff. Should be on the darknet if ever.
I don't really know what they are about but if they did post CP it would not be on clearnet.
>>61990757
Dailystormer is back under Namecheap and some Chicago-based anti-DDOS provider. Namecheap and the DDos provider have both stated they're supporting Dailystormer under the ground of free speech and human rights. Thank the lord some companies still realize Human Rights matter over politics and feelings. I don't want to go down a slippery slope like this...
>>61990929
>Children can't fall in love
I fell in love multiple times when I was a child.
>>61990821
>The alt-righters would be peaceful if they would be let alone.
I am a WWII survivor and I can assure you that people would be peaceful if nazis didn't want to crush their homes, rights, and democracy.
>>61991089
>How so? They just have a different political ideology.
they break other peoples things. "nazis" only shitpost on internet and do no real damage like those antifa people do.
>>61990757
BTFO, /pol/ tard
Hopefully pedos, SJWs, and /pol/faggots die in the upcoming civil war.
Sage for /pol/ thread.
>>61991156
Did a pedo rape your daughter or something? Most pedos don't even talk to children.
>>61991089
>They just look at pictures on their PCs
Yeah, keep telling yourself that retard
>>61991152
>Antifascists break other people's things?
yes. they do things like break windows and burn cars.
>incitement to violence
>don't post any examples
hmmm really makes you think. and yes the onus is on them to provide evidence because they held an investigation and declared that they were inciting violence. so they should be able to easily copy paste such examples.
>>61991194
>most people break windows and burn cars
???
>>61991089
>How so?
antifa is a terrorist organization and seeks to create a government change, by force if necessary
>>61991181
>Most pedos don't even talk to children.
Cause they're too busy raping them
>>61991092
>Chicago-based
Won't be standing on principle very long then.
>>61991210
>antifa is a terrorist organization
Are you claiming that most people in the world belong in a terrorist organisation?
>>61991226
most people in the world don't want to live in a commie hellhole, so they are on our side.
>>61990757
This is called political repressions, deal with it.
>>61991226
ANTIFA is regarded as a terrorist organization by the NJ department of homeland security. not a strawman.
>>61991214
Most pedos don't rape children.
>>61991152
>most people identify as anti-fascist
Most people don't wear black masks and carry red flags and bats to "peaceful protests". You know damn well who we're talking about.
>>61991208
i didnt know that most people are drug using terrorists.. (those people using the red and black flag logo thing)
>>61991226
>Being intentionally retarded
We're talking about your faggy little Black Bloc.
>>61991247
>You know damn well who we're talking about.
Not really. A poltard earlier today claimed that because in a bug issue a tor maintainer said that she was antifascist means that she is antifa.
>>61991092
>Not distributing neo-nazi content is a violation of human rights
>>61991272
>poltard
Oh look, an outsider.
You would think sometime in the last five years agitpropers would have learned how /board titles/ work.
>>61991292
Is this supposed to be an argument?
>>61991272
You know ANTIFA. The communist group that is old as the Nazis themselves.
>>61991273
No, not allowing the distribution of content because of ANY ideology is a violation of human rights, and taking sides in a political battle and using your narrative as a reason to silence differing opinions is repulsive. Go back to >>>/pol/.
>>61991273
>free speech is a human right
QED
>b-b-but muh hate speech
Free speech is a natural right pertaining to expression. It includes political action, discussion, and any other form of expression that does not directly interfere with the natural rights of others. As such, all speech is a subset of free speech.
Hate speech is a subset of speech, which offends some groups. As a subset of speech, it is a subset of free speech.
Hate speech is free speech.
>>61990757
https://dailystormer.lol looks like they moved to namecheap, they're still on west EU/US providers, just bitching with nothing accomplished
>>61991304
No, it's a simple observation. I'm glad we can agree you're an outside agitpropper.
>>61990929
>lol ok pedo
That was the joke, idiot.
>>61991214
>most terrorists don't kill people
>>61991344
What's an agitpropper?
Also, why are you posting r eddit pictures?
>I'm glad we can agree
It seems that you can't read. I did not agree to anything.
>>61991214
>Cause they're too busy raping them
Only the "Asian" ones in Britain.
