Tor bans racism

>>61976321
ITT: Lack of reading comprehension.

>>61976321
Fuck off. They have denounced all the illegal stuff on their network. Now that they get a new vile user of the tor network they denounce them to. And they aren't "banning" racism. They are saying "we don't like racism"

>>61976428
but they do like child porn then? i dont hear them denouncing when a child porn page appears or when another black market rises from nothing

Stop making new threads.
>>61973793
>>61973793
>>61973793

>>61976477
Read the tor FAQ.

>>61976394
Tor is entitled to their own free speech, but I can't say I'm not enjoying these memes

File: Thinking_Face_Emoji_grande.png (143KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 600x600px

Are alt retards now defaming the only network that will host their shit?

Wait, this is psy-ops from CIA, isn't it? Alt-right is just useful idiots to attract heat on Tor and get it shut down by public outrage.

Well played.

File: 1500137404833.png (69KB, 208x202px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 208x202px

>>61976486
Who ever the moron is who made that thread didn't include "Tor" in his fucking post. I fucking ctrl f'd Tor before I made this thread and it didn't show up. IMAGINE MY SHOCK. Eat a dick you dumb bitch.

File: 1500110689002.jpg (189KB, 593x534px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 593x534px

>>61976494

>>61976490
We're focusing on their Twitter 'PR' right now.

>>61976563
Read https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq-abuse.html.en and go back to >>>/pol/, brainlet.

>>61976624
>>61976563
>>61976486
>ctrl f words that should be in post
>not found
>"You need to look through all 150 threads in the catalog before making a post"
LMAO

>>61976624
I just read the whole thing. How is it relevant?

>>61976321
>Slavetrade,Order a Hitman
Not on tor

>Childporn is A-OKAY
>Guns, Drugs, Slavetrade,Order a Hitman etc. are fine.
They don't seem to agree. https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq-abuse.html.en
We have a thread already >>61973793

>>61976563
>>61976658
>bullshitting
It contains the word tor in the post.

>>61976602
They tweet what is relevant that day.

File: 1498318563621.png (443KB, 1000x1050px) Image search: [Google]

443KB, 1000x1050px

>>61976321
>>61976327
>>61976347
>>61976358
>>61976378
>>61976394

>>61976757
your photo reeks of leftist shilling, for the left cannot meme

>>61976772
>it doesn't count
lmao

>>61976378
>he did not read the faq
kys
Also, some of these are indeed freedom, what are you trying to prove?

>>61976772
Yeah, it has no jpeg artefacts ;(((

This is what happens when we have a /pol/tard global moderator
Fucking gook

>>61976321
yeah we get it the left is mentally retarded and promotes everything that is wrong with society

>>61976321
Can someone ban OP for being a fucking idiot that can't read?

>>61976843
Yeah Pointing at a Retard and laughing about how retarded they are gets boring pretty quick.

Outrage culture was a mistake

>>61976757
Ok I have to ask what software you used to typeset that text because it is an atrocity

>>61976501
CIA owns TOR, why would they want to shut it down?
TOR is as much "secure" as hosting your shit on "CIA ftp server"

>>61976321
>Tor is truly a great service to bypass censorship they said
Things like this really show the true face of liberals, leftists and jewish organizations

>>61976979
It's also owned by Sweden.

>>61977155
well that explains the tweet then, cant have no nationalist on network

>>61976979
NordVPN uses VPN Over Tor
they are STUPID or a CIA cover

https://pando.com/2014/07/16/tor-spooks/

>>61976428
They're probably secretly happy about it. The more people using TOR. The easier it is for spooks and crimmials to hide among their traffic. They're just saying this stuff to keep their libtard friends in the Acula and EFF happy.

>>61976501
The CIA would never shut down TOR. Neither would the millitary or Navy. They use it for covert operations and most of the funding for the project comes from them.

>>61977308
the positive thing is that I seriously hope less people use Tor and soon they realize even VPNs aren't safe except for 1 or 2

File: Image2.png (413KB, 1000x1050px) Image search: [Google]

413KB, 1000x1050px

>>61976772
>>61976757
>the left can't even align type
>they can't into kerning either
wow.

>>61976321
the only good thing liberals will make is allowing lowering or eliminating completely the age of consent.

There is no other reason or benefit to be liberal.

>>61976321
You can't stop bullets coming from an unknown sources

>>61976321
But they can't actually remove them from TOR. They can't only virtue signal.

What's the point again?

>It's the leftist jews funded by Soros!!

It's time for you to understand that normal people have always been irked by racism, you've spent too much time in your /pol/ hugbox.

How are /pol/fags this willfully ignorant / unabashedly stupid? We've had this thread at least half a dozen times already, and your idiotic arguments have already been debunked

File: 1494116065403.png (77KB, 760x787px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 760x787px

>>61976321
Tor can't ban shit. They're retarded if they think they can.

>>61977538
>It's time for you to understand that normal people have always been irked by racism

You're a fucking retard

>>61977538
>always
Maybe in your lifetime and in western countries.
Outside the west people are openly racist and nobody bats an eyelid.
And until a few decades ago racism was the norm in the west too.

>/pol/weenies getting BTFO left, right and centre

>>61977668
>Outside the west people are openly racist and nobody bats an eyelid.
If you hate Western values, don't live in the Western world. Go live in some developing shithole where people openly defecate outside of the sweatshops they work in for 14 hours a day.

>>61977538
define "normal”

I’m one of the 2 white guys in my workplace, and all the asians, Indians and blacks are openly racist

>>61976321
DOES NO ONE READ THE BLOG POST

>Tor is designed to defend human rights and privacy by preventing anyone from censoring things, even us.

>>61977707
Nice strawman faggot.
I never said anything regarding my personal opinions on the subject.
I just corrected his (your?) misconception.

Also one can love something without agreeing with all aspects of it like a dumb cheerleader who blindly likes anything associated with the team he decided to root for.
I can love western values and civilization and hate its anti-racism stance (mainly because it ends up making it ruin itself, as seen by what happened to the countries/areas with a lot of immigrants).

>>61977805
>I can love western values and civilization and hate its anti-racism stance (mainly because it ends up making it ruin itself, as seen by what happened to the countries/areas with a lot of immigrants).
Saying mass immigration is bad because people of different ethnicities should be treated badly is like saying gun control is bad because people who die from gun violence are failures of natural selection. Your core argument is good, but that doesn't mean shit if you are defending it in a retarded way.

>>61977538
>normal people
>irked by fucking opinions
Those ar pansies, not normal people

>tor is allowed to have freedom of speech
i never knew child porn was free speech desu, learn something new everyday

which of these three things threatens the global jewish agenda?
Terrorism/muslim extremism
Pedophilia
Drugs
White people trying to preserve themselves

>>61977538
>people have always been irked by racism
"normal people" is not the type of people you may think, im not on the US or EU and people here are openly racist to each other even on fucking TV like nothing, they even make fun of niggers directly like nothing, fucking faggot

>>61977565
screaming /pol/ every post is not debunking, sorry

tech-illiterate redditors pls go

>>61977869
>drugs
this one
we can create the femboy master race with drugs, it will rise up and smite the jews

>>61977846
>mass immigration is bad because people of different ethnicities should be treated badly
But that's not even close to what I said you fucking strawmanning retard.

I said that having immigrants in the country ruins the country because immigrants from shittier places always have a bad influence on the country they move to, because of their behavior, their aptitudes, their IQ (which may not be an accurate representation of intelligence intended as "brain power" but it accurately represents the ability of a person to do most of the tasks required for skilled labor), and even their mere presence (since we're hardwired for tribalistic tendencies and different people are subconsciously seen as a bad thing).
Not to mention how when they get numerous enough they always get into politics to change the country into a version that's more similar to their country of origin, and consequently diluting and eroding the local culture and values.

