Ubuntu and cinnamon.

>>61966819
Just stick with cinnamon mint.

You can install Cinnamon through the repos. You don't have to worry about it

>>61966819
Mint is pretty much Ubuntu. So there's no reason to go with Ubuntu Cinnamon. Plus, the devs of Mint are devs of Cinnamon. So you'll always have a better Cinnamon experience there.

File: IMG_0172.jpg (340KB, 1271x1600px) Image search: [Google]

340KB, 1271x1600px

Why does Cinnamon even exist? It looks 90% like xfce. And it's so unstable, it has its own widget to restart the desktop.

>>61967175
I have the same question about LXDE, MATE, pantheon and deepin. They're a waste of time and the devs could be more useful if they worked on more relevant DEs.

>>61966819
>>61966819
I've gone from Mint to Ubuntu, even though Ubuntu is a beginners distro through and through, I had to spend a lot more time fucking around with it, particularly in respects to fucking around with Nvidia drivers than I ever had to for mint,

mint justwerkz, usually without a hitch. It's probably the closest i've gotten to an out of the box experience to windows

>>61966928
That's the one where you could rice mint the most?

File: hunny.png (342KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

342KB, 400x400px

>>61967565
Yeah I love how it's repos are so small you have to fetch your programs from dozens of places, just like Windows.

>>61967175
>>61967246
Cinnamon is a wannbe MATE, really.
But it's not light enough to contend, not stable enough to content, and doesn't have the same level of customization.

>>61967822
MATE is wannabe Xfce
But it's not as light, functional nor customizable. Guess anything based on GNOME is garbage.