>>61991365
Oops meant for
>>61991244
>>61991365
Actually it would be closer to saying that most Mohammedists don't kill people.
>>61991372
>What's agitprop
I'm glad you asked, my closeted leftist friend! Why, such a simple Google search could answer your question, one is almost led to believe you're feigning ignorance!
>why are you posting screencaps of an organized leftist reddit raid on 4chan
Oh my, we might need to use a little logicial deduction. I accused you of being an outsider spreading political propaganda and discontent. I posted pictures of an organized campaign of outsiders doing exactly that. Perhaps you could connect the two?
You're cornered, skookums.
>>61991320
>>61991324
>No, not allowing the distribution of content because of ANY ideology is a violation of human rights
So if you ask me to distribute nazi propaganda and I say 'no', then I'm in violation of your human rights?
>>61991482
By the logic of civil rights activists, yes. You have to bake me the cake you Nazi biggot.
>>61991126
>I am a WW2 survivor
Posting on 4chan?
>>61991324
SJWs have badly conflated speech with actions such that hate speech is now violence
>>61991549
Action can be free speech. Violence cannot, as it interferes with the natural rights of others. The only case in which a natural right allows you to violate the rights of another is self defense.
>>61991482
If you're a big corporation like Google, or GoDaddy, or some other horrible multi-billion dollar (and/or) government-backed organization, then you are setting a precedence that it's OK to impede on a person's rights if their viewpoints don't match my own. They certainly have the rights as a private company to run their business as they please, but creating a narrative like this will make it possible for governments of the future to impede on ANY speech, including the type you might support.
>>61991500
Isn't being a defender of free speech also a civil rights issue which would arouse civil rights activists to act?
I'm also not in favour of the whole "bake my cake" thing, but that's because I think that it's incongruent with the principles of J.S Mill's liberal theory. But the cake thing, to my knowledge, is based on the idea of protected classes - and Nazis/Communists/etc. are not recgonised as such.
>>61991549
Not really; Marcuse's essay in "A Critique of Pure Tolerance" is worth reading on this point. Speech isn't conflated with action, but rather, the distance between speech and action in some circumstances is vanishingly small which is enough to give it serious consideration as incitement of action.
>>61991568
>natural rights
needed this kek today
>The only case
"It's this way because I say it is!"
>>61991593
>only argument is reddit tier "kek"
sure showed me
>>61991045
Six companies, that almost five are in bed with the DNC.
Those companies would have benefited a lot from the TPP.
>>61991152
>Most people in the world will identify as anti fascists yet they don't do that.
Nobody knows what fascism means in these days.
They only know that "a evil thing" and they should oppose to it.
My god, for some leftist intellectuals, talking to the middle class is fascism. That would be the end of any modern political party if they do that in this era.
>>61991592
>some other ... organisation
Why does who I am matter to what rights I have in the private sphere of action?
>then you are setting a precedence that it's OK to impede on a person's rights if their viewpoints don't match my own
No I'm not. I'm not impeding on your rights by refusing your usage of my private sphere. You don't have any right by default.
>but creating a narrative like this will make it possible for governments of the future
What "narrative"? I am merely exercising my rights, just as you exercise yours. Unless you think that liberal rights are a "narrative". You're using a slippery slope fallacy, too.
My main issue is that when people take the Internet as it is presented to them without looking further, just as Marx says the economy presents itself as a vast array of commodities, the Internet presents itself as various parties that control speech. The only solution to this is decentralisation.
I have commented elsewhere on this:
>it's partly out of the fact that we're using centralised technology to share ideas. It's right to be concerned when the discourse is controlled by a small number of peoeple who act out of the desire for profit, which is what's happening here. The quicker we can dispense of the idea that the "popular" Internet offers a "free market of ideas", the quicker we'll see people losing trust in the controllers of the "popular" Internet, from Youtube to domain registrars.
As such, the main discourse being controlled by few people is well within their rights to do so, but it's the perogative of the people against this commodification of particular viewpoints at the expense of others (if I may borrow from the bourgeois "free market of ideas" idea) to begin to resist this.
Registrar etc. can do as it pleases; the solution isn't to chastise the registrar for its decision to use its rights, rather it is to become disillusioned with centralisation.