How they're treated badly is just a consequence of them being shitty.

I'm an arab myself born and raised in Europe and I absolutely despise how my people act, and every time someone is racist towards me I'm only angry at my people for causing this racist with their constant shittyness, and not with them, who are only inevitably racist because there's no way to think positively of arabs after experiencing them.

Reads the links they talk about:
https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2016/01/07/diversity-proximity-war-the-reference-list/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTROCGb5qj8

>>61978112
>literally defending the people who are racist towards you
I mean, why? Is the thought of someone considering you as an individual alien to you? Dont they teach that in the arab ghetto in Germany?
Maybe you should start thinking whether the people who treat you like shit are actually just as stupid and just as mediocre as immigrants, that maybe your average Yuro guy cant name 5 major figures from Western Civilization, or doesnt know his politics, or just worries about satisfying his consumerist tendencies with the next hip-hop or starbucks drink or new phone, while the people from violent countries are just thinking how to save their own ass.

There's nothing wrong with wanting your fellow immigrants to adapt to another country, but dont treat yourself as a second-class citizen when you succesfully done so, and dont put up with irrational behavior just because they happen to be white.

>>61978027
I was speaking about illegal drugs.

One day, women will be turned into breeding machines, purely used to produce more femboys.

This is technology board retards

>>61977538
Are normal people not irked by child porn and terrorist groups then?

Something must be done about these jews in control of the media and silicon valley.
We need some kind of solution to this problem.

>>61977866
It is.

File: 1498797687127.png (76KB, 1040x532px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 1040x532px

>>61976378
>unawful weaponry
I agree

>>61978352
yes, a final one

File: 1500228568146.png (69KB, 366x401px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 366x401px

>>61978389
WE MUST KILL THESE DEMONS

>>61978315
I'm not defending them.
I still wouldn't be happy.
I'm just saying that I can't blame them because I too think the same things of arabs, and it's statistically accurate for someone who doesn't know me to assume I'm like the other pieces of shit that I can't be immediately discerned from.

>Maybe you should start thinking whether the people who treat you like shit are actually just as stupid and just as mediocre as immigrants, that maybe your average Yuro guy cant name 5 major figures from Western Civilization, or doesnt know his politics, or just worries about satisfying his consumerist tendencies with the next hip-hop or starbucks drink or new phone, while the people from violent countries are just thinking how to save their own ass.
Dude I'm not a white supremacist.
I don't believe all white people are renaissance men who discend from the seed of the gods and are infallible in everything.
I just think that people from shitty countries (namely Middle East and Africa, but also Latin America and South-East Asia) are on average worse than white people by all standards we commonly use to see if someone is a piece of shit or a good contributing member of society.

>but dont treat yourself as a second-class citizen
Never said I did.
Just that it's not unreasonable for people who don't know me to think I didn't integrate (which would make me a second class citizen imho) and that I'm just one of the many usual shitty arabs.

>>61978315
>and dont put up with irrational behavior just because they happen to be white
I never do that. When whites do something stupid I hold them accountable for it (we were just talking about how I hate how Europeans are so anti-racism)
Hating arabs (and immigrants from shitty countries) is a 100% rational behavior.
One. Hundred. Percent.
Even Arabs often hate other Arabs kek.
If whites insulted a regular well-mannered Japanese man just for being japanese it would be irrational as they don't usually act in a way that warrants hate.

>>61976394
> modern libertarianism.jpg

>>61978435
>as they don't usually act in a way that warrants hate.
lol

>>61978352
an armed revolution is the only solution. start by purging the whole US government because it is corrupt to the core, then move on from there.

how many times does this thread need to appear? they didn't ban it, and unless you can show that they did, you're just shitposting and causing drama for no reason. Fuck off

>>61978389
So let me get this straight.

She had nothing to do with that project but happened to find someone who disagrees with her on Twtter, so she semi-doxed him to go and talk to his superiors in order to shame their company (for having an employee that holds such abhorrent views) into firing him?

This would make what she did an attempt to ruin someone's life for something (not even that offensive or unthinkable) he said on his Twitter page.

What's worrying is that I've seen hundreds of cases like this.
Is it socially acceptable to do this?
What about those guys who have families?
Doesn't anybody care about someone ruining families, lives, careers, and reputations, just because they got offended at a disagreeing opinion online?

>>61978481
eat shit pansy

>>61978461
Please elaborate.

Maybe I'm just ignorant on the subject and the Japanese are secretly damaging society as much as Arabs and I never got to know about it.

give the tl;dr, they actually posted this? the guys behind TOR?

because it creates a VERY dangerous precedent.

>>61978490
>requests, reasonably, for source showing the site in question was removed from TOR
>eat shit pansy
you're really building a credible stance there, faggot.

>>61978497
whoa calm down anon why are you getting so mad?

>>61978505
? ain't even mad

They're never going to do anything about pedophiles or druggies, liberals are their core userbase.

>>61978483
That's why I don't use social media.
>can have any opinion I want in public
>nothing to doxx online, hard to find my identity without Facebook

>>61978495
>eff is sjw
wow, big news, remember the appelbaum mess?
Anyhow, this is just pr, it changes nothing.

>>61978505
>eat shit pansy
>as a reply to a proper argument
I would not blame him for calling you a faggot.

>>61976428
>>61976477
They literally said that they're planning on altering the source code to allow tracking of sites and users to blacklist for hate speech. There's no point to Tor any longer. It's only a matter of time before governments hammer them and start tracking everything on Tor.

>>61978512
liberals are against pedophiles.

>>61976772
your post reeks of asshurting

>>61978521
You're going to need to provide source on that.
Sounds like FUDD

>>61978521
source on that?

>>61977846
>Not to mention how when they get numerous enough they always get into politics to change the country into a version that's more similar to their country of origin, and consequently diluting and eroding the local culture and values.

This is exactly how it works.
See London's mayor or France's education system for reference.

>>61978315
>average Yuro guy cant name 5 major figures from Western Civilization
>American education

>>61978522
funnily enough. it's hypocrisy at its finest.

but some of them, the actual liberals who didn't just jump into the bandwagon, are actually pushing it.

I remember a tweet from a few days back pushing the LGBTP acronym.

>>61978546
>funnily enough. it's hypocrisy at its finest.
SJWism in general is hypocrisy at its finest, after all liberals were supposed to push for freedom, yet here we are.

>I remember a tweet from a few days back pushing the LGBTP acronym.
If you have the link please post it.

>>61978538
I think you quoted the wrong post.

Anyway, don't you think this is damaging to the culture of the country where it happens?
Instead of letting it evolve naturally, you end up mixing it with other ones that are often ideologically against it (most Arabs hate western values and culture for example).

>>61978522
They sure weren't in the 80s

>these anons making claims saying 'tor literally said/did xx, can you believe it?'
>no source on ANY of their claims
fuck, i hate people who cause drama and shitpost for no reason

File: 0Fl3Nry.jpg (112KB, 750x699px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 750x699px

thank you /pol/ for ruining this board and this website

>>61978600
Back to your Firefox Nightly Icon thread #34935 dumb cunt

>>61978522
That's just because generally all people are.
Liberals are the only ones saying "we should help them instead of demonizing them, it's not their fault" and trying their hardest to be "open minded" about them (as with everything, since they're extremists of relativism).

Conservatives though, are on the opposite end, being all crazy about "think of the children" and "see the slippery slope? we told you people would've started saying that when gays sttarted to be accepted and you laughed at us".

