15.2 TB write over the course of 5 years is good?

>>61980097
What am I doing wrong?

>>61980087
Yes.

>>61980087
If you had a hard disk in it, it was probably failing after 5 years. An ssd has most of the time a TBW of 70 or more. So it doesn't care much.

>>61980087
I have 10TB of writing and 20TB of reading on my 2.5 years old ssd

>>61980102
You need more writes

File: kingston.jpg (140KB, 674x728px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 674x728px

>>61980128
Yeah, I guess so. Pic related is its current health.

On the other hand, when SSDs do fail there is no way to recover the data.

>>61980154
Reading doesn't matter. The TBW is all about the writing data.

>>61980154
>>61980087

What do you guys do?

I've had a laptop for almost 7, how do I check the write amount?

>>61980166
>35C
wew. get proper room and device cooling m8

>>61980177
https://crystalmark.info/download/index-e.html

>>61980166
retired block count the bad sector equivalent of SSDs?

>>61980171
Most of it came from when I was a gaymer, the rest is mainly temp files and programs I develop

>>61980166
>malware disk info
Congrats

>>61980166
It's always a good plan to make back-ups frequently. If an SSD fails, it will have some bad sectors that cause blue screens or kernel panics. If you boot from a resque disk, you can access your data.

>>61980199
I think so. But I don't know how to read it actually. Raw value is 2 in HEX which is also 2 in DEC. Now why is current value 100? What does that mean? 100%? Threshold of 3 is what, 3% or 3 in RAW value?

File: earlyfailures.gif (11KB, 618x326px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 618x326px

had a 60gb kingston ssdnow which shit the bed and refused to accept any new writes after not that long and not that much data written, the refurbished 60gb ocz agility I got as a replacement has outlasted it by a few years now

currently on an 840 pro though, if this thing doesn't last forever I'll be sorely disappointed

>>61980208
Please elaborate more. Curious.

>>61980213
worst and current is probably upper limit and lower limit.
threshold is incremental and I think constant (can't go below, only increase).
>Threshold of 3 is what, 3% or 3 in RAW value?
depends on how the manufacturer interprets it.

>>61980250
The installer used to include OpenCandy, but hasn't for a long time. He's just retarded.

>>61980250
not them but
>non foss
>probably phones infos to some website masked as "customer experience"
>sending your drive serials online associated with IP address which is an identifier if you're noob @ opsec and didn't firewall it
>what is big data
>some company probably bought your info few years ago and you're not aware of it
>what is user agreement+deception
>windows and dotnet itself is malware enough anyways
Nothing to worry about. They know.

>>61980331
using windows in the first place means you have a dildo up your ass. none of this matters since you're track anyways if you use the net.

>>61980189
Why? 35C is fine... It's similar to how warm the equipment is if you are holding it in your hand.

>>61980331
I have a firewall that blocks everything by default and CDI doesn't trigger it, so it's not trying to contact anything. Many other """""safe""""" programs that people here use all the time, like Speccy, do try to phone home on every launch though.

File: 234.jpg (97KB, 628x504px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 628x504px

>>61980087

those manage easily a 200 TB+ ... so in 5 years 15.2 is very reasonable - thats about mine as well

MTBF: 1.5 Million hours so ... its nothing

>>61980331
>They know.
They know fucking what? My total write amount? The number of bad sectors on my HDDs? Who cares

>>61980353
>Speccy, do try to phone home on every launch though.
Maybe disable looking for new versions at startup then?

File: botnet.png (221KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 1920x1080px

>>61980401
I never had it enabled to begin with. It still tries to phone home. Nice try, Piriform shill.

>>61980087
but it's only 120GB dummy

File: SSD.png (108KB, 680x756px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 680x756px

>>61980166
Seems like yours has done better than mine. I have ~13.5TB of writes and only 94% condition, it has been in use for little under 4 years. Few months ago it was still at 97% and the condition seems to be falling steadily.

I thought it would last me longer, but I guess I'll have to buy a replacement at some point. Hopefully there won't be a catastrophic failure before that.