>>61991632
It wasn't an argument. I see no evidence that natural rights exist.
>>61991632
>believing in natural rights
Do you also believe in Aquina's labor value theory or in the fifth ways to know God too?
If corporations can legally have some level of first amendment rights how come they have the complete freedom to disregard others that are exercising their freedom of speech on their public facing services? It's funny how it's a one way street just because one side has the money to ensure their rights are enumerated
Really makes me thienk
>>61990845
Because it's not a crime to be a pedophile, only to act on it. "I may not agree with what you say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it." is the core tenet behind any advocacy groups, NAMBLA included, being allowed to remain.
>>61991861
Because the first amendment is just a limitation to what the gov can do.
>>61990757
>stormfags cucked from their safe space
Wow I believe in Kek now.
>>61991880
see pic related
>>61991880
What the government is limited to against """""people"""""""
Corporations are people to some extent as well according to the fun rulings in the Supreme Court
They're only people when it's convenient for them
>>61991880
So, an apology is in order, for the whole "gay wedding cake" fiasco? I mean, if Google can pick and choose......
>>61992031
The gov can't go after you if you say "fuck the niggers" but shitty companies can refuse to hire you.
>>61990757
I see no hypocrisy here, stormfags are worse than pedos.
>>61992057
>xD
>>61991880
yes but the hypocrisy is this:
Corporations expect that the gov will not make laws limiting their freedom of speech as corporate entities
Yet they have no respect for freedom of speech for others (sure, they're not legally bound to but it's definitely hypocrisy)
>>61992198
I will agree to that.
>>61990757
isn't this political persecution and much much illegal?
Its like when the US persecuted wikileaks all over the world.
>>61991723
I have no argument against the rights of private corporations, but it does concern me to see them use narratives as a means to gain finances from MSM exposure when the point in question relates to whether it's OK to silence opinions that you don't agree with. Specific political preference has absolutely nothing to do with it.
>>61990757
is this what /pol/ looks like?
>>61992031
>So, an apology is in order, for the whole
not really because iirc they're trying to pin him on anti-discriminatory business laws for race, gender, sex, ethnicity (even though being a homo doesn't fall into those specifically)
So technically, if Stormwhatever started a religion (which seems to be the latest legal meem) they probably could qualify for those same anti-discrimination laws and have a case against the bandwagon that dropped them
tl;dr alt-right should look into becoming religion or sexual identity
>>61990757
keep /pol/ in /pol/
this is equivelant of youtubers complaining about being taken down. dont like it host it yourself no one is stopping you.
>>61991876
>is
was
>>61990788
>the right rapes kids for centuries
>lol its fine, jesus christ would have wanted it
>the left rapes kids and gets caught
>EVERYONE KNOWS THE LEFT ARE PEDOS FUCK ALL LIBTARDS
>>61992283
how cute
you say this like google isn't a regulated monopoly that has a huge power to censor and is generally regarded as the go to public platform
are we still memeing free market?
if the megacorps are doing what they want that means the majority is affected, whether you're a special snowflake that uses non mainstream services is irrelevant
>>61992537
the internet has existed for a long time before google, and it will outlast it as well. You don't need google to host your own content or for others to find it. It isn't a monopoly when there are other choices and people are free to use those, except they choose not to.
You are not entitled to eyeballs from a platform solely because people choose to be in mass on that platform. No one will stop you from hosting your own content and broadcasting it yourself. This applies to everyone, youtubers, /pol/tards, lefty reddit users or sexual predators, idgaf, you're not entitled to anything. Host it yourself.
>>61992057
>stormfags are worse than pedos.
nice bait
>>61990787
>It's not hypocrisy if they like pedos and dislike racism. I assume this describes most of the left.
this guy is telling it how it is
>>61991152
Heck you can sing Hiel hitler in India and no one cares.
>>61990787
leftists also support immigration, so I can see them supporting pedophilia as well.
>>61990785
Neither is the Daily Stormer. To destabilize a country you would need more reach. Like CNN, who promote dangerous conspiracy theories and violent terrorist groups.
Anyway, OP says "Hypocrisy", but since I've never seen people on the left denounce child rape, I'm not sure it's "hypocritical". It seems rather consistent really.