>>61978435
>who doesn't know me to assume I'm like the other pieces of shit that I can't be immediately discerned from.
Sounds like babby tier behavior, how can it be rational? Dogs are literally above this type of behavior. It isnt rational at all, especially since most people dont know the supposed statistics on other races (supposed, because they are open to interpretation and are done on a niche population)
>Dude I'm not a white supremacist.
>but I think people from non-white countries are inferior to people from white countries by all standards we use to see if someone is a contributing member of society
That's literally on the line of white supremacy, and quite relative anyway. What if I consider orthodox, pious Catholics as the standard to be a good contributing member of society?
>Just that it's not unreasonable for people who don't know me to think I didn't integrate
Yes, of course it is unreasonable, how else are you going to judge someone if you dont even know them? It is subhuman.
>Hating arabs (and immigrants from shitty countries) is a 100% rational behavior.
You shouldnt hate arabs, you should love arabs and do something good for them, like helping them adapt into whatever country they move into or helping them move to a place they are more comfortable in. Maybe our hedonistic-consumerist culture isnt quite in everyones taste
>they don't usually act in a way that warrants hate.
They were literally anheroing themselves to attack americans about 70 years ago. The fact that you dont hate them now brings witness that their race doesnt affect their behavior as to be a social hazard.

>>61978608
but not even those threads are safe from teenagers whining about cultural marxism

File: 1501306983471.jpg (221KB, 800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 800x1200px

>>61978522
Think again faggot.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VhNbGTnA53s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7T6qU16fT4

>>61978600
you're welcome, mossad

>>61978626
Is this supposed to prove anything?

>>61978483
>>>61978389
>So let me get this straight.
>She had nothing to do with that project but happened to find someone who disagrees with her on Twtter, so she semi-doxed him to go and talk to his superiors in order to shame their company (for having an employee that holds such abhorrent views) into firing him?
>This would make what she did an attempt to ruin someone's life for something (not even that offensive or unthinkable) he said on his Twitter page.
>What's worrying is that I've seen hundreds of cases like this.
>Is it socially acceptable to do this?
>What about those guys who have families?
>Doesn't anybody care about someone ruining families, lives, careers, and reputations, just because they got offended at a disagreeing opinion online?

This is what the leftists do, and depending on the day, anyone who disagrees with them may also be labelled a bigot, kkk, nazi or poltard - even if they are leftist too.
Individuality is chastised, only the herd mentality is allowed.
Ironically, for anyone whom has bothered to study WW2 history, the similarities in behaviour to those of the nazi party after they settled into power are way beyond superficial, whether you believe that to be a coincidence or relevant at all.

>>61976321
Not racism, only the white racism.

>>61978522
ummm but the LGBT originally welcomed NAMBLA??

File: DHdVb9sUwAAGhXR.jpg (157KB, 901x896px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 901x896px

>>61976321
something strange about the creators cant quite put my finger on it though

>>61978620
>Liberals are the only ones saying "we should help them instead of demonizing them, it's not their fault"
Are they? To my experience they are the ones that try to hang them the most, even though most of them did nothing wrong.

>we told you people would've started saying that when gays sttarted to be accepted and you laughed at us
Pedos literally existed since the ancient times.

>>61978633
Yes that if your left of center your a child loving faggot.

oh look, it's another thread full of triggered alt-right-crybabies. what is it, did the tor project invade your safe space? poor, poor guys.

>/g/ - identity politics

>>61978621

Technically speaking stereotyping when based upon actual behavior is an effective way of living your life when it comes to avoiding danger.

It's perfectly rational though it has been ingrained in the population to be thought of as wrong.

>>61977253
>NordVPN
is NordVPN any good? I was thinking of getting a VPN.

from DK by the way.

>>61978650
"Though, as we shall see below, in a libertarian society the existence of a free baby market will bring such 'neglect' down to a minimum." - Murray Rothbard

>>61978649
>Are they? To my experience they are the ones that try to hang them the most, even though most of them did nothing wrong.
My experience has been different.
Especially when it comes to online articles and pubblications.

>>61978649
>Pedos literally existed since the ancient times.
I never said "accepted for the first time ever". Don't put words in my mouth.
A few decades ago neither pedos nor gays were accepted, so when liberals started to talk about accepting gays, conservatives said "if you start accepting this kind of sexual deviancy you'll end up on a bad slippery slope and at the end people will start to want pedo acceptance", because at the time and place where this was said, pedos weren't accepted.

It's not the ancient Greeks (or any ancient peoples) that said that, so why are you talking about ancient times.
We're talkin about conservatives in the last 100 or so years.

>>61978684
What is wrong with pedos and homos being accepted?

>>61978681
Wtf I want to be progressive and pump every 8 year old full of puberty blockers now.

File: 45dfc9d531573fc4941b5621c6d8df8629b6e96d00b5d3201fdcdfaefa861cca-ss.jpg (101KB, 612x816px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 612x816px

>>61978696
Homosexuality and pedophilia are bourgeois and reactionary

>>61978702
The point is that you're cherry picking and hasty generalization is a retarded argument, retard

>>61978696
>lets normalize and accept people who abuse children
The modern left everybody, no wonder they shill for Islam so much. But muh virtuous pedophiles!

>>61978681
I don't care enough to pick a side on whatever dick slamming you guys are talking about. but a quote from someone, taken out of context, with no source, isn't really a strong counter argument

This is libertarian retardism to its full extent. Welcome to liberalism 101. Tor does some good, but yeah its when they say shit like that. Makes you doubt whether there is any brain activity between their brain.

>>61978696
Homos I don't care as long as they don't start pushing their lifestyle on other people (which is happening at full force right now, up to children being indoctrinated into liking degenerate shit in the name of acceptance).

Pedos are damaging to society because a certain portion of them ends up hurting children.

>>61978668
Really? Is the right-wing stereotype of being racist, out-of-touch, rural, suburban retard who follows the principles of National Socialism perfectly rational?
>buh it was made by the mainstream meteor!!
My point exactly, most stereotypes are based on perceptions, which gives rise to misconceptions, intentional or not. You just need to see history to know this is true (the anti-Catholicism of the USA, the anti-hispanism of the Anglo race during colonial times, the capitalist-greed memes of communist countries, etc.

>>61978726
As a leftist I can tell you with 100% confidence that homosexuals should not he allowed to marry or raise children.

>>61978716
>>lets normalize and accept people who abuse children
Who are you quoting? Nobody in this thread claimed anything similar to that.
Only a small minority of pedophiles are child rapists.

>The modern left everybody
Not a leftist.

>no wonder they shill for Islam so much
How is shilling for islam relevant to this?

>>61978726
>Pedos are damaging to society because a certain portion of them ends up hurting children.
And a certain portion of homos ends up raping men. Nice argument there.

>>61978726
Homos want to push the homo lifestyle so they can fuck the young, young men down the street, moron

>>61978738
identity politics is a hell of a drug. you get labeled something that your discussion opponent views as abhorrent, and then none of your arguments are valid, and anything you believe in is automatically the worst thing ever. shit sucks, yo.

>>61978776
Indeed, sjws are a big joke.

File: 1502975980932.png (776KB, 1104x593px) Image search: [Google]

776KB, 1104x593px

>>61976321
appelbaum did not have to die for this

>>61978738
>And a certain portion of homos ends up raping men. Nice argument there.
Yeah, nice argument. So nice I can find it convincing.

>>61978738
>And a certain portion of homos ends up raping men. Nice argument there.
Homos have a way to be homos by having consensual sex.
Pedos do not.
It is therefore obvious that an intrinsic part of being pedo is to have sex with children (or even just touch them), which is not something we want to happen.

If anal sex between men were for some reason as bad as diddling kids, then it would be the same for homos, as they'd have no other way of releasing their urges than to do the bad act of anal sex.

