AMD shit at tuning hardware

>windows user
thread disregarded

File: 1263938280347.jpg (11KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 250x250px

>>61954999
>he fell for the amd meme
>he bought vega

>>61954999
GN had similar results,for 100W less you only cut 5% on performance.

>>61954999
because they have to go with a voltage that will ensure stability for even the worst functional silicon

>>61954999
See if you can get any more out of the HBM2, and then go run all the Firestrike benchmarks and post scores.

>>61955057
I need it for compute workloads. Wanna recommend me a better card? :)

>>61955163
I got the HBM2 to 1000. Haven't tried any higher desu. I assume it can go higher. Lemme grab firestrike.

>>61955028
you're so cool kween let me smell ur feet

>>61955185
Once you get the power Target to plus 50% and undervolt as much as you can, your best bet is to leave core clocks alone and try to Max out the memory overclock.

>>61955057
>he isn't using vega to make $500 each month on buttcoins

>>61955218
>he thinks single card mining is profitable
enjoy the $60-100 a month for 720 full throttle hours on your equipment.

File: gtujdo[1].png (1MB, 1384x1011px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1384x1011px

>>61955163
Here is timespy. Note that I'm on a sotck Ryzen 7 1700 which might dampen results a little. This is 1630/1010.

>>61956163
>$60-$100
My fury X cost maybe $20 a month extra at worst while mining $90 worth a month when I wasn't using it for other tasks.

>>61956223

I just noticed it's showing different scores. It also crashed 3 times before running. Let me rebench.

>>61956223
I just checked whattomine, it takes 6x 480 to make $10 a day at current difficulty and its going up again. I have a job so that seems like more effort for minimal financial gains.

>>61956305
>I'll only earn $20 a week mining bitcoin
>Not worth it bro
t.2010 faggot

>>61956305

I didn't buy the card for mining. I just turn it on to mine when I go to sleep. It's like an overtime rebate.

>>61956223
I'm only looking at the graphics score anyway. 7,381 is very good for a Vega 64 Air, actually. Especially as TimeSpy is Vega's worst 3DMark test.

>>61956546

trying to slap together some OpenCL benches since I'm mainly going to be using it for that.

>>61956353
>speculation is always profitable
I'm not even going to call you a name.

>>61954999
That's surprising that you can get a stready clock