>>61991273
Human Rights are whatever you say they are. Some people believe in Free Speech, some don't.
>>61992283
>host it yourself no one is stopping you
ICANN is.
Good Night Alt Right And Anyone Who Disagrees With Fringe Communist Lunatics
>>61992774
rightists also support religion, so I can see them supporting pedophilia as well.
>>61992830
ICANN isn't stopping you from hosting anything you want.
>>61992898
Yes they are.
They've blocked dozens of registrations.
>>61992847
Leftists are the ones passing blasphemy laws all over the joint and threatening to beat up atheists.
>>61992920
>They've blocked dozens of registrations.
That isn't how ICANN works faggot. Show proof to backup your claims
>>61992920
You can give people your fucking IP instead of a domain name, faggot!
>>61992953
Why don't we have a program /plugin that uses pictures with ip data embedded or something so that this stuff stops?
>I'm going to censor you!
"I'm going to make you irrelevant ..."
>mods still haven't deleted this thread
It's a blatant non-technology thread. For fuck's sake.
>>61992944
>>61992953
So these are shills? Why would people this technologically retarded be on /g/?
>>61993552
Because /pol/ is like Islam it can't stand to be indoors in private in their own home, they must proselytize their fanaticism onto the public sphere.
>>61993167
>It's a blatant non-technology thread.
but it is about technology. there's like 10 other threads about tech culture on /g/ right now
>>61993764
But it's not, /g/ in general advocates freedom and self sufficiency when it comes to technology. Crying about what a private company does is something /g/ in general hates. It's usually in the form of YouTuber threads, this one is new though but it's the same shit different form. The response is the same, you're not entitled to a platform by a private company. Host your own.
>>61993796
>Crying about what a private company does is something /g/ in general hates.
You're retarded. The daily anti-google threads, etc are usually about some kind of censorship. I mean, we had days worth of Google firing a guy about his internal memo. Fuck off.
>>61993818
That's /pol/tards coming to /g/ because "this is technology and we gonna red pill you /g/".
You fuck off back to /pol/
>>61993796
>Host your own.
this is what all the free market lolbergtarians say until the Jews work together to harass your company, its employees, and organize a boycott that puts it out of business as soon as you do something they don't like
>muh free market
You need to actually get a job so you understand how political things get in the office and in the market. The free market is a complete myth.
kek you
>>61993865
>i don't understand how the internet works the post
>>61993864
>That's /pol/tards coming to /g/
lol newfag. /g/ has a significant amount of people who went to /pol/ after /new/ was shut down. Speaking as somebody who spends most of their 4chan time on /g/, I can assure you that this isn't a daily raid. Our readership is naturally inclined towards /pol/thought.
I'm personally a moderate and this is the definition of a slippery slope.
We need to put our political differences to the side for this debate, and work together on behalf of freedom of speech.
Why is this the only place that is even giving the subject any light?
I don't support offensive content but I do support somones ability to have their own ideology and unfiltered speech.
>>61990757
What's hypocritical about that?
What happens when the definition of hate speech is dictated only by the left?
>>61990757
Mortal sin in west is hate Jews,you could be paedophilie,misogyny,racist agains blacks but never anti jew
>>61990757
I thought you were always winning. Why are you crying conservative snowflake?
>>61991530
You know you can lie on the internet.
>>61994040
Imagine being THIS butthurt.
>>61994040
If you are only being resistant against this because your hate for the right you might want to rethink your priorities and recognize how dangerious this could become.
I'd suggest to take a step back and look at the situation and think of the outcome in a couple years.
This could be very dangerious on the internet a once anonymous place now with policed ideologies.
>>61991996
this is why internet should be treated as public utility. isps do not deserve ownership
>>61991089
>SJWs are against paedophilia and anime (because as they claim anime promotes paedophilia
Just a little while ago all of the she rags were in favor of it. It's only because of Trump voters with anime profiles on Twitter that they're against it because theyll literally turn on anything to attacl their enemies. As soon as Trump is out of office they'll be back supporting it
>>61991344
>4 reddit users joking about raiding 4chan
clear evidence that reddit has overtaken 4chan
srsly now, that's clear evidence that /pol/tards are retarded, ill and paranoid
>>61990821
>The alt-righters would be peaceful if they would be let alone.