If men had 100% self control it would be ok to accept pedos as just sick in the head.
Too bad they don't, so we have no way of knowing who can control themselves around kids and who can't resist diddling them.

>>61978779
>identity politics
granted, if someone identifies as a SJW and parrots all the things that caricatures of them parrot, then yes. but the same can be said about any group. individually though, they probably aren't as extreme as people make them out to be. that being said, fuck extremist ideologies of any flavor

File: crx981ou8aqpmaz-2.png (872KB, 750x750px) Image search: [Google]

872KB, 750x750px

>>61978546
that sounds like the same 'slippery slope' bullshit arguments the conservative christian right have been making about gays for decades, "what's next, men and children? men and animals", the fact that there's almost nobody talking about lgbtp other than the usual right wing "news" source suspects and a few nobodies on twitter should almost confirm that, if it looks like shit and smells like shit you probably shouldn't be so gullible and do a taste test

even the typical sjw bullshit websites are condemning it https://resistinghate.org/lgbt-p-is-not-genuine/ or an archive link if you prefer http://archive.fo/7MuxK

>>61978620
liberals are for rehabilitation and support of non-offenders in a prevention role? you don't say

>>61978650
funny how quickly you alt-right republicunts pretended like milo never existed once he started advocating for paedophilia

>>61978716
we can't go a week without some scandal with higher ups in the catholic church covering up child abuse cases by moving priests between churches and refusing to cooperate with the police or outright lying to them, but if we were to take your beliefs at face value they represent true western values, fucking degenerate

>>61978786
>Pedos do not.
They can fap.
They can also find a willing participant - not everything has to be rape.
Also, many of the so called pedos are actually attracted to teens instead of preteens.

>If anal sex between men were for some reason as bad as diddling kids
Girls can get pregnant/boys can make a woman pregnant, two men can't. Being a pedo is literally more acceptable in the laws of biology and the laws of god.

>Too bad they don't, so we have no way of knowing who can control themselves around kids and who can't resist diddling them.
Just don't put them close to kids then? Simple.

>>61978785
Yet I fail to see any counterargument in your post.

>>61978828
>They can also find a willing participant - not everything has to be rape.
sex without consent is rape
this is what the age of consent is for

>>61978795
>once he started advocating for paedophilia
Link?

>>61978838
I dont, I agree with your argument. Homos are damaging to society.

>>61978839
So how come two 15 year olds can legally fuck each other? the current "age of consent" law is pure cognitive dissonance.

>>61978574
My bad. Hate posting from a phone, but I'm out all day.
Yes, it is very bad for the country, but it's not coincidental or accidental, this whole thing was planned (remember ISIS said they would flood the western civilizations with "refugees"), and I'm convinced there are hidden interests at work here beyond ISIS concerning this whole "acceptance".
A prime example of that is pro-pedo shills starting to pop up in different places of the internet claiming being a pedo is no different than being homosexual.

>>61978845
how do you not know about this?

>>61978828
>laws of god
if that's your backing to support your stance, you need to start providing evidence for god for those to be credible.

>>61978857
Why? Most people in the world take them to be axiomatic

>>61978857
you know what he meant, fag. sodomy isn't natural.

>>61978483
>>61978514
>>61978635
"She" even made a blog about her crusade through github, eventually she lost her marbles (as trannies usually do), refused medical leave and got fired.

https://where.coraline.codes/blog/my-year-at-github/

>>61978877
sure it is, it exists in the natural world unless you're claiming that humanity is somehow intrinsically unnatural
>>61978867
because you're not attributing them to being self evident or even verifiable. you're attributing them to 'the laws of god', which is an entity that is not self evident

File: 1481328608879.png (326KB, 500x464px) Image search: [Google]

326KB, 500x464px

>>61978839
>sex without consent is rape
Yes

>this is what the age of consent is for
The age of consent is an instance of the law saying that one of the participants does not actually consent even though he does. It might be rape in the eyes of law but it is not rape in reality.

>>61978888
There are lots of things that arent self evident that we take for granted anyway. If most people take the laws of God for granted then there is no need to prove them

>>61978888
where in the natural world does it exist?
fyi you are not currently living in the "natural world"

>>61978857
>you need to start providing evidence for god for those to be credible.
God in this instance defined as the laws of the universe in general - the function and the seed that guides the world.
You do not need a proof of the Christian dogma in order for my argument to be sound.

>>61978856
Because I only care and read about GNU/Linux and CS? We are not on /pol/.

>>61978786
>Homos have a way to be homos by having consensual sex.
>Pedos do not.
which is why it's imperative to get paedos to come forward to cooperate so they can receive support and therapy to give them coping mechanisms that doesn't involve abusing children or facilitating abuse through supporting people who do abuse children, and you can't do that if they're demonised before they even commit a crime

the same can be said for a lot of groups of degenerate criminals like rapists, to a lesser extent thieves, etc, if you don't give people options they'll act in their own self interest or to fulfil their own desires which in the case of paedos means raping kids

>>61978845
I said that he was advocating for paedophilia which may be a bit misleading, he was defending it in the case of young male teenagers and older men, I apologise, it has been a while since I saw the video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJhHwspZGcg

>>61978889
the law is there because younger people are susceptible to being manipulated by older figures which typically represent authority figures and regardless children may not fully understand the gravity of what is being asked of them, the law is necessary to protect a vulnerable group in society from predatory behaviour - that's why generally people below the age of consent can have consensual sex with other people below the age of consent (except in america)

>>61978849
because they are the same physically and mentally development-wise

it is about well-mature grownups not taking advantage of impressionable people without a fully developed brain (until 21-25 desu, but 16-18 strikes a balance between needlessly restrictive and protective enough).
I know this is /g/, which is full of autists, and you can argue pedantically all you want about edge cases and technicalities and anecdotes, but in the end this is what it is.

It is not about labelling as many people as possible as pedos, when growing, developing and learning is part of life (e.g 14-15 year olds experimenting on their own terms, or 15-17 year olds even), but stopping say 40 year olds from this.

>>61976321
>Tor bans racism
Tor can't ban anything, that's the whole point of Tor.
And does the Daily Stormer actually oppose the human rights that Tor defends (anonymity, privacy, protection from denial of service)? All I hear is that they don't like liberals and black people.

>>61978938
>because they are the same physically and mentally development-wise
And?

>it is about well-mature grownups not taking advantage of impressionable people without a fully developed brain
How about underage people doing the same?

>>61978928
>people below the age of consent can have consensual sex with other people below the age of consent (except in america)
>expect in america

Wait what? Really?
Do they imprison teenagers for having sex?
What a meme country.

>>61978928
>that's why generally people below the age of consent can have consensual sex with other people below the age of consent (except in america)
America does have "Romeo and Juliet" type laws in several states, but I think it should be noted that minors are more than capable of manipulating each other in horrible ways (which can involve sexual activity).

>>61976321
I feel like their only motivation for doing this is that it'd bring a lot of unwanted attention to their service.
Because yeah TOR is used for CP. Fucking pedos.

>>61978941
>they don't like liberals and black people.
aka the people that oppose anonymity and privacy

>>61978980
liberals yes. black people definitely not.

>>61978958
>How about underage people doing the same?
this is what I was talking about with /g/ and edge cases.
Most underage people do not, and even among those who do there are other repercussions than the legal age of consent ones.

>>61978983
black people are liberals

>>61978980
>people that oppose anonymity and privacy
>eff is made up by liberals, same for tor
lol

>>61978988
not really. they are incredibly reactionary but only vote demokkkrat for the welfare checks.

