http://www.anandtech.com/show/11732/unannounced-8th-generation-core-15w-u-series-cpus-appear-on-intels-price-list
THANK YOU BASED INTEL
>>61965617
>1.8GHz i7
>1.6GHz i5
what?
>>61965709
Intel tries to compete with Zen in low power enviroments.
>>61965709
You missed the 1.7GHz i5 :^)
>>61965617
>>61965709
Shit like this is why I laugh when shills tell me Raven Ridge isn't going to fuck Intel's shit up in the laptop marketspace.
>>61965928
No takes these retards seriosly.
Everyone with half a brain knows Zen scales much better into lower power targets.
FFS 7601 is *only* 180watts TDP, and the thing has insane amounts of uncore besides 32cores.
>>61966119
the 7601 is actually less than that, zen starts shitting itself when going above 3GHz though
>>61966263
3.3ghz, actually.
And it's node limitation.
>>61966275
that's what you get for building your processors on a silicon process made to be used on smartphones
those 7nm ryzens will be some crazy stuff
>>61965617
>>61966305
Yeah, these would be really killy ones, considering Icelake (10+) can't clock higher than Intel's refined 14nm node.
>>61966361
if they manage a good ipc improvement from the shrink they'll still be ahead of AMD on low core count stuff seeing that they can't keep clockspeeds good on high core counts
>>61966430
>IPC improvement
>from the shrink
?
Also they can't be ahead of Zen2.
>>61966430
There's no IPC improvement, just better turbo behavior under specific conditions. RR is going to obliterate intel
>>61965617
THANK YOU BASED INTEL AYYYYYMD DEAD AND BANKRUPT.
AMD FANBOIS ON SUICIDE WATCH. THANK YOU BASED INTEL. IF YOU HAD A COCK, I WOULD SUCK IT. THANK YOU BASED INTEL.
So Coffee Lake is out Aug 21 confirmed?
>>61966490
I'm talking about intel's 10nm desktop CPUs (which are still years away nevertheless) against 7nm ryzen
>>61966515
These have no chance against Zen.
They are too late.
>>61966529
Selling all my intel stocks now before it's too late
>>61965617
>$102 price difference for 2MB cache and 100MHz
AYYY INTEL
>>61965617
>FCBGA
fucking jews
>>61965617
>i7
>2/4 threads