Wrong. The alt-right holds these protests looking to stir up shit and start a fight. They don't get to play victim when they get exactly what they're looking for, even if the alt-left is also looking for a fight.
>>61991344
I don't think it's working considering everywhere I go I see /pol/ spreading more and more, and it doesn't seem like it's just them raiding. Their mindset is spreading.
>>61994198
same with net neutrality and the ISP privacy law, these idiots don't even know what they protest
i don't want retards like this messing with my internets
>>61994266
>The alt-right holds these protests looking to stir up shit and start a fight.
lol what. they just want to hold speeches, and the police didn't let them even get to their PA system in the park last weekend.
also, the police forced them to move towards the enemy to get out of the park or be arrested for unlawful assembly, probably so that they could create a situation where altrighter would be provoked into committing violence. they did not. they were attacked by the left, and the police did nothing about it.
Source: the ACLU observers at the event
http://www.nbc12.com/story/36132116/aclu-fires-back-at-gov-mcauliffe-claims-police-stood-by-waiting-for-violence-in-charlottesville
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wr_KDEtqiw0
>>61994397
>ACLU
Don't you alt-righters hate the ACLU or do you like them when they say stuff that you like?
>>61995047
broken clock
>>61991089
Don't group anime in with your heebaphillia, kiddiefucker.
Drown fags in the bogs or toss them from the rooftops.
>>61995075
>being an alt-righter is a tedious existence of cognitive dissonance and considerable mental effort to make reality fit into their warped world view
ISHYGDDT
captcha: onibus barcelona
>>61990757
TRUMPTARDS BTFO AGAIN
/pol/ IS FINISHED AND BANKRUPT
>>61995047
The ACLU is handy for shutting down fags like you before you cry about wanting a source that you approve of.
Now accept your defeat, libcuck. Your own ACLU was there and disagrees with your delusions.
>>61995140
I'm not an alt righter but even I can see Antifa are always the aggressors.
Thoughts and words are just that.
Actions are the principle of aggression, so you should judge based on actions.
Let's see how many leftist sites are banned by hosting services: Oh it's zero.
>>61995468
The white supremacists and neo-nazis literally said they want to remove 'others' from their homeland. How do you think they would achieve that?
Don't you see the whole "we are peacefully gathering" is just a ploy until they can spread their ideology and gain numbers. Once they're powerful enough they won't be peaceful. To know this is true all you need to do is look at a history book. Even Hitler said that only a violent resistance in the early days of Nazi party could have stopped it. Antifa is just taking advice from the most famous fascist.
>>61995485
>Let's see how many leftist sites are banned by hosting services: Oh it's zero.
That's the thing leftists never seem to understand. The corporations they hate support them. They get no trouble from local government. They have no problem finding a place to conduct their activism.
They are literally the Jew's shock troops and they are so dumb they don't even realize it lol.
>>61995538
What is wrong with removing certain people aka invaders and attackers from your own homeland? What could be better for stopping "racism" by making sure that everybody stays in their own homeland, with the ability to run it the way they see fit? And before you talk about "Native Americans" I don't think you will tell Blacks, Jews, Asians, and Latinos to get out of the US because it was formerly "native american" land. You fags always seem to forget that when discussing the Redmen.
Do you tell Africans that they can't remove White people if they wanted to? Do you tell the Asians they can't remove other people from Asian lands?
No. Because you are anti-white.
Please, go away.
>>>/pol/
>>61995601
Nice strawman you built there. Is that the only way /pol/yps can argue?
The reality is the world is a mixed place. You have black people in Asia, white people in Africa, asian people in America. But your brains can't deal with reality, so you fantasize about some impossible pure homeland? What happens to people of mixed race? Do they get their own countries? Do 3/4 black get a different country than those who are 1/2 black?
Your ideology and ideas are retarded. Do us all a favour and kill yourself.
>>61995864
>he thinks the world is mixed by itself and not because his handlers make it that way
So much for your "diversity"
What happens when you mix all the colors together, child? Oh yeah, sludge.
