>>61957164 was always a honeypot, they just recently admitted

>>61957187
oh, are there any other secure dark web browsers?

>>61957208
I2P and freenet. Instead of creating these threads though OP, you can visist the wiki. The installgentoowiki.

>>61957187
what you talking about. There's nothing as secure as the onion encryption. You obviously haven't looked into how this works.

>browser fingerprinting can identify you out from millions
>nearly all fingerprinting techniques rely on javascript
Tor really just hides your IP and replaces TLS between you and onion services. TorBrowser helps you scrap a few fingerprintings, but turning off JS is far more secure.

>>61957470
this

only way to get you with JS off is the ending node and your ISP exchanging data about visitors for profit

>>61957187
>was always a honeypot
citation needed

>they just recently admitted being hypocrites
Not really

>>61957164
It will be quite secure after they implement the new changes concerning crypto algorithms.

File: Tor Is Fucked.png (495KB, 2672x2320px) Image search: [Google]

495KB, 2672x2320px

>>61957164
>>61957386
>>61957619

>>61957839
>2013
Wasn't that a flash vulnerability?
You are supposed to have flash and js disabled.

>firefox vulnerability takes down half darkweb sites
That does not make sense.

>>61957839
>archive.is
Quite ironic, you can't visit that site with tor nor with most vpns.

>>61957839
why are the comments decribind 4 years old already-fixed issues, yet are from 2017? Noone mentions how it's impossible to bugreport because there are no contacts and pgp keys on tor project website (the whole website is mess).

File: 1502995548205.png (104KB, 497x350px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 497x350px

>>61957896
https://www.dailydot.com/news/eric-marques-tor-freedom-hosting-child-porn-arrest/
https://www.wired.com/2013/09/freedom-hosting-fbi/

You could have easily just visited the links in the pic. Here's five seconds of searching for you.

>>61958075
Only a single irrelevant link in that post.
In any case, all of these have been explained.

>>61958022
>Already fixed issues

A good handful of those issues still exist. The post was chronicling the list of Tor's massive fuckups over the years proving they're nothing but charlatans. They made an addon for Firefox that linked your Tor browsing habits to your native browser for God's sake. They know nothing about what they're doing.

>>61958145
>>61958075
>>61957839

urm, sorry to make you feel so stupid honey but onion routing is not tor. Onion routing and encryption is the way tor and other services I'll never reveal to a normie like you work. It's basically an at least 3 key encryption mechanism over at least three nodes. This way a node can only know what's before and what's after it and cannot see the message encrypted.

So.... except the cases normies like you would use JS or flash in the native resolution of their computer screen to browse facebook and feel "xD private" onion encryprion cannot be beaten when working with plaintext information and environments except IF your isp and the server at the END of the nodes that receives the unencrypted messages actually communicate and have an agreement on busting you for any of your illegal actions.

Onion is not just Tor.

Now off my board until you educate yourself on the things you have an opinion for and before I tell your mommy you searched for kiddy pizza on ahmia

>>61957164
Not secure enough to have them delete your stuff.

>>61958828
ps. Learn how to host such services. Or any services at all. It would be a great start to get you going.

>>61957619
they're ok with drugs and cp and guns but they're afraid of mean words?


ok

You're safe so long as you aren't a racist :^)
https://twitter.com/torproject/status/898256109789687808

>>61959380
It makes sense to try and deflect "we hate nazis and criminals but unfortunately we can't do anything about them" instead of letting the plebs think TOR is for nazis and criminals and needs to be banned

File: 1503024215820.jpg (166KB, 901x896px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 901x896px

Just ask these two fine individuals.

>>61957578
>>61957470
but wont turning off js make it kinda pointless for browsing as alot of things wont work?

File: 1502392993634.jpg (43KB, 400x288px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 400x288px

>>61958828
CMU attack. Not even taking your weak bait.

>>61959746
>Vice/likewise media reader

who's baiting who