I've noticed Mister Metokur has uploaded videos related to recent /g/ threads in the past. Is he a /g/entoomen?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=le2R2Ps58pQ
What do you think about D.A.D?
>>61947508
4chan is not another link aggregation website. le reddit is over there ---->
>>61947527
Maybe you missed the point
>>61947533
Well, I didn't click that shit, if that's what you mean.
>>61947549
I'll summarize for you, lazy nigger.
An internet "Mutually Assured Destruction", or Digitally Assured Destruction could be a way to combat websites like CloudFlare/Google that think it's okay to censor its users' beliefs. The D.A.D would be spitefully voting against net neutrality in hopes it would also fuck the websites that politically censor users.
>>61947595
Still, link could better be posted on reddit. That website is specially made to share links.
>>61947606
But what do you think about D.A.D?
>>61947663
Nobody cares. Go to /pol/ or reddit where this thread belongs.
>>61947709
Another >>>/pol/ poster, ladies and gentlemen.
>>61947508
The only companies with balls big enough to do that in the first place could afford to pay for premium ISP services
>>61947595
Google would benefit from net neutrality, you fucking retard. They can afford to pay for special treatment.
>>61947965
Hey it wasn't my idea, I'm just asking what /g/ thinks of it. Could it be of any benefit? D.A.D is nice in concept so perhaps there's an alternative?
>>61947527
Dumb newfag
Couldn't we just burn it all regardless? Self Assured Destruction, SAD!
>>61947965
They would prefer not to pay the hall of cost.
>>61947508
Why don't these people shill for things like ipfs
>>61949257
If you were a giant internet corporation with a near monopoly, would you a) pay for special treatment small startups just can't afford , ensuring your near monopoly stays that way or b) want an even playing field where you dont have to pay for special treatment but where a competitior could come any day?
>>61949837
Why am I not surprised communist on /g/ have no idea how economics works?
Who will the ISP go after?
Small content creator who doesn't use up any of the pipes and barely have any money, or big fucks like google who have a lot more money and use up a shit ton of data and require ISPs to constantly create more and more pipes to handle peak rates?
In fact, just look at what happened to Netflix, its already proven big companies will get fucked over.
>>61947508
This guy is the reason Terry Davis is banned from youtube, why are you shilling him on /g/???