>>61991723
wrt your gripes about "natural rights" the comment you replied to was evidently about YOUR lack of an argument.
the argument for natural rights is more empirical and descriptive than normative. as follows, we observe:
(0) freedom (liberty) of thought - within the physical or other (logical?) limits of your brain to cogitate.
(1) freedom (liberty) of action - withing the physical limits of your body to act
(10) from the previous two propositions we can derive a concept of "ownership" with the idea of "self ownership" as a model: being able to think and act with our bodies, we can consider the tools and items we manipulate with thought and being as extensions of our body.
I am myself less than wholly convinced of this argument, and more than that, any other supposed "natural" rights stand on shaky ground. More than that even, I loathe the entire concept of rights to begin with, for all too often, the language of "rights" is used to DENY people LIBERTY, to the point that I even think advocating for "rights" is highly immoral.
I wonder how many people who support Tucows actually are pedos themselves.
>>61990821
>The alt-righters would be peaceful if they would be let alone.
Thanks to their car of peace that perception is over, funny how they were condemned harder than the ISIS van of peace that happened in Spain a few days later. The jewish media, politics and banking cartels are flexing their influence HARD.
>>61995966
>import niggers
>free them from guilt trip
>they start breeding your daughters
>wtf! I hate black ppl now!
Also
>be Japan/China/Korea
>NOT import niggers
>98% homogeneous
>THIS MUST BE THE WORK OF JEWS
>>61990757
Because they are jews and sucking little boys penises is allowed under jewish law.
>>61992318
savage
>>61991126
Surely you must be a holocaust surviver too?? Clearly you even survived WW1 and a hundred years war.
>>61996002
I wonder who imported them...I wonder who owned the ships that brought them to the New World...hmmm...maybe a google search will tell me and show me primary documents from the time as to who were the primary slave importers back then....
>>61990757
It says it right there in your image, you mong.
Daily Stormer violated their ToS, NAMBLA most likely didn't.
That's not them taking action to show their support for various political agendas, it's them getting off their lazy asses and actually enforcing the rules they themselves put down.
>>61996075
If you want more nazis, go ahead.
>>61995538
>The white supremacists and neo-nazis literally said they want to remove 'others' from their homeland. How do you think they would achieve that?
Eminent Domain. There is literally nothing illegal about forcing certain groups of people out of their homes and forcing them to relocate to who knows where simply because another group of people with more money wants them out.
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere" - Martin Luther King Jr.
Socialism isn't a solution, either, because you can consider the country as a sort of communal property where the "stakeholders" i.e. the autochthonous and indigenous citizens see their "property values" drop (more welfare spending, less social engagement) by admitting foreigners, but by halting immigration, or even going so far as to expel foreigners from their country (shared property) living standards increase.
>>61996089
Not gonna happen, thanks to the alt-kike and their fucking stupid rally the ENTIRE right has been BTFO for generations, the pendulum is swinging hard left now. Fuck, you have even Trump and Romney defending ANTIFA now, just like that.
>>61991324
>natural right
There's no such thing, idiot.
>>61991092
Is DS just a blog?
>>61991000
The trips of truth
>>61996036
Your ancestors were nigger importers. It's right to be ashamed but you shouldn't deny it.
>>61995538
>Once they're powerful enough they won't be peaceful.
That's true for ANY revolution tho.
>>61991112
You are not legally allowed to do that, I even bet it was to other children as well which is extra illegal
>>61994268
/pol/ has a massive ideological footprint as everyone steals their memes to put on twitter/reddit/facebook. The people posting /pol/ stuff probably aren't even users of 4chan.
>>61996144
>Your ancestors were nigger importers.
Not mine. I'm not Jewish.
>>61996111
It is already happening.
When you call everyone right to marx a nazi and give no choice, some might just swallow the pill and go full blown nazi.
And giving the nazis a fuckton of evidences that they're right just make em stronger.
>>61996217
Have you taken a DNA test?
>>61996231
It WAS happening, but not anymore, every lemming is following the media narrative now that the last holdouts like Trump gave in. Should have kept the plausible deniability instead of being LARPers throwing nazi salutes and hanging with the literal KKK.
>>61996250
yes and my mom did our whole geneology tree
>>61996217
>I'm not Jewish.
A pleb and a filthy goy in other words.