>>61978988
most of the time they just vote that way because the other majority party has traditionally shit on them

>>61978987
>Most underage people do not
Sure thing.

>there are other repercussions than the legal age of consent ones.
That law would apply to adults as well then.

>>61978962
yeah, as with all american laws varies heavily by state but generally the exceptions are called something like close in age exceptions, from wiki
>The laws were designed to prosecute persons far older than the victims rather than teenagers close in age; therefore prosecutors rarely pursued teenagers in relationships with other teenagers even though the wordings of the laws made some close-in-age teenage relationships illegal.

>>61978974
>America does have "Romeo and Juliet" type laws in several states
yeah I misspoke there, and minors are definitely capable of manipulating each other, I think a few countries and probably at least some states have laws where the minors still have to be within a year or two of each other especially as they get older to prevent 16 year olds from diddling 12 year olds, and standard rape laws should still apply - manipulating and deceiving people into sex should still be considered rape even if it was consensual at the time

>>61978622
>defending cultural Marxism

Kill yourself, you anti white cuck

>>61976772
stop diving our race amongst politics you idiot

>>61979003
>>even though the wordings of the laws made some close-in-age teenage relationships illegal.
good luck explaining that to autists on /g/ taking everything literally without taking the intent into account though

>>61979000
remind me which party created the Great Society program?

>>61979014
if the zionists want to genocide the white race that's a problem, but don't bring marx into this.

>>61979003
some more from wiki
>A backlash among the public occurred when some teenagers engaging in close-in-age relationships received punishments perceived by the public to be disproportionate,[8] and thus age-gap provisions were installed to reduce or eliminate penalties if the two parties are close in age.[9]

I recall that the recent controversy is that teenagers below the age of 18 consensually exchanging nude photos are technically distributing child pornography

>>61979014
>everything I don't like is cultural marxism
>wahhhh cuck
Could you possibly be more of a stereotype?

>>61979022
dividing*

>>61979027
According to Wikipedia, the Democrat Lyndon B Johnson.

File: Mainstream_Left.png (407KB, 610x336px) Image search: [Google]

407KB, 610x336px

>>61979022
Leftists are subhuman pawns

>>61979035
>no argument
Why are anti white cucks so stupid?

>>61979047
>hurr argument
Argument against what, exactly?
The fact that you call literally everything you don't like cultural marxism?

>>61978992
have you noticed that the aclu are also dirty jewish leftist liberals until they start defending nazis and white supremacists? really wish people would educate themselves on what liberal means before using it as a slur for the left

>>61979057
Because it's true m, you leftist subhumans are the pawns of the capitalists you claim to hate

Tor has fucking changed over the years. A LOT.

They love to supress opinion and remove a lot of shit because the people editing shit in it think they're doing something very important.

>>61979047
>>>61979035
>>no argument
>Why are anti white cucks so stupid?

the post he was replying to wasn't an argument, could you be any more hypocritical?

File: 1425585431865.jpg (17KB, 358x373px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 358x373px

>>61979090
>Because it's true
Keep up the good fight, I know you're doing your part in influencing culture for the better.

>>61978495
nothing happened its pol being fucking retarded like always

>We are disgusted, angered, and appalled by everything these racists stand for and do.
>We feel this way any time the Tor network and software are used for vile purposes.
>But we can't build free and open source tools that protect journalists, human rights activists, and ordinary people around the world if we also control who uses those tools.
>Tor is designed to defend human rights and privacy by preventing anyone from censoring things, even us.

>>61979123
>b-but they're going to block onion links in their client! what do you mean you want a source, you don't need a source goyim

>>61979091
>They love to supress opinion and remove a lot of shit because the people editing shit in it think they're doing something very important.
Wut?

>Tor has fucking changed over the years. A LOT.
Like?

>>61979115
>the cowardly anti white cuck can't even argue

>>61979123
It's lefty shill comment #20392394 pretending not to see the hypocrisis of their cancerous virtue signaling blog post.

Tor would cease to exist the moment they wrote such an euphoric blog post about black markets, terrorist organizations, child porn, etc.

>>61979199
>We feel this way any time the Tor network and software are used for vile purposes.

Kill yourself you worthless faggot

>>61979184
Argue what? That not literally everything you dislike is cultural Marxism?
I don't have a list of everything you dislike, but I'm just guessing it probably includes some things that aren't cultural Marxism.
Feel free to call me a cuck or a leftist, or whatever else you desire instead of producing that list though.

>>61979217
>here's a weasel sentence glossing over all the nastier stuff
Wow... and you called me a 'faggot'... wow... try leaving your /r/esist echo chambers once in a while to learn how to argue

>>61979241
>Tor responds to a recent event that is popular in the news dealing with their technology
>wow why the fuck aren't they responding to every other complaint ever lodged against them in the past

>>61979178
Removal of pedo bait/honeypot from the wiki, but keeping actual pedo content if you look hard enough.

File: shitskins.jpg (343KB, 624x810px) Image search: [Google]

343KB, 624x810px

>>61978795
>but Catholics though!
Your arguments against Catholics falls apart because you're constantly shilling for Islam where pedophilia and incest is the norm.

>>61979297
What wiki are you talking about? The tor team does not have any wiki to my knowledge.

>>61979305
You are wasting your time the people in this thread are retarded.

>>61979254
Why should they involve themselves in the first place?

>>>/pol/

>>61978648
Cymru? IT WAS THE WELSH ALL ALONG

>>61979199
>Tor would cease to exist the moment they wrote such an euphoric blog post about black markets, terrorist organizations, child porn, etc.

what's it feel like being a brainlet that can't do their own research? I've always wondered

https://twitter.com/torproject/status/329647368494522370
https://twitter.com/torproject/status/212758818428428288
https://twitter.com/torproject/status/894667754342674432
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/trip-report-white-house-forum-combat-human-trafficking
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/q-and-east-african-human-rights-activist
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/protecting-your-internet-traffic-volatile-times
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/tor-misused-criminals
https://twitter.com/torproject/status/693198539309080576

>>61978795
>Marriage is a crusty outdated institution held onto by backwards clingers

>"Hey we want to be a part of this now despite our life-shortening dysgenic lifestyles and the fact we've been insulting you for the last 30 years"

How surprising people don't want them to marry. Blame the democrats for sowing the seeds of social division, not the right.

Doesn't really matter

The alt-right won the culture war

>>61979366
delet this
#fakenews

>>61978621
>Sounds like babby tier behavior, how can it be rational? Dogs are literally above this type of behavior. It isnt rational at all, especially since most people dont know the supposed statistics on other races (supposed, because they are open to interpretation and are done on a niche population)
Someone can believe the right thing for the wrong reason.
I can be afraid of train tracks because my cusin told me they'll electrocute me, which is stupid but I'd still be right in being afraid of being on them because a train might run me over.
Just like one can believe black and Arab immigrants tend to be violent and criminal because of his personal experience.
It wouldn't be accurate to use anedotal evidence to prove something, but it doesn't mean he's automatically wrong, and in this case it's completely right because all the statistics tell the same story he ended up believing for the wrong reason.

>That's literally on the line of white supremacy, and quite relative anyway.
It doesn't matter how you call it.
I don't subscribe to any ideology that sees whites as superior no matter what.
It's just objective and undeniable that the way the average white acts/is is way more desirable in a well-functioning society.
If the races were reversed I'd think the opposite and see whites as the worse people.
Reality is that immigrants from those countries are harmful to the (almost always white) countries they move to, so whichever way you call this view, it still ends up being real.

