do we really need military class components in our graphics cards?

>>61928130
yes

Does it give you double xp?

File: 1370718291222.png (342KB, 695x698px) Image search: [Google]

342KB, 695x698px

>>61928130
Marketing marketing marketing. Whatever MSI advertise about military grade reliability is all bollocks and never true by their engineering practices. Even try to tear down their pricier boards and you'll eventually find dirt cheap Nikos mosfets or some very poor powerstage arrangement in them somewhere.

why is the military playing videogames

military grade doesn't really mean anything, it just means "isn't the bottom barrel of China's no name brands"

>>61928130
overclocker kids need them. 250 fps rather than 230 could mean life or death in CS:GO, nvm that cheap 60hz monitor!

There is no reason to use a military-grade component
#BanAssaultGraphicsCards

>>61928130
Its a meme. There are no set standards for Mil-std testing.

>use metal in our cards
>military uses metal
>M I L S P E C

since military procurement is often lowest price I never understood why milspec was touted as somehow being anything more than barely acceptable

>>61928323
This is wrong

>>61928481
This is correct

As a defence IT contractor I regularly deploy "military spec" gear, ie what is "acceptable" for use. Which is XP on desktops with a single gb of ram and motherfucking parallel ports

>>61928130
>"meme's eye"
Never