I wish this language had taken off as the de-facto standard for

>>61963655
It handles lazy evaluation and IO in a manner that is much better than Haskell, but because it has linear types it can do safe-Rust-like imperative programming efficiently without breaking referential transparency.

Also, it has a lot less syntactic sugar. There is no if statement, just a lazy if function.

>>61963655
That looks like a very interesting language as I look through it. Fewer warts than Haskell.

>>61963655
>strongly

>>61963981
Stronger than Haskell. It has linear types.

Clean was an awesome language. Too bad that it's more dead than D.