So old CPU architectures are better for games

>>61944855
It depends if you'd rather have 90fps or 81fps. You know, on your 60Hz monitor.

>>61944855
Do you have a 144Hz 1080p monitor? If so, buy Intel.

Otherwise just buy AMD.

its true

AMD is fine for gaming. Emulation may not be quite as good (or possible) on AMD but really you should be fine.

>>61944910
Intel is great for gaming and fine for productivity but for some reason this is a bad way to shop for CPU even if you game more than anything else.

>>61944910
Emulation is fine on ryzen
t. currently playing Catherine

>>61944864
Can you even see the difference? My eyes can only see 30fps at most

>>61944910
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwZTyhmFgJo&t=47s
They seem to be getting somewhere with ryzen and emulation. Persona 5 is ps4

>>61945681
>60*
unironically this

>>61945707
Persona 5 is also on PS3.

>>61946026
ps3 emu is shit though.

>>61946631
The fuck does that have to do with my post?

>>61945707 said Persona 5 is PS4 and linked a video of the PS3 version being played in a PS3 emulator.

If you're the same poster you're double retarded

They just compile gaymen for 256kB L2, I guess. I wonder if they change the target architecture to i9 with 1MB L2.

>>61944886
but what if you buy AMD, then decide you want a 144hz monitor? oops.

>>61949235
wow 120 fps vs 130 fps the difference it not noticeable, and minimums matter more

File: 1488072640714.jpg (21KB, 333x374px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 333x374px

>>61944855
"Wealthy" AMD "nobleman" sweating in his shitty second hand fur coat.

File: haredi-intel.jpg (35KB, 636x390px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 636x390px

>>61950236

Good goy!

>>61944864
this actually does make a difference in aiming in source based games, because the frames will draw closer to the point where the monitor refreshes

File: jontron-puking-o.gif (522KB, 320x180px) Image search: [Google]

522KB, 320x180px

>>61950320
>Shitty engine made in 2004
>Based on an even older engine released in 1996

>>61950278
Enjoy your red hot tdp.

>>61950346
dont underestimate some people, for example there are still tons of servers full of people out there for cs1.6

>>61950372
2011 called, they want their memes back.

>>61950380
That's a game released back when AMD was on top and all Intel had was the Pentium 4 spaceheater edition. How ironic.

>>61950346
Everyone should just play ashes.

is my 8350 getting better for games?

File: AMD-Radeon-Vega-Frontier-Edition-Liquid-Cooled_350W-740x377.png (77KB, 740x377px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 740x377px

>>61950385
Vega called and said that the memes are here to stay.

File: AS002034_17.gif (212KB, 330x300px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 330x300px

>>61950434
>Trying to deflect a CPU discussion away from CPUs to GPUs

>>61950416
Everyone should just play CS:GO at 550 FPS.

>>61950465
the ironic thing is that it is actually one of the more popular games out there right now

>>61950482
And you don't need 550 FPS unless you're pro or trying to go pro. AMD will usually give you 350 FPS which is more than enough.

>>61950511
true, and also a pro could wreck anyone at even 60 fps

>>61944855
get intel if you enjoy stuttering. higher arithmetic average FPS doesn't imply better gameplay. People's ignorance of basic statistics&probability is the reason why statisticians are jewing everyone out of their money (and rightly so).

>>61950429
no, sell it ASAP while retards are still buying it and get yourself a Ryzen.

>>61945707
>comparing power levels

Hahaha, oh wow.

Fucking Personafags.

>>61944886
i have a 1080p 144hz monitor but i'm considering upping to a monoprice zero-G, should i switch to ryzen when i do? i'm apprehensive because i have 24gb (8gb plus another 16 i got when ddr3 was cheap) and i don't want to hemorrhage money to upgrade to the latest arch from devil's canyon. would an older core-x (4960x or smth) make sense?

>>61945707
Impressive results but I'm guessing an i7 at 5GHz will still be better. Or not?

>>61944855
>wealthy
>AMD

then why does it cost less?

>>61950908
Wealthy people don't waste their money

>>61951044
Poor people are willing to ask for less, as they're desperate for money.