Python
>hmm, let's try this, it seems intuitively right
>it works
Any other autistic bullshit language like C#, C++, Java and whatnot
>hmm, let's try this, it seems intuitively right
>wah wah you can't
Seriously, why is every other language so fucking shit? Why can't these autists construct their languages so that they're logical and intuitive?
>>61989954
I have a hard time understanding people so I can empathize with you having a hard time understanding programming languages.
>>61989994
i have a hard time with everything ;_;
>>61990497
I'm hard right now
Good thing I started learning programming and choosed python master race then, isn't it.
>>61989954
Python (((((( programmers ))))))) in a nutshell:
>import
and then u write shit code that is only intuitive to you
>>61989954
dumb Kyoukoposter
>>61990682
are you telling me you wrote all of your own libraries?
>>61990682
How is that a bad thing? No e-peen stroking?
>>61990682
Humanity's progress is built on the work of those who came before us. Only an utter moron would reinvent the wheel.
>>61989954
Why are you comparing an interpreted scripting language to lower-level compiled languages?
Python's competitors are languages like Perl, Ruby, and Scheme. Perl's more powerful, Ruby's more elegant, and Scheme lets you do magic. Python's only real strength is quantity/quality of libraries.
>>61989954
You know, C# is also a beginner friendly language like python, it's literally made for pajeet code slaves
>>61989954
>Python
>>61992612
> Rust
See >>61992413
>>61989954
t brainlet
>>61992413
So why complain against C++, Java and C#
Python is for shitty scripts, no more than it
>>61989954
>his language doesn't support tail recursion
>>61993719
well it supports me in that I have a job writing python
you work on open-sores hobby projects in a low level language (because you are a low life) for free
intuition is earned, brainlet
anything immediately intuitive is made for the lowest common denominator. that's why activities with high learning curves are mastered by few people. now go write another fizzbuzz.
>>61994310
>that's why activities with high learning curves are mastered by few people.
>mastered by few
>high learning curve
way to say the exact opposite of what you meant.
>>61994329
should have said steep. you knew what I meant
>>61993708
>>61993746
It would seem the best language for you to learn would be English. Unlike in Python, our grammar isn't only whitespace.
>>61989954
Ruby is better.
>>61994341
wrong again. You mean "shallow"
I had the misfortune of having to write Python at work.
>Python
>It just works
Pick one
>pip is garbage, virtualenv is shit, pylint/flake8 are fucking shit
>requirements.txt, setup.py, pyproject.toml: literally "ONE OBVIOUS WAY OF DOING THINGS"
>Anaconda, Jupyter coming in just to mess things up further
>Random dependencies always require some dumb-ass system dependency to be installed: I don't expect pip install to ever work on the first run
>Right version of stdlib docs takes forever to find on Google
>After you find them it's impossible to find the right page for the API you're looking for
>numpy and scipy don't play well with regular python
>Type hinting is useless, the type checkers out there aren't production ready
>One word: FORCED INDENTATION OF CODE
>__everything__ __has__ __these__ __fucking__ __things__ __everywhere__
>stdlib is where everything goes to die: (unittest, tk: enjoy your dead batteries included)
>Python 2 vs Python 3: I can't believe I still encounter this in 2017
>It's so slow we need PyPy that BREAKS ALL THE TIME
>[for a in for b in c for d in e for f in g]
>Decorator and contextlib hell
>Enjoy deploying to production (at least we have containers now)
>Exception system that is stuck in the 90s
>PEP8 looks ugly
>>61994978
Is there any web backend stuff that doesn't spiral into a clusterfuck when you get more than a few classes involved? I really hate writing PHP.
>>61995054
If there is, I haven't found one yet. It's definitely not Flask or Django.
The hottest thing right now in JS scriptkiddie webdevland is Elixir/Phoenix, but I think it's just another Rails clusterfuck.
>>61990682
ebin
That actually gets shit done unlike reinventing the wheel
>>61989954
>hmm, let's try this, it seems intuitively right
>it works
>hmm, let's try this, it seems intuitively right too
>it works too
X100
>Wait what, why does this happen?