>>61991089
>SJWs are against paedophilia and anime (because as they claim anime promotes paedophilia).
SJWs are for pedophilia and anime (because as they claim anime promotes love and alternate lifestyles)
See how easy that is?
>>61996267
Still can happen to some proportion if the left push it hard enough.
But i guess trump probably will disarm em quite horribly and stop the mess.
This shit literally writes itself
>>61996300
Anime? No. ESA scientist received a public lynching for wearing an animu shirt.
>>61996305
>>61996305
>But i guess trump probably will disarm em quite horribly and stop the mess.
Trump is siding with the people that build naked statues of him and chant "NO TRUMP NO KKK NO FASCIST USA" rather than his more radical base. Yes, it's that bad.
>>61996332
It looked like western art to me. It probably wouldn't have been as bad if it was actually anime shit. It changes everyday what they're outraged about, so who fucking knows.
>>61996144
Who did the (predominantly jewish) slave traders buy the slaves from?
Answer: it was other sub-saharan africans and arab (semitic) slavers.
Obama's Kenyan relatives probably owned slaves a LOT more recently than anyone in the United States.
Absolutely nobody has the moral high ground.
>>61996183
/pol/ doesnt really exist anymore. just like /b/ it died a slow, agonizing death from the waves of newfags. what youre really talking about is reddits t_d where most of the magapedes kekcucks, blacked posters and other cretins come from. there used to be a time you could talk about Hobbes, Plato, Thomas Moore, Machiavelli and the merits of central authority and enlightened despots in communist, fascist, and capitalist systems, even the merits of neoliberal tyranny like in larry summers behavioral "nudge". But those authoritarians were mainly a fringe who differed from neoliberals like Hillary Clinton mainly in their ideas about the appropriate ends of state power (helping the lower classes rather than enriching the wealthy), where now the majority are mainly racist libertarians who worship the "GOD EMPROR" and describe themselves as Civic Nationalists without understanding what that actually means.
>>61996435
>there used to be a time you could talk about Hobbes, Plato, Thomas Moore, Machiavelli and the merits of central authority and enlightened despots in communist, fascist, and capitalist systems, even the merits of neoliberal tyranny like in larry summers behavioral "nudge".
All these posters moved to twit/pol/, then most get banned and never heard from again.
>>61996300
Why are you lying?
>>61990757
Because alt-right have it all
>Racist and hateful in country based on immigrants.
> Pedophiles as the majority are Christians who them or their pop are raping children.
>Worse than ISIS by using same technique ( car ran over = truck ran over)
> Arrogant and ignorant with guns, what could possibly go wrong?
Those alt-right should be collected and castrated for a better humanity.
>>61990757
What exactly is the "Daily Stormer"?
>>61996323
Damn, she's hot as hell
I think the really funny thing about all of this is the amount of virtue signaling they're putting themselves through.
They couldn't just revoke it, no. They have to tell everyone about it like "hey guys, we're cool too! we're all antinazi and shit!". These companies are not really concerned about being moral. They just want publicity.
>>61996000
>>61991324
>Hate speech is free speech.
So is companies denying hate speech on their platforms lmao
now I'm not gonna say much
but
so far the alt right has done less damage than antifa. they need to be dealt with, and they are not in the right. but deal with the actual terrorists first.
>>61997312
stormfront's news site
it was cancer anyway
>>61997821
Sure, just as Neo Nazis has done less damage than the Nazis of the 40's. Though, if you look at the bigger picture, then right wing organizations has done more terrorism than left wing terrorism
http://www.npr.org/2017/06/16/533255619/fact-check-is-left-wing-violence-rising
>>61997835
>stormfront's news site
that's not even true you idiot. they were completely unrelated.
gay pedos don't elect wannabe Nazis that don't stay in their containment board.
right side of history?
>>61997941
Based cat
>>61997821
>so far the alt right has done less damage than antifa.
what nobody seems to have mentioned here is that both groups are even less damaging to society than pic related, but everybody is afraid to talk about it.
>>61997941
I am a centrist nihilist and i strongly dislike antifa and somewhat dislike conservatives and nazis. I would not take actions against people beating people because today both sides are crazy and let them kill each other, but attacking animals? WHAT TYPE OF MONSTER YOU ARE? YOU PIECE OF SHIT.