1/7

>>61976321
Tor = EFF

>>61978621
>What if I consider orthodox, pious Catholics as the standard to be a good contributing member of society?
I don't care about a "benchmark" citizen to compare others to.
I'm just comparing the average (western) European with the average immigrants that comes to his country.
Which one is more desirable for a good society. Which group you'd live in a neighborhood full of?
It's not relative at all.
IQ, criminal behavior (also dependent on IQ), skills, views of the local culture, religious beliefs (which define their opinion on what's good and wrong) are all pretty objective and measurable.
Even mannerism and care for the collectivity.
Ever been to Arab countries? Nobody gives a shit about anything and it's a complete dump oa a dog-eat-dog society, and in European areas where there are a lot of them it's the same shit.
They also yell all the time at each other at any hour of the day and night and savagely beat their kids all the time in public (mi father did this too) and call them the worst insults possible like "ya gazma" (you shoe), "ya zift" (you scum), "ya khara" (you shit), "ya sharmouta" (you whore), etc, which are some of the worst possible insults in their culture, and they use them just to call them instead of their name. Literally a mother at the park aggressively yelling "you whore it's time to go home" to her daughter, and often dragging her forcibly even though the daughter complied immediately.
I live right in front of a park in an area with a bit of muslims and I see/hear this all day every day, and have throughout all my life (both in Europe or in Arab countries).
They are complete animals and trust me, you don't want them in your country.
Obviously not everyone is like this, but a big enough number that shows that there's something wrong with a culture that harbors this kind of widespread behavoir.
Nobody is happy with living with them.

2/7

>>61978621
They are also huge assholes.
Every time there's ramadan (where they have to fast during the day) I see at least one instance of muslim men standing around public fountains acting aggressively towards the infidels who dare drink during ramadan (even if they're locals) and cursing them in Arabic without anyone knowing (except other arabs like me).

Not to mention how they all have a culture of "I don't care I'm exploiting people, as long as I end up winning", and many of them literally get taught that exploiting and "jewing" non-muslims is the best possible scenario.
This leads to all those statistics about their abuse of welfare, lack of work, etc.
They love it.

All my Arab friends know and talk about about this ubiquitous hatred towards everybody, but particularly non-muslims/non-arabs.
Obviously they don't tell you or the media (they'd shoot themselves in the foot by letting everybody know how much they hate their generous hosts that let them live in their land).

3/7

>>61976327
>>61976347
Fucking awesome, keep questioning those pedophile-enabling scumbags.

>>61978621
>Yes, of course it is unreasonable, how else are you going to judge someone if you dont even know them? It is subhuman.
That's absolutely retarded. Let me explain.
I don't hate any immigrant individually, and I'm not going to label them as scum right away, and in fact, I have tons of immigrant friends of all kinds and I don't hate them because I know they're good people and I judge them individually.
The thing is, we're talking about a macroscopic problem here, which is the overall effect of immigration from certain countries of western society.
You can't talk about a macroscopic problem with a microscopic approach by saying "maybe this one is good" when we're considering how they overall act as a group.
You can't consider the single savage murderer because he's just one, just like you can't consider the single good student because he too would be just one.
You have to see the statistics and see how THE GROUP acts to establish how the group acts, right?
You can't just judge an entire group by some individuals, can you?
It'd be like acting like lions aren't dangerous because you once met one and didn't maul you.
It would still be reasonable to stay away from a lion because while this one may not be dangerous, we know that they statistically they tend to be, so it's far more likely that he is, rather than he's not.
If you're in a ghetto and see someone who looks like a hoodrat and gets into a liquor store with a gun, are you going to assume that this is the exception where it's just a kid filming a sketch for school, or that he's the much more likely criminal robbing a store?
If you talk about a southern conservative (in the USA) who's defending his confederate flag, it's safe to assume that he's an ignorant redneck because it's statistically the more likely option.

4/7

>>61978621
What's completely retarded about this line of thinking is that people who have it see macroscopical phenomenons (where it's the overall average that matters) that they don't like and start to refute them by approaching them like microscopical ones (where it's the individual that counts), and then apply their findings (based on exceptions) to the whole thing and judge each part of it like the unlikely individual they wanted to sample.

If I meet an immigrant that doesn't have anything special that would distinguish him (like the way he looks, carries himself, or even just driving a Bugatti), then it's safe to assume that he's far more likely to be one of the many lowlife scumbags, rather than one of the exceptional good citizens.
Keep in mind I'm not labelling him and judging him based on this assumption. I'm just keeping on a "I assume he is until proven contrary" but don't act on it and keep an open mind about him.

Like if I'm in a dark alley with one of them, I'm not gonna do anything to him because he might be a good guy, but I'm not gonna take my chances and assume he's one and lower my guard.
Just like if I met a stray pitbull with cut ears and tail on the street, I'm not gonna label it as a dangerous vicious dog and shoot him, but I'm not going to assume it's a good dog either, so I'll just assume he's dangerous and take the right precautions, because doing otherwise (labelling it as a good dog and perhaps petting it) is the stupidest thing you can do.

If I have to hire someone for my company and it's part of a group that's statistically likely to be low-IQ and violent, I'm still going to judge him based on how he proves to be, because in that case it's not important how his group acts, but only how HE ALONE does, so I'll look at him microscopically, since he might be the exceptional excellent guy and I'd be wrongly discriminationg against him.

5/7

>>61979375
if the government weren't getting involved with people's private affairs by giving huge tax incentives and legal protections to married couples maybe gay couples wouldn't care as much about getting married, it's almost like people don't like being denied legal rights

>despite our life-shortening dysgenic lifestyles
I'll ignore that you don't understand what dysgenic means but have you considered that gay couples forced into straight marriages/lifestyles have a far worse quality of life despite the inherent problems of coming out as openly gay? even in third world muslim shitholes people still come out as gay regardless of it being a potential death penalty

>>61978521
>altering the source code to allow tracking of sites and users to blacklist for hate speech.
Couldn't exit nodes do that already?

>>61978621
>You shouldnt hate arabs, you should love arabs and do something good for them, like helping them adapt into whatever country they move into or helping them move to a place they are more comfortable in.
I do that with my friends and family.
I can't help the millions of immigrants integrate. Especially if they don't want to.
Actually I don't even care about integration. They can keep their culture if they want.
I just want them to be respectful towards the countries they move to, and their peoples and cultures/values. Seems like a nobrainer but apparently it's not, because shitty people don't care about not acting like shitty people.

>Maybe our hedonistic-consumerist culture isnt quite in everyones taste
If they don't like it here they should leave.
It's not up to me to decide whether they want the harder life of their shitty countries where everyone shares their ideals or the easier life here where they hate the people but love the money.

6/7

Can anyone give a link to Daily Stormer?

>>61978621
>They were literally anheroing themselves to attack americans about 70 years ago.
If the Japanese of today were still doing it, then it would be reasonable to hate the Japanese of today.
Since it's only the Japanese of decades ago, I'll think bad things about those, but not about those of today who aren't doing it.
Also it's a false equivalency, since the average soldier (of any country) doesn't represent the average member of his people.
The average Japanese tends to be hardworking and well-mannered, so if he immigrated in Europe he wouldn't act in an undesirable way and would be a positive contribution to the local society.
A Japanese who acts like an animal would still NOT be enough to be racist against all Japanese, as he'd be just one of few like that.
If THE AVERAGE Japanese started acting like the average Middle-Eastern or African does, then it would be correct to assume that a Japanese you see on the street is a piece of shit, because it'd be far more likely than him being the rarer good guy.

>The fact that you dont hate them now brings witness that their race doesnt affect their behavior as to be a social hazard.
I don't care about race. I care about behavior, which is certainly related to race (through IQ, impulsivity, violent tendencies, etc), but anyone of any race who behaves well and isn't a piece of shit is welcome for me.

