>mariadb
>PostgreSQL
>Oracle
>MongoDB
>NoSQL
Who would win?
win doing what?
>>61934208
sqlite
>>61934208
> >MongoDB
> >NoSQL
Same shit, isn't it? You can add Redis and Memcached to the list.
>PostgreSQL
>Oracle
While Oracle is the enterprise king, Postgres is slowly eating its legs, gaining the functions programmers wanted from it after Oracle to Postgres migration five years ago.
>mariadb
>PostgreSQL
Now that's not so obvious, while Postgres is definitely superiour to any MySQL fork in terms of features, they still don't have a simple master-master replication built-it, or any logical-level replication, for that case. People use something like Bucardo and whatnot when they don't want a physical level replication.
>>61934208
PostgreSQL
Percona Server
>>61934208
DocumentDB
Relational data:
Postgres > SQL Server > MySQL/Forks > Oracle
Data Dumpster:
Cassandra > MongoDB = Just about every other doc store
Cache:
Redis > Everything
XML or JSON
>>61936801
> Nobody mentions mssql
>>61937098
troll?
>>61937098
Are you shitposting or just retarded? I included SQL Server along with some others not mentioned in the OP. I included them because they're respectable competitors in their category.
>>61937145
> Are you shitposting or just retarded?
> SQL Server
Ohhh. Sorry.
>>61936801
this. except
>HBase > Cassandra > all other doc stores