>>61992847
>Canadian left makes criticizing Islam illegal
>b-b-ut muh ALT-RIGHT
>>61991126
>if nazis didn't want to crush their homes..
lol, you fell for the world domination meme my friend. by the way are you a survivor like the holocaust survivors that keep getting younger and pass on their trauma through their genes?
>>61995485
there are many leftist sites on watchlists... or, yes, banned by whole states
of course you ignorant dumbasses wouldn't know
>>61997697
No it's not, free speech refers to ferment only. Private entities can do whatever the fuck they please. Only exception is if they are in a position to abuse (eg. Monopoly).
BAKE THAT FUCKING CAKE!
DELTE THIS WRONGTHINK!
>>61997862
That source, lmao.
Please name some big right wing terrorist attacks in the last 50 Years.
>inb4 the aforementioned virgin plow
Left wing: North Korea, Venezuela, Cuba, Russia today and before, RAF, DDR, China in the whole
>inb4 China isnt communism
It is, it only hybrids itself to capitalistic for trade, but manipulates its curreny and silences the opposition.
We have literally no Problem world wide with right wing Terrorism. There are some plebs who wear all white ghost outfits and cry about some shit, but they dont bomb buildings or kidnap politicians like lefties did/do
>>61998388
That picture would be good if its content was actually practiced.
>>61990757
Go fuck yourself you stupid fucking nazi
>>61998638
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bologna_massacre
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklahoma_City_bombing
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anders_Behring_Breivik
>>61990785
If one stupid website can destabilize an entire country, then it should exist until the causes of instability are addressed.
>>61990902
Racism is about ensuring a future for your race. Antiracism is about spreading hate on your own race.
>>61999266
just scrolled by this thread to say
>(you)
>>61997587
I wonder if these (((companies))) can be sued for sabotage.
>>61999310
>(((Breivik)))
He is literally a mason larping as a templar. Haven't you read his book?
>>61996267
>civic nationalism meme
Time to stop. Nationalism is a bad meme
>>61990757
Fuck off kike, NAMBLA is based.
>>61991592
>If you're a big corporation like Google, or GoDaddy, or some other horrible multi-billion dollar (and/or) government-backed organization, then you are setting a precedence that it's OK to impede on a person's rights if their viewpoints don't match my own. They certainly have the rights as a private company to run their business as they please, but creating a narrative like this will make it possible for governments of the future to impede on ANY speech, including the type you might support.
There is no law in the constitution where it says "government or any entity" it just says Congres shall not make any law... or things like that
>>61990946
It's 99% men. Main reason why women don't become perverts is because they don't have to. A significant part of the male population is completely stripped of breeding rights (being omega, ugly, disabled, poor etc.) so they have to find something else to stick their dicks into.
>>61999765
[citation needed]
>>61999765
>breeding rights
you don't have a right to breed?
>>61990757
Yeah they don't actually give a shit. They just don't want a PR nightmare thanks to the media attention from le edgy alt-right driver 2k17
>>61991092
>Dailystormer is back under Namecheap and some Chicago-based anti-DDOS provider.
Namecheap just kicked Daily Stormer off for being highly offensive.
At Namecheap, we see both sides of the free speech consideration. On the one hand, we cannot be the ones censoring content, unpopular though it may be. On the other hand, and without question, the content appearing on the DailyStormer.lol is highly offensive, even more so in light of the recent events in Charlottesville, VA.
https://blog.namecheap.com/inciting-violence-vs-freedom-speech/
>>61991996
> equating the Internet to any other medium in history
>>61992318
[citation needed]
>>61992774
lmao they call them asian instead of pakis. the UK is fucked
I'm seeing some pretty retarded logic in this thread. Based on what some of you clowns are saying, the Daily Stormer could get a LLC and get away with whatever they want. Am I correct? If sweet and pure Google and the rest can do it as businesses, then what prevents anyone from the other end of the political spectrum from doing the same thing?
>>61999615
Muslims do far worse within a week.
I am not impressed.
>>61991089
>SJWs are against paedophilia and anime (because as they claim anime promotes paedophilia)
wtf I love SJWs now