7/7

>>61978795
>"what's next, men and children? men and animals"
funny because now some are asking to tolerate paedophelia because "muh feeling" and we have to deal with furries everyday now.

/pol/ tears are always the best, stay butthurt you cancerous filth

>>61979477
B-but his argument was against pedos

>>61978657
s-shut up

>>61979477
losing his marble so much that he's lost the ability to read, the so emotional left is at it again

File: download.jpg (12KB, 192x263px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 192x263px

>>61979473
>you're cancerous because your not an anti white prole like me!

Why why are leftists so ugly and stupid?

>>61979493
Cry some more.

Man I haven't seen a roast this bad since the jews.

>>61979504
Why are you so butthurt about white liberation?

>>61979493
>it's ok to kill anyone who disagrees with me
Your anger is showing, filth

>I can't read: the thread: the shitstorm

>>61979416
>>61979424
So you are Arab?

>>61979535
Yes, as I had already stated here >>61978112

>>61979521
"there are a lot of violent/terrorist muslim so their religion must be full of them"
WOA THAT'S WACIST


"i'm not ok with your extremist left idea"
lol the right is full of murderer nazi ur dum go away.

>>61979463
difference is no one is taking that seriously and leading neurologists have already proven pedophiles are pieces of shit with incurable disorders.

>>61979366
And not a single source is a virtue signaling PR fluff piece how they proudly host all that nasty shit.

Call me back next time Interpol cracks down a pedo ring and they say "pedophilia is vile but we'll defend their right to host child porn on our network".

>>61979400
Upboated fellow liberal ledditor xD

>>61979545
What's that? Caps lock? Thanks for proving my point.

>>61979521
>"bashing the fash" and assassinating members of congress is okay
>but doing a civic duty ajd clearing the rosd of terrorist is bad

Why are you leftists such subhumans?

>>61976321
Wtf I hate tor now!

Bait thread

>>61979568
wtf i like alt-right now!

>>61979559
yea the caplock was my portrayal of the usual over-reaction of people who put emotion or logic, the kind of people who love to use classic logical fallacies

>>61979544
I just wanted to make sure I didn't read wrong.

If this question makes sense, what has made you come to think/be this way? You don't seem to be part of the average.

Generally curious here.

>>61979579
>portrayal
No, it was your anger.

File: bb745dde496600c863eb3b66879607bc.jpg (983KB, 1506x2480px) Image search: [Google]

983KB, 1506x2480px

>>61976321

I find it rather amusing when people think one thing should be allowed, just because other things are "tolerated".

I don't care if all of that other stuff wasn't bashed as proudly as the hate speech, it's all wrong in my opinion.

>Guns, Drugs, Slavery, Assassination are NOT fine.

Fixed that for you.

>>61979587
>Hi, I'm a newfag and can't into parody!

>>61979613
>guns
>drugs
>bad
found the beta

>>61979616
>i was only pretending to be retarded

>be mad that some fat antifa cunt who advocated political violence got mowed down.
>don't be mad when Muslims constantly mow down women and children in Europe
Liberals everybody.

>>61979587
projection is also a good mental self-defense. keeping you from facing the reality.
good night bro i hope you'll over-come the need to argues angrily at people at night and move on from this political left or right bullshit when they're both clearly wrong.

>>61979618
>found the beta
I'm fine with that.

>>61979626
>no u

>>61979624
>implying anyone actually cares
at this point people politicize tragedies as soon as they happen

>>61979583
Living with both Arabs and Europeans.
Most people subconsciously want to protect their ego, so they block any notion that they come from an "inferior" or "worse" group, and end up being proud of it regardless.
For some reason I don't have this, and I sort of have to be pedantic with myself about what's objective and what's what I wish things were.
In this case I really can't be proud of my people when I see the difference between them and Europeans every day, and can't help but compare them.
It's very easy to see how different the two groups are once you don't care about holding back on the distinctions, and obviously Middle Eastern people and Africans end up being objectively worse in virtually all the important traits you want in the people who live with you.

It probably helps that I come from a Christian family and growing up I had almost all European friends (plus the few Arab kids from church, which I met on the week end, and are all like me) up to 11 yo where I started to make immigrant friends, so I inevitably ended up being shaped more by the local culture rather than the culture of my country of origin, and act/think like a westerner (which is only amplified by my disdain for Arab culture, and by my conscious effort to be a good person by western standards).

>>61979447
>dysgenic
I know exactly what it means you sanctimonious buttblaster. It applies to culture as much as it applies to genetics.

>Le gubmint
>tax incentives and legal protections
Neither of which gays need or deserve in the same way hetero couples do. Maybe they shouldn't have spent years decrying it as a bastion of le white male christian oppression.

>>61979651
it sounds like you're living like most orientals live in western countries.

>>61979650
The media has been trying to make a martyr out of her since it happened and there is now a petition to put a statue of her in place of the confederate one, although they're not sure if there are enough raw materials available to make a statue with such girth.

>>61979670
>orientals
What do you mean exactly by that?

>>61979678
east-asian

>>61979654
>Neither of which gays need or deserve in the same way hetero couples do.
No one needs them at all.

File: Cu1SQASWgAApAZe.jpg (68KB, 922x519px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 922x519px

>>61976321

>>61979675
>someone said something on TV which makes it a universally accepted fact

>>61979683
protip: chinese support trump because they hate muslims (read: they hate being killed in suicide attacks

>>61979651
Yes that sounds right. No one wants to hear their what group they are with genetically is worse than others somehow. No one wants to be apart of something that seems awful. Even other whites/Euros/Americans try to disassociate themselves from what they hate. So it makes sense.

Is there any reason I, as a white American, should learn some Arabic just to know what others are saying? Curious about that too. It seems useful, but if I were to try and do that for any culture/race then it would probably be over my head.

Thanks for answering btw.

>>61979683
Oh ok.
In my experience and by what I read, yes.
Although they're not perfect (the Chinese for example often form enclaves and do tax-evading tricks and white collar crimes like that), they certainly don't do anything that people from African and Middle Eastern countries don't do, and on top of that they don't make their areas unlivable.

There's a reason people always talk about people from shittier countries (like ME, Africa, Latin America, SEA, Eastern Europe, etc), but never about immigrants from East-Asia or other Western countries.

>>61979651
Being ashamed of who you are for reasons you can't control doesn't make a lot of sense. People are not their ethnicities.
I imagine some retard will reply to this with "u mean except white people fag" though

>>61979651
The only problem with Arabs is Islam, and all of the Islamic circles they get in.
Maybe sometimes the strong tribal affiliations, but that is mostly muslims, again.
Same with 99% of immigrants - most non-christians or non-atheists are shit people.

>>61977439
back to /gd/ you go

File: 1468241808590.png (47KB, 381x292px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 381x292px

>>61979732
the problem with islam is dawa.

if they worshipped and kept to themselves it would be the mythical peaceful religion the TV wants you to believe it is, but they practice dawa, the political side of islam (and islamification/with world domination as the endgame), so it isn't.

this might be interesting for some of you

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bx2hEc7Dlcg

>>61978635
>This is what the leftists do
Except that she isnt a leftist

>>61979708
well east-asians are more prone to racism too.
I don't associate with the right but I'd say east asians are a lot more assimilated into western societies because much like the anon said they just want to live their lives and not have their shit fucked up.
Because of this their asian communities can exist within western societies without even needing to radically westernize themselves, there's no real need because the cultures are largely compatible with each other.
>>61979720
I think people are more comfortable with shady business practices than hoodlums.
You're not going to get stabbed because someone is stealing money from the government by cheating on their taxes, but someone who's stealing from you up front might.

A lot of the right would say this is a biological thing, east asians have the highest IQs after all so maybe africans and arabs act like beasts because they're idiots.
It might have a role to play, education as well. I feel it's more that cultures need to be somewhat compatible before mass integration can be run smoothly.
A lot of migrants are not up to speed with the 21st century, you can't just drop them in a western culture and expect them to behave like good little boys.
The argument ultimately stems whether we should allow them to assimilate inside the western counties, hurting the people already there or if we should force them to wait outside the countries, hurting themselves.
There's not really a perfect answer.

>>61979670
Germany has given them more than enough chances.

>>61978839
>this is what the age of consent is for
It is for spooked cucks

>>61979683
East-Asians are seen as whites usually, and they usually develop respect for the country they are in.

>>61979716
>Is there any reason I, as a white American, should learn some Arabic just to know what others are saying? Curious about that too. It seems useful, but if I were to try and do that for any culture/race then it would probably be over my head.
Obviously I'm biased, but I'll try not to be.
Arab culture, if you ignore the people, can be very beautiful, but I don't think it's worth it when there are many equally beautiful cultures you can explore without having to deal with Arabs.
I'd consider Mediterranean European Countries or East Asian ones, which are still civilized enough, and have an equally worthwile culture IMO.

Consider it only if you want to specifically deal with Arab countries (like if you want to do business with them or want to actually study their history like an Egyptologist) or with Arab people (if you want to get involved with cultural relations with immigrants in your country and things like that).
Otherwise there are better options I think.

>>61979725
I'm not ashamed of who I am.
I know what kind of person I've become and I hold myself accountable for my choices.
I'm only ashamed of other Arabs who act in undesirable ways, but they have little to do with me, because the person I am wasn't influenced by them.
Of course strangers don't know that, so they assume I'm one of those other ones, but I can't do anything about that, except behaving and carrying myself in the best way I can.
If it's someone important to me I'll explain that I'm not like the others, like I did in this thread (maybe a bit more succintly kek).

>>61979732
Mostly yes, but also Christian arabs are hugely influenced by islamic culture, as they're basically forced to live like muslim in their countries (but with different values of course).
For example my mom comes from an all christian family and had FGM done to her.

>>61979774
why don't you listen to what this bl*ck wom*n has to say

>>61979752

>>61979304
>Your arguments against Catholics falls apart because you're constantly shilling for Islam
try reading between the lines fuckface, I called one organised religion in a position of power that abuses and rapes children degenerates, I'm not about to bend down and accept another organised religion in a position of power that abuses children

>>61979463
>funny because now some are asking to tolerate paedophelia because "muh feeling"
nobody's asking anybody to tolerate sexual abuse of children, they're asking that paedophiles not be demonised by the state before they've committed a crime so that they come forward to cooperate under the care and more importantly supervision of therapists, so that they can develop coping strategies that doesn't involve raping children

it's almost as if there were two separate comment chains discussing the pros and cons of this setup that were conveniently ignored

>>61979552
>And not a single source is a virtue signaling PR fluff piece
they've done plenty of those
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/stockholm-may-2014-trip-report
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/what-tor-supporter-looks-edward-snowden
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/tor-80-percent-percent-1-2-percent-abusive
it's almost as if they've just realised that tor gets a reputation for being the shady back alley of the internet and need to explain to plebs involved in this highly viral political debate why they cannot remove the dailystorm despite being politically against them, to quote from the blog about combatting human trafficking,
>Interestingly, no other press showed up to cover the event.
it's almost as if nobody gives a shit about anything any more unless they can use it to push a political agenda

>they proudly host all that nasty shit.
did we read the same article? between all the retards in this thread claiming tor are going to censor them and you mentioning that they proudly host dailystormer I'm not sure any more

>>61979774
>A lot of migrants are not up to speed with the 21st century
This. Though it is largely US/GB politics of the last 150 years that made now-Islamic shotholes Islamic and backwards.

>>61979806
I see I see.

Thanks for answering again.

>>61979774
>I think people are more comfortable with shady business practices than hoodlums.
>You're not going to get stabbed because someone is stealing money from the government by cheating on their taxes, but someone who's stealing from you up front might.
>A lot of the right would say this is a biological thing, east asians have the highest IQs after all so maybe africans and arabs act like beasts because they're idiots.
>It might have a role to play, education as well. I feel it's more that cultures need to be somewhat compatible before mass integration can be run smoothly.
>A lot of migrants are not up to speed with the 21st century, you can't just drop them in a western culture and expect them to behave like good little boys.
>The argument ultimately stems whether we should allow them to assimilate inside the western counties, hurting the people already there or if we should force them to wait outside the countries, hurting themselves.
>There's not really a perfect answer.
I agree, but I don't think integration is possible.
In France and Germany for example there are tons of migrants who've been in Europe for multiple generations (literally being born without ever knowing a relative who migrated), and they're still very much Arabs and often less integrated than FOB ones.
Integration is virtually impossible because each group wants to live their own way, and nobody is willing to sacrifice their way of life, so it's impossible to make anyone happy, and the parties end up fighting over everything.

See the links here:
>>61978112

>>61979843
>hough it is largely US/GB politics of the last 150 years that made now-Islamic shotholes Islamic and backwards.
according to whom?

because this bl*ck wom*n says that this is wrong. she even goes as far to say that western liberal democracy is superior

>>61979752

>>61979852
You're welcome.
If you have other questions, feel free to ask. I'll try my best before the thread gets archived.

>>61979806
>FGM
Basically what happened in the US with MGM, being treated as nothing.

Arabs I know usually defend themselves that FGM is an African practice. How common is it witb Arabs?

>>61979654
>I know exactly what it means you sanctimonious buttblaster
kek, I deserve that
but yeah, fuck the gays for complaining that their oppressors are oppressing them, not like they deserve it amiright

not really sure what else to say

>>61979752
This is true.

Muslims are the most peaceful people, and their societies are the most peaceful ones.

As long as EVERYONE follows their same exact interpretation of the scriptures and nobody does anything slightly outside the rules of the religion and the local hierarchies.
In which case it's imperative that things have to be fixed by any means necessary, in order to achieve peace.

>>61979871
It's not very common right now (mostly just in very poor/uneducated and communities or with extremists), but my mother was born in the 60, when it was still popular enough for christians to do it as well.

>>61979854
>western liberal democracy is superior
Superior to Islam? Yes.

But both GB/US made the radical islamization movements that made the middle east an islamic shithole.

>>61979428
But /pol/ is full of pedos, as is the church and all the other conservaturd institutions.

>>61979867
Would you say you give everyone the chance to be individually judged before labeling them a walking stereotype, or do you assume them to be a walking stereotype before individually judging them?

>>61979843
>Though it is largely US/GB politics of the last 150 years that made now-Islamic shotholes Islamic and backwards.

I'm a brit and every time I mention this one of my croatian friends is quick to remind me that turkey/ottoman empire were doing it for centuries before that, much like how europe/the us ran the slave trade for centuries fucking africa up beyond belief but muslims were also doing it for centuries before

>>61979752
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Copts
Copts in Egypt have been persecuted since Muslims invaded their country.
Even today they keep getting killed for no reason, their churches get burned, people get beaten on the street, and there's a comparable discrimination to that of blacks in 60s/70s America.

For muslims it's impossible to coexist.
They HAVE to force everyone to live their way, and I guarantee you, once they get numerous enough in Europe, they'll try the same thing.
They're already getting into politics for islam-friendly laws and they're an extreme minority. Imagine if they were the majority...

Anonymous ## Mod 2017-08-19 09:58:28 Post No.61979952
[Report]

Anonymous ## Mod 2017-08-19 09:58:28 Post No.61979952 [Report]

This thread was moved to >>>/pol/138178903